Patricia Rodríguez de Gil
University of South Florida
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Patricia Rodríguez de Gil.
Multivariate Behavioral Research | 2015
Patricia Rodríguez de Gil; Aarti P. Bellara; Rheta E. Lanehart; Reginald S. Lee; Eun Sook Kim; Jeffrey D. Kromrey
Considering that the absence of measurement error in research is a rare phenomenon and its effects can be dramatic, we examine the impact of measurement error on propensity score (PS) analysis used to minimize selection bias in behavioral and social observational studies. A Monte Carlo study was conducted to explore the effects of measurement error on the treatment effect and balance estimates in PS analysis across seven different PS conditioning methods. In general, the results indicate that even low levels of measurement error in the covariates lead to substantial bias in estimates of treatment effects and concomitant reduction in confidence interval coverage across all methods of conditioning on the PS.
Educational and Psychological Measurement | 2017
Yan Wang; Patricia Rodríguez de Gil; Yi-Hsin Chen; Jeffrey D. Kromrey; Eun Sook Kim; Thanh Pham; Diep Nguyen; Jeanine L. Romano
Various tests to check the homogeneity of variance assumption have been proposed in the literature, yet there is no consensus as to their robustness when the assumption of normality does not hold. This simulation study evaluated the performance of 14 tests for the homogeneity of variance assumption in one-way ANOVA models in terms of Type I error control and statistical power. Seven factors were manipulated: number of groups, average number of observations per group, pattern of sample sizes in groups, pattern of population variances, maximum variance ratio, population distribution shape, and nominal alpha level for the test of variances. Overall, the Ramsey conditional, O’Brien, Brown–Forsythe, Bootstrap Brown–Forsythe, and Levene with squared deviations tests maintained adequate Type I error control, performing better than the others across all the conditions. The power for each of these five tests was acceptable and the power differences were subtle. Guidelines for selecting a valid test for assessing the tenability of this critical assumption are provided based on average cell size.
Archive | 2012
Rheta E. Lanehart; Patricia Rodríguez de Gil; Eun Sook Kim; Aarti P. Bellara; Reginald S. Lee
Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods | 2016
Diep Nguyen; Eun Sook Kim; Patricia Rodríguez de Gil; Anh P. Kellermann; Yi-Hsin Chen; Jeffrey D. Kromrey; Aarti P. Bellara
Archive | 2015
Yan Wang; Seang-Hwane Joo; Patricia Rodríguez de Gil; Jeffrey D. Kromrey; E Rheta; EunSook Kim; Jessica Montgomery; Reginald S. Lee; Chunhua Cao
Archive | 2013
Anh P. Kellermann; Aarti P. Bellara; Patricia Rodríguez de Gil; Diep Nguyen; Eun Sook Kim; Yi-Hsin Chen; Jeffrey D. Kromrey
Archive | 2013
Patricia Rodríguez de Gil; Than Pham; Patrice Rasmussen; Anh P. Kellermann; Jeanine L. Romano; Yi-Hsin Chen; Jeffrey D. Kromrey
Archive | 2013
Patricia Rodríguez de Gil; Jeanine Romano Thanh Pham; Diep Nguyen; Jeffrey D. Kromrey; Sook Kim
Archive | 2013
Patricia Rodríguez de Gil; Jeffrey D. Kromrey
Archive | 2012
Diep Nguyen; Patricia Rodríguez de Gil; Aarti P. Bellara; Jeffrey D. Kromrey