Patrick C. Schottel

Articular Congruity Is Associated with Short-Term Clinical Outcomes of Operatively Treated SER IV Ankle Fractures

BACKGROUND With regard to supination-external rotation type-IV (SER IV) ankle fractures, there is no consensus regarding which patient, injury, and treatment variables most strongly influence clinical outcome. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the impact of articular surface congruity on the functional outcomes of operatively treatment of SER IV ankle fractures. METHODS A prospectively generated database consisting of operatively treated SER IV ankle fractures was reviewed. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were used to assess ankle joint congruity. Ankles were considered incongruent in the presence of >2 mm of articular step-off, intra-articular loose bodies, or an articular surface gap of >2 mm (despite an otherwise anatomic reduction) due to joint impaction and comminution. Patients with at least one year of clinical follow-up were eligible for analysis. The primary and secondary outcome measures were the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and ankle motion. RESULTS One hundred and eight SER IV fractures met our inclusion criteria. The average duration of follow-up was twenty-one months. Seventy-two patients (67%) had a congruent ankle joint, and thirty-six (33%) had elements of articular surface incongruity on postoperative CT scanning. These two groups were similar with regard to comorbidities and injury and treatment variables. At the time of the final follow-up, the group with articular incongruity had a significantly worse FAOS with regard to symptoms (p = 0.012), pain (p = 0.004), and activities of daily living (p = 0.038). Those with articular incongruity had worse average scores in the FAOS sport domain as well. No significant differences in ankle motion were found between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS In this population of patients with an operatively treated SER IV ankle fracture, the presence of postoperative articular incongruity correlated with inferior early clinical outcomes. Orthopaedic surgeons should scrutinize ankle fracture reductions and strive for perfection to allow for the best possible clinical outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Treatment of Lisfranc Fracture-Dislocations with Primary Partial Arthrodesis

Background: The optimal method of treatment for Lisfranc fracture-dislocations remains controversial, and the role of primary partial arthrodesis for combined osseous-ligamentous Lisfranc injuries is unclear. This study reviewed the outcomes of Lisfranc injuries treated by primary partial arthrodesis. Methods: Patients who underwent primary partial arthrodesis for a primarily ligamentous or combined osseous and ligamentous Lisfranc fracture-dislocation were reviewed retrospectively and assessed at followup according to radiographic, clinical and standardized patient-based outcomes. Twenty-five patients (12 ligamentous, 13 combined), median age of 46 (range, 20 to 73) years, were followed for an average of 42 (range, 24 to 96) months. Results: The average American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was 81 points (scale 0 to 100), with patients in general losing points for mild pain, limitations of recreational activities, and fashionable footwear requirements. There was no statistical difference between ligamentous and combined injuries with regard to the physical or mental component scores on the SF-36. At latest followup, patients reported an average return to 85% of their preinjury activity level (range, 50% to 100%). Twenty-one patients (84%) expressed satisfaction with their outcome and at latest followup, the mean visual analog pain scale (VAS) score was 1.8 out of 10 (range, 0 to 8). Three patients showed radiographic signs of posttraumatic arthritis of adjacent joints. Conclusion: Treatment of both primarily ligamentous and combined osseous and ligamentous lisfranc injuries with primary partial arthrodesis produced good clinical and patient-based outcomes. Level of Evidence: III, Retrospective Comparative Study

The Measurement and Clinical Importance of Syndesmotic Reduction After Operative Fixation of Rotational Ankle Fractures

BACKGROUND Rotational ankle fractures often have unstable syndesmotic injuries that require reduction and stabilization. Multiple studies have focused on methods to assess syndesmotic reduction; however, the clinical importance of anatomic syndesmotic reduction remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the quality of syndesmotic reduction influenced clinical outcomes following operative treatment of ankle fractures with unstable syndesmotic injuries. METHODS Patients were included from an institutional trauma registry if they had sustained rotational ankle fractures with intraoperative evidence of syndesmotic instability requiring syndesmotic reduction and stabilization. Patients with at least twelve months of disease-specific, patient-reported clinical outcomes were included. Computed tomography (CT) imaging of both ankles was performed within two days postoperatively for all patients. Four previously utilized methods of assessing syndesmotic reduction using axial CT images of the operatively treated and the contralateral ankle were used. RESULTS A total of 155 patients met the study inclusion criteria and underwent analysis. The four methods used to assess syndesmotic reduction had reliabilities ranging from moderate to almost perfect (intraclass correlation coefficient [2,1] range = 0.544 to 0.821). Measurements of the uninjured syndesmosis were consistent with those in several previous studies of normal syndesmotic morphology, and the four methods of syndesmotic assessment had strong internal consistency. The mean measurement differences between the injured and normal ankles ranged from 1.32 to 1.88 mm of displacement and averaged 5.75° of rotation. There were no correlations noted between any of the four syndesmotic reduction assessment methods and any Foot and Ankle Outcome Score domains. CONCLUSIONS Within the range of syndesmotic malreductions studied, the quality of syndesmotic reduction did not significantly influence clinical outcomes. These results challenge previous definitions of syndesmotic malreduction and the clinical importance of minor syndesmotic changes. It remains unclear, however, whether greater magnitudes of syndesmotic malreduction than those seen in this cohort would lead to inferior patient-reported outcomes.

Anatomic Ligament Repair Restores Ankle and Syndesmotic Rotational Stability as Much as Syndesmotic Screw Fixation.

Objectives: To compare the external rotation stability of 3 different syndesmotic stabilization techniques in a cadaveric ankle fracture model. Methods: Nondestructive external rotation stresses of 4 N·m were applied to 8 cadaveric limbs using a hydraulic loading frame. Four conditions were tested using a repeated-measures design: intact and 3 repair conditions after a destabilizing ligamentous ankle injury with syndesmotic disruption. The 3 repair conditions were tricortical trans-syndesmotic screw fixation, posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL) repair, and combined PITFL and deltoid ligament repair. External rotation of the ankle joint and syndesmosis was measured using a motion capture system and compared for each test condition. Repeated-measures 1-way analyses of variance statistical tests were performed to compare the ankle and syndesmotic rotation findings between the 3 repair conditions and intact condition. Results: Rotational ankle stability was not fully restored by any of the 3 repair constructs. The intact ankle joint externally rotated approximately half as many degrees as the 3 repair conditions (intact: 10.9; trans-syndesmotic screw: 17.0; PITFL: 21.4; and PITFL/deltoid: 15.6). The intact condition also demonstrated significantly fewer degrees of syndesmotic rotation than the repair constructs (intact 2.4; trans-syndesmotic screw 5.2; PITFL 8.5; and PITFL/deltoid 6.9). Each of the repair conditions resulted in an externally rotated fibula when no loads were applied. The ligamentous repairs externally rotated the fibula twice as much as the trans-syndesmotic screw (P < 0.016). Conclusions: We found that combined repair of the PITFL and deltoid ligament restores an equivalent amount of ankle and syndesmotic rotational stability when compared to trans-syndesmotic screw fixation. Based on our findings, ligamentous repair can potentially be a viable treatment alternative in unstable ankle fracture patients with syndesmotic disruption. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Time Trade-Off as a Measure of Health-Related Quality of Life: Long Bone Nonunions Have a Devastating Impact.

BACKGROUND Long bone nonunions have an important impact on a patients quality of life. The purpose of this study was to compare long bone nonunions with use of the Time Trade-Off direct measure to compute utility scores and to determine which nonunion anatomic location had the lowest health-related quality of life. The Time Trade-Off assesses the percentage of a patients remaining life that the patient would be willing to trade for perfect health. METHODS Eight hundred and thirty-two consecutive long bone nonunions with Time Trade-Off data were identified and were retrospectively studied from a prospectively collected patient database. Nonunions with infections and those involving the articular portion of the bone were recorded. Time Trade-Off utility scores were obtained for all nonunion cases upon their initial clinical evaluation by a single surgeon specializing in reconstructive trauma. RESULTS The mean utility score of our nonunion cohort was 0.68 and it differed significantly by long bone (p = 0.037). Nonunions of the forearm had the lowest utility score (0.54), followed by the clavicle (0.59), femur (0.68), tibia or fibula (0.68), and humerus (0.71). Post hoc tests showed that patients with nonunions of the forearm had significantly lower utility scores (p = 0.031) compared with all other bones. CONCLUSIONS Patients diagnosed with a long bone nonunion have a very low health-related quality of life. We found that this single cohorts mean utility score was 0.68. This result is well below that of illnesses such as type-I diabetes mellitus (0.88), stroke (0.81), and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (0.79). We found that patients with forearm nonunions had the lowest utility scores. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Comparison of Clinical Outcome of Pronation External Rotation versus Supination External Rotation Ankle Fractures

Background: A pronation external rotation (PER) ankle fracture is a relatively uncommon injury. The purpose of this study was to examine the immediate and short-term clinical outcomes of operatively treated PER IV ankle fractures and compare them with a similarly treated cohort of supination external rotation IV (SER IV) fractures. Methods: 22 PER IV and 108 SER IV fractures were identified from a single surgeon’s prospectively collected database from 2004 to 2010. All patients were treated with fracture fragment and ligament specific fixation during the same time period by the same surgeon. Postoperative radiographs and bilateral ankle computed tomography (CT) scans were reviewed for articular incongruity, syndesmotic malreduction, and loss of reduction. Clinical outcome measures, including the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and ankle range of motion (ROM), were collected at latest follow-up visit. Results: There was no difference in the rate of wound complications, fracture nonunion, or loss of reduction between the PER IV and SER IV groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative articular incongruity (19% vs 8%, P = .23); however, the PER IV cohort was found to have a significantly higher rate of syndesmotic malreduction (40% vs 18%, P = .04). No clinically or statistically significant differences were detected between the 2 groups in regard to all FAOS domains. Conclusion: In a cohort of operatively treated PER IV fractures, fracture fragment and ligament specific fixation resulted in good short-term outcomes that were comparable to those seen in similarly treated patients with an SER IV fracture pattern. However, a notably greater number of syndesmotic malreductions were noted in the PER IV cohort, and therefore heightened scrutiny is recommended in treating this particular injury pattern. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Multiplanar Fixation for Patella Fractures Using a Low-Profile Mesh Plate.

Summary: Patella fractures are challenging orthopaedic injuries. Many commonly used fixation techniques can be ineffective and lead to poor clinical outcomes even with satisfactory reductions and fracture healing. In this investigation, we present the technique of cage plate fixation of patella fractures and the clinical outcomes of 9 initial patients surgically treated at our institution. This technique allows direct visualization of the articular reduction, provides multiplanar fixation, effectively stabilizes inferior pole comminution, and reduces the risk of patella vascular disruption. Using this technique, we have achieved excellent functional and radiographic outcomes.

Anatomic Fixation of Supination External Rotation Type IV Equivalent Ankle Fractures.

Objectives: To compare radiographic and clinical outcomes of supination external rotation type IV equivalent (SER IV E) ankle fractures (AO/OTA classification 44-B2.1) treated with transsyndesmotic screw fixation with those treated with deltoid and posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL) repair. Design: Case series and single-surgeon retrospective analysis of a prospective database. Setting: Academic level I trauma center. Patients: Forty-five SER IV E ankle fractures fulfilled all inclusion/exclusion criteria with at least 12 months of radiographic follow-up. Intervention: Deltoid and PITFL repair in addition to lateral malleolus fixation compared with transsyndesmotic screw fixation. Main Outcome Measurements: Syndesmotic reduction compared with contralateral extremity on a postoperative computed tomography scan and maintenance of reduction based on final postoperative radiographs [medial clear space (MCS) and tibiofibular clear space (TCS)]. Results: There was no significant difference in mean postoperative TCS, MCS, or change in TCS or MCS between the cohorts. The anatomic treatment group had significantly better postoperative syndesmotic reduction compared with the transsyndesmotic cohort (7.4% vs. 33.3%; P = 0.02). Fourteen patients in the transsyndesmotic screw cohort underwent removal compared with 3 patients in the anatomic cohort who required secondary procedures. The transsyndesmotic screw cohort had statistically significant better mean dorsiflexion of ankle (mean 20 vs. 17 degrees; P = 0.02). Conclusions: This comparison of treatment strategies for SER IV E ankle fractures has shown an improvement in immediate postoperative syndesmotic reduction and the elimination of reoperation for removal of transsyndesmotic screws in patients treated with PITFL repair. Previous research has shown a good correlation between functional outcomes and syndesmotic reduction; however, further investigation into the functional outcomes of these patients is necessary to determine the future clinical impact of this anatomic fixation strategy. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Predictive radiographic markers for concomitant ipsilateral ankle injuries in tibial shaft fractures.

Objectives: To quantify the radiographic tibia and fibula shaft fracture characteristics that are associated with a concomitant ipsilateral ankle injury. Design: Retrospective case–control study. Setting: Academic level I trauma center. Patients: Seventy-one adult patients with an operatively treated tibial shaft fracture met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Intervention: Preoperative radiographs were categorized according to tibia and fibula fracture pattern, location and spatial relationship to each other. Preoperative computed tomographic scans were then evaluated to assess for the presence of an articular ankle injury. Main Outcome Measurements: (1) incidence of concomitant tibial shaft fracture and ipsilateral ankle injury; and (2) statistical association between tibia and fibula fracture characteristics in patients with and without an ipsilateral ankle fracture. Results: Thirty-five of 71 (49.3%) tibial shaft fracture patients had a concomitant ipsilateral ankle injury. Of these, 31 (88.6%) ankle injuries occurred in patients with a spiral pattern tibia fracture of the distal third diaphysis (P < 0.001). A spiral pattern tibia fracture, a distal one-third tibial shaft fracture location, or a spiral pattern fibula fracture all were significantly associated with the presence of an ipsilateral ankle injury (P ⩽ 0.001; P = 0.001; and P = 0.002, respectively). Patients with either a transverse pattern or absent fibula fracture, a nonspiral pattern tibia fracture, or a midshaft diaphyseal tibia fracture location were significantly less likely to have an associated ankle injury (P ⩽ 0.001; P ⩽ 0.001; and P = 0.012, respectively). Conclusions: Ipsilateral ankle fractures are commonly associated with tibial shaft fractures, specifically distal one-third spiral type injuries. Recognition of an associated ankle injury is important as it can alter operative and postoperative management. Clinical studies are needed to examine patient outcomes with or without ipsilateral ankle injury to determine the clinical significance of this entity. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Outcomes of Schatzker II tibial plateau fracture open reduction internal fixation using structural bone allograft.

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to report the rate of anatomic reduction, articular subsidence, and clinical outcomes for Schatzker II tibial plateau fractures treated with structural bone allografts. Design: This is a retrospective case series. Setting: Academic Level I Trauma Center. Patients/Participants: A trauma registry was used to identify 77 Schatzker II tibial plateau fractures. Intervention: Schatzker II tibial plateau fracture open reduction internal fixation and structural bone graft using either Plexur P (N = 29) or fibular allograft (N = 48). Main Outcome Measurement: The primary outcome was articular subsidence. Secondary outcomes included fracture malreduction and clinical outcomes including the Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale, the Lower Extremity Functional Scale, and the Short Form (SF)-36. Results: No patients experienced subsidence > 2mm. This rate is significantly lower than published rates for autogenous iliac crest (30.3%, P < 0.0001) and calcium phosphate cement (8.7%, P = 0.0099). The rate of fracture malreduction was 11.7% (9/77); only 4 had more than 3 mm of residual incongruity. Average outcome scores were the following: Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale, 81.7; Lower Extremity Functional Scale, 78.5; SF-36 physical component, 48.3; and SF-36 mental component, 53.1. There was no difference between patients treated with Plexur P or fibula with regard to the primary or secondary outcomes. Conclusions: The use of structural allograft resulted in a high rate of anatomic reduction and negligible rate of articular subsidence and good clinical outcomes in the treatment of this population of Schatzker II tibial plateau fractures. This compares favorably with historical results using nonstructural grafts. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.