Patrick Maguire

Noninvasive stereotactic radiosurgery (CyberHeart) for creation of ablation lesions in the atrium

BACKGROUND A variety of catheter-based energy modalities are used for cardiac ablation to treat arrhythmias. Robotic radiosurgery is increasingly being utilized to successfully accomplish precise tissue ablation in anatomically remote areas. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to examine the experimental feasibility of a noninvasive method using stereotactic robotic radiosurgery (SRS) to create cardiac lesions. METHODS Sixteen (16) Hanford-Sinclair mini swine (weight 40-70 kg) under general anesthesia were studied. Baseline computed tomographic scans were performed, followed by electroanatomic mapping using the CARTO system. Stereotactic robotic radiosurgery was performed using the CyberHeart system, with predetermined targets at the cavotricuspid isthmus, AV node, pulmonary vein-left atrial junction, or left atrial appendage. From 25 to 196 days after treatment, the animals were investigated with repeat electroanatomic voltage mapping and transesophageal echocardiography, when possible. The animals then were sacrificed and pathology specimens taken. RESULTS Dose ranging suggested that 25 Gy was needed to produce an electrophysiologic effect. The time course showed an electrophysiologic effect consistently by 90 days. The method was feasible for producing bidirectional cavotricuspid isthmus block and AV nodal conduction block. The pulmonary vein-left atrial junction and left atrial appendage showed marked voltage reduction to less than 0.05 mV. No spontaneous arrhythmias were observed. Pathology specimens showed no evidence of radiation damage outside the target. Histology samples from target sites showed effects consistent with X-beam radiation. CONCLUSION Stereotactic robotic radiosurgery can produce cavotricuspid isthmus block, AV nodal block, and significant decreased voltage at the pulmonary vein-left atrial junction. No other organ damage was seen. The study findings demonstrate the feasibility of this noninvasive treatment method for creating cardiac lesions. This approach merits further investigation in the treatment of arrhythmias.

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Refractory Cardiac Ventricular Arrhythmia

A 71-year-old man with coronary artery disease, coronary artery bypass grafting in 2000, baseline ejection fraction of 0.24, and implantation of a single chamber implanted cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in 2009 for ventricular tachycardia (VT) presented with continuous episodes of nonsustained and sustained VT refractory to sotalol and mexiletine. Despite angioplasty and stent for coronary artery disease, VT continued for 2 years. Medical history included atrial fibrillation and oxygen-dependent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Baseline electrocardiogram (ECG) showed atrial fibrillation with a ventricular rate of 82 beats per minute with inferior Q waves and QRS duration of 90 ms. Twelve-lead ECG during VT showed a regular, wide-complex tachycardia at 160 beats per minute (CL 380–400 ms), with a right bundle branch block pattern, superior axis, precordial transition at V3–V4. His ICD log showed numerous VT episodes, with a single morphology seen on intracardiac ventricular electrogram, cycle length 380–411ms. Episodes were nonsustained, pace-terminated, and shock-terminated. As catheter ablation was relatively medically contraindicated, he consented to a Food and Drug Administration and Institutional Review Board–approved compassionate-use protocol of stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR), noninvasive ablation of VT substrate by stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) techniques for tumors. STAR therapy was delivered in October, 2012. Baseline echocardiogram showed a dilated left ventricle (LV), ejection fraction of 0.24, with basal inferior aneurysm, and apical and infero-posterior akinesis. Positron emission tomography–computed tomography showed extensive hypometabolic scar in the LV extending between the LV base and the apex, involving the inferior, inferoseptal, and inferolateral walls. A target for STAR was delineated using proprietary visualization and contouring software (CardioPlan™, CyberHeart™, Portola Valley, CA), outlining the target volume corresponding to what would have been the …

In vivo dose measurement using TLDs and MOSFET dosimeters for cardiac radiosurgery

In vivo measurements were made of the dose delivered to animal models in an effort to develop a method for treating cardiac arrhythmia using radiation. This treatment would replace RF energy (currently used to create cardiac scar) with ionizing radiation. In the current study, the pulmonary vein ostia of animal models were irradiated with 6 MV X‐rays in order to produce a scar that would block aberrant signals characteristic of atrial fibrillation. The CyberKnife radiosurgery system was used to deliver planned treatments of 20–35 Gy in a single fraction to four animals. The Synchrony system was used to track respiratory motion of the heart, while the contractile motion of the heart was untracked. The dose was measured on the epicardial surface near the right pulmonary vein and on the esophagus using surgically implanted TLD dosimeters, or in the coronary sinus using a MOSFET dosimeter placed using a catheter. The doses measured on the epicardium with TLDs averaged 5% less than predicted for those locations, while doses measured in the coronary sinus with the MOSFET sensor nearest the target averaged 6% less than the predicted dose. The measurements on the esophagus averaged 25% less than predicted. These results provide an indication of the accuracy with which the treatment planning methods accounted for the motion of the target, with its respiratory and cardiac components. This is the first report on the accuracy of CyberKnife dose delivery to cardiac targets. PACS numbers: 87.53.Ly, 87.53.Bn

Stereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation (STAR) of Ventricular Tachycardia: A Treatment Planning Study

Purpose The first stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) of ventricular tachycardia (VT) was delivered at Stanford on a robotic radiosurgery system (CyberKnife® G4) in 2012. The results warranted further investigation of this treatment. Here we compare dosimetrically three possible treatment delivery platforms for STAR. Methods The anatomy and target volume of the first treated patient were used for this study. A dose of 25 Gy in one fraction was prescribed to the planning target volume (PTV). Treatment plans were created on three treatment platforms: CyberKnife® G4 system with Iris collimator (Multiplan, V. 4.6)(Plan #1), CyberKnife® M6 system with InCise 2TM multileaf collimator (Multiplan V. 5.3)(Plan #2) and Varian TrueBeamTM STx with HD 120TM MLC and 10MV flattening filter free (FFF) beam (Eclipse planning system, V.11) (Plan #3 coplanar and #4 noncoplanar VMAT plans). The four plans were compared by prescription isodose line, plan conformity index, dose gradient, as well as dose to the nearby critical structures. To assess the delivery efficiency, planned monitor units (MU) and estimated treatment time were evaluated. Results Plans #1-4 delivered 25 Gy to the PTV to the 75.0%, 83.0%, 84.3%, and 84.9% isodose lines and with conformity indices of 1.19, 1.16, 1.05, and 1.05, respectively. The dose gradients for plans #1-4 were 3.62, 3.42, 3.93, and 3.73 with the CyberKnife® MLC plan (Plan #2) the best, and the TrueBeamTM STx co-planar plan (Plan #3) the worst. The dose to nearby critical structures (lung, stomach, bowel, and esophagus) were all well within tolerance. The MUs for plans #1-4 were 27671, 16522, 6275, and 6004 for an estimated total-treatment-time/beam-delivery-time of 99/69, 65/35, 37/7, and 56/6 minutes, respectively, under the assumption of 30 minutes pretreatment setup time. For VMAT gated delivery, a 40% duty cycle, 2400MU/minute dose rate, and an extra 10 minutes per extra arc were assumed. Conclusion Clinically acceptable plans were created with all three platforms. Plans with MLC were considerably more efficient in MU. CyberKnife® M6 with InCise 2TM collimator provided the most conformal plan (steepest dose drop-off) with significantly reduced MU and treatment time. VMAT plans were most efficient in MU and delivery time. Fluoroscopic image guidance removes the need for additional fiducial marker placement; however, benefits may be moderated by worse dose gradient and more operator-dependent motion management by gated delivery.

Ventricular Tachycardia: A Treatment Comparison Study of the CyberKnife with Conventional Linear Accelerators

The work described here compared the available technical solutions for the treatment of ventricular tachycardia with stereotactic body radiation therapy. Due to the complexity of target motion during cardiac and pulmonary motion as well as the several proximate radio-sensitive structures of the tracheobronchial tree and esophagogastrointestinal tract, four potential candidates for this treatment were identified: Accuray CyberKnife (Accuray Incorporated, Sunnyvale, California, United States), Varian TrueBeam (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, California, USA), Elekta Infinity (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden), and Varian Edge (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, California, USA). All four treatment modalities were evaluated for their ability to deliver a conformal, homogeneous dose to most of the target volume, to spare nearby and distant critical and sensitive anatomical structures as well as for treatment efficiency. It was found that conventional linear accelerator technology was superior in their ability to spare distant critical structures and deliver treatments efficiently while the CyberKnife showed superiority in sparing nearby critical structures more aggressively by creating larger dose gradients at the periphery of the target volume. Both treatment modalities were similar in their ability to cover the entire target with the prescription dose, conform that dose to the target volume, and deliver a homogeneous dose.