Paul Chervinsky

A Comparison of Salmeterol with Albuterol in the Treatment of Mild-to-Moderate Asthma

BACKGROUND An effective, long-acting bronchodilator could benefit patients with asthma who have symptoms not controlled by antiinflammatory drugs. We compared a new long-acting, inhaled beta 2-adrenoceptor agonist, salmeterol, with a short-acting beta 2-agonist, albuterol, in the treatment of mild-to-moderate asthma. METHODS We randomly assigned 234 patients (150 male and 84 female patients 12 to 73 years old) to one of three treatment groups: one group received 42 micrograms of salmeterol twice daily, one received 180 micrograms of albuterol four times daily, and one received placebo. Treatment was assigned in a double-blind fashion, and all patients could use supplemental inhaled albuterol as needed during the 12-week treatment period. RESULTS Measurements of the forced expiratory volume in one second, performed hourly for 12 consecutive hours, showed that a single dose of salmeterol produced a greater mean area under the curve than two doses of albuterol taken 6 hours apart (6.3 vs. 4.9 liter.hr, P < 0.05). The difference was significant on day 1 and at week 4 of the study, but not at week 8 or 12. Salmeterol was also more effective than albuterol or placebo (with albuterol taken as needed) in increasing the morning peak expiratory flow rate: salmeterol induced a mean increase of 24 liters per minute over the pretreatment values, as compared with a decrease of 6 liters per minute with albuterol (P < 0.001) and an increase of 1 liter per minute with placebo (P = 0.002). The mean overall symptom score was improved most by salmeterol treatment (P < 0.05), with the number of days with symptoms and of nights with awakenings decreasing by 22 percent and 52 percent, respectively; there were no differences in results between albuterol treatment and placebo administration. We found no evidence of tolerance to the bronchodilating effects of salmeterol, and adverse reactions to all the treatments were infrequent and mild. CONCLUSIONS For the management of mild-to-moderate asthma, salmeterol given twice daily is superior to albuterol given either four times daily or as needed.

Budesonide delivered by Turbuhaler is effective in a dose-dependent fashion when used in the treatment of adult patients with chronic asthma

BACKGROUND Airway inflammation is a hallmark of asthma, therefore current treatment recommendations include the use of inhaled glucocorticosteroids (GCS). However, there is little evidence that the effects of inhaled GCS are dose dependent. OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of a second-generation GCS, budesonide, delivered by Turbuhaler, in adults with chronic asthma. METHODS In a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, parallel-group study, 473 subjects 18 to 70 years of age received either placebo or budesonide (200, 400, 800, or 1600 microg total daily dose) administered twice daily. Primary efficacy end points were mean change from baseline for FEV1 and morning peak expiratory flow. Safety was assessed by reported adverse events and by a cosyntropin-stimulation test. RESULTS The mean baseline FEV1 was 63% to 66% of predicted normal value between groups. All doses of budesonide were more effective than placebo (p < 0.001). The mean changes in morning peak expiratory flow were 12, 22, 27, and 30 L/min in the 200, 400, 800, and 1600 microg budesonide total daily dose groups, respectively, and -27 L/min for the placebo group. A statistically significant dose-response effect for the mean change from baseline over the 12-week study was seen for both morning peak expiratory flow and FEV1. Budesonide-treated subjects also demonstrated significant reduction in asthma symptoms and bronchodilator use compared with placebo. There were no clinically significant differences in treatment-related adverse experiences among groups. CONCLUSIONS Budesonide administered by Turbuhaler exhibited a dose response and was effective at low doses. It was well tolerated and significantly more effective than placebo.

Efficacy and safety of loratadine plus pseudoephedrine in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and mild asthma

BACKGROUND Antihistamines have been shown to have a variety of therapeutic effects in asthma. Although nasal obstruction may play an important role in modulating lower airway function, no prior trial has used a decongestant in combination with an antihistamine in patients with allergic rhinitis and concomitant asthma. OBJECTIVE We sought to determine the efficacy and safety of loratadine (5 mg) plus pseudoephedrine (120 mg) (L/P) twice daily in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and mild asthma. METHODS We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of L/P in 193 subjects during the fall allergy season. Nasal and chest symptoms, albuterol use, and peak expiratory flow rates were recorded daily for 6 weeks. Spirometry was measured at baseline and after 1, 2, 4, and 6 weeks of therapy, and health-related quality of life was rated at the beginning and end of the study. RESULTS Total rhinitis and asthma symptom severity scores were significantly reduced in patients receiving active therapy compared with those receiving placebo throughout the 6-week study. Peak expiratory flow rates improved significantly in patients treated with L/P during weeks 2 through 6 (peak effect [mean +/- SEM]: L/P, 26.23 +/- 4.64 L/min vs placebo, 8.52 +/- 3.53 L/min, p = 0.002) as did FEV1 (peak effect [mean +/- SEM]: L/P, 170 +/- 53 ml vs placebo, 20 +/- 40 ml, p = 0.01) at all clinic visits. In addition, select measures of asthma-specific quality of life improved significantly relative to placebo. CONCLUSIONS L/P significantly improved nasal and asthma symptoms, pulmonary function, and quality of life in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and concomitant mild asthma.

Fluticasone propionate aerosol for the treatment of adults with mild to moderate asthma

BACKGROUND Recent emphasis on the control of airway inflammation in asthma highlights the need for safe and effective antiinflammatory agents. Fluticasone propionate is one of the most potent antiinflammatory corticosteroids developed to date. OBJECTIVE This study assessed the safety and efficacy of fluticasone propionate aerosol in the treatment of mild to moderate asthma. METHODS Fluticasone propionate aerosol (25, 100, or 500 micrograms twice daily) or placebo was given for as long as 8 weeks to adults with mild to moderate asthma in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. Patients were removed from the study if they showed predefined signs of worsening asthma. RESULTS Sixty-three percent of placebo-treated patients and 23%, 13%, and 4% of patients treated with fluticasone propionate 25, 100, and 500 micrograms twice daily, respectively, were removed from the study. Mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second, forced vital capacity, and forced expiratory flow at midexpiratory phase at weekly visits throughout the study demonstrated that fluticasone propionate was more efficacious than placebo in maintaining asthma control. Measurements of peak expiratory flow and symptom scores significantly improved and nighttime awakenings and albuterol use to treat symptoms significantly declined in fluticasone propionate-treated groups relative to the placebo-treated group. Differences among fluticasone propionate groups for these variables were not statistically significant. Incidence and severity of adverse events were similar across groups. Fluticasone propionate did not affect morning or stimulated plasma cortisol concentrations, although slight, transient reductions in urinary free cortisol and urinary 17-hydroxy steroids occurred in the group receiving 500 micrograms fluticasone propionate twice daily. CONCLUSION These data indicate that fluticasone propionate provides safe and effective treatment for mild to moderate asthma.

Effects of montelukast (MK-0476), a new potent cysteinyl leukotriene (LTD4) receptor antagonist, in patients with chronic asthma

BACKGROUND Cysteinyl leukotrienes mediate signs and symptoms of asthma. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, a new potent and specific cysteinyl leukotriene (LTD4) receptor antagonist, montelukast (MK-0476), was evaluated for tolerability and clinical efficacy in patients with chronic asthma (receiving and not receiving inhaled corticosteroids). METHODS Twenty-nine nonsmoking patients with asthma (15 treated concomitantly with inhaled corticosteroids) with FEV1 percent predicted values between 50% to 80% received MK-0476, 200 mg, or placebo three times daily for 10 1/3 days (31 doses) in a random, crossover manner, after a 2-week, open, baseline period. Comparisons in FEV1 (mean percent change from baseline after the first and last dose), mean daily daytime asthma and nocturnal awakening scores, and mean daily beta-agonist use were made between treatment periods. RESULTS Montelukast, compared with placebo, caused improvements in FEV1 (mean percentage point difference of the percentage change from baseline) 3 and 4 hours after dosing on day 1 (hour 3, 9.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53, 18.72; hour four, 10.9%; 95% CI -0.25, 20.20) and day 11 (hour 3, 14.0%; 95% CI 0.76, 31.43; hour 4, 13.4%; 95% CI 1.24, 28.83). Reductions were observed in mean daily beta-agonist use (1.0 puff/day [95% CI -1.61, -0.26]), mean daytime symptom scores, and nocturnal awakenings over the 10 1/3 day treatment period. There were no important differences between the groups receiving and those not receiving inhaled corticosteroids. Montelukast was well tolerated with no serious clinical adverse events reported. CONCLUSIONS In this study Montelukast, 200 mg, administered three times daily for 10 1/3 days, compared with placebo, was generally well tolerated and resulted in significant improvement in chronic asthma, irrespective of the presence of inhaled corticosteroids.

Inhaled salmeterol and fluticasone: a study comparing monotherapy and combination therapy in asthma.

BACKGROUND The current stepwise approach to pharmacotherapy in the treatment of asthma includes the initiation of an inhaled corticosteroid with the addition of a long-acting inhaled bronchodilator if low dose inhaled corticosteroid fails to control asthma symptoms. OBJECTIVE To determine whether initiation of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate treatment together improves asthma control greater than initiation of monotherapy with the individual agents alone with no additional safety risk in patients with asthma who had not previously been treated with inhaled corticosteroids. METHODS A total of 136 male and female patients at least 12 years of age with asthma [forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV) between 50% and 80% of predicted] were randomized to twice daily salmeterol 42 microg, fluticasone propionate 88 microg, fluticasone propionate 220 microg, salmeterol 42 microg plus fluticasone propionate 88 microg, salmeterol 42 microg plus fluticasone propionate 220 microg, or placebo for 4 weeks. RESULTS Patients treated with salmeterol combined with fluticasone propionate had improvements over baseline in FEV at endpoint that were at least twice as great (0.6 to 0.7 L) as improvements in patients treated with salmeterol (0.3 L) or fluticasone propionate alone (0.3 L) (P < .05). Patient-rated data (peak expiratory flow, asthma symptom scores, percent of days with no asthma symptoms) confirmed greater (P < .05) mean change from baseline improvements after combined treatment compared with fluticasone propionate alone. No clinically significant differences were noted between treatment groups in any safety measurement. CONCLUSION Initiation of maintenance therapy with salmeterol and fluticasone propionate in patients with asthma treated with short-acting beta2-agonists alone provides greater improvements in pulmonary function and symptom control than initiation of maintenance therapy with fluticasone propionate alone.

Dose Ranging Study of Mometasone Furoate (Nasonex) in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

BACKGROUND Topical nasal corticosteroids are rapidly gaining acceptance as first-line therapy for seasonal allergic rhinitis, but there is a desire for effective corticosteroids with an improved safety profile over existing products. OBJECTIVE A multicenter, double-blind dose ranging study was conducted to compare the activity and tolerance of four doses of mometasone furoate nasal spray (tradename Nasonex) and placebo in adult patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS Four hundred eighty patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis were enrolled and randomized to receive mometasone furoate nasal spray 50 micrograms (n = 96), 100 micrograms (n = 95), 200 micrograms (n = 98) or 800 micrograms (n = 95), or placebo vehicle (n = 95) once daily for 28 days. RESULTS All of the doses of mometasone furoate nasal spray showed activity in reducing the severity of rhinitis. The 200-microgram dose reduced total nasal symptom scores and total symptom scores throughout the study (P < .05 versus placebo vehicle). The 50-microgram dose and the 100-microgram dose showed less consistent activity at early timepoints (days 3 and 7), while the 800 microgram dose did not provide significant additional benefits over the 200-microgram dose. All dose levels were well tolerated CONCLUSION The results of this trial indicate that 200 micrograms once daily is the optimum dose of mometasone furoate nasal spray for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Montelukast dose selection in 6- to 14-year-olds : Comparison of single-dose pharmacokinetics in children and adults

Montelukast, an oral leukotriene‐receptor antagonist, has demonstrated efficacy and tolerability for the treatment of chronic asthma in adults. A once‐daily 10 mg dose (film‐coated tablet) was selected as the optimal adult dose based on dose‐ranging studies. Asthma is a similar disease and is treated with the same medications in children and adults. These observations suggested that a dose of montelukast in children providing overall drug exposure (i.e., montelukast plasma concentrations) similar to that of the 10 mg film‐coated tablet dose in adults would be efficacious, well tolerated, and obviate the need for separate dose‐ranging studies in children. Therefore, the dose of montelukast for 6‐ to 14‐ year‐old children was selected by identifying the chewable tablet dose of montelukast yielding a single‐dose area under the plasma concentration‐time curve (AUC) comparable to that achieved with the adult 10 mg film‐coated tablet dose. Based on this approach, which included dose normalization of data from several pediatric pharmacokinetic studies, a 5 mg chewable tablet dose of montelukast was selected for use in clinical efficacy studies in 6‐ to 14‐year‐old children with asthma.

SCH 434: A new antihistamine/decongestant for seasonal allergic rhinitis☆

In a double-blind, multicenter study, we compared the effects of SCH 434 (Claritin-D; Schering Corp., Kenilworth, N.J.), a new sustained-release, combination antihistamine/decongestant medication, with the effects of its individual components and placebo in 435 patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. SCH 434 contains 5 mg of loratadine, a nonsedating antihistamine, and 120 mg of pseudoephedrine as the decongestant component. Administered twice daily in this study, SCH 434 effected a 50% decrease in total symptom scores at day 4 and was significantly (p less than or equal to 0.03) more effective than the components alone or the placebo. Loratadine or pseudoephedrine alone, with 43% and 33% decline in symptom scores, respectively, also was more effective than placebo (p less than 0.05). As expected, pseudoephedrine alone was more effective than loratadine (p less than 0.01) in relieving nasal stuffiness; SCH 434 was more effective (p less than or equal to 0.01) than placebo and loratadine in relieving nasal stuffiness. All treatments were safe and well tolerated, although insomnia and dry mouth were noted in a significant number of patients who received either SCH 434 or pseudoephedrine. No serious side effects were noted. The incidence of sedation did not differ significantly among the four treatment groups. We conclude that SCH 434 is a safe and effective treatment for symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis. The combination drug (SCH 434) was better than its components for some, but not all, symptoms.

Dose-Related Response to Inhaled Fluticasone Propionate in Patients with Methacholine-Induced Bronchial Hyperresponsiveness: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

Dose-response relationships with inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of asthma have been difficult to establish. A multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study was conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of low doses of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) in patients with mild to moderate asthma. Methacholine challenge testing was conducted in addition to measurement of traditional efficacy variables. After a single-blind screening period, 138 patients > or = 12 years of age were randomly assigned to receive placebo, FP 50 microg, or FP 100 microg, twice daily for 8 weeks. The results of methacholine challenge testing averaged over all visits favored FP 200 microg/day over placebo and FP 100 microg/day (p < 0.05); there were no significant differences between placebo and FP 100 microg/day. Mean changes from baseline to endpoint favored each dose of FP over placebo based on forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1), patient-measured peak expiratory flow (PEF), total symptom scores, and rescue bronchodilator use (p < 0.05); there were no differences in these parameters between the two doses of FP. The addition of methacholine challenge testing allowed definition of a dose-response relationship that was not apparent with traditional efficacy variables.