Robert J. Dockhorn

A Comparison of Salmeterol with Albuterol in the Treatment of Mild-to-Moderate Asthma

BACKGROUND An effective, long-acting bronchodilator could benefit patients with asthma who have symptoms not controlled by antiinflammatory drugs. We compared a new long-acting, inhaled beta 2-adrenoceptor agonist, salmeterol, with a short-acting beta 2-agonist, albuterol, in the treatment of mild-to-moderate asthma. METHODS We randomly assigned 234 patients (150 male and 84 female patients 12 to 73 years old) to one of three treatment groups: one group received 42 micrograms of salmeterol twice daily, one received 180 micrograms of albuterol four times daily, and one received placebo. Treatment was assigned in a double-blind fashion, and all patients could use supplemental inhaled albuterol as needed during the 12-week treatment period. RESULTS Measurements of the forced expiratory volume in one second, performed hourly for 12 consecutive hours, showed that a single dose of salmeterol produced a greater mean area under the curve than two doses of albuterol taken 6 hours apart (6.3 vs. 4.9 liter.hr, P < 0.05). The difference was significant on day 1 and at week 4 of the study, but not at week 8 or 12. Salmeterol was also more effective than albuterol or placebo (with albuterol taken as needed) in increasing the morning peak expiratory flow rate: salmeterol induced a mean increase of 24 liters per minute over the pretreatment values, as compared with a decrease of 6 liters per minute with albuterol (P < 0.001) and an increase of 1 liter per minute with placebo (P = 0.002). The mean overall symptom score was improved most by salmeterol treatment (P < 0.05), with the number of days with symptoms and of nights with awakenings decreasing by 22 percent and 52 percent, respectively; there were no differences in results between albuterol treatment and placebo administration. We found no evidence of tolerance to the bronchodilating effects of salmeterol, and adverse reactions to all the treatments were infrequent and mild. CONCLUSIONS For the management of mild-to-moderate asthma, salmeterol given twice daily is superior to albuterol given either four times daily or as needed.

Use of an anti-IgE humanized monoclonal antibody in ragweed-induced allergic rhinitis☆☆☆★★★

BACKGROUND Increased serum levels of antigen-specific IgE are often associated with allergic respiratory disorders. RhuMAb-E25, a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody, decreases free serum IgE by forming biologically inactive immune complexes with free IgE. OBJECTIVE We hypothesized that rhuMAb-E25 would decrease total serum IgE and reduce symptoms. METHODS Two hundred forty subjects were enrolled into five groups to determine the safety, tolerance, and efficacy of repeated administration of rhuMAb-E25 in adults with ragweed-induced allergic rhinitis and to explore the pharmacodynamic relationship of rhuMAb-E25 and IgE. One hundred eighty-one subjects received an initial intravenous loading dose (day 0, 1 month before ragweed season), followed by administration of rhuMAb-E25 (in mg/kg body weight) of 0.15 mg/kg subcutaneously, 0.15 mg/kg intravenously, or 0.5 mg/kg intravenously on days 7, 14, 28, 42, 56, 70, and 84. A subcutaneous placebo group and an intravenous placebo group were included. The total evaluation time included the 84-day treatment period, followed by a 42-day observation period. RESULTS Adverse events were mild, and no differences were observed in the rates between the three active and two placebo treatment groups. Ragweed-specific IgE levels correlated with symptom scores. RhuMAb-E25 decreased serum free IgE levels in a dose- and baseline IgE-dependent fashion. However, only 11 subjects had IgE levels that were suppressed to undetectable levels (< or = 24 ng/ml), a sample too small to demonstrate significant differences and clinical efficacy. Thus the case for efficacy was not proven. Nonetheless, the study confirms that it is safe to repeatedly administer rhuMAb-E25 over a period of months. CONCLUSIONS Because rhuMAb-E25 decreased serum free IgE in a dose-dependent fashion and because symptom scores correlated with antigen-specific IgE levels, the results suggest that if given in adequate doses, rhuMAb-E25 should be an effective therapy for allergic diseases.

Montelukast once daily inhibits exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in 6- to 14-year-old children with asthma☆☆☆★★★

OBJECTIVE To determine whether montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, attenuates exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in 6- to 14-year-old children with asthma. STUDY DESIGN Double-blind, multicenter, 2-period crossover study. Children (n = 27) with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) > or =70% of the predicted value and a fall in FEV1 > or =20% after exercise on 2 occasions. Patients received montelukast (5-mg chewable tablet) or placebo once daily in the evening for 2 days in crossover fashion (at least 4 days between treatment periods). Standardized exercise challenges were performed 20 to 24 hours after the last dose in each period. End points included area above the postexercise percent fall in FEV1 versus time curve (AAC0-60 min), maximum percent fall in FEV1 from pre-exercise baseline, and time to recovery of FEV1 to within 5% of pre-exercise baseline. RESULTS Montelukast significantly reduced AAC0-60 min (265 vs 590% x min for montelukast and placebo, respectively, P < or = .05; approximately 59% protection relative to placebo) and the maximum percent fall (18% vs 26% for montelukast and placebo, respectively, P < or = .05). Montelukast treatment resulted in a shorter time to recovery (18 vs 28 minutes for montelukast and placebo, respectively, P = .079). CONCLUSIONS Montelukast attenuates EIB at the end of the dosing interval in 6- to 14-year-old children with asthma.

Once daily fluticasone propionate is as effective for perennial allergic rhinitis as twice daily beclomethasone diproprionate

BACKGROUND Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray, a new potent corticosteroid, is effective when given once or twice daily for seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS Fluticasone propionate was compared with beclomethasone dipropionate in a multicenter double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in 466 patients with perennial allergic rhinitis. Adults and adolescents (aged 12 to 71 years) with moderate to severe symptoms, nasal eosinophilia, and a positive skin test reaction (> or = 2+) to a perennial allergen received fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray 100 micrograms twice daily or 200 micrograms once daily, or beclomethasone dipropionate aqueous nasal spray 168 micrograms twice daily, or placebo for 6 months. RESULTS Clinician- and patient-rated scores for nasal obstruction (including obstruction on awakening), rhinorrhea, sneezing, and nasal itching were reduced by the first visit at 7 days after initiation of active treatment and remained lower than those of patients receiving placebo throughout the 6-month treatment period. Nasal eosinophilia was reduced in significantly more patients receiving active treatment. The incidence of adverse events was similar in all four treatment groups except for blood in nasal mucus, which was reported by significantly more patients in the two twice-daily active treatment groups compared with the placebo group. There was no evidence of systemic effects of fluticasone propionate. There were no significant differences between fluticasone propionate given once or twice daily or beclomethasone dipropionate given twice daily for any efficacy or safety evaluation. CONCLUSIONS Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray given once daily in the morning is safe and effective therapy for perennial allergic rhinitis and is as effective as twice daily dosing with fluticasone propionate or beclomethasone dipropionate.

Safety and Efficacy of Azelastine Nasal Spray (Astelin NS) for Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis: a 4-Week Comparative Multicenter Trial

BACKGROUND Azelastine is a chemically novel investigational antiallergy drug with the ability to antagonize the effects of chemical mediators of the early- phase and late phase allergic responses suggesting its usefulness in the treatment of upper and lower airway diseases. OBJECTIVE The objective of this 4-week, double- bind, multicenter trial was to evaluate the efficacy of azelastine nasal spray in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS Two hundred sixty-four subjects 12 years of age and older were randomized to receive either azelastine, 2 sprays/nostril qd; azelastine, 2 sprays/nostril bid; oral chlorpheniramine maleate, 12 mg bid; or placebo. The primary efficacy parameters were the changes in major and total symptom severity scores. RESULTS Overall, across all 4 weeks of treatment, the mean percent improvements in the total and major symptom complex severity scores in both azelastine treatment groups were greater than those for the placebo group. For the azelastine 2 sprays bid group, the overall results were significant at P = .05 for the major symptom complex score and at .05 < P = .10 for the total symptom complex score versus placebo. For both azelastine treatment groups, improvements in all of the individual rhinitis symptoms were superior to those for the placebo group and, in general were clinically and statistically significant. Azelastine nasal spray was well tolerated; adverse experiences were generally application site reactions, mild to moderate, and not limiting to continued treatment. CONCLUSIONS Azelastine nasal spray demonstrated broad clinical antirhinitis activity that for the 2 sprays/nostril bid dosage regimen was consistently clinically and statistically significant.

A dose-ranging study of mometasone furoate aqueous nasal spray in children with seasonal allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND The efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate aqueous nasal spray (MFNS; Nasonex) 200 microg once daily for the treatment and prophylaxis of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) and treatment of perennial rhinitis have been demonstrated in adults. However, the dose response of MFNS in pediatric patients has not yet been characterized. OBJECTIVE This study was conducted to determine the dose-response relationship of 3 different doses of MFNS in a pediatric population. METHODS This was a multicenter, double-blind, active- and placebo-controlled study of 679 children 6 to 11 years of age with histories of SAR and documented positive skin test responses. Patients were randomized to one of the following treatment groups for 4 weeks: MFNS 25 microgram once daily, MFNS 100 microgram once daily, MFNS 200 microgram once daily, beclomethasone dipropionate 84 microgram twice daily (168 microgram/day), or placebo. Physician evaluations were performed at days 4, 8, 15, and 29, and patient evaluations were analyzed for days 1 to 15 and 16 to 29. RESULTS The mean reduction from baseline in physician-evaluated total nasal symptom scores at day 8 (the primary efficacy variable) was significantly greater in the MFNS and beclomethasone dipropionate groups than in the placebo group (P </=.02). No significant differences were observed among the 3 MFNS groups. However, as treatment continued, symptoms in patients treated with MFNS 100 or 200 microgram once daily continued to improve, whereas those treated with MFNS 25 microgram once daily demonstrated little further improvement. By day 29, MFNS 100 and 200 microgram once daily both were significantly more effective than MFNS 25 microgram once daily in relieving symptoms of SAR, but MFNS 200 microgram provided no additional benefit over MFNS 100 microgram. All doses of MFNS were well tolerated, and cosyntropin stimulation tests performed before and after treatment found no evidence of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression. CONCLUSION These results indicate that the most appropriate therapeutic dosage of MFNS in the treatment of SAR in children 6 to 11 years of age is 100 microgram once daily. In addition, MFNS at doses up to 200 microgram once daily for 4 weeks was well tolerated and had no detectable effects on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function.

Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray compared with terfenadine tablets in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND Comparative studies with topical corticosteroids and antihistamines for treatment of allergic rhinitis have not always demonstrated clear distinctions between the two on the basis of therapeutic efficacy. OBJECTIVE This study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray with those of terfenadine in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS Three hundred forty-eight patients with allergic rhinitis were given fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray (200 micrograms once daily), terfenadine tablets (60 mg twice daily), or placebo for 4 weeks in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study. RESULTS Clinician-rated total nasal symptom scores after 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks of therapy and patient-rated total nasal symptom scores throughout treatment were significantly (p <0.05) lower in the fluticasone propionate group compared with the terfenadine group or the placebo group. Terfenadine was not statistically different from placebo on the basis of clinician-related nasal symptom scores, except for sneezing. Total nasal airflow, measured by rhinomanometry, significantly (p <0.05) improved in the fluticasone propionate group compared with the terfenadine group or the placebo group. More fluticasone propionate-treated patients compared with placebo-treated patients had reduced nasal mucosal eosinophil counts after 4 weeks of therapy (p <0.05). No serious or unusual drug-related adverse events were reported. Morning plasma cortisol concentrations after 4 weeks of therapy did not differ among groups. CONCLUSION Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray is more effective than terfenadine tablets for treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Adrenal Effects and Pharmacokinetics of CFC-free Beclomethasone Dipropionate: a 14-Day Dose-Response Study

Since equivalent efficacy is achieved with lower doses of the reformulated beclomethasone dipropionate in the chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)‐free propellant HFA‐134a (HFA) than with the original CFC‐beclomethasone dipropionate formulation, it is possible the HFA‐beclomethasone dipropionate may have less safety concerns than the CFC formulation. Despite its chronic use, the steady‐state pharmacokinetics of beclomethasone dipropionate has never been studied before. This double‐blind study examined adrenal effects and pharmacokinetics after 14 days of dosing with HFA‐beclomethasone dipropionate.

Comparative Study of Cetirizine and Terfenadine Versus Placebo in the Symptomatic Management of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

BACKGROUND Cetirizine is a new antihistamine with greater selectivity for the histamine H1 receptor and a low rate of hepatic metabolism. Cetirizine once daily is effective in the symptomatic treatment of seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria. OBJECTIVE The efficacy and safety of cetirizine 10 mg qd, terfenadine 60 mg bid, and placebo were compared in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS A multicenter, prospective, double-blind, randomized, parallel study was conducted for 2 weeks during the ragweed pollen season in patients with documented allergic rhinitis. Total symptom complex and total symptom complex plus nasal congestion scores, global efficacy, overall satisfaction, and adverse events were assessed at baseline and after 1 and 2 weeks of treatment. RESULTS Of the 311 patients randomized to treatment, 283 completed the study. Cetirizine produced a marked improvement in symptoms scores compared with placebo after 1 week of therapy (P = .001). By the end of week 1, total symptom complex scores were improved by 37% with cetirizine compared with 29% for terfenadine, and 23% for placebo. An overall treatment effect was evident at week 1 (P = .0019), with marked differences between cetirizine and both placebo (P = .0004) and terfenadine (P = .0464) but not between terfenadine and placebo (P = .1215). A more marked treatment effect was evident during the first week of the study; this appeared to be related to spontaneous resolution of symptoms, since mean pollen counts derived for each patient declined significantly each week of the study. Therapy was generally well tolerated. Headache was the most common side effect in each group. Four patients on cetirizine, one on terfenadine, and two on placebo withdrew because of side effects. Somnolence was reported in 12 patients on cetirizine (P < .05), 2 on terfenadine, and 3 on placebo. CONCLUSION Cetirizine produced a greater improvement in symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis than terfenadine or placebo.

Effects of budesonide by means of the Turbuhaler on the hypothalmic-pituitary-adrenal axis in asthmatic subjects: A dose-response study

BACKGROUND As a general phenomenon, corticosteroids may suppress the activity in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. The adrenal stimulation test is a commonly used method to assess the relative risk of exogenous corticosteroids to induce systemic side effects. OBJECTIVES This clinical trial was performed to assess the effects of budesonide on the HPA axis (at 800, 1600, or 3200 microg/day, given as a twice daily regimen, administered by means of the Turbuhaler) in adult patients with mild, non-steroid-dependent asthma. METHODS Sixty-four asthmatic patients received budesonide or placebo by inhalation or 10 mg/day oral prednisone once daily as a positive control in a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study. Plasma cortisol concentration was measured to assess the effect on the HPA axis before and during a 6-hour infusion of synthetic adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), cosyntropin. RESULTS After 6 weeks of treatment, plasma cortisol concentrations after adrenal stimulation by cosyntropin infusion had fallen by 4% in the placebo group; by 13%, 11%, and 27% in the budesonide groups (800, 1600, and 3200 microg/day, respectively); and by 35% in the prednisone group. The decrease was significant only in the 3200 microg/day budesonide (p = 0.03) and prednisone (p = 0.005) groups. Over the same time period, decreases in basal plasma cortisol concentrations were 1% in the placebo group; 19%, 19%, and 34% in the three budesonide groups; and 37% in the prednisone group. Only in the prednisone group was the decrease significant (p = 0.03 vs placebo). CONCLUSIONS In this study budesonide inhaled by means of the Turbuhaler, at doses recommended for clinical use (800 or 1600 microg/day), did not produce any statistically significant suppression of the HPA axis compared with placebo.