Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Paul D. Hemenway is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Paul D. Hemenway.


The Astronomical Journal | 2002

Astrometry with the Hubble Space Telescope: A Parallax of the Fundamental Distance Calibrator RR Lyrae*

G. Fritz Benedict; Barbara E. McArthur; Laurence W. Fredrick; Thomas E. Harrison; J. T. Lee; Catherine L. Slesnick; June-Koo Kevin Rhee; Richard J. Patterson; Edmund P. Nelan; William Hamilton Jefferys; W. F. van Altena; Peter John Shelus; Otto G. Franz; L. H. Wasserman; Paul D. Hemenway; Raynor L. Duncombe; Darrell B. Story; A. L. Whipple; Arthur J. Bradley

We present an absolute parallax and relative proper motion for the fundamental distance scale calibrator � Cep. We obtain these with astrometric data from FGS 3, a white-light interferometer on the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). Utilizing spectrophotometric estimates of the absolute parallaxes of our astrometric reference stars and constrainingCep and reference star HD 213307 to belong to the same association (Cep OB6), we findabs = 3.66 � 0.15 mas. The larger than typical astrometric residuals for the nearby astrome- tric reference star HD 213307 are found to satisfy Keplerian motion with P = 1.07 � 0.02 yr, a perturbation and period that could be due to an F0 V companion � 7 mas distant from and � 4 mag fainter than the pri- mary. Spectral classifications and VRIJHKT2M and DDO51 photometry of the astrometric reference frame surroundingCep indicate that field extinction is high and variable along this line of sight. However the extinction suffered by the reference star nearest (in angular separation and distance) toCep, HD 213307, is lower and nearly the same as forCep. Correcting for color differences, we find hAVi = 0.23 � 0.03 for � Cep and hence an absolute magnitude MV = � 3.47 � 0.10. Adopting an average V magnitude, hVi = 15.03 � 0.03, for Cepheids with log P = 0.73 in the large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) from Udalski et al., we find a V-band distance modulus for the LMC, mM = 18.50 � 0.13, or 18.58 � 0.15, where the lat- ter value results from a highly uncertain metallicity correction. These agree with our previous RR Lyr HST parallax-based determination of the distance modulus of the LMC.


The Astronomical Journal | 1999

Interferometric Astrometry of Proxima Centauri and Barnard's Star Using HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE Fine Guidance Sensor 3: Detection Limits for Substellar Companions

G. Fritz Benedict; Barbara E. McArthur; David Wayne Chappell; Edmund P. Nelan; William Hamilton Jefferys; W. F. van Altena; J. T. Lee; D. W. Cornell; Peter John Shelus; Paul D. Hemenway; Otto G. Franz; L. H. Wasserman; Raynor L. Duncombe; Darrell B. Story; A. L. Whipple; Laurence W. Fredrick

We report on a substellar-companion search utilizing interferometric fringe-tracking astrometry acquired with Fine Guidance Sensor 3 on the Hubble Space Telescope. Our targets were Proxima Centauri and Barnards star. We obtain absolute parallax values of πabs = 07687 ± 00003 for Proxima Cen and πabs = 05454 ± 00003 for Barnards star. Once low-amplitude instrumental systematic errors are identified and removed, our companion detection sensitivity is less than or equal to one Jupiter mass for periods longer than 60 days for Proxima Cen. Between the astrometry and the recent radial velocity results of Kurster et al., we exclude all companions with M > 0.8MJup for the range of periods 1 day < P < 1000 days. For Barnards star, our companion detection sensitivity is less than or equal to one Jupiter mass for periods longer than 150 days. Our null results for Barnards star are consistent with those reported by Gatewood in 1995.


The Astronomical Journal | 1998

Photometry of Proxima Centauri and Barnard's Star Using Hubble Space Telescope Fine Guidance Sensor 3: A Search for Periodic Variations

G. Fritz Benedict; Barbara E. McArthur; Edmund P. Nelan; Darrell B. Story; A. L. Whipple; Peter John Shelus; William Hamilton Jefferys; Paul D. Hemenway; Otto G. Franz; L. H. Wasserman; Raynor L. Duncombe; W. F. van Altena; Laurence W. Fredrick

We have observed Proxima Centauri and Barnards star with the Hubble Space Telescope Fine Guidance Sensor 3. Proxima Cen exhibits small-amplitude, periodic photometric variations. Once several sources of systematic photometric error are corrected, we obtain 2 mmag internal photometric precision. We identify two distinct behavior modes over the past 4 years: higher amplitude, longer period and smaller amplitude, shorter period. Within the errors, one period (P ~ 83 days) is twice the other. Barnards star shows very weak evidence for periodicity on a timescale of approximately 130 days. If we interpret these periodic phenomena as rotational modulation of starspots, we identify three discrete spots on Proxima Cen and possibly one spot on Barnards star. We find that the disturbances change significantly on timescales as short as one rotation period.


arXiv: Astrophysics | 1998

Photometry of Proxima Centauri and Barnard's Star Using HST Fine Guidance Sensor 3: A Search for Periodic Variations

G. Fritz Benedict; Barbara E. McArthur; Edmund P. Nelan; Darrell B. Story; A. L. Whipple; Peter John Shelus; William Hamilton Jefferys; Paul D. Hemenway; Otto G. Franz; L. H. Wasserman; Raynor L. Duncombe; Wm. van Altena; Laurence W. Fredrick

We have observed Proxima Centauri and Barnards star with the Hubble Space Telescope Fine Guidance Sensor 3. Proxima Cen exhibits small-amplitude, periodic photometric variations. Once several sources of systematic photometric error are corrected, we obtain 2 mmag internal photometric precision. We identify two distinct behavior modes over the past 4 years: higher amplitude, longer period and smaller amplitude, shorter period. Within the errors, one period (P ~ 83 days) is twice the other. Barnards star shows very weak evidence for periodicity on a timescale of approximately 130 days. If we interpret these periodic phenomena as rotational modulation of starspots, we identify three discrete spots on Proxima Cen and possibly one spot on Barnards star. We find that the disturbances change significantly on timescales as short as one rotation period.


The Astronomical Journal | 1993

NGC 4314. II: Hubble Space Telescope I-band surface photometry of the nuclear region

G. F. Benedict; J. L. Higdon; William Hamilton Jefferys; Raynor L. Duncombe; Paul D. Hemenway; Peter John Shelus; A. L. Whipple; Edmund P. Nelan; Darrell B. Story; Barbara E. McArthur

We present an HST I-band Planetary Camera image of the nuclear region of NGC 4314, an anemic barred galaxy with recent star formation confined to a nuclear ring. These data resolve the nuclear ring into multiple sites of new star formation and resolve associated dust lanes into discrete clouds. Deconvolution results in at least 0.13 arcsec resolution, as demonstrated by the de Vaucouleurs r exp 1/4 law. Contrasted with similar studies of M87 and NGC 7457, we find no photometric evidence for an extreme concentration of stars in the center of NGC 4314. We identify an oval distortion of length 8 arcsec in the nuclear region, using ellipse-fitting routines and the unsharp masked frame. This nuclear bar has newer stars near its ends. We catalog 14 star clusters associated with H II regions in the nuclear ring. As an additional demonstration of the resolution achieved, the integral size distribution of these clusters is described by an exponential relationship which prevails down to 0.14 arcsec.


The Astronomical Journal | 2001

Precise masses for wolf 1062 AB from hubble space telescope interferometric astrometry and Mcdonald observatory radial velocities

G. F. Benedict; Barbara E. McArthur; Otto G. Franz; L. H. Wasserman; Todd J. Henry; Tsunenori Takato; Iskra V. Strateva; James L. Crawford; P. A. Ianna; Donald W. McCarthy; Edmund P. Nelan; William Hamilton Jefferys; W. F. van Altena; Peter John Shelus; Paul D. Hemenway; Raynor L. Duncombe; Darrell B. Story; A. L. Whipple; Arthur J. Bradley; Laurence W. Fredrick

We present an analysis of astrometric data from Fine Guidance Sensor 3 (FGS 3), a white-light interferometer on HST , and of radial velocity data from two ground-based campaigns. We model the astrometric and radial velocity measurements simultaneously to obtain parallax, proper motion, and component masses for Wolf 1062 (Gl 748; M3.5 V). To derive the mass fraction, we relate FGS 3 fringe scanning observations of the science target to a reference frame provided by fringe tracking observations of a surrounding star —eld. We obtain an absolute parallax mas) yielding (n abs \ 98.0 ^ 0.4 M A \ 0.379 and high-quality component masses with errors of only 1.5%. ^ 0.005 M _ M B \ 0.192 ^ 0.003 M _ ,


Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific | 1994

Astrometry with Hubble Space Telescope Fine Guidance Sensor number 3: Position-mode stability and precision

G. F. Benedict; Barbara E. McArthur; Edmund P. Nelan; Darrell B. Story; A. L. Whipple; William Hamilton Jefferys; Q.-H. Wang; Peter John Shelus; Paul D. Hemenway; John E. McCartney; Wm. F. van Altena; Raynor L. Duncombe; Otto G. Franz; Laurence W. Fredrick

We report results from a test exploring the long- and short-term astrometric stability of Hubble Space Telescope Fine Guidance Sensor #3. A test field was observed 40 times over 522 days to determine the precision and accuracy of FGS astrometry and to measure the character and magnitude of possible secular scale changes. We examine the astrometric data and the associated guide star data to determine random errors. These data are also explored to find sources of systematic error. After correcting for some systematic effects we obtain a precision of 0.002 arcsec (2 mas) per observation (RSS of x and y). This is relative astrometry within a central 2.5 arc minute FGS field of view of any orientation. We find that the scale varies over time and confirm the sense of the trend with independent data. From the 40 observation sets we produce a catalog of an astrometry test field containing 8 stars whose relative positions are well known to an average 0.7 and 0.9 mas in x and y. One reference star has a relative parallax of 3.1 ± 0.5 mas. Finally, we report that 11 observation sets acquired over 387 days produce parallaxes and relative positions with 1 mas precision.


The Astronomical Journal | 2003

Astrometry with The Hubble Space Telescope: A Parallax of the Central Star of the Planetary Nebula NGC 6853

G. Fritz Benedict; Barbara E. McArthur; Laurence W. Fredrick; Thomas E. Harrison; Michael F. Skrutskie; Catherine L. Slesnick; June-Koo Kevin Rhee; Richard J. Patterson; Edmund P. Nelan; William Hamilton Jefferys; W. F. van Altena; Thomas J. Montemayor; Peter John Shelus; Otto G. Franz; L. H. Wasserman; Paul D. Hemenway; Raynor L. Duncombe; Darrell B. Story; A. L. Whipple; Arthur J. Bradley

We present an absolute parallax and relative proper motion for the central star of the planetary nebula NGC 6853 (the Dumbbell). We obtain these with astrometric data from the Fine Guidance Sensor 3, a white-light interferometer on the Hubble Space Telescope. Spectral classifications and VRIJHKT2M and DDO51 photometry of the stars making up the astrometric reference frame provide spectrophotometric estimates of their absolute parallaxes. Introducing these into our model as observations with error, we find πabs = 2.10 ± 0.48 mas for the DAO central star of NGC 6853. A weighted average with a previous ground-based USNO determination yields πabs = 2.40 ± 0.32. We assume that the extinction suffered by the reference stars nearest (in angular separation and distance) to the central star is the same as for the central star. Correcting for color differences, we find AV = 0.30 ± 0.06 for the central star, hence, an absolute magnitude MV = 5.48. A recent determination of the central star effective temperature aided in estimating the central star radius, R* = 0.055 ± 0.02 R⊙, a star that may be descending to the white dwarf cooling track.


The Astronomical Journal | 1990

Optical variability of extragalactic objects used to tie the HIPPARCOS reference frame to an extragalactic system using Hubble space telescope observations

Elizabeth Pike Bozyan; Paul D. Hemenway; A. Noel Argue

Observations of a set of 89 extragalactic objects (EGOs) will be made with the Hubble Space Telescope Fine Guidance Sensors and Planetary Camera in order to link the HIPPARCOS Instrumental System to an extragalactic coordinate system. Most of the sources chosen for observation contain compact radio sources and stellarlike nuclei; 65 percent are optical variables beyond a 0.2 mag limit. To ensure proper exposure times, accurate mean magnitudes are necessary. In many cases, the average magnitudes listed in the literature were not adequate. The literature was searched for all relevant photometric information for the EGOs, and photometric parameters were derived, including mean magnitude, maximum range, and timescale of variability. This paper presents the results of that search and the parameters derived. The results will allow exposure times to be estimated such that an observed magnitude different from the tabular magnitude by 0.5 mag in either direction will not degrade the astrometric centering ability on a Planetary Camera CCD frame.


The Astronomical Journal | 2000

Interferometric Astrometry of the Detached White Dwarf-M Dwarf Binary Feige 24 Using HST Fine Guidance Sensor 3: White Dwarf Radius and Component Mass Estimates*

G. Fritz Benedict; Barbara E. McArthur; Otto G. Franz; L. H. Wasserman; Edmund P. Nelan; J. T. Lee; Laurence W. Fredrick; William Hamilton Jefferys; W. F. van Altena; Edward L. Robinson; William John Spiesman; Peter John Shelus; Paul D. Hemenway; Raynor L. Duncombe; Darrell B. Story; A. L. Whipple; Arthur J. Bradley

With Hubble Space Telescope Fine Guidance Sensor 3 we have determined a parallax for the white dwarf–M dwarf interacting binary, Feige 24. The white dwarf (DA) component has an effective temperature Teff ~ 56,000 K. A weighted average with past parallax determinations (πabs = 14.6 ± 0.4 mas) narrows the range of possible radius values, compared with past estimates. We obtain RDA = 0.0185 ± 0.0008 R⊙ with uncertainty in the temperature and bolometric correction the dominant contributors to the error. Fine Guidance Sensor 3 photometry provides a light curve entirely consistent with reflection effects. A recently refined model mass-luminosity relation for low-mass stars provides a mass estimate for the M dwarf companion, MdM = 0.37 ± 0.20 M⊙, where the mass range is due to metallicity and age uncertainties. Radial velocities from Vennes and Thorstensen provide a mass ratio from which we obtain MDA = 0.49 M⊙. Independently, our radius and recent log g determinations yield 0.44 M⊙ < MDA < 0.47 M⊙. In each case, the minimum DA mass is that derived by Vennes & Thorstensen from their radial velocities and Keplerian circular orbits with i ≤ 90°. Locating Feige 24 on an (M, R)-plane suggests a carbon core. Our radius and these mass estimates yield a value of γgrav inconsistent with that derived by Vennes & Thorstensen. We speculate on the nature of a third component whose existence would resolve the discrepancy.

Collaboration


Dive into the Paul D. Hemenway's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Raynor L. Duncombe

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter John Shelus

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. L. Whipple

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Edmund P. Nelan

Space Telescope Science Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Darrell B. Story

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

G. Fritz Benedict

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Barbara E. McArthur

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge