Paul E. Ulmer
Argonne National Laboratory
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Paul E. Ulmer.
Physical Review Letters | 2002
Paul E. Ulmer; K. A. Aniol; H. Arenhövel; J. P. Chen; E. Chudakov; D. Crovelli; J. M. Finn; Kevin Fissum; O. Gayou; Jonatan Piedra Gomez; J.-O. Hansen; C. W. de Jager; Sabine Jeschonnek; M. K. Jones; M. Kuss; J. J. LeRose; M. Liang; R. Lindgren; S. Malov; D. Meekins; R. Michaels; John C. Mitchell; Charles F. Perdrisat; Punjabi; R. Roche; Franck Sabatie; A. Saha; R. Suleiman; L. Todor; B. Wojtsekhowski
The 2H(e,e()p)n cross section was measured in Hall A of the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility near the top of the quasielastic peak (x(Bj)=0.964) at a four-momentum transfer squared, Q(2)=0.665 (GeV/c) (2) (omega=0.368 GeV, W=2.057 GeV), and for recoil momenta up to 550 MeV/c. The measured cross section deviates by 1-2sigma from a state-of-the-art calculation at low recoil momenta. At high recoil momenta the cross section is well described by the same calculation; however, in this region, final-state interactions and interaction currents are predicted to be large, and alternative choices of nucleon-nucleon potential and nucleon current operator may result in significant spread in the calculations.
Physical Review C | 2002
J. Adam; Franz Gross; Sabine Jeschonnek; Paul E. Ulmer; J. W. Van Orden
Using the covariant spectator theory and the transversity formalism, the unpolarized, coincidence cross section for deuteron electrodisintegration,
Archive | 2005
J. Arrington; Aron M. Bernstein; William Brooks; Volker Burker; L. S. Cardman; Carl E. Carlson; Gordon D. Cates; Jian-Ping Chen; A. Dzierba; R. Ent; L. Elouadrhiri; Howard Fenker; H. Gao; Ashot Gasparian; Jose L. Goity; D. W. Higinbotham; R. J. Holt; Charles Earl Hyde; Cornelis De Jager; Sabine Jeschonnek; Xiangdong Ji; Xiangdong Jiang; M. K. Jones; Cynthia Keppel; S. E. Kuhn; K.S. Kumar; Jean Laget; David Mack; C. Meyer; W. Melnitchouk
d(e,ep)n
Physical Review Letters | 2001
D. Crovelli; Konrad A. Aniol; J. Gomez; J. J. LeRose; A. Saha; Paul E. Ulmer; Vina Punjabi; R. Lindgren; Charles F. Perdrisat; D. Meekins; Joseph Mitchell; M. K. Jones; Robert Michaels; Bogdan Wojtsekhowski; H. Arenhoevel; Michael Finn; J.-O. Hansen; R. Suleiman; Kevin Fissum; S. Malov; Cornelis De Jager; R. Roche; M. Kuss; E. Chudakov; Sabine Jeschonnek; Franck Sabatie; L. Todor; Meihua Liang; O. Gayou; Jian-Ping Chen
, is studied. The relativistic kinematics are reviewed, and simple theoretical formulae for the relativistic impulse approximation (RIA) are derived and discussed. Numerical predictions for the scattering in the high
Physical Review C | 2006
B. Hu; Oliver Keith Baker; A. Cochran; Cynthia Keppel; M. K. Jones; Paul E. Ulmer; Alexander Klein; S. E. Kuhn; L. Todor; L. B. Weinstein; Hartmuth Arenhoevel; W. Bertozzi; Shalev Gilad; Nilanga Liyanage; D. Rowntree; E. Brash; S. Dumalski; J. Hovebo; A. Kozlov; G. J. Lolos
Q^2
Physical Review C | 2006
Bitao Hu; M. K. Jones; Paul E. Ulmer; H. Arenhövel; Oliver Keith Baker; W. Bertozzi; E. Brash; John Calarco; Jian-Ping Chen; Eugene A. Chudakov; A. Cochran; Scott Dumalski; R. Ent; John M. Finn; F. Garibaldi; Shalev Gilad; R. Gilman; C. Glashausser; J. Gomez; V. Gorbenko; J.-O. Hansen; J. Hovebo; Cornelis De Jager; Sabine Jeschonnek; Xiaodong Jiang; Cynthia Keppel; Andreas Klein; Alexandre Kozlov; S. E. Kuhn; G. Kumbartzki
region obtained from the RIA and five other approximations are presented and compared. We conclude that measurements of the unpolarized coincidence cross section and the asymmetry
Physical Review Letters | 2002
Paul E. Ulmer; K. A. Aniol; H. Arenhövel; J. P. Chen; E. Chudakov; D. Crovelli; J. M. Finn; Kevin Fissum; O. Gayou; Jonatan Piedra Gomez; J.-O. Hansen; C. W. de Jager; Sabine Jeschonnek; M. K. Jones; M. Kuss; J. J. LeRose; M. Liang; R. Lindgren; S. Malov; D. Meekins; R. Michaels; John C. Mitchell; Charles F. Perdrisat; Vina Punjabi; R. Roche; Franck Sabatie; A. Saha; R. Suleiman; L. Todor; B. Wojtsekhowski
A_phi
Physical Review Letters | 2002
Paul E. Ulmer; K. A. Aniol; H. Arenhoevel; J. P. Chen; E. Chudakov; D. Crovelli; J. M. Finn; Kevin Fissum; O. Gayou; Jonatan Piedra Gomez; J.-O. Hansen; C. W. de Jager; Sabine Jeschonnek; M. K. Jones; M. Kuss; J. J. LeRose; M. Liang; R. Lindgren; S. Malov; D. Meekins; R. Michaels; John C. Mitchell; Charles F. Perdrisat; Vina Punjabi; R. Roche; Franck Sabatie; A. Saha; R. Suleiman; L. Todor; B. Wojtsekhowski
, to an accuracy that will distinguish between different theoretical models, is feasible over most of the wide kinematic range accessible at Jefferson Lab.
Physical Review C | 2002
K. Wijesooriya; A. Afanasev; M. Amarian; K. Aniol; S. Becher; K. Benslama; Louis Bimbot; P. Bosted; E. J. Brash; J. Calarco; Z. Chai; C.C. Chang; T. Chang; J. Chen; S. Choi; E. Chudakov; Steve Churchwell; D. Crovelli; S. Dieterich; S. Dumalski; D. Dutta; M. Epstein; K. Fissum; B. Fox; S. Frullani; H. Gao; J. Gao; F. Garibaldi; O. Gayou; R. Gilman
This Conceptual Design Report (CDR) presents the compelling scientific case for upgrading the Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility (CEBAF) at Jefferson Lab to 12 GeV. Such a facility will make profound contributions to the study of hadronic matter.
Archive | 2000
Jian-Ping Chen; Eugene A. Chudakov; Cornelis De Jager; J. Gomez; J.-O. Hansen; John J. LeRose; Robert Michaels; Joseph Mitchell; A. Saha; Bogdan Wojtsekhowski; J. Berthot; Pierre Bertin; Alexandre Deur; Rachele Di Salvo; L. B. Weinstein; Werner U. Boeglin; P. Markowitz; Jeffrey Templon; P. Gueye; Ting Chang; Alan M. Nathan; Raffaele De Leo; L. Lagamba; Moskov Amarian; Evaristo Cisbani; S. Frullani; F. Garibaldi; R. Iommi; M. Iodice; Guido Marie Urciuoli
The 2H(e,e()p)n cross section was measured in Hall A of the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility near the top of the quasielastic peak (x(Bj)=0.964) at a four-momentum transfer squared, Q(2)=0.665 (GeV/c) (2) (omega=0.368 GeV, W=2.057 GeV), and for recoil momenta up to 550 MeV/c. The measured cross section deviates by 1-2sigma from a state-of-the-art calculation at low recoil momenta. At high recoil momenta the cross section is well described by the same calculation; however, in this region, final-state interactions and interaction currents are predicted to be large, and alternative choices of nucleon-nucleon potential and nucleon current operator may result in significant spread in the calculations.