Paul G. Preston
University of California, San Francisco
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Paul G. Preston.
Anesthesiology | 1998
Randall E. Kan; Samuel C. Hughes; Mark A. Rosen; Charlize Kessin; Paul G. Preston; Errol Lobo
Background Remifentanil has not been studied in obstetric patients. This study evaluates the placental transfer of remifentanil and the neonatal effects when administered as an intravenous infusion. Methods Nineteen parturients underwent nonemergent cesarean section with epidural anesthesia and received 0.1 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg‐1 [middle dot] min‐1 remifentanil intravenously, which was continued until skin closure. Maternal arterial (MA), umbilical arterial (UA), and umbilical venous (UV) blood samples were obtained at delivery for analysis of drug concentrations of remifentanil, its metabolite, and blood gases. Maternal vital signs were monitored continuously, and pain and sedation levels were assessed intermittently. Apgar scores were obtained at 1, 5, 10, and 20 min, and Neonatal and Adaptive Capacity Scores were noted 30 and 60 min after delivery. Parturients and newborns were observed for at least 24 h after surgery for side effects. Results The means and SDs of UV:MA and UA:UV ratios for remifentanil were 0.88 +/‐ 0.78 and 0.29 +/‐ 0.07, respectively. Mean clearance was 93 ml [middle dot] min‐1 [middle dot] kg‐1. The mean UV:MA and UA:MV ratios for remifentanil acid were 0.56 +/‐ 0.29 and 1.23 +/‐ 0.89, respectively. The mean MA (remifentanil acid):MA (remifentanil) ratio was 2.92 +/‐ 3.65. There were no adverse effects on the neonates, but there was a sedative effect and respiratory depressant effect on the mothers. Conclusions Remifentanil crosses the placenta but appears to be rapidly metabolized, redistributed, or both. Maternal sedation and respiratory changes occur, but without adverse neonatal or maternal effects.
Seminars in Perinatology | 2011
Paul G. Preston; Connie M. Lopez; Nancy Corbett
The opening of a new facility often brings teams from different backgrounds who have previously never worked together. Organizational goals of safety and high reliability from the first day of operations would be impossible to attain without testing. Simulation is now being used to test new services, departments, and entire facilities before opening. This has been accomplished by establishing a well-developed program of in situ simulation with strong physician and nursing educator co-leads and simulation teams. This article describes a process for testing through simulation and the systemic findings from testing existing and new facilities and services.
Anesthesiology | 1988
Paul G. Preston; Mark A. Rosen; Samuel C. Hughes; Beth Glosten; Brian K. Ross; Don Daniels; Sol M. Shnider; P. A. Dailey
Social Science & Medicine | 1995
Paul G. Preston
Anesthesiology | 1987
Beth Glosten; P. A. Dailey; Paul G. Preston; Sol M. Shnider; Brian K. Ross; Mark A. Rosen; Samuel C. Hughes
Anesthesiology | 1987
Paul G. Preston; Mark A. Rosen; Don Daniels; Beth Glosten; Sol M. Shnider; Brian K. Ross; P. A. Dailey; Samuel C. Hughes
Anesthesiology | 1988
Samuel C. Hughes; R G Wright; D Murphy; Paul G. Preston; W Hughes; Mark A. Rosen; Sol M. Shnider
Anesthesiology | 1987
Brian K. Ross; Samuel C. Hughes; Beth Glosten; Sol M. Shnider; Paul G. Preston; Mark A. Rosen; P. A. Dailey
Survey of Anesthesiology | 1999
Randall E. Kan; Samuel C. Hughes; Mark A. Rosen; Charlize Kessin; Paul G. Preston; Errol Lobo
Social Science & Medicine | 1997
Paul G. Preston