Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Paul H. Taghert is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Paul H. Taghert.


Cell | 1999

A pdf Neuropeptide Gene Mutation and Ablation of PDF Neurons Each Cause Severe Abnormalities of Behavioral Circadian Rhythms in Drosophila

Susan C. P. Renn; Jae H Park; Michael Rosbash; Jeffrey C. Hall; Paul H. Taghert

The mechanisms by which circadian pacemaker systems transmit timing information to control behavior are largely unknown. Here, we define two critical features of that mechanism in Drosophila. We first describe animals mutant for the pdf neuropeptide gene, which is expressed by most of the candidate pacemakers (LNv neurons). Next, we describe animals in which pdf neurons were selectively ablated. Both sets of animals produced similar behavioral phenotypes. Both sets entrained to light, but both were largely arrhythmic under constant conditions. A minority of each pdf variant exhibited weak to moderate free-running rhythmicity. These results confirm the assignment of LNv neurons as the principal circadian pacemakers controlling daily locomotion in Drosophila. They also implicate PDF as the principal circadian transmitter.


Neuron | 2005

PDF Receptor Signaling in Drosophila Contributes to Both Circadian and Geotactic Behaviors

Inge Mertens; Anick Vandingenen; Erik C. Johnson; Orie T. Shafer; Weihua Li; Jennifer S. Trigg; Arnold De Loof; Liliane Schoofs; Paul H. Taghert

The neuropeptide Pigment-Dispersing Factor (PDF) is a principle transmitter regulating circadian locomotor rhythms in Drosophila. We have identified a Class II (secretin-related) G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that is specifically responsive to PDF and also to calcitonin-like peptides and to PACAP. In response to PDF, the PDF receptor (PDFR) elevates cAMP levels when expressed in HEK293 cells. As predicted by in vivo studies, cotransfection of Neurofibromatosis Factor 1 significantly improves coupling of PDFR to adenylate cyclase. pdfr mutant flies display increased circadian arrhythmicity, and also display altered geotaxis that is epistatic to that of pdf mutants. PDFR immunosignals are expressed by diverse neurons, but only by a small subset of circadian pacemakers. These data establish the first synapse within the Drosophila circadian neural circuit and underscore the importance of Class II peptide GPCR signaling in circadian neural systems.


The Journal of Neuroscience | 2004

The Neuropeptide Pigment-Dispersing Factor Coordinates Pacemaker Interactions in the Drosophila Circadian System

Yiing Lin; Gary D. Stormo; Paul H. Taghert

In Drosophila, the neuropeptide pigment-dispersing factor (PDF) is required to maintain behavioral rhythms under constant conditions. To understand how PDF exerts its influence, we performed time-series immunostainings for the PERIOD protein in normal and pdf mutant flies over 9 d of constant conditions. Without pdf, pacemaker neurons that normally express PDF maintained two markers of rhythms: that of PERIOD nuclear translocation and its protein staining intensity. As a group, however, they displayed a gradual dispersion in their phasing of nuclear translocation. A separate group of non-PDF circadian pacemakers also maintained PERIOD nuclear translocation rhythms without pdf but exhibited altered phase and amplitude of PERIOD staining intensity. Therefore, pdf is not required to maintain circadian protein oscillations under constant conditions; however, it is required to coordinate the phase and amplitude of such rhythms among the diverse pacemakers. These observations begin to outline the hierarchy of circadian pacemaker circuitry in the Drosophila brain.


Current Biology | 2008

Organization of the Drosophila Circadian Control Circuit

Michael N. Nitabach; Paul H. Taghert

Molecular genetics has revealed the identities of several components of the fundamental circadian molecular oscillator - an evolutionarily conserved molecular mechanism of transcription and translation that can operate in a cell-autonomous manner. Therefore, it was surprising when studies of circadian rhythmic behavior in the fruit fly Drosophila suggested that the normal operations of circadian clock cells, which house the molecular oscillator, in fact depend on non-cell-autonomous effects - interactions between the clock cells themselves. Here we review several genetic analyses that broadly extend that viewpoint. They support a model whereby the approximately 150 circadian clock cells in the brain of the fly are sub-divided into functionally discrete rhythmic centers. These centers alternatively cooperate or compete to control the different episodes of rhythmic behavior that define the flys daily activity profile.


Neuron | 2008

Widespread receptivity to neuropeptide PDF throughout the neuronal circadian clock network of Drosophila revealed by real-time cyclic AMP imaging.

Orie T. Shafer; Dong Jo Kim; Richard Dunbar-Yaffe; Viacheslav O. Nikolaev; Martin J. Lohse; Paul H. Taghert

The neuropeptide PDF is released by sixteen clock neurons in Drosophila and helps maintain circadian activity rhythms by coordinating a network of approximately 150 neuronal clocks. Whether PDF acts directly on elements of this neural network remains unknown. We address this question by adapting Epac1-camps, a genetically encoded cAMP FRET sensor, for use in the living brain. We find that a subset of the PDF-expressing neurons respond to PDF with long-lasting cAMP increases and confirm that such responses require the PDF receptor. In contrast, an unrelated Drosophila neuropeptide, DH31, stimulates large cAMP increases in all PDF-expressing clock neurons. Thus, the network of approximately 150 clock neurons displays widespread, though not uniform, PDF receptivity. This work introduces a sensitive means of measuring cAMP changes in a living brain with subcellular resolution. Specifically, it experimentally confirms the longstanding hypothesis that PDF is a direct modulator of most neurons in the Drosophila clock network.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2002

Influence of the period-dependent circadian clock on diurnal, circadian, and aperiodic gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster

Yiing Lin; Mei Han; Brian Shimada; Lin Wang; Therese M. Gibler; Aloka Amarakone; Tarif Awad; Gary D. Stormo; Russell N. Van Gelder; Paul H. Taghert

We measured daily gene expression in heads of control and period mutant Drosophila by using oligonucleotide microarrays. In control flies, 72 genes showed diurnal rhythms in light-dark cycles; 22 of these also oscillated in free-running conditions. The period gene significantly influenced the expression levels of over 600 nonoscillating transcripts. Expression levels of several hundred genes also differed significantly between control flies kept in light-dark versus constant darkness but differed minimally between per01 flies kept in the same two conditions. Thus, the period-dependent circadian clock regulates only a limited set of rhythmically expressed transcripts. Unexpectedly, period regulates basal and light-regulated gene expression to a very broad extent.


The Journal of Comparative Neurology | 2007

Development and morphology of the clock-gene-expressing lateral neurons of Drosophila melanogaster.

Charlotte Helfrich-Förster; Orie T. Shafer; Corinna Wülbeck; Eva Grieshaber; Dirk Rieger; Paul H. Taghert

The clock‐gene‐expressing lateral neurons are essential for the locomotor activity rhythm of Drosophila melanogaster. Traditionally, these neurons are divided into three groups: the dorsal lateral neurons (LNd), the large ventral lateral neurons (l‐LNv), and the small ventral lateral neurons (s‐LNv), whereby the latter group consists of four neurons that express the neuropeptide pigment‐dispersing factor (PDF) and a fifth PDF‐negative neuron. So far, only the l‐LNv and the PDF‐positive s‐LNv have been shown to project into the accessory medulla, a small neuropil that contains the circadian pacemaker center in several insects. We show here that the other lateral neurons also arborize in the accessory medulla, predominantly forming postsynaptic sites. Both the l‐LNv and LNd are anatomically well suited to connect the accessory medullae. Whereas the l‐LNv may receive ipsilateral photic input from the Hofbauer‐Buchner eyelet, the LNd invade mainly the contralateral accessory medulla and thus may receive photic input from the contralateral side. Both the LNd and the l‐LNv differentiate during midmetamorphosis. They do so in close proximity to one another and the fifth PDF‐negative s‐LNv, suggesting that these cell groups may derive from common precursors. J. Comp. Neurol. 500:47–70, 2007.


Journal of Neurobiology | 1999

Genetic analysis of the Drosophila ellipsoid body neuropil: Organization and development of the central complex

Susan C. P. Renn; J. Douglas Armstrong; Mingyao Yang; Zongsheng Wang; Xin An; Kim Kaiser; Paul H. Taghert

The central complex is an important center for higher-order brain function in insects. It is an intricate neuropil composed of four substructures. Each substructure contains repeated neuronal elements which are connected by processes such that topography is maintained. Although the neuronal architecture has been described in several insects and the behavioral role investigated in various experiments, the exact function of this neuropil has proven elusive. To describe the architecture of the central complex, we study 15 enhancer-trap lines that label various ellipsoid body neuron types. We find evidence for restriction of gene expression that is correlated with specific neuronal types: such correlations suggest functional classifications as well. We show that some enhancer-trap patterns reveal a single ellipsoid body neuron type, while others label multiple types. We describe the development of the ellipsoid body neuropil in wild-type animals and propose developmental mechanisms based on animals displaying structural mutations of this neuropil. The experiments performed here demonstrate the degree of resolution possible from the analysis of enhancer-trap lines and form a useful library of tools for future structure/function studies of the ellipsoid body.


The Journal of Comparative Neurology | 2006

Reevaluation of Drosophila melanogaster's Neuronal Circadian Pacemakers Reveals New Neuronal Classes

Orie T. Shafer; Charlotte Helfrich-Förster; Susan C. P. Renn; Paul H. Taghert

In the brain of the fly Drosophila melanogaster, ∼150 clock‐neurons are organized to synchronize and maintain behavioral rhythms, but the physiological and neurochemical bases of their interactions are largely unknown. Here we reevaluate the cellular properties of these pacemakers by application of a novel genetic reporter and several phenotypic markers. First, we describe an enhancer trap marker called R32 that specifically reveals several previously undescribed aspects of the flys central neuronal pacemakers. We find evidence for a previously unappreciated class of neuronal pacemakers, the lateral posterior neurons (LPNs), and establish anatomical, molecular, and developmental criteria to establish a subclass within the dorsal neuron 1 (DN1) group of pacemakers. Furthermore, we show that the neuropeptide IPNamide is specifically expressed by this DN1 subclass. These observations implicate IPNamide as a second candidate circadian transmitter in the Drosophila brain. Finally, we present molecular and anatomical evidence for unrecognized phenotypic diversity within each of four established classes of clock neurons. J. Comp. Neurol. 498:180–193, 2006.


Development | 2003

The bHLH protein Dimmed controls neuroendocrine cell differentiation in Drosophila

Randall S. Hewes; Dongkook Park; Sebastien A. Gauthier; Anneliese M. Schaefer; Paul H. Taghert

Neuroendocrine cells are specialized to produce, maintain and release large stores of secretory peptides. We show that the Drosophila dimmed/Mist1 bHLH gene confers such a pro-secretory phenotype on neuroendocrine cells. dimmed is expressed selectively in central and peripheral neuroendocrine cells. In dimmed mutants, these cells survive, and adopt normal cell fates and morphology. However, they display greatly diminished levels of secretory peptide mRNAs, and of diverse peptides and proteins destined for regulated secretion. Secretory peptide levels are lowered even in the presence of artificially high secretory peptide mRNA levels. In addition, overexpression of dimmed in a wild-type background produces a complimentary phenotype: an increase in secretory peptide levels by neuroendocrine cells, and an increase in the number of cells displaying a neuroendocrine phenotype. We propose that dimmed encodes an integral component of a novel mechanism by which diverse neuroendocrine lineages differentiate and maintain the pro-secretory state.

Collaboration


Dive into the Paul H. Taghert's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dongkook Park

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lynne E. Schneider

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Erik C. Johnson

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Martha A. O'Brien

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James W. Truman

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Philip F. Copenhaver

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Susan C. P. Renn

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeffrey N. Carr

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge