Paul Statkevich

Marked inactivation of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase activity with protracted temozolomide schedules

Temozolomide, an oral DNA methylator that inactivates the DNA repair enzyme O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (AGAT), has demonstrated anticancer activity on protracted schedules. Protracted schedules may lead to an ‘autoenhancement’ of temozolomides inherent cytotoxic potential by cumulative reduction of the cells capacity for AGAT-mediated DNA repair and resistance. This study was undertaken to characterise AGAT inactivation and regeneration in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of patients treated on two protracted temozolomide schedules. O6-alkyl guanine-DNA alkyltransferase activity was measured in the PBMCs of patients treated on two phase I protracted temozolomide studies. Patients were treated daily for either 7 days every 2 weeks (Schedule A) or 21 days every 4 weeks (Schedule B). The effects of various temozolomide doses (75–175 mg m−2), treatment duration (7–21 days), and temozolomide plasma levels on AGAT inactivation and regeneration, as well as the relation between AGAT inactivation and toxicity, were studied. O6-alkyl guanine-DNA alkyltransferase activity in PBMCs was measured serially in 52 patients. Marked inactivation of AGAT occurred following 7 days of temozolomide treatment, with mean AGAT activity decreasing by 72% (P<0.0001). Similarly, mean AGAT activity decreased by 63 and 73% after 14 and 21 days of treatment, respectively (P<0.001 for both comparisons). O6-alkyl guanine-DNA alkyltransferase inactivation was greater after 7 days of treatment with higher doses of temozolomide than lower doses and remained markedly reduced 7 days post-treatment. However, AGAT inactivation following temozolomide treatment for 14 and 21 days was similar at all doses. On the continuous 21-day schedule, AGAT inactivation was significantly greater in patients who experienced severe thrombocytopenia than those who did not (90.3±5.5 vs 72.5±16.1%, P<0.045). In Conclusion, protracted administration of temozolomide, even at relatively low daily doses, leads to significant and prolonged depletion of AGAT activity, which may enhance the antitumour activity of the agent.

Phase I dose-escalation and pharmacokinetic study of temozolomide (SCH 52365) for refractory or relapsing malignancies.

SummaryTemozolomide, an oral cytotoxic agent with approximately 100% bioavailability after one administration, has demonstrated schedule-dependent clinical activity against highly resistant cancers. Thirty patients with minimal prior chemotherapy were enrolled in this phase I trial to characterize the drug’s safety, pharmacokinetics and anti-tumour activity, as well as to assess how food affects oral bioavailability. To determine dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), temozolomide 100–250 mg m–2 was administered once daily for 5 days every 28 days. The DLT was thrombocytopenia, and the MTD was 200 mg m–2 day–1. Subsequently, patients received the MTD to study how food affects the oral bioavailability of temozolomide. When given orally once daily for 5 days, temozolomide was well tolerated and produced a non-cumulative, transient myelosuppression. The most common non-haematological toxicities were mild to moderate nausea and vomiting. Clinical activity was observed against several advanced cancers, including malignant glioma and metastatic melanoma. Temozolomide demonstrated linear and reproducible pharmacokinetics and was rapidly absorbed (mean Tmax ~1 h) and eliminated (mean t1/2 = 1.8 h). Food produced a slight reduction (9%) in absorption of temozolomide. Temozolomide 200 mg m–2 day–1 for 5 days, every 28 days, is recommended for phase II studies.

Treating cancer with PEG Intron: Pharmacokinetic profile and dosing guidelines for an improved interferon-alpha-2b formulation

PEG Intron (pegylated interferon‐alpha‐2b [IFN‐α‐2b]; Schering‐Plough, Kenilworth, NJ) has demonstrated delayed clearance and increased area under the curve compared with native IFN‐α‐2b. Studies in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection and malignancies have demonstrated both biologic and clinical activity of PEG Intron and have provided empiric data to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics of PEG Intron and IFN‐α‐2b.

Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of the Oral Farnesyl Transferase Inhibitor SCH 66336 Given Twice Daily to Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

PURPOSE A single-agent dose-escalating phase I and pharmacokinetic study on the farnesyl transferase inhibitor SCH 66336 was performed to determine the safety profile, maximum-tolerated dose, and recommended dose for phase II studies. Plasma and urine pharmacokinetics were determined. PATIENTS AND METHODS SCH 66336 was given orally bid without interruption to patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed solid tumors. Routine antiemetics were not prescribed. RESULTS Twenty-four patients were enrolled onto the study. Dose levels studied were 25, 50, 100, 200, 400, and 300 mg bid. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed on days 1 and 15. At 400 mg bid, the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) consisted of grade 4 vomiting, grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, and the combination of grade 3 anorexia and diarrhea with reversible grade 3 plasma creatinine elevation. After dose reduction, at 300 mg bid, the DLTs consisted of grade 4 neutropenia, grade 3 neurocortical toxicity, and the combination of grade 3 fatigue with grade 2 nausea and diarrhea. The recommended dose for phase II studies is 200 mg bid, which was found feasible for prolonged periods of time. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed a greater than dose-proportional increase in drug exposure and peak plasma concentrations, with increased parameters at day 15 compared with day 1, indicating some accumulation on multiple dosing. Plasma half-life ranged from 4 to 11 hours and seemed to increase with increasing doses. Steady-state plasma concentrations were attained at days 7 through 14. A large volume of distribution at steady-state indicated extensive distribution outside the plasma compartment. CONCLUSION SCH 66336 can be administered safely using a continuous oral bid dosing regimen. The recommended dose for phase II studies using this regimen is 200 mg bid.

Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Temozolomide on a Daily-for-5-Days Schedule in Patients With Advanced Solid Malignancies

PURPOSE To determine the principal toxicities, characterize the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and pharmacodynamics (PDs) of temozolomide (TMZ) on a daily-for-5-days schedule, and recommend a dose for subsequent disease-directed studies in both minimally pretreated (MP) and heavily pretreated (HP) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients received TMZ as a single oral dose daily for 5 consecutive days every 28 days. TMZ doses were escalated from 100 to 150, and 150 to 200 mg/m(2)/d in separate cohorts of MP and HP patients. PK plasma was sampled on days 1 and 5. TMZ concentrations were analyzed and pertinent PK parameters were related to the principal toxicities of TMZ in PD analyses. RESULTS Twenty-four patients were treated with 85 courses of TMZ. Thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were the principal dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of TMZ on this schedule. The cumulative rate of severe myelosuppressive effects was unacceptably high at TMZ doses exceeding 150 mg/m(2)/d in both MP and HP patients. TMZ was absorbed rapidly with maximum concentrations achieved in 0.90 hours, on average, and elimination was rapid, with a half-life and systemic clearance rate (Cl(S/F)) averaging 1.8 hours and 115 mL/min/m(2), respectively. When clearance was normalized to body-surface area (BSA), interpatient variability in Cl(S/F) was reduced from 20% to 13% on day 1 and from 16% to 10% on day 5. Patients who experienced DLT had significantly higher maximum drug concentration( )(median 16 v 9.5 microg/mL, P =. 0084) and area under the concentration-time curve (median 36 v 23 microg-h/mL, P =.0019) values on day 5. CONCLUSION Prior myelosuppressive therapy was not a determinant of toxicity. TMZ 150 mg/m(2)/d administered as a single oral dose daily for 5 days every 4 weeks is well tolerated by MP and HP patients, with higher doses resulting in unacceptably high rates of severe hematologic toxicity. TMZ doses should be individualized according to BSA rather than use of a prespecified oral dose for all individuals. TMZ is an optimal agent to develop in combination with other cytotoxic, biologic, and targeted therapeutics for patients with relevant malignancies.

Posaconazole pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability in subjects with varying degrees of chronic renal disease.

Posaconazole is a triazole antifungal in development for the treatment of invasive fungal infections. The authors evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of posaconazole in healthy subjects and in those with mild (CLCR = 50–80 mL/min), moderate (CLCR = 20–49 mL/min), and severe chronic renal disease (CLCR <20 mL/min; receiving outpatient hemodialysis) (n = 6/group). Subjects received one 400‐mg dose of posaconazole oral suspension with a standardized high‐fat breakfast. For hemodialysis‐dependent subjects, this dose was given on a nonhemodialysis day, and a second 400‐mg dose was given 6 hours before hemodialysis. Blood samples were collected before dose and up to 120 hours postdose. For hemodialysis‐dependent subjects following the second dose, additional samples (predialyzed and postdialyzed) were collected before, during, and after dialysis. There was no correlation between posaconazole pharmacokinetics and mild to moderate renal disease; the slopes of the linear regressions for creatinine clearance versus posaconazole AUC, Cmax, CL/F, and t1/2 values were not significantly different from zero (P > .130). Mean CL/F values before and during hemodialysis were comparable. Furthermore, the difference in the predialyzed and postdialyzed posaconazole concentrations was only ∼3%, supporting that posaconazole was not removed by hemodialysis. Protein binding was similar in all groups (∼98%) and was unaffected by hemodialysis. Posaconazole was generally well tolerated. One patient had elevated liver function test results that were not present at baseline and were thought to be possibly related to posaconazole. Results of this single‐dose study indicate that dosage adjustments for patients with varying degrees of renal disease are not required.

A population pharmacokinetic model that describes multiple peaks due to enterohepatic recirculation of ezetimibe

BACKGROUND Ezetimibe, a selective inhibitor of intestinal cholesterol absorption, is in clinical development for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. It is rapidly absorbed and glucuronidated in the intestine. The parent compound and its conjugated metabolite undergo enterohepatic recirculation, resulting in multiple peaks in the plasma concentration-time profile. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model for ezetimibe that incorporates enterohepatic recirculation. METHODS A population compartment model incorporating input from the gallbladder, consistent with food intake, was developed to account for enterohepatic recirculation. The amount recycled was allowed to vary within a subject and between subjects, accommodating variability in bile secretion. The data used consisted of 90 profiles from healthy subjects who received single or multiple doses of ezetimibe 10 or 20 mg. Modeling was carried out using a nonlinear mixed-effect function in the S-PLUS statistical program. RESULTS The amount of ezetimibe recycled into the central compartment was estimated to be approximately 17% to 20% of the total amount absorbed, independent of the volume of distribution. The intersubject coefficient of variation was 46% to 80% in the absorption rate constant, 27% in the distribution phase, and approximately 50% in the volume of distribution. CONCLUSIONS PPK models adapted for enterohepatic recirculation allowed a formal assessment of the magnitude and frequency of the enterohepatic recirculation process, and the associated intersubject and intrasubject variability in healthy subjects. The PPK approach also helped to assess the correlation between the observed maximum or minimum (24 hours postdose) concentration with the model-based area under the curve, confirming the appropriateness of the former measures as a surrogate of drug exposure for a possible correlation with pharmacodynamics.

Phase I Study of the Farnesyltransferase Inhibitor Lonafarnib with Paclitaxel in Solid Tumors

Purpose: To establish the maximum tolerated dose of lonafarnib, a novel farnesyltransferase inhibitor, in combination with paclitaxel in patients with solid tumors and to characterize the safety, tolerability, dose-limiting toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of this combination regimen. Experimental Design: In a Phase I trial, lonafarnib was administered p.o., twice daily (b.i.d.) on continuously scheduled doses of 100 mg, 125 mg, and 150 mg in combination with i.v. paclitaxel at doses of 135 mg/m2 or 175 mg/m2 administered over 3 h on day 8 of every 21-day cycle. Plasma paclitaxel and lonafarnib concentrations were collected at selected time points from each patient. Results: Twenty-four patients were enrolled; 21 patients were evaluable. The principal grade 3/4 toxicity was diarrhea (5 of 21 patients), which was most likely due to lonafarnib. dose-limiting toxicities included grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia at dose level 3 (100 mg b.i.d. lonafarnib and 175 mg/m2 paclitaxel); grade 4 diarrhea and grade 3 peripheral neuropathy at dose level 3A (125 mg b.i.d. lonafarnib and 175 mg/m2 paclitaxel); and grade 4 neutropenia with fever and grade 4 diarrhea at level 4 (150 mg b.i.d. lonafarnib and 175 mg/m2 paclitaxel). The maximum tolerated dose established by the continual reassessment method was lonafarnib 100 mg b.i.d. and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2. Paclitaxel appeared to have no effect on the pharmacokinetics of lonafarnib. The median duration of therapy was eight cycles, including seven cycles with paclitaxel. Six of 15 previously treated patients had a durable partial response, including 3 patients who had previous taxane therapy. Notably, two of five patients with taxane-resistant metastatic non-small cell lung cancer had partial responses. Conclusions: When combined with paclitaxel, the recommended dose of lonafarnib for Phase II trials is 100 mg p.o. twice daily with 175 mg/m2 of paclitaxel i.v. every 3 weeks. Additional studies of lonafarnib in combination regimens appear warranted, particularly in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interaction between fenofibrate and ezetimibe.

SUMMARY Objective: The cholesterol absorption inhibitor, ezetimibe, significantly decreases low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. The pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and safety profiles of ezetimibe and fenofibrate were evaluated alone and after co-administration in 32 subjects with primary hypercholesterolemia. Research design and methods: This was a randomized, evaluator (single)-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Subjects with untreated LDL-C ≥ 130 mg/dL (3.37 mmol/L) were randomized to receive one of four oral treatments each morning for 14 days: fenofibrate 200 mg + ezetimibe 10 mg, fenofibrate 200 mg, ezetimibe 10 mg, or placebo. Serum lipids were assessed before drug administration on day 1, day 7, and day 14. Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed on day 14. Main outcome measures: The primary pharmacodynamic parameter was percentage change from baseline in LDL-C concentration following co-administration of ezetimibe and fenofibrate vs either drug alone, or placebo. A secondary outcome was the potential for a pharmacokinetic interaction between ezetimibe and fenofibrate. Results: Ezetimibe and fenofibrate co-administration was well tolerated and produced statistically significant mean percentage reductions from baseline in LDL-C ( p ≤ 0.05 vs either drug alone or placebo), total cholesterol and triglycerides ( p ≤ 0.05 vs either fenofibrate or placebo), apolipoprotein C-III ( p ≤ 0.05 vs placebo), and LDL-III ( p ≤ 0.05 vs either drug alone or placebo). Ezetimibe did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of fenofibrate. Concomitant fenofibrate administration significantly increased the mean Cmax and AUC of total ezetimibe approximately 64% and 48%, respectively. However, based on the established safety profile and flat dose-response of ezetimibe, this effect is not considered to be clinically significant. Conclusion: Co-administration of ezetimibe and fenofibrate produced significantly greater reductions in LDL-C than either drug alone and greater reductions in triglycerides than fenofibrate. These effects were accompanied by improvements in the lipid/lipoprotein profile, suggesting that co-administration therapy with ezetimibe and fenofibrate may be an effective therapeutic option for patients with mixed dyslipidemia.

High-performance liquid chromatographic analysis and stability of anti-tumor agent temozolomide in human plasma

Temozolomide (SCH 52365; TEMODAL) is an antineoplastic agent with activity against a broad spectrum of murine tumors. This compound is currently marketed in the European Union for the treatment of patients with glioblastoma multiforme and anaplastic astrocytoma, which are serious and aggressive types of brain cancers. It has been postulated that temozolomide exerts its in vivo activity via the decomposition product MTIC, which is believed to alkylate nucleophiles, and in the process is converted to AIC. A high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method was developed and validated for the analysis of temozolomide in human plasma. The determination of temozolomide involved extraction with ethyl acetate followed by separation on a reversed phase C-18 column and quantification by UV absorbance at 316 nm. The calibration curve was linear over a concentration range of 0.1-20 microg/ml. The limit of quantitation was 0.1 microg/ml, where the coefficient of variation (CV) was 0% and the bias was 10.0%. The method was precise with a coefficient of variation ranging from 2.5 to 6.9% and accurate with a bias ranging from 5.0 to 10.0%. Temozolomide was unstable at 37 degrees C in human plasma with a degradation t1/2 of 15 min; however, it was stable at 4 degrees C for at least 30 min. Temozolomide was stable in acidified human plasma (pH < 4) for at least 24 h at 25 degrees C, and for at least 30 days at -20 degrees C. Moreover, temozolomide was stable in acidified human plasma after being subjected to three freeze thaw cycles. The assay was shown to be specific, accurate, precise, and reliable for use in pharmacokinetic studies.