Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Rajat Bannerji is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Rajat Bannerji.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2003

Apoptotic-regulatory and complement-protecting protein expression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: relationship to in vivo rituximab resistance.

Rajat Bannerji; Shinichi Kitada; Ian W. Flinn; Michael Pearson; Donn C. Young; John C. Reed; John C. Byrd

PURPOSE Rituximab has clinical activity in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and has a variety of proposed mechanisms, including apoptosis, complement-dependent cell lysis (CDC), and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). Here we examine pretreatment biologic features that promote resistance to apoptosis and CDC in CLL patients and correlate it with clinical outcome to rituximab-based therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Pretreatment samples from 21 CLL patients treated on a prospective, single-agent rituximab trial were examined for quantitative expression of apoptotic and CDC regulatory proteins, and the level of expression of these proteins was correlated with clinical outcome. RESULTS Of the 21 patents for whom samples were available, 10 attained a partial response and 11 failed to respond to rituximab therapy. The mean pretreatment expression of Bcl-2, Mcl-1, XIAP, and the ratio of Bcl-2/Bax were higher but not statistically increased in nonresponding patients versus those responding to treatment. In contrast, the pretreatment Mcl-1/Bax ratio was significantly elevated (0.82 +/- 0.28 v 0.39 +/- 0.29, P <.016) in nonresponding patients compared with patients responding to rituximab therapy. Although pretreatment expression of CD55 and CD59 was not associated with response to rituximab therapy, significantly higher levels of CD59 were observed in the CLL cells that were not cleared from the blood at completion of therapy than the level observed at baseline levels (P =.02). CONCLUSION These data indicate that baseline expression of the Mcl-1/Bax ratio, but not CD55 and CD59, predict for clinical response to rituximab therapy in CLL patients. Further study of disrupted apoptosis in CLL as a potential mechanism of resistance to rituximab appears warranted.


Current Opinion in Oncology | 2000

Update on the biology of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Rajat Bannerji; John C. Byrd

An understanding of the molecular biology of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL) has led to the appreciation that several different B-cell diseases are represented under this name. Variability in the bcl-2 family of proteins, p53 mutation, or the presence of various chromosomal abnormalities corresponds to variability of the clinical course of disease and response to therapy. Differential expression of cell surface adhesion molecules by B-CLL cells have also been shown to influence clinical outcome, as have the expression of immune regulatory molecules (eg, CD80, CD40R, CD27 and CD79b). Recent work studying immunoglobulin-heavy chain gene rearrangement postulates at least two subsets of B-CLL originating from different stages of B-cell development and following different clinical courses. The knowledge that B-CLL is the final consequence of many different molecular perturbations may allow the development of chemotherapies, immunotherapies, and gene therapies that target the specific molecular defect in a given case of B-CLL.


Cancer Biology & Therapy | 2011

Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor dinaciclib (SCH727965) inhibits pancreatic cancer growth and progression in murine xenograft models

Georg Feldmann; Anjali Mishra; Savita Bisht; Collins Karikari; Ignacio Garrido-Laguna; Zeshaan Rasheed; Niki A. Ottenhof; Tikva Dadon; Hector Alvarez; Volker Fendrich; N. V. Rajeshkumar; William Matsui; Peter Brossart; Manuel Hidalgo; Rajat Bannerji; Anirban Maitra; Barry D. Nelkin

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal of human malignancies, and potent therapeutic options are lacking. Inhibition of cell cycle progression through pharmacological blockade of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) has been suggested as a potential treatment option for human cancers with deregulated cell cycle control. Dinaciclib (SCH727965) is a novel small molecule multi-CDK inhibitor with low nanomolar potency against CDK1, CDK2, CDK5 and CDK9 that has shown favorable toxicity and efficacy in preliminary mouse experiments, and has been well tolerated in Phase I clinical trials. In the current study, the therapeutic efficacy of SCH727965 on human pancreatic cancer cells was tested using in vitro and in vivo model systems. Treatment with SCH727965 significantly reduced in vitro cell growth, motility and colony formation in soft agar of MIAPaCa-2 and Pa20C cells. These phenotypic changes were accompanied by marked reduction of phosphorylation of Retinoblastoma (Rb) and reduced activation of RalA. Single agent therapy with SCH727965 (40 mg/kg i.p. twice weekly) for 4 weeks significantly reduced subcutaneous tumor growth in 10/10 (100%) of tested low-passage human pancreatic cancer xenografts. Treatment of low passage pancreatic cancer xenografts with a combination of SCH727965 and gemcitabine was significantly more effective than either agent alone. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis identified overrepresentation of the Notch and Transforming Growth Factor-beta (TGF-beta) signaling pathways in the xenografts least responsive to SCH727965 treatment. Treatment with the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor SCH727965 alone or in combination is a highly promising novel experimental therapeutic strategy against pancreatic cancer.


Leukemia | 2012

The novel cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor dinaciclib (SCH727965) promotes apoptosis and abrogates microenvironmental cytokine protection in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells

Amy J. Johnson; Yuh-Ying Yeh; Lisa L. Smith; Amy J. Wagner; Joshua Hessler; Sneha V. Gupta; Joseph M. Flynn; Jeffrey A. Jones; Xiaoli Zhang; Rajat Bannerji; Michael R. Grever; John C. Byrd

The cyclin dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor flavopiridol has demonstrated promising clinical results in relapsed CLL patients leading to efforts to develop improved CDK inhibitors. Dinaciclib (SCH727965) is a pan-CDK inhibitor, derived from a detailed screen in ovarian xenograft mouse models for therapeutic index, whose toxicity in solid tumor phase I studies appears favorable. Dinaciclib in CLL cells demonstrates concentration dependent apoptosis that is superior to flavopiridol following a clinically relevant 2-hour exposure. Dinaciclib potently down-regulates expression of Mcl-1 in CLL cells and antagonizes protection mediated by multiple soluble proteins important in the microenvironment of CLL including TNF-α IL-4, BAFF, and CD40-ligand. In contrast, contact with stromal cells or fibronectin abrogates the cytotoxicity of dinaciclib that is antagonized by a pan inhibitor and p110 alpha isoform specific inhibitor of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway suggesting potential for combination strategies. These data justify clinical development of dinaciclib in CLL.


Leukemia | 2015

Dinaciclib is a Novel Cyclin Dependent Kinase Inhibitor with Significant Clinical Activity in Relapsed and Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Joseph M. Flynn; Jeffery A. Jones; Amy J. Johnson; Leslie A. Andritsos; Kami Maddocks; Samantha Jaglowski; Joshua Hessler; Michael R. Grever; Eun Kyung Im; Honghong Zhou; Y Zhu; D. Zhang; Karen Small; Rajat Bannerji; John C. Byrd

Dinaciclib (SCH727965) is a selective CDKi chosen for clinical development based upon a favorable therapeutic index in cancer xenograft models. We performed a phase I dose escalation study of dinaciclib in relapsed and refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients with intact organ function and WBC<200 × 109 /l. Five separate dose levels (5 mg/m2, 7 mg/m2, 10 mg/m2, 14 mg/m2 and 17 mg/m2) were explored dosing on a weekly schedule × 3 with 1 week off (4-week cycles) using a standard 3+3 design with expansion cohorts to optimize safety. Fifty-two patients were enrolled with relapsed and refractory CLL. Escalation through cohorts occurred with two dose-limiting toxicity (DLTs) at the 17 mg/m2 dose (tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) and pneumonia). The phase II expansion occurred at 14 mg/m2 with 16 patients receiving this dose with one DLT (TLS). Additional stepped up dosing to the maximum tolerated dose was examined in 19 patients at this dose. Adverse events included cytopenias, transient laboratory abnormalities and TLS. Responses occurred in 28 (54%) of patients independent of del(17)(p13.1) with a median progression-free survival of 481 days. Dinaciclib is clinically active in relapsed CLL including those patients with high risk del(17)(p13.1) disease and warrants future study.


Lung Cancer | 2014

Randomized phase 2 study of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor dinaciclib (MK-7965) versus erlotinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer☆

Joe Stephenson; John Nemunaitis; Anil A. Joy; Julie C. Martin; Ying-Ming Jou; Da Zhang; Paul Statkevich; Siu-Long Yao; Yali Zhu; Honghong Zhou; Karen Small; Rajat Bannerji; Martin J. Edelman

OBJECTIVES Dinaciclib (MK-7965, formerly SCH 727965), a novel, small-molecule inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases, has been shown to induce apoptosis in preclinical studies of human tumor cell lines, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. Erlotinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of advanced NSCLC as second- or third-line therapy. This phase 2, randomized, multicenter, open-label study compared dinaciclib with erlotinib in patients with previously treated NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study was comprised of 2 parts: in part 1, patients were randomized to either intravenous (IV) dinaciclib (50 mg/m2) or oral erlotinib (150 mg) using an adaptive Bayesian design that adjusted the randomization ratio in favor of the more active arm, and in part 2, patients who had progressed on erlotinib were permitted to cross over to receive dinaciclib at the same dosage as in part 1. Patients were followed until disease progression or death, initiation of nonstudy cancer treatment, discontinuation, or withdrawal of consent. The primary efficacy end point was time-to-progression (TTP) in part 1 and objective response rate (ORR) in part 2. RESULTS Based on Kaplan-Meier estimates, the median TTP was 1.49 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.31, 2.63) following initial treatment with dinaciclib, compared with 1.58 months (95% CI: 1.38, 2.83) with erlotinib. No objective responses were observed following initial treatment with dinaciclib. Common severe (grade 3 or 4) drug-related adverse effects included neutropenia, leukopenia, vomiting, and diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS Dinaciclib, administered IV, was well tolerated at the 50 mg/m2 dose, but does not have activity as monotherapy in previously treated NSCLC. Evaluation of dinaciclib in combination with other agents for other indications including breast cancer and multiple myeloma is in progress.


Molecular Cancer Therapeutics | 2015

Combined Inhibition of Cyclin-Dependent Kinases (Dinaciclib) and AKT (MK-2206) Blocks Pancreatic Tumor Growth and Metastases in Patient-Derived Xenograft Models

Chaoxin Hu; Tikva Dadon; Venugopal Chenna; Shinichi Yabuuchi; Rajat Bannerji; Robert Booher; Peter Strack; Nilofer A Azad; Barry D. Nelkin; Anirban Maitra

KRAS is activated by mutation in the vast majority of cases of pancreatic cancer; unfortunately, therapeutic attempts to inhibit KRAS directly have been unsuccessful. Our previous studies showed that inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (CDK5) reduces pancreatic cancer growth and progression, through blockage of the centrally important RAL effector pathway, downstream of KRAS. In the current study, the therapeutic effects of combining the CDK inhibitor dinaciclib (SCH727965; MK-7965) with the pan-AKT inhibitor MK-2206 were evaluated using orthotopic and subcutaneous patient-derived human pancreatic cancer xenograft models. The combination of dinaciclib (20 mg/kg, i.p., three times a week) and MK-2206 (60 mg/kg, orally, three times a week) dramatically blocked tumor growth and metastasis in all eight pancreatic cancer models examined. Remarkably, several complete responses were induced by the combination treatment of dinaciclib and MK-2206. The striking results obtained in these models demonstrate that the combination of dinaciclib with the pan-AKT inhibitor MK-2206 is promising for therapeutic evaluation in pancreatic cancer, and strongly suggest that blocking RAL in combination with other effector pathways downstream from KRAS may provide increased efficacy in pancreatic cancer. Based on these data, an NCI–CTEP-approved multicenter phase I clinical trial for pancreatic cancer of the combination of dinaciclib and MK-2206 (NCT01783171) has now been opened. Mol Cancer Ther; 14(7); 1532–9. ©2015 AACR.


JAMA Oncology | 2018

Prognostic Factors for Complete Response to Ibrutinib in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Pooled Analysis of 2 Clinical Trials

Susan O’Brien; Samantha Jaglowski; John C. Byrd; Rajat Bannerji; Kristie A. Blum; Christopher P. Fox; Richard R. Furman; Peter Hillmen; Thomas J. Kipps; Marco Montillo; Jeff P. Sharman; Sam Suzuki; Danelle F. James; Alvina D. Chu; Steven Coutre

Importance Ibrutinib, a first-in-class Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor taken once daily, is approved in the United States for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma and allows for treatment without chemotherapy. Extended treatment with ibrutinib has demonstrated increased complete response (CR) rates over time. Objective To analyze baseline factors that predict CR in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma treated with ibrutinib. Design, Setting, and Participants Univariate and multivariate analyses of pooled data from 2 clinical trials were used to assess the prognostic value of baseline factors associated with CR in 327 patients from the PCYC-1102 and PCYC-1112 studies treated with single-agent ibrutinib. Participants were followed up in academic and community medical centers in the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, France, Italy, Ireland, Poland, Spain, and Austria. Main Outcomes and Measures Odds ratio (OR) of CR rate. Results The 327 patients included in this analysis had a median age of 67 years (range, 30-86 years) and 227 (69.4%) were male. At baseline, 185 patients (56.6%) had bulky disease (lymph node ≥5 cm), 184 (56.3%) had advanced-stage disease, and 182 (55.7%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 or higher. Thirty-one patients (9.5%) were in the first-line setting; 38 (11.6%) had undergone 1 previous therapy, 81 (24.8%) had undergone 2, and 177 (54.1%) had undergone 3 or more; patients with relapsed/refractory disease had undergone a median of 3 (range, 0-12) previous therapies. Median time on study was 26.4 months (range, 0.3-55.6 months). Thirty-two of the 327 patients (9.8%) treated with ibrutinib had a CR (PCYC-1102: relapsed/refractory, 12 of 101 [11.9%]; treatment-naive, 8 of 31 [25.8%]; and PCYC-1112: 12 of 195 [6.2%]). The median time to CR for these patients was 14.7 months (range, 4.6-47.1 months). Univariate analysis of baseline factors showed that bulky disease, clinical stage, number of previous therapies, and &bgr;2-microglobulin concentration had a significant effect on the odds of CR. The final multivariate model showed that patients with no previous therapy vs patients with at least 1 previous therapy (OR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.01-6.95; P = .047) and patients without bulky disease (lymph node <5 cm) vs those with bulky disease (lymph node ≥5 cm [OR, 4.97; 95% CI, 1.91-12.91; P = .001]) had an increased likelihood of CR. Conclusions and Relevance Patients receiving ibrutinib as a first-line therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia and those without bulky disease had a better likelihood of CR to treatment. The CR rate with continued longer-term ibrutinib treatment was higher than in previous reports. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: NCT01105247 and NCT01578707


British Journal of Cancer | 2017

Phase 1 safety, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor dinaciclib administered every three weeks in patients with advanced malignancies

Monica M. Mita; Alain C. Mita; Jennifer L. Moseley; Jennifer Poon; Karen Small; Ying Ming Jou; Paul Kirschmeier; Da Zhang; Yali Zhu; Paul Statkevich; K. Sankhala; John Sarantopoulos; James M. Cleary; Lucian R. Chirieac; Scott J. Rodig; Rajat Bannerji; Geoffrey I. Shapiro

Background:Dinaciclib is a potent inhibitor of cell cycle and transcriptional cyclin-dependent kinases. This Phase 1 study evaluated the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of various dosing schedules of dinaciclib in advanced solid tumour patients and assessed pharmacodynamic and preliminary anti-tumour activity.Methods:In part 1, patients were enrolled in escalating cohorts of 2-h infusions administered once every 3 weeks, utilising an accelerated titration design until a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was defined. In part 2, 8- and 24-h infusions were evaluated. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for all schedules. Pharmacodynamic effects were assessed with an ex vivo stimulated lymphocyte proliferation assay performed in whole blood.Effects of dinaciclib on retinoblastoma (Rb) phosphorylation and other CDK targets were evaluated in skin and tumour biopsies. In addition to tumour size, metabolic response was evaluated by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography.Results:Sixty-one patients were enrolled to parts 1 and 2. The RP2Ds were 50, 7.4 and 10.4 mg m−2 as 2- 8- and 24-hour infusions, respectively. Dose-limiting toxicities included pancytopenia, neutropenic fever, elevated transaminases, hyperuricemia and hypotension. Pharmacokinetics demonstrated rapid distribution and a short plasma half-life. Dinaciclib suppressed proliferation of stimulated lymphocytes. In skin and tumour biopsies, dinaciclib reduced Rb phosphorylation at CDK2 phospho-sites and modulated expression of cyclin D1 and p53, suggestive of CDK9 inhibition. Although there were no RECIST responses, eight patients had prolonged stable disease and received between 6 and 30 cycles. Early metabolic responses occurred.Conclusions:Dinaciclib is tolerable at doses demonstrating target engagement in surrogate and tumour tissue.


Cancer Research | 2011

Abstract 2242: A randomized phase 2 study of the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor Dinaciclib (SCH 727965) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Stephen L. Warren; John Nemunaitis; Joe Stephenson; Benoit Samson; Anil A. Joy; Da Zhang; Paul Statkevich; Ying-Ming Jou; Siu-Long Yao; Mark Navarro; Rajat Bannerji; Martin J. Edelman

Dinaciclib is a potent, selective inhibitor of CDKs 1, 2, 5, and 9 with preclinical activity against NSCLC cell lines and tumor xenografts. NSCLC tumors have numerous defects in cell cycle regulation (abnormal p16/cyclin D/Rb pathway, cyclin E overexpression, loss of p27/KIP1). The rationale for this study is that abnormal cell cycle regulation may predispose NSCLC cells to the pro-apoptotic effects of dinaciclib. A randomized, multicenter, open-label phase 2 study was conducted to compare the efficacy of dinaciclib and erlotinib (150 mg PO QD) in patients (pts) with locally advanced previously treated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Dinaciclib 50 mg/m2 was administered by 2-hour i.v. infusion once every 21 days. Key inclusion criteria included ≤ 2 prior chemotherapy regimens and measurable disease. Patients were randomized to treatment with dinaciclib or erlotinib using an adaptive Bayesian design to adjust the randomization ratio in favor of the more active arm. Patients could cross-over to dinaciclib after progressing on erlotinib. This design provides a comparison of dinaciclib versus erlotinib and assesses dinaciclib activity in patients who9ve progressed on erlotinib. Primary endpoints: Time-to-progression (TTP) for pts receiving upfront treatment; and response rate (RR) for pts who crossed over to dinaciclib. Sixty-four pts received upfront treatment with either erlotinib (n=49) or dinaciclib (n=15). Seventeen patients crossed over from upfront erlotinib arm to dinaciclib. Median age was 65 (range 46-82) with a median of 1 (range 1-2) prior chemotherapy regimens and median ECOG performance status of 1 (0-2). The median number of treatment cycles was 2 (range 1-19), with 27/32 treated pts receiving > 1 cycle of treatment with dinaciclib. Tumor responses were assessed using RECIST. No dinaciclib responses were observed in either upfront or cross over arms. Two of forty-nine (4%) evaluable subjects receiving upfront erlotinib were reported to have partial responses (PR). Analysis of TTP will be presented at the meeting. Treatment-related grade 1 and 2 toxicities, occurring in >30% of pts included diarrhea (76%), neutropenia (66%), vomiting (59%), nausea (55%), fatigue (38%) and leukopenia (38%). The most common treatment-related grade 3 and 4 toxicities, occurring in 2 or more pts were neutropenia (60%), leukopenia (32%), vomiting (20%), diarrhea (16%), fatigue (12%), nausea (12%), electrolyte imbalance (8%) and hyperuricemia (8%). PK results are pending and will be included in the final abstract. Dinaciclib has acceptable safety and tolerability in patients with NSCLC but did not demonstrate anti-tumor activity. In accordance with pre-specified rules of the adaptive design, patient enrollment was stopped initially in the crossover stage and in the upfront stage of the trial. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2242. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-2242

Collaboration


Dive into the Rajat Bannerji's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John C. Byrd

Johns Hopkins University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Monica M. Mita

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge