Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Paul T. O'Brien is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Paul T. O'Brien.


Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2009

Methods and results of an automatic analysis of a complete sample of Swift-XRT observations of GRBs

P. A. Evans; A. P. Beardmore; Kim L. Page; J. P. Osborne; Paul T. O'Brien; R. Willingale; Rhaana L. C. Starling; D. N. Burrows; Olivier Godet; L. Vetere; Judith Lea Racusin; Mike R. Goad; K. Wiersema; L. Angelini; Milvia Capalbi; Guido Chincarini; Neil Gehrels; J. A. Kennea; Raffaella Margutti; D. C. Morris; C. J. Mountford; C. Pagani; Matteo Perri; Patrizia Romano; Nial R. Tanvir

We present a homogeneous X-ray analysis of all 318 gamma-ray bursts detected by the X-ray telescope (XRT) on the Swift satellite up to 2008 July 23; this represents the largest sample of X-ray GRB data published to date. In Sections 2-3, we detail the methods which the Swift-XRT team has developed to produce the enhanced positions, light curves, hardness ratios and spectra presented in this paper. Software using these methods continues to create such products for all new GRBs observed by the Swift-XRT. We also detail web-based tools allowing users to create these products for any object observed by the XRT, not just GRBs. In Sections 4-6, we present the results of our analysis of GRBs, including probability distribution functions of the temporal and spectral properties of the sample. We demonstrate evidence for a consistent underlying behaviour which can produce a range of light-curve morphologies, and attempt to interpret this behaviour in the framework of external forward shock emission. We find several difficulties, in particular that reconciliation of our data with the forward shock model requires energy injection to continue for days to weeks.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2005

Evidence for a canonical GRB afterglow light curve in the Swift/XRT data

Ja Nousek; Vanessa Mangano; Paul T. O'Brien; P. Giommi; Olivier Godet; S. D. Barthelmy; Mike R. Goad; Sergio Campana; G. Cusumano; J. P. Osborne; A. P. Beardmore; A. Falcone; Jonathan Granot; G. Tagliaferri; Milvia Capalbi; David N. Burrows; Patrizia Romano; C. P. Hurkett; J. A. Kennea; Guido Chincarini; Dirk Grupe; Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz; Sandy Patel; Kim L. Page; Alan A. Wells; Chryssa Kouveliotou; A. Moretti; N. Gehrels

We present new observations of the early X-ray afterglows of the first 27 gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) detected with the Swift X-ray Telescope (XRT). The early X-ray afterglows show a canonical behavior, where the light curve broadly consists of three distinct power law segments. These power law segments are separated by two corresponding break times. On top of this canonical behavior of the early X-ray light curve, many events have superimposed X-ray flares, which are most likely caused by internal shocks due to long lasting sporadx activity of the central engine, up to several hours after the GRB. We find that the initial steep decay is consistent with it being the tail of the prompt emission: from photons that are radiated at large angles relative to our line of sight. The first break in the light curve takes place when the forward shock emission becomes dominant, with the intermediate shallow flux decay likely caused by the continuous energy injection into the external shock. When this energy injection stops, a second break is then observed in the light curve. This energy injection increases the energy of the afterglow shock by at least a factor of f greater than or approx. equal to 4, and augments the already severe requirements for the efficiency of the prompt gamma-ray emission.


Nature | 2006

The association of GRB 060218 with a supernova and the evolution of the shock wave.

Sergio Campana; Vanessa Mangano; Alexander J. Blustin; Peter J. Brown; David N. Burrows; Guido Chincarini; J. R. Cummings; G. Cusumano; M. Della Valle; Daniele Malesani; P. Meszaros; John A. Nousek; M. J. Page; Takanori Sakamoto; Eli Waxman; Bing Zhang; Z. G. Dai; Neil Gehrels; Stefan Immler; F. E. Marshall; K. Mason; A. Moretti; Paul T. O'Brien; Julian P. Osborne; Kim L. Page; Patrizia Romano; Pwa Roming; Gianpiero Tagliaferri; L. R. Cominsky; P. Giommi

Although the link between long Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) and supernovae (SNe) has been established, hitherto there have been no observations of the beginning of a supernova explosion and its intimate link to a GRB. In particular, we do not know however how a GRB jet emerges from the star surface nor how a GRB progenitor explodes. Here we report on observations of the close GRB060218 and its connection to SN2006aj. In addition to the classical non-thermal emission, GRB060218 shows a thermal component in its X-ray spectrum, which cools and shifts into the optical/UV band as time passes. We interpret these features as arising from the break out of a shock driven by a mildly relativistic shell into the dense wind surrounding the progenitor. Our observations allow us for the first time to catch a SN in the act of exploding, to directly observe the shock break-out and to provide strong evidence that the GRB progenitor was a Wolf-Rayet star.Although the link between long γ-ray bursts (GRBs) and supernovae has been established, hitherto there have been no observations of the beginning of a supernova explosion and its intimate link to a GRB. In particular, we do not know how the jet that defines a γ-ray burst emerges from the stars surface, nor how a GRB progenitor explodes. Here we report observations of the relatively nearby GRB 060218 (ref. 5) and its connection to supernova SN 2006aj (ref. 6). In addition to the classical non-thermal emission, GRB 060218 shows a thermal component in its X-ray spectrum, which cools and shifts into the optical/ultraviolet band as time passes. We interpret these features as arising from the break-out of a shock wave driven by a mildly relativistic shell into the dense wind surrounding the progenitor. We have caught a supernova in the act of exploding, directly observing the shock break-out, which indicates that the GRB progenitor was a Wolf–Rayet star.


Nature | 2006

An optical supernova associated with the X-ray flash XRF 060218

E. Pian; Paolo A. Mazzali; N. Masetti; P. Ferrero; Sylvio Klose; Eliana Palazzi; Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz; S. E. Woosley; C. Kouveliotou; J. S. Deng; A. V. Filippenko; Ryan J. Foley; J. P. U. Fynbo; D. A. Kann; Weidong Li; J. Hjorth; K. Nomoto; Ferdinando Patat; Daniel Sauer; Jesper Sollerman; Paul M. Vreeswijk; E. W. Guenther; A. Levan; Paul T. O'Brien; Nial R. Tanvir; R. A. M. J. Wijers; Christophe Dumas; Olivier R. Hainaut; Diane S. Wong; Dietrich Baade

Long-duration γ-ray bursts (GRBs) are associated with type Ic supernovae that are more luminous than average and that eject material at very high velocities. Less-luminous supernovae were not hitherto known to be associated with GRBs, and therefore GRB–supernovae were thought to be rare events. Whether X-ray flashes—analogues of GRBs, but with lower luminosities and fewer γ-rays—can also be associated with supernovae, and whether they are intrinsically ‘weak’ events or typical GRBs viewed off the axis of the burst, is unclear. Here we report the optical discovery and follow-up observations of the type Ic supernova SN 2006aj associated with X-ray flash XRF 060218. Supernova 2006aj is intrinsically less luminous than the GRB–supernovae, but more luminous than many supernovae not accompanied by a GRB. The ejecta velocities derived from our spectra are intermediate between these two groups, which is consistent with the weakness of both the GRB output and the supernova radio flux. Our data, combined with radio and X-ray observations, suggest that XRF 060218 is an intrinsically weak and soft event, rather than a classical GRB observed off-axis. This extends the GRB–supernova connection to X-ray flashes and fainter supernovae, implying a common origin. Events such as XRF 060218 are probably more numerous than GRB–supernovae.


Science | 2005

Bright X-ray Flares in Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows

David N. Burrows; Patrizia Romano; A. Falcone; Shiho Kobayashi; Bing Zhang; A. Moretti; Paul T. O'Brien; Michael R. Goad; Sergio Campana; Kim L. Page; Lorella Angelini; S. D. Barthelmy; Andrew P. Beardmore; Milvia Capalbi; Guido Chincarini; J. R. Cummings; G. Cusumano; Derek B. Fox; Paolo Giommi; J. E. Hill; J. A. Kennea; Hans A. Krimm; Vanessa Mangano; Francis E. Marshall; P. Meszaros; David C. Morris; John A. Nousek; Julian P. Osborne; Claudio Pagani; Matteo Perri

Gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglows have provided important clues to the nature of these massive explosive events, providing direct information on the nearby environment and indirect information on the central engine that powers the burst. We report the discovery of two bright x-ray flares in GRB afterglows, including a giant flare comparable in total energy to the burst itself, each peaking minutes after the burst. These strong, rapid x-ray flares imply that the central engines of the bursts have long periods of activity, with strong internal shocks continuing for hundreds of seconds after the gamma-ray emission has ended.


Nature | 2005

A short γ-ray burst apparently associated with an elliptical galaxy at redshift z = 0.225

Neil Gehrels; Craig L. Sarazin; Paul T. O'Brien; Bing Zhang; Loius M. Barbier; S. D. Barthelmy; Alexander J. Blustin; David N. Burrows; J. Cannizzo; J. R. Cummings; Michael R. Goad; Stephen T. Holland; C. P. Hurkett; J. A. Kennea; Andrew J. Levan; Craig B. Markwardt; K. O. Mason; P. Meszaros; M. J. Page; David M. Palmer; E. Rol; Takanori Sakamoto; R. Willingale; Lorella Angelini; Andrew P. Beardmore; Patricia T. Boyd; Alice A. Breeveld; Sergio Campana; Margaret Chester; Guido Chincarini

Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) come in two classes: long (> 2 s), soft-spectrum bursts and short, hard events. Most progress has been made on understanding the long GRBs, which are typically observed at high redshift (z ≈ 1) and found in subluminous star-forming host galaxies. They are likely to be produced in core-collapse explosions of massive stars. In contrast, no short GRB had been accurately (< 10″) and rapidly (minutes) located. Here we report the detection of the X-ray afterglow from—and the localization of—the short burst GRB 050509B. Its position on the sky is near a luminous, non-star-forming elliptical galaxy at a redshift of 0.225, which is the location one would expect if the origin of this GRB is through the merger of neutron-star or black-hole binaries. The X-ray afterglow was weak and faded below the detection limit within a few hours; no optical afterglow was detected to stringent limits, explaining the past difficulty in localizing short GRBs.


Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2003

A high-velocity ionized outflow and XUV photosphere in the narrow emission line quasar PG1211+143

K. A. Pounds; J. N. Reeves; A. R. King; Kim L. Page; Paul T. O'Brien; Martin J. L. Turner

The definitive version is available from www.blackwell-synergy.com. Erratum published in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2005, 356, p.1599


Nature | 2005

An origin for short gamma-ray bursts unassociated with current star formation.

S D Barthelmy; G Chincarini; D N Burrows; N Gehrels; S. Covino; A. Moretti; P Romano; Paul T. O'Brien; C L Sarazin; C Kouveliotou; Mike R. Goad; S Vaughan; G Tagliaferri; Bing Zhang; L. A. Antonelli; Sergio Campana; J R Cummings; P D'Avanzo; Melvyn B. Davies; P. Giommi; D Grupe; Y Kaneko; J A Kennea; A King; Shiho Kobayashi; A Melandri; P. Meszaros; J A Nousek; S Patel; T Sakamoto

Two short (< 2 s) γ-ray bursts (GRBs) have recently been localized and fading afterglow counterparts detected. The combination of these two results left unclear the nature of the host galaxies of the bursts, because one was a star-forming dwarf, while the other was probably an elliptical galaxy. Here we report the X-ray localization of a short burst (GRB 050724) with unusual γ-ray and X-ray properties. The X-ray afterglow lies off the centre of an elliptical galaxy at a redshift of z = 0.258 (ref. 5), coincident with the position determined by ground-based optical and radio observations. The low level of star formation typical for elliptical galaxies makes it unlikely that the burst originated in a supernova explosion. A supernova origin was also ruled out for GRB 050709 (refs 3, 31), even though that burst took place in a galaxy with current star formation. The isotropic energy for the short bursts is 2–3 orders of magnitude lower than that for the long bursts. Our results therefore suggest that an alternative source of bursts—the coalescence of binary systems of neutron stars or a neutron star-black hole pair—are the progenitors of short bursts.


Nature | 2005

An unexpectedly rapid decline in the X-ray afterglow emission of long gamma-ray bursts.

Gianpiero Tagliaferri; Mike R. Goad; Guido Chincarini; A. Moretti; Sergio Campana; David N. Burrows; Matteo Perri; S. D. Barthelmy; N. Gehrels; Hans A. Krimm; Takanori Sakamoto; Pawan Kumar; P. Meszaros; Shiho Kobayashi; Bing Zhang; L. Angelini; P. L. Banat; A. P. Beardmore; Milvia Capalbi; S. Covino; G. Cusumano; P. Giommi; Olivier Godet; J. E. Hill; J. A. Kennea; Vanessa Mangano; David C. Morris; John A. Nousek; Paul T. O'Brien; Julian P. Osborne

‘Long’ γ-ray bursts (GRBs) are commonly accepted to originate in the explosion of particularly massive stars, which give rise to highly relativistic jets. Inhomogeneities in the expanding flow result in internal shock waves that are believed to produce the γ-rays we see. As the jet travels further outward into the surrounding circumstellar medium, ‘external’ shocks create the afterglow emission seen in the X-ray, optical and radio bands. Here we report observations of the early phases of the X-ray emission of five GRBs. Their X-ray light curves are characterised by a surprisingly rapid fall-off for the first few hundred seconds, followed by a less rapid decline lasting several hours. This steep decline, together with detailed spectral properties of two particular bursts, shows that violent shock interactions take place in the early jet outflows.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2011

A PHOTOMETRIC REDSHIFT OF z ∼ 9.4 FOR GRB 090429B

A. Cucchiara; Andrew J. Levan; Derek B. Fox; Nial R. Tanvir; Tilan N. Ukwatta; Edo Berger; T. Krühler; A. Küpcü Yoldas; Xue-Feng Wu; Kenji Toma; J. Greiner; F. E. Olivares; A. Rowlinson; L. Amati; Takanori Sakamoto; Kathy Roth; A. W. Stephens; A. Fritz; J. P. U. Fynbo; J. Hjorth; Daniele Malesani; P. Jakobsson; K. Wiersema; Paul T. O'Brien; Alicia M. Soderberg; Ryan J. Foley; Andrew S. Fruchter; James E. Rhoads; Robert E. Rutledge; Brian Paul Schmidt

Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) serve as powerful probes of the early universe, with their luminous afterglows revealing the locations and physical properties of star-forming galaxies at the highest redshifts, and potentially locating first-generation (Population III) stars. Since GRB afterglows have intrinsically very simple spectra, they allow robust redshifts from low signal-to-noise spectroscopy, or photometry. Here we present a photometric redshift of z ~ 9.4 for the Swift detected GRB 090429B based on deep observations with Gemini-North, the Very Large Telescope, and the GRB Optical and Near-infrared Detector. Assuming a Small Magellanic Cloud dust law (which has been found in a majority of GRB sight lines), the 90% likelihood range for the redshift is 9.06 7. The non-detection of the host galaxy to deep limits (Y(AB) ~ 28, which would correspond roughly to 0.001L* at z = 1) in our late-time optical and infrared observations with the Hubble Space Telescope strongly supports the extreme-redshift origin of GRB 090429B, since we would expect to have detected any low-z galaxy, even if it were highly dusty. Finally, the energetics of GRB 090429B are comparable to those of other GRBs and suggest that its progenitor is not greatly different from those of lower redshift bursts.

Collaboration


Dive into the Paul T. O'Brien's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kim L. Page

University of Leicester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

N. Gehrels

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. D. Barthelmy

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. A. Kennea

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. M. Palmer

Universities Space Research Association

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. T. Holland

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

P. A. Evans

University of Leicester

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge