Paul W. Mueller

A comparison of permanent prostate brachytherapy techniques: preplan vs. hybrid interactive planning with postimplant analysis

PURPOSE To compare preparation time, procedure time in the operating room, equipment needs, and Day 0 postimplant dosimetry between two different Mick implant techniques performed at a single institution. METHODS AND MATERIALS One hundred consecutive monotherapy patients treated from 1999 to 2000 with 125I transperineal permanent implantation of the prostate using an afterloading Mick applicator were evaluated. The first 40 patients were treated with a preplanned modified peripheral loading Mick technique. The next 60 were treated with a hybrid interactive image-guided Mick technique. The analysis included planning the following: ultrasound volume, time required of preplanning, Day 0 CT volume, number of seeds, number of needles, activity per seed, total activity of the implant, and procedure time. Dosimetric parameters included D(90), V(100), and V(150). RESULTS Mean planning ultrasound volume (33 vs. 37 cc), Day 0 CT volume (49 vs. 47 cc), mCi/seed (0.30 vs. 0.34 mCi/seed), number of seeds (121 vs. 96), total activity of the implant (36 vs. 32 mCi), D(90) (132 vs. 149 Gy), V(100) (86% vs. 91%), and V(150) (51% vs. 38%) were comparable. Significant differences (p < 0.01) were noted in mean preplan time (30 vs. 7 min), number of needles (32 vs. 19), and procedure time (90 vs. 40 min). CONCLUSIONS Hybrid interactive Mick prostate brachytherapy consistently reduces preplanning time, procedure time, and number of needles used, reducing patient treatment time and costs while maintaining excellent dosimetric coverage. Use of hybrid interactive Mick prostate brachytherapy results in improved therapeutic ratios, i.e., maintains Day 0 D(90) >140 Gy, V(100) >90%, and V(150) <40%, without the need for sophisticated three-dimensional intraoperative planning technology.

Image guided I125 prostate brachytherapy with Hybrid Interactive Mick technique in the community setting: How does it compare?

The aim of this study is to evaluate the target coverage, procedural techniques, and merits of Hybrid Interactive Mick (HIM) I125 transperineal permanent implantation (TPPI) of the prostate performed with 10 urologists in a community hospital. Detailed day 0 post-implant dosimetric evaluations of TPPI procedures were performed on 333 consecutive monotherapy patients treated between September 2000 and November 2003 at a single institution. All patients underwent TPPI with HIM. Pelvic and CXR films were obtained for a manual seed count at day 0 and again > day 90 on 175 patients. The HIM-prostate brachytherapy performed in a community hospital provided median D 90, V100, and V150 values of 157Gy, 94%, and 42.3%, respectively. 18% of patients had seed migration to the lungs while 2% had seed migration to the bladder. Only 7 patients (4%) had 2 or more seeds migrate to the lungs. Procedure times average 38 minutes and number of needles used averaged 18. The post-implant urinary retention rate was 2.1% Use of HIM-prostate brachytherapy in the community setting with multiple urologists reproducibly maintained excellent and consistent dosimetric coverage. Procedure times and number of needles used were minimized, and with careful attention to image-guided technique, seed migration to bladder and lung was also minimized.