Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Pavel V. Zelenin is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Pavel V. Zelenin.


Brain Research Reviews | 2008

Spinal and supraspinal postural networks

T. G. Deliagina; Irina N. Beloozerova; Pavel V. Zelenin; G. N. Orlovsky

Different species maintain a particular body orientation in space (upright in humans, dorsal-side-up in quadrupeds, fish and lamprey) due to the activity of a closed-loop postural control system. We will discuss operation of spinal and supraspinal postural networks studied in a lower vertebrate (lamprey) and in two mammals (rabbit and cat). In the lamprey, the postural control system is driven by vestibular input. The key role in the postural network belongs to the reticulospinal (RS) neurons. Due to vestibular input, deviation from the stabilized body orientation in any (roll, pitch, yaw) plane leads to generation of RS commands, which are sent to the spinal cord and cause postural correction. For each of the planes, there are two groups of RS neurons responding to rotation in the opposite directions; they cause a turn opposite to the initial one. The command transmitted by an individual RS neuron causes the motor response, which contributes to the correction of posture. In each plane, the postural system stabilizes the orientation at which the antagonistic vestibular reflexes compensate for each other. Thus, in lamprey the supraspinal networks play a crucial role in stabilization of body orientation, and the function of the spinal networks is transformation of supraspinal commands into the motor pattern of postural corrections. In terrestrial quadrupeds, the postural system stabilizing the trunk orientation in the transversal plane was analyzed. It consists of two relatively independent sub-systems stabilizing orientation of the anterior and posterior parts of the trunk. They are driven by somatosensory input from limb mechanoreceptors. Each sub-system consists of two closed-loop mechanisms - spinal and spino-supraspinal. Operation of the supraspinal networks was studied by recording the posture-related activity of corticospinal neurons. The postural capacity of spinal networks was evaluated in animals with lesions to the spinal cord. Relative contribution of spinal and supraspinal mechanisms to the stabilization of trunk orientation is discussed.


Brain Research Reviews | 2002

Encoding and decoding of reticulospinal commands.

T. G. Deliagina; Pavel V. Zelenin; G. N. Orlovsky

In the lamprey, the reticulospinal (RS) system is the main descending system transmitting commands to the spinal cord. We investigated these commands and their effect on the spinal mechanisms. The RS commands were studied by recording responses of RS neurons to sensory stimuli eliciting different motor behaviors. Initiation of locomotion was associated with symmetrical bilateral massive activation of RS neurons, whereas turns in different planes were associated with asymmetrical activation of corresponding neuronal groups. The sub-populations of RS neurons causing different motor behaviors partly overlap. We suggest that commands for initiation of locomotion and regulation of its vigour, encoded as the value of bilateral RS activity, are decoded in the spinal cord by integrating all RS signals arriving at the segmental locomotor networks. Commands for turns in different planes, encoded as an asymmetry in the activities of specific groups of RS neurons, are decoded by comparing the activities of those groups. This hypothesis was supported by the experiments on a neuro-mechanical model, where the difference between the activities in the left and right RS pathways was used to control a motor rotating the animal in the roll plane. Transformation of the descending commands into the motor responses was investigated by recording the effects of individual RS neurons on the motor output. Twenty patterns of influences have been found. This great diversity of the patterns allows the RS system to evoke body flexion in any plane. Since most neurons have asymmetrical projections we suggest that, for rectilinear swimming, RS neurons with opposite asymmetrical effects are co-activated.


Behavioural Brain Research | 2008

Postural performance in decerebrated rabbit

Pavel Musienko; Pavel V. Zelenin; Vladimir F. Lyalka; G. N. Orlovsky; T. G. Deliagina

It is known that animals decerebrated at the premammillary level are capable of standing and walking without losing balance, in contrast to postmammillary ones which do not exhibit such behavior. The main goals of the present study were, first, to characterize the postural performance in premammillary rabbits, and, second, to activate the postural system in postmammillary ones by brainstem stimulation. For evaluation of postural capacity of decerebrated rabbits, motor and EMG responses to lateral tilts of the supporting platform and to lateral pushes were recorded before and after decerebration. In addition, the righting behavior (i.e., standing up from the lying position) was video recorded. We found that, in premammillary rabbits, responses to lateral tilts and pushes were similar to those observed in intact ones, but the magnitude of responses was reduced. During righting, premammillary rabbits assumed the normal position slower than intact ones. To activate the postural system in postmammillary rabbits, we stimulated electrically two brainstem structures, the mesencephalic locomotor region (MLR) and the ventral tegmental field (VTF). The MLR stimulation (prior to elicitation of locomotion) and the VTF stimulation caused an increase of the tone of hindlimb extensors, and enhanced their responses to lateral tilts and to pushes. These results indicate that the basic mechanisms for maintenance of body posture and equilibrium during standing are present in decerebrated animals. They are active in the premammillary rabbits but need to be activated in the postmammillary ones.


European Journal of Neuroscience | 2005

Activity of individual reticulospinal neurons during different forms of locomotion in the lamprey

Pavel V. Zelenin

Lamprey (a lower vertebrate) can employ different modes of locomotion, i.e. swimming in open water and crawling in tight places. Swimming is due to the periodic waves of lateral undulations with reciprocal activity of right and left muscles. In contrast, crawling (forward and backward) is based on single waves with coactivation of muscles on two sides. Basic mechanisms of swimming and, most likely, crawling reside in the spinal cord, and are activated by supraspinal commands. The main source of these commands is the reticulospinal (RS) system. The goal of the present experiments was to characterize the activity of individual RS neurons during swimming and during crawling in a U‐shaped tunnel. The activity was recorded by means of chronically implanted electrodes in freely behaving animals. All recorded RS neurons were active during swimming but silent in quiescent animals. Many of them (61%) showed phasic modulation of their firing rate approximately in phase with the activity of ipsilateral rostral muscles. The majority of the neurons (80%) were also active during crawling. Many of them either increased or decreased their activity during crawling as compared to the background activity. These changes were better correlated with the direction of progression (forward or backward) than with the direction of turning in the tunnel (right or left). No correlation of the activity of RS neurons during locomotion and their sensory inputs was found. The results of this study suggest that different modes of locomotion in lampreys can be caused by considerably overlapping groups of RS neurons.


The Journal of Neuroscience | 2012

Spinal and Supraspinal Control of the Direction of Stepping during Locomotion

Pavel Musienko; Pavel V. Zelenin; Vladimir F. Lyalka; Yury Gerasimenko; Grigory N. Orlovsky; Tatiana G. Deliagina

Most bipeds and quadrupeds, in addition to forward walking, are also capable of backward and sideward walking. The direction of walking is determined by the direction of stepping movements of individual limbs in relation to the front-to-rear body axis. Our goal was to assess the functional organization of the system controlling the direction of stepping. Experiments were performed on decerebrate cats walking on the treadmill with their hindlimbs, whereas the head and trunk were rigidly fixed. Different directions of the treadmill motion relative to the body axis were used (0, ±45, ±90, and 180°). For each direction, we compared locomotion evoked from the brainstem (by stimulation of the mesencephalic locomotor region, MLR) with locomotion evoked by epidural stimulation of the spinal cord (SC). It was found that SC stimulation evoked well coordinated stepping movements at different treadmill directions. The direction of steps was opposite to the treadmill motion, suggesting that this direction was determined by sensory input from the limb during stance. Thus, SC stimulation activates limb controllers, which are able to generate stepping movements in different directions. By contrast, MLR stimulation evoked well coordinated stepping movements only if the treadmill was moving in the front-to-rear direction. One can conclude that supraspinal commands (caused by MLR stimulation) select one of the numerous forms of operation of the spinal limb controllers, namely, the forward walking. The MLR can thus be considered as a command center for forward locomotion, which is the main form of progression in bipeds and quadrupeds.


Journal of Neurophysiology | 2010

Facilitation of postural limb reflexes with epidural stimulation in spinal rabbits.

Pavel Musienko; Pavel V. Zelenin; G. N. Orlovsky; T. G. Deliagina

It is known that after spinalization animals lose their ability to maintain lateral stability when standing or walking. A likely reason for this is a reduction of the postural limb reflexes (PLRs) driven by stretch and load receptors of the limbs. The aim of this study was to clarify whether spinal networks contribute to the generation of PLRs. For this purpose, first, PLRs were recorded in decerebrated rabbits before and after spinalization at T12. Second, the effects of epidural electrical stimulation (EES) at L7 on the limb reflexes were studied after spinalization. To evoke PLRs, the vertebrate column of the rabbit was fixed, whereas the hindlimbs were positioned on the platform. Periodic lateral tilts of the platform caused antiphase flexion-extension limbs movements, similar to those observed in intact animals keeping balance on the tilting platform. Before spinalization, these movements evoked PLRs: augmentation of extensor EMGs and increase of contact force during limb flexion, suggesting their stabilizing postural effects. Spinalization resulted in almost complete disappearance of PLRs. After EES, however, the PLRs reappeared and persisted for up to several minutes, although their values were reduced. The post-EES effects could be magnified by intrathecal application of quipazine (5-HT agonist) at L4-L6. Results of this study suggest that the spinal cord contains the neuronal networks underlying PLRs; they can contribute to the maintenance of lateral stability in intact subjects. In acute spinal animals, these networks can be activated by EES, suggesting that they are normally activated by a tonic supraspinal drive.


The Journal of Neuroscience | 2010

Activity of Red Nucleus Neurons in the Cat during Postural Corrections

Pavel V. Zelenin; Irina N. Beloozerova; Mikhail G. Sirota; G. N. Orlovsky; T. G. Deliagina

The dorsal-side-up body posture in standing quadrupeds is maintained by the postural system, which includes spinal and supraspinal mechanisms driven by somatosensory inputs from the limbs. A number of descending tracts can transmit supraspinal commands for postural corrections. The first aim of this study was to understand whether the rubrospinal tract participates in their transmission. We recorded activity of red nucleus neurons (RNNs) in the cat maintaining balance on the periodically tilting platform. Most neurons were identified as rubrospinal ones. It was found that many RNNs were profoundly modulated by tilts, suggesting that they transmit postural commands. The second aim of this study was to examine the contribution of sensory inputs from individual limbs to posture-related RNN modulation. Each RNN was recorded during standing on all four limbs, as well as when two or three limbs were lifted from the platform and could not signal platform displacements. By comparing RNN responses in different tests, we found that the amplitude and phase of responses in the majority of RNNs were determined primarily by sensory input from the corresponding (fore or hind) contralateral limb, whereas inputs from other limbs made a much smaller contribution to RNN modulation. These findings suggest that the rubrospinal system is primarily involved in the intralimb postural coordination, i.e., in the feedback control of the corresponding limb and, to a lesser extent, in the interlimb coordination. This study provides a new insight into the formation of supraspinal motor commands for postural corrections.


The Journal of Physiology | 2009

Activity of pyramidal tract neurons in the cat during standing and walking on an inclined plane

A. Karayannidou; Irina N. Beloozerova; Pavel V. Zelenin; E. E. Stout; Mikhail G. Sirota; G. N. Orlovsky; T. G. Deliagina

To keep balance when standing or walking on a surface inclined in the roll plane, the cat modifies its body configuration so that the functional length of its right and left limbs becomes different. The aim of the present study was to assess the motor cortex participation in the generation of this left/right asymmetry. We recorded the activity of fore‐ and hindlimb‐related pyramidal tract neurons (PTNs) during standing and walking on a treadmill. A difference in PTN activity at two tilted positions of the treadmill (± 15 deg) was considered a positional response to surface inclination. During standing, 47% of PTNs exhibited a positional response, increasing their activity with either the contra‐tilt (20%) or the ipsi‐tilt (27%). During walking, PTNs were modulated in the rhythm of stepping, and tilts of the supporting surface evoked positional responses in the form of changes to the magnitude of modulation in 58% of PTNs. The contra‐tilt increased activity in 28% of PTNs, and ipsi‐tilt increased activity in 30% of PTNs. We suggest that PTNs with positional responses contribute to the modifications of limb configuration that are necessary for adaptation to the inclined surface. By comparing the responses to tilts in individual PTNs during standing and walking, four groups of PTNs were revealed: responding in both tasks (30%); responding only during standing (16%); responding only during walking (30%); responding in none of the tasks (24%). This diversity suggests that common and separate cortical mechanisms are used for postural adaptation to tilts during standing and walking.


Journal of Neurophysiology | 2009

Maintenance of Lateral Stability During Standing and Walking in the Cat

A. Karayannidou; Pavel V. Zelenin; G. N. Orlovsky; Mikhail G. Sirota; Irina N. Beloozerova; T. G. Deliagina

During free behaviors animals often experience lateral forces, such as collisions with obstacles or interactions with other animals. We studied postural reactions to lateral pulses of force (pushes) in the cat during standing and walking. During standing, a push applied to the hip region caused a lateral deviation of the caudal trunk, followed by a return to the initial position. The corrective hindlimb electromyographic (EMG) pattern included an initial wave of excitation in most extensors of the hindlimb contralateral to push and inhibition of those in the ipsilateral limb. In cats walking on a treadmill with only hindlimbs, application of force also caused lateral deviation of the caudal trunk, with subsequent return to the initial position. The type of corrective movement depended on the pulse timing relative to the step cycle. If the force was applied at the end of the stance phase of one of the limbs or during its swing phase, a lateral component appeared in the swing trajectory of this limb. The corrective step was directed either inward (when the corrective limb was ipsilateral to force application) or outward (when it was contralateral). The EMG pattern in the corrective limb was characterized by considerable modification of the hip abductor and adductor activity in the perturbed step. Thus the basic mechanisms for balance control in these two forms of behavior are different. They perform a redistribution of muscle activity between symmetrical limbs (in standing) and a reconfiguration of the base of support during a corrective lateral step (in walking).


The Journal of Neuroscience | 2007

Sensory-Motor Transformation by Individual Command Neurons

Pavel V. Zelenin; G. N. Orlovsky; T. G. Deliagina

Animals and humans maintain a definite body orientation in space during locomotion. Here we analyze the system for the control of body orientation in the lamprey (a lower vertebrate). In the swimming lamprey, commands for changing the body orientation are based on vestibular information; they are transmitted to the spinal cord by reticulospinal (RS) neurons. The aim of this study was to characterize the sensory-motor transformation performed by individual RS neurons. The brainstem–spinal cord preparation with vestibular organs was used. For each RS neuron, we recorded (1) its vestibular responses to turns in different planes and (2) responses in different motoneuron pools of the spinal cord to stimulation of the same RS neuron; the latter data allowed us to estimate the direction of torque (caused by the RS neuron) that will rotate the animals body during swimming. For each of the three main planes (roll, pitch, and yaw), two groups of RS neurons were found; they were activated by rotation in opposite directions and caused the torques counteracting the rotation that activated the neuron. In each plane, the system will stabilize the orientation at which the two groups are equally active; any deviation from this orientation will evoke a corrective motor response. Thus, individual RS neurons transform sensory information about the body orientation into the motor commands that cause corrections of orientation. The closed-loop mechanisms formed by individual neurons of a group operate in parallel to generate the resulting motor responses.

Collaboration


Dive into the Pavel V. Zelenin's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Irina N. Beloozerova

St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Li-Ju Hsu

Karolinska Institutet

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mikhail G. Sirota

St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. Karayannidou

Barrow Neurological Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pavel Musienko

Saint Petersburg State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge