Pedro Moraes Dutra Agrícola

Slow Down and Enjoy: The Effects of Cycling Cadence on Pleasure.

Pleasure plays a key role in exercise behavior. However, the influence of cycling cadence needs to be elucidated. Here, we verified the effects of cycling cadence on affect, perceived exertion (ratings of perceived exertion), and physiological responses. In three sessions, 15 men performed a maximal cycling incremental test followed by two 30-min constant workload (50% of peak power) bouts at 60 and 100 r/min. The pleasure was higher when participants cycled at 60 r/min, whereas ratings of perceived exertion, heart rate, and oxygen uptake were lower (p < .05). Additionally, the rate of decrease in pleasure and increase in ratings of perceived exertion was less steep at 60 r/min (p < .01). Cycling at 60 r/min is more pleasant, and the perceived effort and physiological demand are lower than at 100 r/min.

Self-selected intensity, ratings of perceived exertion, and affective responses in sedentary male subjects during resistance training.

[Purpose] This study examined the exercise intensity and psychophysiological responses to a self-selected resistance training session in sedentary male subjects. [Subjects and Methods] Twelve sedentary male subjects (35.8 ± 5.8 years; 25.5 ± 2.6 kg·m2) underwent four sessions at 48-h intervals: familiarization; two sessions of one repetition maximum test and a resistance training session in which they were told to self-select a load to complete 3 sets of 10 repetitions of chest press, leg press, seated rows, knee extension, overhead press, biceps curl, and triceps pushdown exercises. During the latter, the percentage of one repetition maximum, affective responses (feeling scale), and rating of perceived exertion (OMNI-RES scale) were measured. [Results] The percentage of one repetition maximum for all exercises was >51% (14–31% variability), the rating of perceived exertion was 5–6 (7–11% variability), and the affective responses was 0–1 point with large variability. [Conclusion] Sedentary male subjects self-selected approximately 55% of one maximum repetition, which was above the intensity suggested to increase strength in sedentary individuals, but below the recommended intensity to improve strength in novice to intermediate exercisers. The rating of perceived exertion was indicative of moderate intensity and slightly positive affective responses.

What is the impact of the European Consensus on the diagnosis and prevalence of sarcopenia among institutionalized elderly persons

1 Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Departamento de Artes. Rio Grande do Norte, RN, Brasil. 2 Faculdade Maurício de Nassau, Departamento de Educação Física. Rio Grande do Norte, RN, Brasil. 3 Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Departamento de Saúde Coletiva. Rio Grande do Norte, RN, Brasil. 4 Universidade Potiguar Laureate International Universities, Departamento de Nutrição. Rio Grande do Norte, RN, Brasil.

EFEITO DO ESFORÇO FÍSICO NO DESEMPENHO DE TIRO DE POLICIAIS MILITARES DO BATALHÃO DE CHOQUE

ABSTRACT Introduction: The use of firearms by military police officers is usually preceded by pursuit on foot, and the physiolog -ical changes produced by physical exertion may affect shooting performance. Objective: To verify the effect of physical effort on shooting performance in military police officers. Methods: The sample consisted of 15 men (34.1 ± 5.4 years; 81.4 ± 8.8 kg; 171.3 ± 5.6 cm; 27.7 ± 2.3 kg/m²; 44.9 ± 4.0 ml.kg -1 .min -1 ) of the riot police. In the first session, the subjects performed a maximal treadmill stress test in which the peak oxygen consumption (VO 2peak ) was measured. In the second session, shooting performance (score) and shooting time were measured pre and post-exercise, as well as the time spent to complete a circuit of obstacle running (297 m). Shooting efficiency index was calculated as the ratio between total score and shooting time. The Shapiro-Wilk test confirmed the normal distribution of the data. A paired t-test was used to compare the post-exertion outcomes variables as well as the Pearson correlation coefficient. Results: The time to complete the running circuit was 75.3 ± 4.4 s. Shooting performance (20.4 ± 11.4 vs. 17.6 ± 9.3 points), time (4.48 ± 1.1 vs. 4.23 ± 0.9 s), and efficiency (4.69 ± 2.7 vs. 4.35 ± 2.7 pts/s) did not present significant differences (P>0.2). Additionally, a correlation was detected between VO