Peggy J. Pazzaglia

The emerging role of cytochrome P450 3A in psychopharmacology

Recent advances in molecular pharmacology have allowed the characterization of the specific isoforms that mediate the metabolism of various medications. This information can be integrated with older clinical observations to begin to develop specific mechanistic and predictive models of psychotropic drug interactions. The polymorphic cytochrome P450 2D6 has gained much attention, because competition for this isoform is responsible for serotonin reuptake inhibitor-induced increases in tricyclic antidepressant concentrations in plasma. However, the cytochrome P450 3A subfamily and the 3A3 and 3A4 isoforms (CYP3A3/4) in particular are becoming increasingly important in psychopharmacology as a result of their central involvement in the metabolism of a wide range of steroids and medications, including antidepressants, benzodiazepines, calcium channel blockers, and carbamazepine. The inhibition of CYP3A3/4 by medications such as certain newer antidepressants, calcium channel blockers, and antibiotics can increase the concentrations of CYP3A3/4 substrates, yielding toxicity. The induction of CYP3A3/4 by medications such as carbamazepine can decrease the concentrations of CYP3A3/4 substrates, yielding inefficiency. Thus, knowledge of the substrates, inhibitors, and inducers of CYP3A3/ and other cytochrome P450 isoforms may help clinicians to anticipate and avoid pharmacokinetic drug interactions and improve rational prescribing practices.

The place of anticonvulsant therapy in bipolar illness

Abstract With the increasing recognition of lithium’s inadequacy as an acute and prophylactic treatment for many patients and subtypes of bipolar illness, the search for alternative agents has centered around the mood stabilizing anticonvulsants carbamazepine and valproate. In many instances, these drugs are effective alone or in combination with lithium in those patients less responsive to lithium monotherapy, including those with greater numbers of prior episodes, rapid-cycling, dysphoric mania, co-morbid substance abuse or other associated medical problems, and patients without a family history of bipolar illness in first-degree relatives. Nineteen double-blind studies utilizing a variety of designs suggest that carbamazepine, or its keto-congener oxcarbazepine, is effective in acute mania; six controlled studies report evidence of the efficacy of valproate in the treatment of acute mania as well. Fourteen controlled or partially controlled studies of prophylaxis suggest carbamazepine is also effective in preventing both manic and depressive episodes. Valproate prophylaxis data, although based entirely on uncontrolled studies, appear equally promising. Thus, both drugs are widely used and are now recognized as major therapeutic tools for lithium-nonresponsive bipolar illness. The high-potency anticonvulsant benzodiazepines, clonazepam and lorazepam, are used adjunctively with lithium or the anticonvulsant mood stabilizers as substitutes or alternatives for neuroleptics in the treatment of manic breakthroughs. Preliminary controlled clinical trials suggest that the calcium channel blockers may have antimanic or mood-stabilizing effects in a subgroup of patients. A new series of anticonvulsants has just been FDA-approved and warrant clinical trials to determine their efficacy in acute and long-term treatment of mania and depression. Systematic exploration of the optimal use of lithium and the mood-stabilizing anticonvulsants alone and in combination, as well as with adjunctive antidepressants, is now required so that more definitive treatment recommendations for different types and stages of bipolar illness can be more strongly evidence based.

Discriminative-stimulus and participant-rated effects of methylphenidate, bupropion, and triazolam in d-amphetamine-trained humans.

The discriminative-stimulus and participate-rated effects of a range of doses of d-amphetamine (2.5-20 mg), methylphenidate (5-40 mg), bupropion (50-400 mg), and triazolam (0.0625-0.5 mg) were tested in 5 humans trained to discriminate between oral d-amphetamine (20 mg) and placebo. d-Amphetamine and methylphenidate generally dose dependently increased drug-appropriate responding. Bupropion and triazolam on average occasioned less than or equal to 40% drug-appropriate responding. d-Amphetamine, methylphenidate, and bupropion produced stimulant-like participant-rated effects, while triazolam produced sedative-like effects. These results further demonstrate that the acute behavioral effects of d-amphetamine and methylphenidate overlap extensively in humans, which is concordant with preclinical studies. Bupropion produced some d-amphetamine-like, participant-rated drug effects but did not occasion significant levels of d-amphetamine-appropriate responding. These findings are concordant with previous findings of a dissociation between the discriminative-stimulus and participant-rated effects of drugs.

Nimodipine monotherapy and carbamazepine augmentation in patients with refractory recurrent affective illness

Of 30 patients with treatment-refractory affective illness, 10 showed a moderate to marked response to blind nimodipine monotherapy compared with placebo on the Clinical Global Impressions Scale. Fourteen inadequately responsive patients (3 unipolar [UP], 11 bipolar [BP]) were treated with the blind addition of carbamazepine. Carbamazepine augmentation of nimodipine converted four (29%) of the partial responders to more robust responders. Patients who showed an excellent response to the nimodipine-carbamazepine combination included individual patients with patterns of rapid cycling, ultradian cycling, UP recurrent brief depression, and one with BP type II depression. When verapamil was blindly substituted for nimodipine, two BP patients failed to maintain improvement but responded again to nimodipine and remained well with a blind transition to another dihydropyridine L-type calcium channel blocker (CCB), isradipine. Mechanistic implications of the response to the dihydropyridine L-type CCB nimodipine alone and in combination with carbamazepine are discussed.

Carbamazepine but not valproate induces bupropion metabolism.

Bupropion (BUP) may be less likely than other antidepressants to cause switches into mania and rapid cycling, suggesting utility in bipolar disorder. The combination of BUP with the mood-stabilizing anticonvulsants carbamazepine (CBZ) or valproate (VPA) is a strategy that might further lessen the risk of mania. CBZ induces, and to a lesser extent VPA inhibits the hepatic metabolism of various medications, but their effects on BUP have not been previously studied. Inpatients with mood disorders had pharmacokinetic profiles of BUP and metabolites assessed after single, oral, 150-mg doses of BUP while receiving placebo (N = 17) or during chronic blind CBZ (N = 12) or VPA (N = 5) monotherapy. CBZ but not VPA therapy decreased BUP peak concentrations (Cmax) by 87% (p < 0.0001) and 24-h area under the curve (AUC) by 90% (p < 0.0001), threohydrobupropion Cmax by 81% (p <0.0009) and AUC by 86% (p < 0.002), and erythropydrobupropion Cmax by 86% (p < 0.05) and AUC by 96% (p < 0.05). CBZ increased hydroxybupropion (H-BUP) Cmax by 71% (p < 0.007) and AUC by 50% (p < 0.09) and H-BUP AUC by 94% (p < 0.02). Thus, CBZ markedly decreased BUP and increased H-BUP concentrations, whereas VPA did not affect BUP but increased H-BUP concentrations. Further studies are required to determine how these differential effects of CBZ and VPA on BUP pharmacokinetics influence the tolerability and efficacy of combination therapies with these agents.

Increased Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule in the CSF of Patients with Mood Disorder

Abstract: Neural cell adhesion molecule (N‐CAM) is involved in cell‐cell interactions during synaptogenesis, morphogenesis, and plasticity of the nervous system. Disturbances in synaptic restructuring and neural plasticity may be related to the pathogenesis of several neuropsychiatric diseases, including mood disorders and schizophrenia. Disturbances in brain cellular function may alter concentrations of N‐CAM in the CSF. Soluble human N‐CAM proteins are detectable in the CSF but are minor constituents of serum. We have recently found an increase in N‐CAM content in the CSF of patients with schizophrenia. Although the pathogenesis of both schizophrenia and mood disorders is unknown, ventriculomegaly, decreased temporal lobe volume, and subcortical structural abnormalities have been reported for both disorders. We have therefore measured N‐CAM concentrations in the CSF of patients with mood disorder. There were significant increases in amounts of N‐CAM immunoreactive proteins, primarily the 120‐kDa band, in the CSF of psychiatric inpatients with bipolar mood disorder type I and recurrent unipolar major depression. There were no differences in bipolar mood disorder type II patients as compared with normals. There were no significant effects of medication treatment on N‐CAM concentrations. It is possible that the 120‐kDa N‐CAM band present in the CSF is derived from CNS cells as a secreted soluble N‐CAM isoform. Our results suggest the possibility of latent state‐related disturbances in N‐CAM cellular function, i.e., residue from a previous episode, or abnormal N‐CAM turnover in the CNS of patients with mood disorder.

Synergy of carbamazepine and valproic acid in affective illness: case report and review of the literature.

Carbamazepine and valproic acid are anticonvulsants with mood-stabilizing properties. Basic and clinical research suggest that these medications used together may have synergistic anticonvulsant effects. Psychotropic synergy of the combination has yet to be explored systematically. We present the case of a patient with rapid-cycling bipolar disorder studied under double-blind conditions whose hypomanias and depressions were refractory to either carbamazepine or valproic acid alone, but responded dramatically to the combination. The superior response to the combination appeared to be due to pharmacodynamic rather than pharmacokinetic effects. The clinical and theoretical aspects of the use of carbamazepine and valproic acid in combination are discussed.

Benzodiazepine-receptor ligands in humans: acute performance-impairing, subject-rated and observer-rated effects.

The study presented here compared the acute performance-impairing, subject-rated, and observer-rated effects of quazepam (15, 30, and 45 mg), triazolam (0.1875, 0.375, and 0.5625 mg), zolpidem (7.5, 15, and 22.5 mg), and placebo in nine healthy, non-drug-abusing humans. Quazepam, a trifluoroethylbenzodiazepine, was chosen for study because, when compared with triazolam, a triazolobenzodiazepine, it is a relatively weak benzodiazepine-receptor ligand, and it may bind selectively to the BZ1 benzodiazepine-receptor subtype. Zolpidem, an imidazopyridine, is the most commonly prescribed hypnotic and was chosen for study because it is biochemically distinct from benzodiazepine hypnotics and also purportedly binds selectively to the BZ1 benzodiazepine-receptor subtype. Triazolam was chosen as the reference compound because it binds nonselectively to BZ1 and BZ2 benzodiazepine-receptor subtypes. Triazolam, zolpidem, quazepam, and placebo were administered orally in a double-blind, crossover design. Triazolam and zolpidem produced orderly dose- and time-related impairment of learning, performance, and recall, and produced sedative-like subject- and observer-rated drug effects. The behavioral pharmacologic profile of zolpidem and triazolam was indistinguishable in that at peak effect, the absolute magnitude of drug effect was comparable across the various measures. Quazepam, by contrast, did not impair performance on any task to a statistically significant degree, nor did it produce significant sedation as measured by subject- and observer-rated drug-effect questionnaires. Whether these effects are a result of the unique benzodiazepine-receptor binding profile of quazepam or the testing of insufficient dosages is unknown. Future research could extend the findings presented here by testing higher dosages of quazepam.

Trazodone and triazolam: acute subject-rated and performance-impairing effects in healthy volunteers

Abstract The present study compared the acute subject-rated and performance-impairing effects of trazodone and triazolam in seven healthy humans. Trazodone (50, 100 and 200 mg), triazolam (0.125, 0.25, 0.50 mg) and placebo were administered orally in a double-blind, crossover design. Drug effects were measured approximately 30 min before drug administration and repeatedly afterwards for 6 h. Trazodone and triazolam produced dose-related increases in subject-ratings of drug effect and sedation. The absolute magnitude of trazodone”s and triazolam”s effects was comparable across these measures, which suggests the doses tested were equivalent on some behavioral dimension. By contrast, triazolam, but not trazodone, increased subject ratings of “dizzy”, “excited”, “nervous”, “restless”, “stomach turning” and “itchy skin”. Triazolam, but not trazodone, significantly impaired learning, recall and performance. The present findings suggest trazodone may be a viable alternative to benzodiazepine hypnotics like triazolam, especially when needing to minimize drug-induced impairment. Future research could extend the present findings by replicating them in a clinically relevant population such as individuals with histories of drug abuse.

New Developments in the Use of Anticonvulsants as Mood Stabilizers

There is increasing recognition that lithium is inadequate in the treatment of up to 50% of bipolar patients. In addition to subgroups that are nonresponsive from the outset, loss of efficacy (tolerance) and discontinuation-induced refractoriness have recently been observed. The anticonvulsants carbamazepine and valproate are effective alternative or adjunctive treatments, but tolerance can also occur during their long-term prophylactic use. New treatment algorithms for this loss of efficacy, including combination therapies, require further systematic study. Preliminary data suggesting that some patients with extremely rapid and chaotic mood fluctuations may respond to the L-type calcium channel blocker nimodipine are presented, and the theoretical implications discussed.