Pennan Chinnasamy
International Water Management Institute
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Pennan Chinnasamy.
Water International | 2015
Pennan Chinnasamy; Luna Bharati; Utsav Bhattarai; Ambika Khadka; Shahriar M. Wahid
The water resources of the Koshi Basin (87,311 km2) are largely untapped, and while proposals for their development exist, their impacts on current and future water demand are not quantified. The current study is the first to evaluate the impacts of 11 proposed development projects for hydropower generation and water storage. We find that 29,733 GWh of hydropower could be generated annually and 8382 million m3 of water could be stored. This could satisfy unmet demand in the current (660 million m3) basin situation and in future scenarios – i.e. population, agricultural and industrial growth – that are projected to have 920, 970 and 1003 million m3 of unmet demand, respectively, by 2050.
Ground Water | 2016
Pennan Chinnasamy; Govindasamy Agoramoorthy
Agriculture is a major occupation for people who inhabit the state of West Bengal in India. In order to boost irrigation, 570 tube wells per year were installed during 2002-2008, and 12,000 wells per year were installed during 2009-2013, contributing to higher groundwater (GW) withdrawal. However, the impact of tube wells on GW storage levels has not been well-studied, both spatially and temporally. Hence, this study used remote sensing data from NASAs Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment and the Global Land Data Assimilation Systems to assess change in GW storage. Results showed that GW is being depleted at 8, 5.3, and 14.7 cm (Billion Cubic Meters)/year during the study period. After tube well intensification, the state-wide average net GW recharge was 15.33 BCM/year, while the net GW discharge was at 19 BCM/year. The spatiotemporal GW storage data presented in this paper will benefit managers and policymakers in identifying suitable mitigation plans for future management of GW resources.
Sustainable Water Resources Management | 2018
Yogesh Jadeja; Basant Maheshwari; Roger G Packham; Hakimuddin Bohra; Ramesh Purohit; B. Thaker; Peter Dillon; Sachin Oza; S. Dave; Prahlad Soni; Yogita Dashora; R. Dashora; Tushaar Shah; J. Gorsiya; P. Katara; John Ward; Rai S. Kookana; P. K. Singh; Pennan Chinnasamy; V. Goradiya; Sanmugam Prathapar; Maria Varua; Michael Chew
Participatory groundwater management is increasingly being recognised for its ability to address the challenges of equity, efficiency and sustainability. It can particularly help with effective engagement at the grassroots level for monitoring, recharging and managing the groundwater as a common pool resource. The main aim of this article is to discuss the training and management process used and the lessons learnt from a participatory groundwater management project, titled Managing Aquifer Recharge and Sustainable Groundwater Use through Village-level Intervention (MARVI). In this project, researchers, rural development facilitators and local villagers worked together to initiate participatory groundwater monitoring in 11 villages from the Dharta and Meghraj watersheds in Rajasthan and Gujarat, India. The study involved educating villagers through an intensive program of capacity building, wherein the villagers who participated in the program were called Bhujal Jaankars (BJs), a Hindi word meaning ‘groundwater informed’. The BJs were trained in their local settings through relevant theory and practical exercises, so that they could perform a geo-hydrological evaluation of their area, monitor groundwater and share their findings and experiences with their village community. The study has highlighted that with a well-designed program of capacity building and on-going support through training and nurturing, BJs can play an important role in monitoring watertable depth and other data for estimating groundwater recharge, leading to a sharing of the groundwater information with the local village community to influence the sustainable use of groundwater. Overall they can act as local champions for groundwater futures. Further, this study has demonstrated that BJ capacity building can help to provide a scientific basis for village level groundwater dialogue and assist village communities and other stakeholders to improve their decision making regarding groundwater use, crop selection, agronomy, recharge strategies and other aspects of sustainable groundwater management. Although the BJ program has been successful and BJs can act as a valuable interface between local communities and other stakeholders managed aquifer recharge activities, there still exists some challenges to the BJ programme, such as the need for mechanisms and funding sources that will sustain the BJs over the longer term; wider acceptance of BJs among scientific communities and policy makers; and the acceptance of the role and involvements of BJs in natural resources management programs of the State and Central governments in India.
Archive | 2016
Pennan Chinnasamy; Sanmugam A. Prathapar
This paper reviews the methods that investigate the hydrology of springs, with a focus on the Himalayan region. The methods are classified as field-based empirical and desk-based analytical. Field-based empirical methods help to characterize geology, hydrology, climate and landuse patterns. Desk-based analytical methods guide quantification of fluxes and responses across watersheds, which are potential inputs to the development of hydrogeological maps, quantification of water balances, conceptualization of processes that control or influence the movement and storage of groundwater, and development of a mathematical model, which may guide further sustainable development of water resources.
Water Resources Management | 2015
Pennan Chinnasamy; Govindasamy Agoramoorthy
Water | 2014
Basant Maheshwari; Maria Varua; John Ward; Roger G Packham; Pennan Chinnasamy; Yogita Dashora; S. Dave; Prahlad Soni; Peter Dillon; Ramesh Purohit; Hakimuddin; Tushaar Shah; Sachin Oza; P. K. Singh; Sanmugam Prathapar; Ashish Patel; Yogesh Jadeja; Brijen Thaker; Rai S. Kookana; Harsharn Singh Grewal; K. K. Yadav; Hemant Mittal; Michael Chew; Pratap Rao
Water | 2015
Pennan Chinnasamy; Basant Maheshwari; Sanmugam Prathapar
Agricultural Water Management | 2015
Pennan Chinnasamy; Gourav Misra; Tushaar Shah; Basant Maheshwari; Sanmugam Prathapar
Journal of Hydrology | 2016
Maria Varua; John Ward; Basant Maheshwari; Sachin Oza; Ramesh Purohit; Hakimuddin; Pennan Chinnasamy
Hydrology Research | 2017
Pennan Chinnasamy
Collaboration
Dive into the Pennan Chinnasamy's collaboration.
Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology
View shared research outputsMaharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology
View shared research outputsCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
View shared research outputs