Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Peter C. Braidley is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Peter C. Braidley.


European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery | 2003

A prospective randomised comparison of cardiotomy suction and cell saver for recycling shed blood during cardiac surgery

Anita E. Jewell; Enoch Akowuah; S. Kim Suvarna; Peter C. Braidley; David N. Hopkinson; Graham Cooper

OBJECTIVE Post-operative neuropsychological complications correlate with intra-operative microemboli in the middle cerebral artery. When severe neurological complications follow cardiac surgery, diffuse cerebral fat emboli are present at autopsy. Recycling shed blood with cardiotomy suction is an important source of cerebral fat microemboli. A cell saver may reduce this. METHODS Twenty patients were prospectively randomised to assess the amount of fat in blood salvaged from the pericardium and returned to the patient with either cell saver or cardiotomy suction. Blood samples were taken before and after filtration in the cardiotomy suction group or cell saver processing in the cell saver group. After centrifuging samples, fat content was graded on a scale of 0-3 by a blinded independent observer. Fat content was also quantified by weight. RESULTS Compared with cardiotomy suction, cell saver removed significantly more fat from shed blood. Median fat grading after cell saver was 0 (0-1) compared with 1 (1-2) for cardiotomy suction (P=0.0001). Percentage reduction in fat weight achieved by cell saver or cardiotomy suction was 87% compared to 45% (P=0.007). There was no difference in the post-operative use of blood or blood products, haemoglobin, or bleeding between the two groups. CONCLUSION Use of cell saver results in less fat being recycled during cardiopulmonary bypass.


The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | 1998

Valve replacement with a stentless bioprosthesis: Versatility of the porcine aortic root☆☆☆★

Stephen Westaby; Xu Yu Jin; Takahiro Katsumata; Ahmed A. Arifi; Peter C. Braidley

OBJECTIVE Stentless valves convey important hemodynamic benefits but are used selectively depending on aortic root structure. The Freestyle valve (Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) is a versatile device that can be implanted by different methods depending on operating conditions. We aimed to demonstrate that a stentless valve could be used in every patient without increased risk of morbidity or mortality. We documented the effects of this valve on clinical outcome and left ventricular mechanics. METHODS The Freestyle valve was implanted by the modified subcoronary method into 200 consecutive unselected patients who received a tissue valve in the aortic position and by root replacement in 2. Forty-three percent were older than 75 years. Forty percent underwent coronary bypass. Detailed clinical and echocardiographic follow-up (Food and Drug Administration protocol) was used out to 3 years. RESULTS Mean ischemic time was 43+/-6 minutes for isolated aortic valve replacement and 63+/-14 minutes with concomitant procedures. Thirty-day mortality was 6%, none of the deaths being valve related. Hemodynamic function improved progressively with falling valve gradients and increased effective orifice areas. Left ventricular mass fell within normal limits over 2 years, but at 3 years there was a non-valve-related upswing. No instances of valve thrombosis, hemolysis, or paravalvular leak were noted. Less than 5% had mild to moderate aortic regurgitation. CONCLUSIONS The Freestyle valve can be used in virtually every patient with aortic valve disease and provides superlative hemodynamic outcome. Hospital mortality and morbidity are similar to those reported for stented valves in an elderly population.


Heart Surgery Forum | 2011

Atrial Myxomas: A Single Unit's Experience in the Modern Era

Corinne E. Owers; Paul Vaughan; Peter C. Braidley; Glen A. L. Wilkinson; Timothy J. Locke; Graham Cooper; Norman Briffa; David N. Hopkinson; Pradip K. Sarkar

Background: Although an atrial myxoma is the commonest cardiac tumor, it is still relatively rare, with an annual incidence of approximately 0.5 per million. In our unit, which performs 1000 major cardiac procedures per year, this equates to approximately 3 patients annually. We therefore sought to evaluate our experience of managing this type of tumor over the last 5 years. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of prospectively collected data from the departmental database. We analyzed consecutive patients who were operated upon between 2002 and 2007. Three patients with a papillary fibroelastoma on histological examination were excluded from this study. Results: We have performed excision of atrial myxoma in 18 patients. Twelve patients (66%) were female; the median age was 64 years (range, 35-80 years), and the median logistic euroSCORE was 5.22% (range, 1.51-27.82%). Fifteen patients (83%) were deemed urgent, 2 elective, and 1 emergency. Sixteen tumors (89%) were left sided. Symptoms attributable to the tumor were found in 16 of the 18 patients (embolic, n = 9; chest pain, n = 3; palpitations, n = 2; incidental finding, n = 2, others n = 4), and the mean time from diagnosis to operation was 3 days (range, 0-22 months). The median cardiopulmonary bypass time was 87 minutes (range, 28-228 minutes), with the median aortic cross clamp time being 61 minutes (16-175 minutes). The approaches used were transeptal via right atriotomy (n = 8), biatrial/Dubost (n = 4), left atrial (n = 4), and right atrial (n = 2); the interatrial septum was involved in 14 patients. The resultant defect was closed using a pericardial (n = 8) or prosthetic patch (n = 5) or directly sutured (n = 5). Concomitant procedures were performed in 8 patients (coronary artery bypass graft [CABG], n = 4; mitral valve replacement [MVR], n = 2; valve + grafts, n = 2). All tumors were completely excised. Postoperatively there were no deaths within 30 days of the procedure. Indeed, only 2 patients have died at 4 and 25 months postoperatively, respectively, both of unrelated causes. Median intensive therapy unit (ITU) stay was 2 days (range, 1-9 days), and median hospital stay was 10 days (range, 5-20 days). A permanent pacemaker was required in only 1 patient, and median blood loss was 340 mL (range, 140-1760 mL). Atrial fibrillation was the commonest complication affecting 6/18 patients (33%). Conclusions: Excision of atrial myxoma can be performed using a variety of intraoperative approaches and closure techniques, all with acceptable postoperative morbidity and low mortality rates. To date, no recurrences have been found at median 2-year follow-up.


Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia | 2011

TEE for Estimating Pleural Effusion Volumes

J.J. Ross; Peter C. Braidley; Nicholas J. Morgan-Hughes

We read with interest the article by Howard et al1 describing the use of transesophageal echocardiography to estimate the volume of chronic pleural effusions caused by heart failure. The maximal cross-sectional area (CSAmax) in centimeters squared of the pleural effusion seen on transesophageal echocardiography was recorded. CSAmax was then compared with the actual volume (V) of fluid in milliliters subsequently drained at surgery. Based on 28 data points obtained from 23 patients, the authors conclude that the volume of fluid can be estimated from the following formula: V 4.5 · CSAmax. We have published a similar study in which we measured effusions created after the pleura were surgically opened.2 Our study yielded 111 data points. In addition to CSAmax, we measured the axial length (AL) using the centimeter marks on the transesophageal echocardiographic probe to determine the proximal and distal extent of the effusions relative to the patient’s teeth. We evaluated the formula CSAmax · AL proposed by Swenson and Bull3 and found this to provide a easonably accurate measure of pleural fluid volume for both ightand left-sided effusions. Although recognizing the otential limitations of our data in the context of chronic ffusions, we also did find a good level of agreement with a omputed tomography– based formula derived from chronic ffusion patients.4 We have reanalyzed our data using Howard et al’s formula. These results are presented in Figure 1 and suggest that V 4.5 · CSAmax significantly overestimates the volume of larger effusions, particularly right-sided effusions. We note that Howard et al’s study contained only 3 data points for larger effusions (volume 1,200 mL). In addition, we would question their failure to measure AL as part of


European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery | 2018

Amaze: a randomized controlled trial of adjunct surgery for atrial fibrillation

Samer A.M. Nashef; Simon P. Fynn; Yasir Abu-Omar; Tomasz Spyt; Christine Mills; Colin C Everett; Julia Fox-Rushby; Jeshika Singh; Malcolm Dalrymple-Hay; Catherine Sudarshan; Massimiliano Codispoti; Peter C. Braidley; Francis C. Wells; Linda Sharples

Abstract OBJECTIVES Atrial fibrillation (AF) reduces survival and quality of life (QoL). It can be treated at the time of major cardiac surgery using ablation procedures ranging from simple pulmonary vein isolation to a full maze procedure. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of adjunct AF surgery as currently performed on sinus rhythm (SR) restoration, survival, QoL and cost-effectiveness. METHODS In a multicentre, Phase III, pragmatic, double-blinded, parallel-armed randomized controlled trial, 352 cardiac surgery patients with >3 months of documented AF were randomized to surgery with or without adjunct maze or similar AF ablation between 2009 and 2014. Primary outcomes were SR restoration at 1 year and quality-adjusted life years at 2 years. Secondary outcomes included SR at 2 years, overall and stroke-free survival, medication, QoL, cost-effectiveness and safety. RESULTS More ablation patients were in SR at 1 year [odds ratio (OR) 2.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20–3.54; P = 0.009]. At 2 years, the OR increased to 3.24 (95% CI 1.76–5.96). Quality-adjusted life years were similar at 2 years (ablation − control −0.025, P = 0.6319). Significantly fewer ablation patients were anticoagulated from 6 months postoperatively. Stroke rates were 5.7% (ablation) and 9.1% (control) (P = 0.3083). There was no significant difference in stroke-free survival [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.99, 95% CI 0.64–1.53; P = 0.949] nor in serious adverse events, operative or overall survival, cardioversion, pacemaker implantation, New York Heart Association, EQ-5D-3L and SF-36. The mean additional ablation cost per patient was £3533 (95% CI £1321–£5746). Cost-effectiveness was not demonstrated at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS Adjunct AF surgery is safe and increases SR restoration and costs but not survival or QoL up to 2 years. A continued follow-up will provide information on these outcomes in the longer term. Study registration ISRCTN82731440 (project number 07/01/34).


The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | 2005

Comparison of Two Strategies for the Management of Antiplatelet Therapy During Urgent Surgery

Enoch Akowuah; Vivek Shrivastava; Binal Jamnadas; David N. Hopkinson; Pradeep Sarkar; Robert F. Storey; Peter C. Braidley; Graham Cooper


The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | 2002

Less pain with flexible fluted silicone chest drains than with conventional rigid chest tubes after cardiac surgery

Enoch Akowuah; Eu Chin Ho; Rina George; Karl Brennan; Sue Tennant; Peter C. Braidley; Graham Cooper


Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation | 2005

The importance of 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring after thoracic organ transplantation.

Antony Hayden Walker; Timothy J. Locke; Peter C. Braidley; Abdullah Al-Mohammed


The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | 2006

Two-center prospective randomized controlled trial of Blake versus Portex drains after cardiac surgery

Neil Roberts; Maria Boehm; Madeline Bates; Peter C. Braidley; Graham Cooper; Tom Spyt


BJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia | 2007

Transoesophageal echocardiography for the detection and quantification of pleural fluid in cardiac surgical patients

S.J. Capper; J.J. Ross; E. Sandström; Peter C. Braidley; Nicholas J. Morgan-Hughes

Collaboration


Dive into the Peter C. Braidley's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Graham Cooper

Northern General Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Binal Jamnadas

Northern General Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J.J. Ross

Northern General Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. Kim Suvarna

Northern General Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge