Peter Caldera
Infineon Technologies
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Peter Caldera.
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics | 2008
Karl Hollaus; Oszkar Biro; Peter Caldera; Gernot Matzenauer; G. Paoli; G. Plieschnegger
The aim of this work is to study crosstalk between microstrips on printed circuit boards with the finite element method, the finite difference time domain method, and a circuit model up to several gigahertz. One simple benchmark problem for near end cross talk and one for far end crosstalk have been manufactured and analyzed. Measured scattering parameters are compared with simulated ones obtained by the different methods. Numerical aspects are presented and discussed.
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics | 2006
Karl Hollaus; Oszkar Biro; Peter Caldera; G. Matzenauer; Gerhard Paoli; K. Preis; C. Stockreiter; B. Weiss
The aim of this paper is to study some problems arising in simulating structures on printed circuit boards. Hexahedral edge finite elements of second order using different potential formulations have been employed. Some simplifications are proposed to reduce the computational effort. The input impedance of a micro strip on a test board is computed and compared with measurement data. Some numerical issues are investigated. A semi-analytical method to compute the losses in the microstrip and in the board is presented and results are shown
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics | 2006
B. Weiss; Oszkar Biro; Peter Caldera; Karl Hollaus; G. Paoli; Kurt Preis
A geometric multigrid algorithm for time harmonic electromagnetic wave problems including lossy material is presented. A finite element method with edge elements and nodal elements is used to describe the problems. For the multigrid smoother, complex conjugate gradient method with Gauss-Seidel preconditioning is used
Archive | 2009
Joel Björk; Peter Caldera; Paul Fugger; Karsten Einwich; Karl Hollaus; Wolfgang Pribyl; Jochen Reisinger; Willy Sansen; Andreas Wiesbauer; Horst Zimmermann
This chapter gives an overview on the system design and its different methods to implement it in the whole development process. Various aspects that have to be taken into consideration to reach the described goals are discussed.
Compel-the International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering | 2009
Karl Hollaus; Oszkar Biro; Gernot Matzenauer; Christian Stockreiter; Bernhard Weiß; Peter Caldera; Gerhard Paoli
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to study the extraction of scattering parameters (SPs) from simple structures on a printed circuit board (PCB) by the finite difference time domain (FDTD) method with the aid of a surface impedance boundary condition (SIBC).Design/methodology/approach – The incorporation of SIBC into the FDTD method is described for the general case. The excitation of a field problem by a field pattern and the transition from the field solution to a circuit representation by SPs is discussed.Findings – SPs obtained by FDTD with SIBC are validated with semi‐analytic solutions and compared with results obtained by different numerical methods. Results of a microstrip with a discontinuity considering losses are presented demonstrating the capability of the present method.Originality/value – The comparison of numerical results obtained by different methods demonstrates the capability of the present method to extract SPs from PCBs very efficiently.
Compel-the International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering | 2007
Bernhard Weiß; Oszkar Biro; Peter Caldera; Karl Hollaus; Gerhard Paoli; Kurt Preis; Christian Stockreiter
Purpose – The convergence of the transfinite‐element (TFE) method for high frequency methods is analyzed in this paper. Two different potential formulations will be compared in the frequency and time domain.Design/methodology/approach – The A*‐and A,v‐formulation for time domain and frequency domain transfinite elements are described. The convergence properties of the methods are investigated and demonstrated on a simple test problem.Findings – It is shown that the convergence of the frequency domain method depends also on the discretization of areas where the field values do not change very much. A numerical example shows that for the calculation of the whole frequency range, the time domain approach is much more faster than the frequency domain method.Research limitations/implications – Further, work should also cover additional formulations like, e.g. the T,Φ‐formulation.Practical implications – Pros and cons of different formulations and methods for solving high frequency problems for printed circuit ...
Archive | 2000
Thomas Magesacher; Lajos Gazsi; Peter Caldera
Archive | 2002
Peter Caldera; Roland Haeusler
Archive | 2004
Peter Caldera; Axel Schmitt
Archive | 1997
Franz Dielacher; Peter Caldera; Joerg Hauptmann; Alexander Kahl