Peter D. Bedini
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Peter D. Bedini.
Space Science Reviews | 1998
G. Gloeckler; J. Cain; F. M. Ipavich; E. O. Tums; Peter D. Bedini; L. A. Fisk; Thomas H. Zurbuchen; P. Bochsler; Josef Fischer; Robert F. Wimmer-Schweingruber; J. Geiss; R. Kallenbach
The Solar Wind Ion Composition Spectrometer (SWICS) and the Solar Wind Ions Mass Spectrometer (SWIMS) on ACE are instruments optimized for measurements of the chemical and isotopic composition of solar and interstellar matter. SWICS determines uniquely the chemical and ionic-charge composition of the solar wind, the thermal and mean speeds of all major solar wind ions from H through Fe at all solar wind speeds above 300 km s−1 (protons) and 170 km s−1 (Fe+16), and resolves H and He isotopes of both solar and interstellar sources. SWICS will measure the distribution functions of both the interstellar cloud and dust cloud pickup ions up to energies of 100 keV e−1. SWIMS will measure the chemical, isotopic and charge state composition of the solar wind for every element between He and Ni. Each of the two instruments uses electrostatic analysis followed by a time-of-flight and, as required, an energy measurement. The observations made with SWICS and SWIMS will make valuable contributions to the ISTP objectives by providing information regarding the composition and energy distribution of matter entering the magnetosphere. In addition, SWICS and SWIMS results will have an impact on many areas of solar and heliospheric physics, in particular providing important and unique information on: (i) conditions and processes in the region of the corona where the solar wind is accelerated; (ii) the location of the source regions of the solar wind in the corona; (iii) coronal heating processes; (iv) the extent and causes of variations in the composition of the solar atmosphere; (v) plasma processes in the solar wind; (vi) the acceleration of particles in the solar wind; (vii) the physics of the pickup process of interstellar He in the solar wind; and (viii) the spatial distribution and characteristics of sources of neutral matter in the inner heliosphere.
Planetary and Space Science | 2001
Robert E. Gold; Sean C. Solomon; Ralph L. McNutt; Andrew G. Santo; James B. Abshire; Mario H. Acuna; Robert S. Afzal; Brian J. Anderson; G. Bruce Andrews; Peter D. Bedini; John Cain; Andrew F. Cheng; Larry G. Evans; W. C. Feldman; Ronald B. Follas; G. Gloeckler; John O. Goldsten; S. Edward Hawkins; Noam R. Izenberg; Stephen E. Jaskulek; Eleanor Ketchum; Mark R. Lankton; David A. Lohr; B. H. Mauk; William E. McClintock; Scott L. Murchie; Charles E. Schlemm; David E. Smith; Richard D. Starr; Thomas H. Zurbuchen
Abstract The MErcury, Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging (MESSENGER) mission will send the first spacecraft to orbit the planet Mercury. A miniaturized set of seven instruments, along with the spacecraft telecommunications system, provide the means of achieving the scientific objectives that motivate the mission. The payload includes a combined wide- and narrow-angle imaging system; γ-ray, neutron, and X-ray spectrometers for remote geochemical sensing; a vector magnetometer; a laser altimeter; a combined ultraviolet-visible and visible-infrared spectrometer to detect atmospheric species and map mineralogical absorption features; and an energetic particle and plasma spectrometer to characterize ionized species in the magnetosphere.
AIAA SPACE 2009 Conference & Exposition | 2009
Teck H. Choo; Brian J. Anderson; Peter D. Bedini; Eric J. Finnegan; Joseph P. Skura; Robert J. Steele
MESSENGER (MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging) is the first spacecraft to visit Mercury since the Mariner 10 flybys in 1974 and 1975 and will be the first spacecraft to orbit the innermost planet, beginning in March 2011. The science payload is designed to study all aspects of Mercury and its environment and consists of seven instruments and a radio science experiment. During the primary orbital phase of the mission, the MESSENGER team faces the challenge of scheduling science observations to meet all measurement objectives while operating in a thermally harsh environment in geometrically challenging orbits. An efficient, automated science planning and commanding system called MESSENGER SciBox has been developed to support orbital analysis and strategic planning activities prior to orbital insertion, and to schedule and command the instrument and spacecraft operation during the orbital phase. In this paper we present the architecture of MESSENGER SciBox and its application to pre-orbital simulation and inorbit operational usage.
AIAA SPACE 2011 Conference & Exposition | 2011
Teck H. Choo; Robert J. Steele; Lillian Nguyen; Hari Nair; Michael Lucks; Peter D. Bedini
MESSENGER SciBox is an automated closed-loop planning and commanding system used to optimize orbital science operations for the MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging (MESSENGER) mission. The system plans all science observations for the seven science instruments on the spacecraft and also automatically generates the command sequences that drive the instruments, the guidance and control system, the solid-state recorder, the solar panels, and the radio-frequency communication system. MESSENGER SciBox interacts with the instrument scientists, mission operations team, downlink processing system, and mission design engineers to form a closed-loop system. In orbital operation, the systems employ a feedback loop, with a one-week time step, to improve the system performance. Feedback inputs are used to predict observational performance, to track all science observations, to avoid planning redundant tasks, and to recover from operational anomalies. The software tool is automated because the entire process, from ingesting the feedback inputs to creating the spacecraft and instruments commands, can function without manual interaction. I. Introduction Science operation centers for most space missions generally consist of two components: the uplink system and the downlink system. The uplink system deals with planning and scheduling of science observations, whereas the downlink system deals with the processing of observations returned from the spacecraft. Traditionally, the planning and scheduling of science observations, and the creation of associated spacecraft and instrument commands for science operation, are so time-consuming and labor-intensive that little time is left for the planning team to have close interactions with the data processing team. Any such interactions tend to be ad hoc and informal. On some missions, the two subsystems are so decoupled that they are even housed in different institutions and on separate networks. The lack of tightly coupled interaction frequently results in inefficient use of resources and a less-thanoptimum operational schedule. In this paper we describe an automated planning and commanding system that uses a closed-loop iterative process to continuously refine the science operation schedule and to generate spacecraft and instrument commands for uploading to a spacecraft. The planning system iteratively interacts with the instrument scientists, mission operations center personnel, mission design team, and downlink processing system to produce a scienceobservation-packed operational schedule and to improve the precision of planned operations. The process of ingesting feedback information from the downlink system to the generation of spacecraft and instrument commands for uplink is completely automated. This closed-loop architecture has been implemented as part of science operations for the MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging (MESSENGER) spacecraft now in orbit about Mercury, and it has allowed the MESSENGER team to maximize scientific return for the community with a relatively small operational staff. The closed-loop architecture and its application to MESSENGER orbital operations are the focus of this paper.
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union | 2010
Louise M. Prockter; Peter D. Bedini
When the MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging (MESSENGER) spacecraft enters orbit about Mercury in March 2011 it will begin a new phase in an age-old scientific study of the innermost planet. Despite being visible to the unaided eye, Mercurys proximity to the Sun makes it extremely difficult to observe from Earth. Nonetheless, over the centuries man has pursued a quest to understand the elusive planet, and has teased out information about its motions in the sky, its relation to the other planets, and its physical characteristics. A great leap was made in our understanding of Mercury when the Mariner 10 spacecraft flew past it three times in the mid-1970s, providing a rich set of close-up observations. Now, three decades later, The MESSENGER spacecraft has also visited the planet three times, and is poised to add significantly to the study with a year-long orbital observation campaign.
SOLAR WIND TEN: Proceedings of the Tenth International Solar Wind Conference | 2003
Kenneth A. Potocki; Peter D. Bedini
The NASA Solar Probe mission to the inner frontier of the heliosphere is a part of the Sun‐Earth Connection theme within the Office of Space Science. A NASA‐appointed Science Definition Team has defined a Solar Probe mission and its scientific objectives. These include making measurements to understand the processes that heat the solar corona and produce the solar wind, subjects of continuing scientific debate. The Solar Probe mission will accomplish these objectives with a combination of in situ measurements designed to characterize the local heating and acceleration of plasma near the Sun and high resolution images to detect small‐scale, transient magnetic structures at and around the Sun. In order to sample the solar corona acceleration region, Solar Probe will fly to four solar radii from the center of the Sun in an orbit inclined 90° to the plane of the ecliptic. Engineering solutions to design a probe that can withstand the near‐Sun environment have been proposed for several decades. Current status ...
Acta Astronautica | 2008
Ralph L. McNutt; Sean C. Solomon; David G. Grant; Eric J. Finnegan; Peter D. Bedini
Acta Astronautica | 2012
Peter D. Bedini; Sean C. Solomon; Eric J. Finnegan; Andrew B. Calloway; Susan L. Ensor; Ralph L. McNutt; Brian J. Anderson; Louise M. Prockter
Acta Astronautica | 2014
Daniel O'Shaughnessy; James V. McAdams; Peter D. Bedini; Andrew B. Calloway; Ken Williams; Brian Page
Acta Astronautica | 2014
Teck H. Choo; Scott L. Murchie; Peter D. Bedini; R. Josh Steele; Joseph P. Skura; Lillian Nguyen; Hari Nair; Michael Lucks; Alice F. Berman; J. A. McGovern; F. Scott Turner