Peter Gall
Siemens
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Peter Gall.
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging | 2014
Anwar R. Padhani; Andreas Makris; Peter Gall; David J. Collins; Nina Tunariu; Johann S. de Bono
Current methods of assessing tumor response at skeletal sites with metastatic disease use a combination of imaging tests, serum and urine biochemical markers, and symptoms assessment. These methods do not always enable the positive assessment of therapeutic benefit to be made but instead provide an evaluation of progression, which then guides therapy decisions in the clinic. Functional imaging techniques such as whole‐body diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) when combined with anatomic imaging and other emerging “wet” biomarkers can improve the classification of therapy response in patients with metastatic bone disease. A range of imaging findings can be seen in the clinic depending on the type of therapy and duration of treatment. Successful response to systemic therapy is usually depicted by reductions in signal intensity accompanied by apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) increases. Rarer patterns of successful treatment include no changes in signal intensity accompanying increases in ADC values (T2 shine‐through pattern) or reductions in signal intensity without ADC value changes. Progressive disease results in increases in extent/intensity of disease on high b‐value images with variable ADC changes. Diffusion MRI therapy response criteria need to be developed and tested in prospective studies in order to address current, unmet clinical and pharmaceutical needs for reliable measures of tumor response in metastatic bone disease. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014;39:1049–1078.
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging | 2015
Dong‐Myung Yeo; Soon Nam Oh; Chan Kwon Jung; Myung Ah Lee; Seong Taek Oh; Sung Eun Rha; Seung Eun Jung; Jae Young Byun; Peter Gall; Yohan Son
To investigate whether quantitative parameters derived from dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE‐MRI) are correlated with angiogenesis and biologic aggressiveness of rectal cancer.
MICCAI'11 Proceedings of the 2011 international conference on Prostate cancer imaging: image analysis and image-guided interventions | 2011
Parmeshwar Khurd; Leo Grady; Kalpitkumar Gajera; Mamadou Diallo; Peter Gall; Martin Requardt; Berthold Kiefer; Clifford R. Weiss; Ali Kamen
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a key role in the diagnosis, staging and treatment monitoring for prostate cancer. Automatic prostate localization in T2-weighted MR images could facilitate labor-intensive cancer imaging techniques such as 3D chemical shift MR spectroscopic imaging as well as advanced analysis techniques for diagnosis and treatment monitoring. We present a novel method for automatic segmentation of the prostate gland in MR images. Accurate prostate segmentation in MR imagery poses unique challenges. These include large variations in prostate anatomy and disease, intensity inhomogeneities, and near-field artifacts induced by endorectal coils. Our system meets these challenges with two key components. First is the automatic center detection of the prostate with a boosted classifier trained on intensitybased multi-level Gaussian Mixture Model Expectation Maximization (GMM-EM) segmentations of the raw MR images. The second is the use of a shape model in conjunction with Multi-Label Random Walker (MLRW) to constrain the seeding process within MLRW. Our system has been validated on a large database of non-isotropic T2-TSE (Turbo Spin Echo) and isotropic T2-SPACE (Sampling Perfection with Application Optimized Contrasts) images.
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging | 2015
Elias Kellner; Tobias Breyer; Peter Gall; Klaus Müller; Michael Trippel; Ori Staszewski; Florian Stein; Olaf Saborowski; Olga Dyakova; Horst Urbach; Valerij G. Kiselev; Irina Mader
To compare the vessel size and the cerebral blood volume in human gliomas with histopathology. Vessel size imaging (VSI) is a dynamic susceptibility contrast method for the assessment of the vessel size in normal and pathological tissue. Previous publications in rodents showed a satisfactory conformity with the vessel size derived from histopathology. To assess the clinical value, further, the progression‐free interval was determined and correlated.
PLOS ONE | 2014
Elias Kellner; Peter Gall; Matthias Günther; Marco Reisert; Irina Mader; Roman Fleysher; Valerij G. Kiselev
Evaluation of blood supply of different organs relies on labeling blood with a suitable tracer. The tracer kinetics is linear: Tracer concentration at an observation site is a linear response to an input somewhere upstream the arterial flow. The corresponding impulse response functions are currently treated empirically without incorporating the relation to the vascular morphology of an organ. In this work we address this relation for the first time. We demonstrate that the form of the response function in the entire arterial tree is reduced to that of individual vessel segments under approximation of good blood mixing at vessel bifurcations. The resulting expression simplifies significantly when the geometric scaling of the vascular tree is taken into account. This suggests a new way to access the vascular morphology in vivo using experimentally determined response functions. However, it is an ill-posed inverse problem as demonstrated by an example using measured arterial spin labeling in large brain arteries. We further analyze transport in individual vessel segments and demonstrate that experimentally accessible tracer concentration in vessel segments depends on the measurement principle. Explicit expressions for the response functions are obtained for the major middle part of the arterial tree in which the blood flow in individual vessel segments can be treated as laminar. When applied to the analysis of regional cerebral blood flow measurements for which the necessary arterial input is evaluated in the carotid arteries, present theory predicts about 20% underestimation, which is in agreement with recent experimental data.
Archive | 2011
Parmeshwar Khurd; Leo Grady; Ali Kamen; Mamadou Diallo; Kalpitkumar Gajera; Peter Gall; Martin Requardt; Berthold Kiefer; Clifford Weiss
Archive | 2013
Neil Birkbeck; Jingdan Zhang; Martin Requardt; Berthold Kiefer; Peter Gall; Shaohua Kevin Zhou
Archive | 2012
David Liu; Shaohua Kevin Zhou; Peter Gall; Dorin Comaniciu; Andre de Oliveira; Berthold Kiefer
Archive | 2015
Peter Gall
Archive | 2017
Peter Gall; Andreas Greiser; Dominik Paul; Daniel Nico Splitthoff; Jens Thoene; Felix Wolf