Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Peter Hellekalek is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Peter Hellekalek.


Journal of the American Statistical Association | 1998

Random and quasi-random point sets

Peter Hellekalek; Gerhard Larcher; József Beck

From Probabilistic Diophantine Approximation to Quadratic Fields.- 1 Part I: Super Irregularity.- 2 Part II: Probabilistic Diophantine Approximation.- 2.1 Local Case: Inhomogeneous Pell Inequalities - Hyperbolas.- 2.2 Beyond Quadratic Irrationals.- 2.3 Global Case: Lattice Points in Tilted Rectangles.- 2.4 Simultaneous Case.- 3 Part III: Quadratic Fields and Continued Fractions.- 3.1 Cesaro Mean of % MathType!MTEF!2!1!+- % feaagCart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn % hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr % 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq-Jc9 % vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0-yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr-x % fr-xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 % qadaaeabqaamaacmaabaGaamOBaiabeg7aH9aadaahaaWcbeqaa8qa % caaIXaGaai4laiaaikdaaaaakiaawUhacaGL9baaaSqabeqaniabgg % HiLdaaaa!3F6B!


ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation | 2003

Empirical evidence concerning AES

Peter Hellekalek; Stefan Wegenkittl


workshop on parallel and distributed simulation | 1998

Don't trust parallel Monte Carlo!

Peter Hellekalek

\sum {\left\{ {n{\alpha ^{1/2}}} \right\}}


Archive | 1998

On the Assessment of Random and Quasi-Random Point Sets

Peter Hellekalek


winter simulation conference | 1995

Inversive pseudorandom number generators: concepts, results and links

Peter Hellekalek

and Quadratic Fields.- 3.2 Hardy-Littlewood Lemma 14.- 4 Part IV: Class Number One Problems.- 4.1 An Attempt to Reduce the Yokois Conjecture to a Finite Amount of Computation.- 5 Part V: Cesaro Mean of % MathType!MTEF!2!1!+- % feaagCart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn % hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr % 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq-Jc9 % vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0-yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr-x % fr-xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcqaaaaaaaaaWdbe % aadaaeqaWdaeaapeWaaeWaa8aabaWdbmaacmaapaqaa8qacaWGUbGa % eqySdegacaGL7bGaayzFaaGaeyOeI0IaaGymaiaac+cacaaIYaaaca % GLOaGaayzkaaaal8aabaWdbiaad6gaaeqaniabggHiLdaaaa!42C9!


Israel Journal of Mathematics | 1986

On the ergodicity of a class of skew products

Peter Hellekalek; Gerhard Larcher


Archive | 2012

Hybrid Function Systems in the Theory of Uniform Distribution of Sequences

Peter Hellekalek

\sum\nolimits_n {\left( {\left\{ {n\alpha } \right\} - 1/2} \right)}


Monatshefte für Mathematik | 1995

General discrepancy estimates III: The Erdös-Turán-Koksma inequality for the Haar function system

Peter Hellekalek


Monatshefte für Mathematik | 1980

On regularities of the distribution of special sequences

Peter Hellekalek

.- 6 References.- On the Assessment of Random and Quasi-Random Point Sets.- 1 Introduction.- 2 Chapter for the Practitioner.- 2.1 Assessing RNGs.- 2.2 Correlation Analysis for RNGs I.- 2.3 Correlation Analysis for RNGs II.- 2.4 Theory vs. Practice I: Leap-Frog Streams.- 2.5 Theory vs. Practice II: Parallel Monte Carlo Integration.- 2.6 Assessing LDPs.- 2.7 Good Lattice Points.- 2.8 GLPs vs. (tms)-Nets.- 2.9 Conclusion.- 3 Mathematical Preliminaries.- 3.1 Haar and Walsh Series.- 3.2 Integration Lattices.- 4 Uniform Distribution Modulo One.- 4.1 The Definition of Uniformly Distributed Sequences.- 4.2 Weyl Sums and Weyls Criterion.- 4.3 Remarks.- 5 The Spectral Test.- 5.1 Definition.- 5.2 Properties.- 5.3 Examples.- 5.4 Geometric Interpretation.- 5.5 Remarks.- 6 The Weighted Spectral Test.- 6.1 Definition.- 6.2 Examples and Properties.- 6.3 Remarks.- 7 Discrepancy.- 7.1 Definition.- 7.2 The Inequality of Erdos-Turan-Koksma.- 7.3 Remarks.- 8 Summary.- 9 Acknowledgements.- 10 References.- Lattice Rules: How Well Do They Measure Up?.- 1 Introduction.- 2 Some Basic Properties of Lattice Rules.- 3 A General Approach to Worst-Case and Average-Case Error Analysis.- 3.1 Worst-Case Quadrature Error for Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces.- 3.2 A More General Worst-Case Quadrature Error Analysis.- 3.3 Average-Case Quadrature Error Analysis.- 4 Examples of Other Discrepancies.- 4.1 The ANOVA Decomposition.- 4.2 A Generalization ofP?(L) with Weights.- 4.3 The Periodic Bernoulli Discrepancy - Another Generalization ofP?(L).- 4.4 The Non-Periodic Bernoulli Discrepancy.- 4.5 The Star Discrepancy.- 4.6 The Unanchored Discrepancy.- 4.7 The Wrap-Around Discrepancy.- 4.8 The Symmetric Discrepancy.- 5 Shift-Invariant Kernels and Discrepancies.- 6 Discrepancy Bounds.- 6.1 Upper Bounds forP?(L).- 6.2 A Lower Bound onDF,?,1(P).- 6.3 Quadrature Rules with Different Weights.- 6.4 Copy Rules.- 7 Discrepancies of Integration Lattices and Nets.- 7.1 The Expected Discrepancy of Randomized (0ms)-Nets.- 7 2 Infinite Sequences of Embedded Lattices.- 8 Tractability of High Dimensional Quadrature.- 8.1 Quadrature in Arbitrarily High Dimensions.- 8.2 The Effective Dimension of an Integrand.- 9 Discussion and Conclusion.- 10 References.- Digital Point Sets: Analysis and Application.- 1 Introduction.- 2 The Concept and Basic Properties of Digital Point Sets.- 3 Discrepancy Bounds for Digital Point Sets.- 4 Special Classes of Digital Point Sets and Quality Bounds.- 5 Digital Sequences Based on Formal Laurent Series and Non-Archimedean Diophantine Approximation.- 6 Analysis of Pseudo-Random-Number Generators by Digital Nets.- 7 The Digital Lattice Rule.- 8 Outlook and Open Research Topics.- 9 References.- Random Number Generators: Selection Criteria and Testing.- 1 Introduction.- 2 Design Principles and Figures of Merit.- 2.1 A Roulette Wheel.- 2.2 Sampling from ?t.- 2.3 The Lattice Structure of MRGs.- 2.4 Equidistribution for Regular Partitions in Cubic Boxes.- 2.5 Other Measures of Divergence.- 3 Empirical Statistical Tests.- 3.1 What are the Good Tests?.- 3.2 Two-Level Tests.- 3.3 Collections of Empirical Tests.- 4 Examples of Empirical Tests.- 4.1 Serial Tests of Equidistribution.- 4.2 Tests Based on Close Points in Space.- 5 Collections of Small RNGs.- 5.1 Small Linear Congruential Generators.- 5.2 Explicit Inversive Congruential Generators.- 5.3 Compound Cubic Congruential Generators.- 6 Systematic Testing for Small RNGs.- 6.1 Serial Tests of Equidistribution for LCGs.- 6.2 Serial Tests of Equidistribution for Nonlinear Generators.- 6.3 A Summary of the Serial Tests Results.- 6.4 Close-Pairs Tests for LCGs.- 6.5 Close-Pairs Tests for Nonlinear Generators.- 6.6 A Summary of the Close-Pairs Tests Results.- 7 How Do Real-Life Generators Fare in These Tests?.- 8 Acknowledgements.- 9 References.- Nets, (ts)-Sequences, and Algebraic Geometry.- 1 Introduction.- 2 Basic Concepts.- 3 The Digital Method.- 4 Background on Algebraic Curves over Finite Fields.- 5 Construction of (ts)-Sequences.- 6 New Constructions of (tms)-Nets.- 7 New Algebraic Curves with Many Rational Points.- 8 References.- Financial Applications of Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods.- 1 Introduction.- 2 Monte Carlo Methods for Finance Applications.- 2.1 Preliminaries for Derivative Pricing.- 2.2 Variance Reduction Techniques.- 2.3 Caveats for Computer Implementation.- 3 Speeding Up by Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods.- 3.1 What are Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods?.- 3.2 Generalized Faure Sequences.- 3.3 Numerical Experiments.- 3.4 Discussions.- 4 Future Topics.- 4.1 Monte Carlo Simulations for American Options.- 4.2 Research Issues Related to Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods.- 5 References.


Simulation Practice and Theory | 1997

A note on pseudorandom number generators

Peter Hellekalek

AES, the Advanced Encryption Standard, is one of the most important algorithms in modern cryptography. Certain randomness properties of AES are of vital importance for its security. At the same time, these properties make AES an interesting candidate for a fast nonlinear random number generator for stochastic simulation. In this article, we address both of these two aspects of AES. We study the performance of AES in a series of statistical tests that are related to cryptographic notions like confusion and diffusion. At the same time, these tests provide empirical evidence for the suitability of AES in stochastic simulation. A substantial part of this article is devoted to the strategy behind our tests and to their relation to other important test statistics like Maurers Universal Test.

Collaboration


Dive into the Peter Hellekalek's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gerhard Larcher

Johannes Kepler University of Linz

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Harald Niederreiter

Austrian Academy of Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter Kritzer

Austrian Academy of Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge