Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Peter M. Woods is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Peter M. Woods.


Nature | 2005

A giant γ-ray flare from the magnetar SGR 1806-20

David M. Palmer; S. D. Barthelmy; Neil Gehrels; R. M. Kippen; T. Cayton; C. Kouveliotou; David Eichler; R. A. M. J. Wijers; Peter M. Woods; Jonathan Granot; Yuri Lyubarsky; E. Ramirez-Ruiz; Louis M. Barbier; Margaret Chester; J. R. Cummings; E. E. Fenimore; Mark H. Finger; B. M. Gaensler; Derek D. Hullinger; Hans A. Krimm; Craig B. Markwardt; John A. Nousek; Ann Marie Parsons; S.K. Patel; T. Sakamoto; G. Sato; M. Suzuki; J. Tueller

Two classes of rotating neutron stars—soft γ-ray repeaters (SGRs) and anomalous X-ray pulsars—are magnetars, whose X-ray emission is powered by a very strong magnetic field (B ≈ 1015 G). SGRs occasionally become ‘active’, producing many short X-ray bursts. Extremely rarely, an SGR emits a giant flare with a total energy about a thousand times higher than in a typical burst. Here we report that SGR 1806–20 emitted a giant flare on 27 December 2004. The total (isotropic) flare energy is 2 × 1046 erg, which is about a hundred times higher than the other two previously observed giant flares. The energy release probably occurred during a catastrophic reconfiguration of the neutron stars magnetic field. If the event had occurred at a larger distance, but within 40 megaparsecs, it would have resembled a short, hard γ-ray burst, suggesting that flares from extragalactic SGRs may form a subclass of such bursts.1 Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA 2 NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, 20771, USA 3 NASA/Marshall Space Flight Center, NSSTC, XD-12, 320 Sparkman Dr., Huntsville, AL 35805, USA 4 Department of Physics, Ben Gurion University, POB 653, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel 5 Astronomical Institute “Anton Pannekoek”, University of Amsterdam, Kruislaan 403, 1098 SJ, Amster-


arXiv: Astrophysics | 2006

Soft gamma repeaters and anomalous x-ray pulsars: Magnetar candidates

Peter M. Woods; Christopher Thompson

Introduction Baade and Zwicky (1934) were the first to envision the formation of neutron stars as the end product of a supernova explosion. Their forward thinking was not vindicated for another three decades, with the discovery of the first radio pulsars by Bell and Hewish (Hewish et al. 1968). What Baade and Zwiscky could not have anticipated, however, was the menagerie of astrophysical objects that are now associated with neutron stars. Today, we observe them as magnetically braking pulsars, accreting pulsars in binary systems, isolated cooling blackbodies, sources of astrophysical jets, and emitters of high-luminosity bursts of X-rays. Here, we focus on two of the most extraordinary evolutionary paths of a neutron star, namely soft gamma repeaters (SGRs) and anomalous X-ray pulsars (AXPs). Soft gamma repeaters were discovered as high-energy transient burst sources; some were later found also to be persistent X-ray pulsars, with periods of several seconds, that are spinning down rapidly. Anomalous X-ray pulsars are identified through their persistent pulsations and rapid spin down; some have also been found to emit SGR-like bursts. In spite of the differing methods of discovery, this convergence in the observed properties of the SGRs and AXPs has made it clear that they are, fundamentally, the same type of object. What distinguishes them from other neutron stars is the likely source of energy for their radiative emissions, magnetism.


The Astrophysical Journal | 1999

Discovery of a magnetar associated with the soft gamma repeater SGR 1900+14

C. Kouveliotou; Tod E. Strohmayer; K. Hurley; J. van Paradijs; Mark H. Finger; S. Dieters; Peter M. Woods; Christopher Thompson; Richard C. Duncan

The soft gamma repeater SGR 1900+14 became active again on 1998 June after a long period of quiescence; it remained at a low state of activity until 1998 August, when it emitted a series of extraordinarily intense outbursts. We have observed the source with the Rossi X-Ray Timing Explorer twice, during the onset of each active episode. We confirm the pulsations at the 5.16 s period reported earlier from SGR 1900+14. Here we report the detection of a secular spin-down of the pulse period at an average rate of 1.1 × 10-10 s s-1. In view of the strong similarities between SGRs, we attribute the spin-down of SGR 1900+14 to magnetic dipole radiation, possibly accelerated by a quiescent flux, as in the case of SGR 1806-20. This allows an estimate of the pulsar dipolar magnetic field, which is (2–8) × 1014 G. Our results confirm that SGRs are magnetars.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2004

Changes in the X-ray Emission from the Magnetar Candidate 1E 2259+586 during its 2002 Outburst

Peter M. Woods; V. M. Kaspi; C. Thompson; Fotis P. Gavriil; Herman L. Marshall; Deepto Chakrabarty; Kathryn A. Flanagan; Jeremy S. Heyl; Lars Hernquist

An outburst of more than 80 individual bursts, similar to those seen from Soft Gamma Repeaters (SGRs), was detected from the anomalous X-ray pulsar (AXP) 1E 2259+586 in 2002 June. Coincident with this burst activity were gross changes in the pulsed flux, persistent flux, energy spectrum, pulse profile, and spin-down of the underlying X-ray source. We present Rossi X-Ray Timing Explorer and X-Ray Multi-Mirror Mission observations of 1E 2259+586 that show the evolution of the aforementioned source parameters during and following this episode and identify recovery timescales for each. Specifically, we observe an X-ray flux increase (pulsed and phase-averaged) by more than an order of magnitude having two distinct components. The first component is linked to the burst activity and decays within ~2 days, during which the energy spectrum is considerably harder than during the quiescent state of the source. The second component decays over the year following the glitch according to a power law in time with an exponent -0.22 ? 0.01. The pulsed fraction decreased initially to ~15% rms but recovered rapidly to the preoutburst level of ~23% within the first 3 days. The pulse profile changed significantly during the outburst and recovered almost fully within 2 months of the outburst. A glitch of size ??max/? = (4.24 ? 0.11) ? 10-6 was observed in 1E 2259+586, which preceded the observed burst activity. The glitch could not be well fitted with a simple partial exponential recovery. An exponential rise of ~20% of the frequency jump with a timescale of ~14 days results in a significantly better fit to the data; however, contamination from a systematic drift in the phase of the pulse profile cannot be excluded. A fraction of the glitch (~19%) was recovered in a quasi-exponential manner having a recovery timescale of ~16 days. The long-term postglitch spin-down rate decreased in magnitude relative to the preglitch value. The changes in the source properties of 1E 2259+586 during its 2002 outburst are shown to be qualitatively similar to changes seen during or following burst activity in two SGRs, thus further solidifying the common nature of SGRs and AXPs as magnetars. The changes in persistent emission properties of 1E 2259+586 suggest that the star underwent a plastic deformation of the crust that simultaneously impacted the superfluid interior (crustal and possibly core superfluid) and the magnetosphere. Finally, the changes in persistent emission properties coincident with burst activity in 1E 2259+586 enabled us to infer previous burst-active episodes from this and other AXPs. The nondetection of these outbursts by all-sky gamma-ray instruments suggests that the number of active magnetar candidates in our Galaxy is larger than previously thought.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2003

A Major Soft Gamma Repeater-like Outburst and Rotation Glitch in the No-longer-so-anomalous X-Ray Pulsar 1E 2259+586

Victoria M. Kaspi; Fotis P. Gavriil; Peter M. Woods; Joseph B. Jensen; Mallory Strider Ellison Roberts; Deepto Chakrabarty

We report a major outburst from the anomalous X-ray pulsar 1E 2259+586, in which over 80 X-ray bursts were detected in 4 hr using the Rossi X-Ray Timing Explorer. The bursts range in duration from 2 ms to 3 s and have fluences in the 2-10 keV band that range from 3 ? 10-11 to 5 ? 10-9 ergs cm-2. We simultaneously observed increases of the pulsed and persistent X-ray emission by over an order of magnitude relative to quiescent levels. Both decayed significantly during the course of our 14 ks observation. Correlated spectral hardening was also observed, with the spectrum softening during the observation. In addition, we observed a pulse profile change, in which the amplitudes of the two peaks in the pulse profile were swapped. The profile relaxed back to its pre-outburst morphology after ~6 days. The pulsar also underwent a sudden spin-up (??/? = 4 ? 10-6), followed by a large (factor of ~2) increase in spin-down rate that persisted for more than 18 days. We also observed, using the Gemini North telescope, an infrared enhancement, in which the Ks (2.15 ?m) flux increased, relative to that measured in a observation made in 2000, by a factor of ~3, 3 days post-outburst. The IR counterpart then faded by a factor of ~2 1 week later. In addition, we report an upper limit of 50 ?Jy on radio emission at 1.4 GHz 2 days post-outburst. The X-ray properties of this outburst are like those seen only in soft gamma repeaters. This conclusively unifies anomalous X-ray pulsars and soft gamma repeaters, as predicted uniquely by the magnetar model.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2004

Discovery of a Transient Magnetar: XTE J1810-197

Alaa I. Ibrahim; Craig B. Markwardt; Scott M. Ransom; Mallory Strider Ellison Roberts; Victoria M. Kaspi; Peter M. Woods; Samar Safi-Harb; Solen Balman; W. C. Parke; C. Kouveliotou; K. Hurley; Thomas L. Cline

We report the discovery of a new X-ray pulsar, XTE J1810-197, that was serendipitously discovered on 2003 July 15 by the Rossi X- Ray Timing Explorer (RXTE) while observing the soft gamma repeater SGR 1806-20. The pulsar has a 5.54 s spin period, a soft X-ray spectrum (with a photon index of ≈4), and is detectable in earlier RXTE observations back to 2003 January but not before. These show that a transient outburst began between 2002 November 17 and 2003 January 23 and that the sources persistent X-ray flux has been declining since then. The pulsar exhibits a high spin-down rate ≈ 10-11 s s-1 with no evidence of Doppler shifts due to a binary companion. The rapid spin-down rate and slow spin period imply a supercritical characteristic magnetic field B 3 × 1014 G and a young age τ ≤ 7600 yr. Follow-up Chandra observations provided an accurate position of the source. Within its error radius, the 1.5 m Russian-Turkish Optical Telescope found a limiting magnitude RC = 21.5. All such properties are strikingly similar to those of anomalous X-ray pulsars and soft gamma repeaters, providing strong evidence that the source is a new magnetar. However, archival ASCA and ROSAT observations found the source nearly 2 orders of magnitude fainter. This transient behavior and the observed long-term flux variability of the source in absence of an observed SGR-like burst activity make it the first confirmed transient magnetar and suggest that other neutron stars that share the properties of XTE J1810-197 during its inactive phase may be unidentified transient magnetars awaiting detection via a similar activity. This implies a larger population of magnetars than previously surmised and a possible evolutionary connection between magnetars and other neutron star families.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2001

Evidence for a Sudden Magnetic Field Reconfiguration in Soft Gamma Repeater 1900+14

Peter M. Woods; C. Kouveliotou; Ersin Gogus; Mark H. Finger; Don Smith; K. Hurley; Christopher Thompson

We report the detection of large flux changes in the persistent X-ray flux of soft gamma repeater (SGR) 1900+14 during its burst active episode in 1998. Most notably, we find a factor of ~700 increase in the nonburst X-ray flux following the August 27 flare, which decayed in time as a power law. Our measurements indicate that the pulse fraction remains constant throughout this decay. This suggests a global flux enhancement as a consequence of the August 27 flare rather than localized heating. While the persistent flux has since recovered to the preoutburst level, the pulse profile has not. The pulse shape changed to a near sinusoidal profile within the tail of the August 27 flare (in γ-rays), and this effect has persisted for more than 1.5 years (in X-rays). The results presented here suggest that the magnetic field of the neutron star in SGR 1900+14 was significantly altered (perhaps globally) during the giant flare of August 27.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2000

Physical Mechanisms for the Variable Spin-down and Light Curve of SGR 1900+14

Christopher Thompson; Robert C. Duncan; Peter M. Woods; C. Kouveliotou; Mark H. Finger; Jan van Paradijs

We consider the physical implications of the rapid spin-down of soft gamma repeater SGR 1900+14 reported by Woods and colleagues in 1999. During an 80 day interval between 1998 June and the large outburst on 1998 August 27, the mean spin-down rate increased by a factor of 2.3, resulting in a positive period offset of ΔP/P = 10-4. A radiation-hydrodynamical outflow associated with the August 27 event could impart the required torque, but only if the dipole magnetic field is stronger than ~1014 G and the outflow lasts longer and/or is more energetic than the observed X-ray flare. A positive period increment is also a natural consequence of a gradual, plastic deformation of the neutron star crust by an intense magnetic field, which forces the neutron superfluid to rotate more slowly than the crust. Sudden unpinning of the neutron vortex lines during the August 27 event would then induce a glitch opposite in sign to those observed in young pulsars, but of a much larger magnitude as a result of the slower rotation. The change in the persistent X-ray light curve following the August 27 event is ascribed to continued particle heating in the active region of that outburst. The enhanced X-ray output can be powered by a steady current flowing through the magnetosphere, induced by the twisting motion of the crust. The long-term rate of spin-down appears to be accelerated with respect to a simple magnetic dipole torque. Accelerated spin-down of a seismically active magnetar will occur when its persistent output of Alfven waves and particles exceeds its spin-down luminosity or if particle flows modulate the ratio of conduction to displacement currents in the outer magnetosphere. We suggest that SGRs experience some episodes of relative inactivity, with diminished , and that such inactive magnetars are observed as anomalous X-ray pulsars (AXPs). The reappearance of persistent X-ray emission from SGR 1900+14 within one day of the August 27 event provides strong evidence that the persistent emission is not powered by accretion.


The Astrophysical Journal | 1999

Discovery of a New Soft Gamma Repeater, SGR 1627-41

Peter M. Woods; C. Kouveliotou; Jan van Paradijs; K. Hurley; R. Marc Kippen; Mark H. Finger; Michael Stephen Briggs; S. Dieters; G. J. Fishman

We report the discovery of a new soft gamma repeater (SGR), SGR 1627-41, and present BATSE observations of the burst emission and BeppoSAX Narrow-Field Instrument observations of the probable persistent X-ray counterpart to this SGR. All but one burst spectrum are well fit by an optically thin thermal bremsstrahlung model with kT values between 25 and 35 keV. The spectrum of the X-ray counterpart, SAX J1635.8-4736, is similar to that of other persistent SGR X-ray counterparts. We find weak evidence for a periodic signal at 6.41 s in the light curve for this source. Like other SGRs, this source appears to be associated with a young supernova remnant, G337.0-0.1. Based upon the peak luminosities of bursts observed from this SGR, we find a lower limit on the dipole magnetic field of the neutron star of B(sub dipole) approximately > 5 x 10(exp 14) G.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2007

The prelude to and aftermath of the giant flare of 2004 December 27 : Persistent and pulsed X-ray properties of SGR 1806-20 from 1993 to 2005

Peter M. Woods; C. Kouveliotou; Mark H. Finger; Ersin Gogus; Colleen A. Wilson; Sandeep K. Patel; K. Hurley

We report on the evolution of key spectral and temporal parameters of SGR 1806-20 prior to and following the highly energetic giant flare of 2004 December 27. Using RXTE, we track the pulse frequency of the SGR and find that the spin-down rate varied erratically in the months before and after the flare. Contrary to the giant flare in SGR 1900+14, we find no evidence for a discrete jump in spin frequency at the time of the December 27th flare (|Δν/ν| < 5 × 10-6). In the months surrounding the flare, we find a strong correlation between pulsed flux and torque consistent with the model for magnetar magnetosphere electrodynamics proposed by Thompson et al. As with the flare in SGR 1900+14, the pulse morphology of SGR 1806-20 changes drastically following the flare. Using Chandra and other publicly available imaging X-ray detector observations, we construct a spectral history of SGR 1806-20 from 1993 to 2005. The usual magnetar persistent emission spectral model of a power law plus a blackbody provides an excellent fit to the data. We confirm the earlier finding by Mereghetti et al. of increasing spectral hardness of SGR 1806-20 between 1993 and 2004. However, our results indicate significant differences in the temporal evolution of the spectral hardening. Rather than a direct correlation between torque and spectral hardness, we find evidence for a sudden torque change that preceded a gradual hardening of the energy spectrum on a timescale of years. Interestingly, the spectral hardness, spin-down rate, phase-averaged flux, and pulsed flux of SGR 1806-20 all peak months before the flare epoch.

Collaboration


Dive into the Peter M. Woods's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

C. Kouveliotou

George Washington University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark H. Finger

Universities Space Research Association

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ersin Gogus

Marshall Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

K. Hurley

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ersin Gogus

Marshall Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Victoria M. Kaspi

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christopher Thompson

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stefanie Wachter

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge