Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Peter W. A. Roming is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Peter W. A. Roming.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2009

DISCERNING THE PHYSICAL ORIGINS OF COSMOLOGICAL GAMMA-RAY BURSTS BASED ON MULTIPLE OBSERVATIONAL CRITERIA: THE CASES OF z=6.7 GRB 080913, z=8.2 GRB 090423, AND SOME SHORT/HARD GRBs

Bing Zhang; Bin-Bin Zhang; Francisco J. Virgili; En-Wei Liang; D. Alexander Kann; Xue-Feng Wu; Daniel Proga; Hou-Jun Lv; Kenji Toma; P. Meszaros; David N. Burrows; Peter W. A. Roming; Neil Gehrels

The two high-redshift gamma-ray bursts, GRB 080913 at z = 6.7 and GRB 090423 at z = 8.2, recently detected by Swift appear as intrinsically short, hard GRBs. They could have been recognized by BATSE as short/hard GRBs should they have occurred at z ≤ 1. In order to address their physical origin, we perform a more thorough investigation on two physically distinct types (Type I/II) of cosmological GRBs and their observational characteristics. We reiterate the definitions of Type I/II GRBs and then review the following observational criteria and their physical motivations: supernova (SN) association, specific star-forming rate (SFR) of the host galaxy, location offset, duration, hardness, spectral lag, statistical correlations, energetics and collimation, afterglow properties, redshift distribution, luminosity function, and gravitational wave signature. Contrary to the traditional approach of assigning the physical category based on the gamma-ray properties (duration, hardness, and spectral lag), we take an alternative approach to define the Type I and Type II Gold Samples using several criteria that are more directly related to the GRB progenitors (SN association, host galaxy type, and specific SFR). We then study the properties of the two Gold Samples and compare them with the traditional long/soft and short/hard samples. We find that the Type II Gold Sample reasonably tracks the long/soft population, although it includes several intrinsically short (shorter than 1 s in the rest frame) GRBs. The Type I Gold Sample only has five GRBs, four of which are not strictly short but have extended emission. Other short/hard GRBs detected in the Swift era represent the BATSE short/hard sample well, but it is unclear whether all of them belong to Type I. We suggest that some (probably even most) high-luminosity short/hard GRBs instead belong to Type II. Based on multiple observational criteria, we suggest that GRB 080913 and GRB 090423 are more likely Type II events. In general, we acknowledge that it is not always straightforward to discern the physical categories of GRBs, and re-emphasize the importance of invoking multiple observational criteria. We cautiously propose an operational procedure to infer the physical origin of a given GRB with available multiple observational criteria, with various caveats laid out.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2007

GRB radiative efficiencies derived from the swift data: GRBs versus XRFs, long versus short

Bing Zhang; En-Wei Liang; Kim L. Page; Dirk Grupe; Bin-Bin Zhang; S. D. Barthelmy; David N. Burrows; Sergio Campana; Guido Chincarini; Neil Gehrels; Shiho Kobayashi; P. Meszaros; A. Moretti; John A. Nousek; Paul T. O'Brien; Julian P. Osborne; Peter W. A. Roming; Takanori Sakamoto; Patricia Schady; R. Willingale

We systematically analyze the prompt emission and the early afterglow data of a sample of 31 GRBs detected by Swift before 2005 September and estimate the GRB radiative efficiency. BATs narrow band inhibits a precise determination of the GRB spectral parameters, and we have developed a method to estimate these parameters with the hardness ratio information. The shallow decay component commonly existing in early X-ray afterglows, if interpreted as continuous energy injection in the external shock, suggests that the GRB efficiencies previously derived from the late-time X-ray data were not reliable. We calculate two radiative efficiencies using the afterglow kinetic energy E(K) derived at the putative deceleration time (t(dec)) and at the break time (t(b)), when the energy injection phase ends, respectively. At tb XRFs appear to be less efficient than normal GRBs. However, when we analyze the data at tdec, XRFs are found to be as efficient as GRBs. Short GRBs have similar radiative efficiencies to long GRBs despite of their different progenitors. Twenty-two bursts in the sample are identified to have the afterglow cooling frequency below the X-ray band. Assuming epsilon(e) 0:1, we find eta(gamma)(t(b)) usually 90%. Nine GRBs in the sample have the afterglow cooling frequency above the X-ray band for a very long time. This suggests a very small epsilon(B) and/or a very low ambient density n.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2008

Using Quantitative Spectroscopic Analysis to Determine the Properties and Distances of Type II Plateau Supernovae: SN 2005cs and SN 2006bp

Luc Dessart; Stephane Blondin; Peter J. Brown; Malcolm Stuart Hicken; D. John Hillier; Stephen T. Holland; Stefan Immler; Robert P. Kirshner; Peter A. Milne; Maryam Modjaz; Peter W. A. Roming

We analyze the Type II plateau supernovae (SNe IIP) SN 2005cs and SN 2006bp with the non-LTE model atmosphere code CMFGEN. We fit 13 spectra in the first month for SN 2005cs and 18 for SN 2006bp. Swift ultraviolet photometry and ground-based optical photometry calibrate each spectrum. Our analysis shows that both objects were discovered less than 3 days after they exploded, making these the earliest SN IIP spectra ever studied. They reveal broad and very weak lines from highly ionized fast ejecta with an extremely steep density profile. We identify He II λ4686 emission in the SN 2006bp ejecta. Days later, the spectra resemble the prototypical Type IIP SN 1999em, which had a supergiant-like photospheric composition. Despite the association of SN 2005cs with possible X-ray emission, the emergent UV and optical light comes from the photosphere, not from circumstellar emission. We surmise that the very steep density falloff we infer at early times may be a fossil of the combined actions of the shock wave passage and radiation driving at shock breakout. Based on tailored CMFGEN models, the direct fitting technique and the expanding photosphere method both yield distances and explosion times that agree within a few percent. We derive a distance to NGC 5194, the host of SN 2005cs, of 8.9 ± 0.5 Mpc and 17.5 ± 0.8 Mpc for SN 2006bp in NGC 3953. The luminosity of SN 2006bp is 1.5 times that of SN 1999em and 6 times that of SN 2005cs. Reliable distances to SNe IIP that do not depend on a small range in luminosity provide an independent route to the Hubble constant and improved constraints on other cosmological parameters.


The Astronomical Journal | 2009

ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT CURVES OF SUPERNOVAE WITH THE SWIFT ULTRAVIOLET/OPTICAL TELESCOPE

Peter J. Brown; Stephen T. Holland; Stefan Immler; Peter A. Milne; Peter W. A. Roming; Neil Gehrels; John A. Nousek; Nino Panagia; Martin D. Still; Daniel E. Vanden Berk

We present ultravioliet (UV) observations of supernovae (SNe) obtained with the UltraViolet/Optical Telescope (UVOT) on board the Swift spacecraft. This is the largest sample of UV light curves from any single instrument and covers all major SN types and most subtypes. The UV light curves of SNe Ia are fairly homogenous while SNe Ib/c and IIP show more variety in their light curve shapes. The UV-optical colors clearly differentiate SNe Ia and IIP, particularly at early times. The color evolution of SNe IIP, however, makes their colors similar to SNe Ia at about 20 days after explosion. SNe Ib/c are shown to have varied UV-optical colors. The use of UV colors to help type SNe will be important for high redshift SNe discovered in optical observations. These data can be added to ground based optical and near infrared data to create bolometric light curves of individual objects and as checks on generic bolometric corrections used in the absence of UV data. This sample can also be compared with rest-frame UV observations of high redshift SNe observed at optical wavelengths.We present ultraviolet (UV) observations of supernovae (SNe) obtained with the UltraViolet/Optical Telescope (UVOT) on board the Swift spacecraft. This is the largest sample of UV light curves from any single instrument and covers all major SN types and most subtypes. The UV light curves of SNe Ia are fairly homogenous, while SNe Ib/c and IIP show more variety in their light-curve shapes. The UV-optical colors clearly differentiate SNe Ia and IIP, particularly at early times. The color evolution of SNe IIP, however, makes their colors similar to SNe Ia at about 20 days after explosion. SNe Ib/c are shown to have varied UV-optical colors. The use of UV colors to help type SNe will be important for high-redshift SNe discovered in optical observations. These data can be added to ground-based optical and near infrared data to create bolometric light curves of individual objects and as checks on generic bolometric corrections used in the absence of UV data. This sample can also be compared with rest-frame UV observations of high-redshift SNe observed at optical wavelengths.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2007

Swift and XMM-Newton Observations of the Extraordinary Gamma-Ray Burst 060729: More than 125 Days of X-Ray Afterglow

Dirk Grupe; Caryl Gronwall; Xiang-Yu Wang; Peter W. A. Roming; J. R. Cummings; Bing Zhang; P. Meszaros; Maria Diaz Trigo; P. T. O’Brien; Kim L. Page; A. P. Beardmore; Olivier Godet; Daniel E. Vanden Berk; Peter J. Brown; S. Koch; David C. Morris; M. C. Stroh; David N. Burrows; John A. Nousek; Margaret Chester; Stefan Immler; Vanessa Mangano; Patrizia Romano; Guido Chincarini; Julian P. Osborne; Takanori Sakamoto; Neil Gehrels

We report the results of the Swift and XMM observations of the Swift-discovered long Gamma-Ray Burst GRB 060729 (


The Astrophysical Journal | 2010

The Absolute Magnitudes of Type Ia Supernovae in the Ultraviolet

Peter J. Brown; Peter W. A. Roming; Peter A. Milne; F. Bufano; Robin Ciardullo; N. Elias-Rosa; Alexei V. Filippenko; Ryan J. Foley; Neil Gehrels; Caryl Gronwall; Malcolm Stuart Hicken; Stephen T. Holland; Erik Andrew Hoversten; Stefan Immler; Robert P. Kirshner; Weidong Li; Paolo A. Mazzali; Mark M. Phillips; Tyler A. Pritchard; Martin D. Still; Massimo Turatto; Daniel E. Vanden Berk

T_{90}


web science | 2006

Very Early Optical Afterglows of Gamma-Ray Bursts: Evidence for Relative Paucity of Detection

Peter W. A. Roming; Patricia Schady; Derek B. Fox; Bing Zhang; En-Wei Liang; Keith O. Mason; E. Rol; David N. Burrows; Alex J. Blustin; Patricia Therese Boyd; Peter J. Brown; Stephen T. Holland; Katherine E. McGowan; Wayne B. Landsman; Kim L. Page; James E. Rhoads; S. R. Rosen; Daniel E. Vanden Berk; S. D. Barthelmy; Alice A. Breeveld; Antonino Cucchiara; Massimiliano De Pasquale; Edward E. Fenimore; Neil Gehrels; Caryl Gronwall; Dirk Grupe; Michael R. Goad; M. V. Ivanushkina; Cynthia H. James; J. A. Kennea

=115s). The afterglow of this burst was exceptionally bright in X-rays as well as at UV/Optical wavelengths showing an unusually long slow decay phase (


Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2012

The dust extinction curves of gamma-ray burst host galaxies

Patricia Schady; T. Dwelly; Mat Page; T. Krühler; J. Greiner; S. R. Oates; M. De Pasquale; M. Nardini; Peter W. A. Roming; A. Rossi; Martin Still

\alpha


arXiv: Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics | 2011

An Updated Ultraviolet Calibration for the Swift/UVOT

Alice A. Breeveld; Wayne B. Landsman; S. T. Holland; Peter W. A. Roming; N. P. M. Kuin; M. J. Page

=0.14\plm0.02) suggesting a larger energy injection phase at early times than in other bursts. The X-ray light curve displays a break at about 60 ks after the burst. The X-ray decay slope after the break is


The Astrophysical Journal | 2006

GRB 060313: A New Paradigm for Short-Hard Bursts?

Peter W. A. Roming; Daniel E. Vanden Berk; Valentin Pal’shin; Claudio Pagani; Jay P. Norris; Pawan Kumar; Hans A. Krimm; Stephen T. Holland; Caryl Gronwall; Alex J. Blustin; Bing Zhang; Patricia Schady; Takanori Sakamoto; Julian P. Osborne; John A. Nousek; F. E. Marshall; P. Meszaros; S. Golenetskii; Neil Gehrels; Dmitry D. Frederiks; Sergio Campana; David N. Burrows; Patricia Therese Boyd; S. D. Barthelmy; R. L. Aptekar

\alpha

Collaboration


Dive into the Peter W. A. Roming's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. N. Burrows

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Neil Gehrels

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. D. Barthelmy

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

N. Gehrels

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David N. Burrows

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. T. Holland

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Scott Douglas Barthelmy

Universities Space Research Association

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hans A. Krimm

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kim L. Page

University of Leicester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge