Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Petya Yorgova is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Petya Yorgova.


Spine | 2012

Are antifibrinolytics helpful in decreasing blood loss and transfusions during spinal fusion surgery in children with cerebral palsy scoliosis

Arjun A. Dhawale; Suken A. Shah; Paul D. Sponseller; Tracey P. Bastrom; Geraldine Neiss; Petya Yorgova; Peter O. Newton; Burt Yaszay; Mark F. Abel; Harry L. Shufflebarger; Peter G. Gabos; Kirk W. Dabney; Freeman Miller

Study Design. Therapeutic comparative study. Objective. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of antifibrinolytic (AF) agents in reducing blood loss and transfusions during posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in children with cerebral palsy (CP) scoliosis. Summary of Background Data. Scoliosis surgery in CP children is associated with substantial blood loss. Few reports on the role of AFs exist. Methods. A multicenter, retrospective review of a prospectively collected database of 84 consecutively enrolled patients with CF (age < 18 years) with spinal deformity who underwent PSF and instrumentation. The use of AFs, tranexamic acid (TXA), epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA), or none was based on the surgeon preference. Estimated blood loss (EBL), transfusion requirements, and length of stay were recorded. Analysis was performed with the independent-samples t test and 1-way analysis of variance with post hoc Bonferroni analysis. Results. The average age at the time of surgery was 14.4 ± 2.6 years. The groups were well matched in preoperative major deformity, age, levels fused, and operating time. Forty-four patients received AFs (30 TXA and 14 EACA), and 40 received no antifibrinolytics (NAF). The EBL averaged 1684 mL for the AFs group and 2685 mL for the NAF group (P = 0.002). There was more cell salvage transfusion in the NAF group. No significant differences were found in total transfusion requirements. There was a trend for decreased hospital stay in the AFs group. No adverse effects were seen. On comparison of the 3 groups (NAF, TXA, and EACA), a significant difference was observed between the TXA and the other groups with respect to EBL and cell salvage transfusion. Conclusion. AFs significantly reduced intraoperative EBL associated with PSF, with no adverse effects; however, we could not demonstrate significant differences in total transfusion, except in cell salvage. TXA was more effective than EACA in decreasing the EBL and cell salvage transfusion.


Spine | 2014

The effect of serial growing rod lengthening on the sagittal profile and pelvic parameters in early-onset scoliosis

Suken A. Shah; Ali F. Karatas; Arjun A. Dhawale; Ozgur Dede; Gregory M. Mundis; Laurens Holmes; Petya Yorgova; Geraldine Neiss; Charles E. Johnston; John B. Emans; George H. Thompson; Jeff Pawelek; Behrooz A. Akbarnia

Study Design. Retrospective case series. Objective. To report the effect of repeated growing rod (GR) lengthenings on the sagittal and pelvic profile in patients with early-onset scoliosis. Summary of Background Data. Posterior distraction-based GRs have gained popularity as a technique for the surgical management of early-onset scoliosis. However, there are no published studies on the effect of serial GR lengthenings on sagittal balance, thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), and pelvic parameters. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed data from a multicenter early-onset scoliosis database. Forty-three patients who were able to walk with minimum 2-year follow-up who underwent single- or dual-GR surgery were included for review. Mean number of lengthenings was 6.4 (range, 3–16). Mean preoperative age was 5.6 years (standard deviation, 2.4 yr), and mean follow-up was 3.5 years. Maximum TK, LL, and sagittal balance were assessed preoperatively, after index surgery, and at the latest follow-up. Results. There was a significant decrease both in TK and LL after index surgery, which then increased during the lengthening period. There was a significant increase in both proximal junctional kyphosis and distal junctional angle. Pelvic parameters (pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, sacral slope) were unchanged during the treatment period. Significant improvement was observed in sagittal balance. There was a correlation between the change in TK and change in LL. Conclusion. TK decreased after index surgery and increased between the index surgery and the latest follow-up, which was accompanied by an increase in LL. All-screw proximal constructs had mean 9° more proximal junctional kyphosis than all-hook proximal constructs. An increase in proximal junctional kyphosis and distal junctional angle was found during the treatment period. Although there was an independent effect of number of lengthenings on TK, there was no significant detrimental effect on other sagittal spinopelvic parameters. GRs had a positive effect on sagittal vertical axis, which returned patients to a more neutral alignment through the course of treatment. Level of Evidence: 4


Spine | 2015

Prediction of Curve Progression in Idiopathic Scoliosis: Validation of the Sanders Skeletal Maturity Staging System.

Prakash Sitoula; Kushagra Verma; Laurens Holmes; Peter G. Gabos; James O. Sanders; Petya Yorgova; Geraldine Neiss; Kenneth J. Rogers; Suken A. Shah

Study Design. Retrospective case series. Objective. This study aimed to validate the Sanders Skeletal Maturity Staging System and to assess its correlation to curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis. Summary of Background Data. The Sanders Skeletal Maturity Staging System has been used to predict curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis. This study intended to validate that initial study with a larger sample size. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 1100 consecutive patients with idiopathic scoliosis between 2005 and 2011. Girls aged 8 to 14 years (<2 yr postmenarche) and boys aged 10 to 16 years who had obtained at least 1 hand and spine radiograph on the same day for evaluation of skeletal age and scoliosis curve magnitude were followed to skeletal maturity (Risser stage 5 or fully capped Risser stage 4), curve progression to 50° or greater, or spinal fusion. Patients with nonidiopathic curves were excluded. Results. There were 161 patients: 131 girls (12.3 ± 1.2 yr) and 30 boys (13.9 ± 1.1 yr). The distribution of patients within Sanders stage (SS) 1 through 7 was 7, 28, 41, 45, 7, 31, and 2 patients, respectively; modified Lenke curve types 1 to 6 were 26, 12, 63, 5, 38, and 17 patients, respectively. All patients in SS2 with initial Cobb angles of 25° or greater progressed, and patients in SS1 and SS3 with initial Cobb angles of 35° or greater progressed. Similarly, all patients with initial Cobb angles of 40° or greater progressed except those in SS7. Conversely, none of the patients with initial Cobb angles of 15° or less or those in SS5, SS6, and SS7 with initial Cobb angles of 30° or less progressed. Predictive progression of 67%, 50%, 43%, 27%, and 60% was observed for subgroups SS1/30°, SS2/20°, SS3/30°, SS4/30°, and SS6/35° respectively. Conclusion. This larger cohort shows a strong predictive correlation between SS and initial Cobb angle for probability of curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis. Level of Evidence: 3


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume | 2015

An Independent Evaluation of the Validity of a DNA-Based Prognostic Test for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Benjamin D. Roye; Margaret L. Wright; Hiroko Matsumoto; Petya Yorgova; Daren McCalla; Joshua E. Hyman; David P. Roye; Suken A. Shah; Michael G. Vitale

BACKGROUND ScoliScore is a DNA-based prognostic test, designed and used to help to predict the risk of curve progression in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The role of this test in clinical practice remains unclear as the published results of the ScoliScore have not been validated independently. The purpose of this study was to determine if the ScoliScore effectively predicted the risk of curve progression in patients with mild and moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in two urban academic medical centers. METHODS One hundred and twenty-six patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who met inclusion criteria at two centers were administered the ScoliScore test. Two groups were created: a progression group (those who had a Cobb angle of >40° or those who had undergone surgical fusion) and a non-progression group (those who had skeletal maturity without curve progression to 40°). ScoliScore values and risk levels were compared between the two groups. The negative predictive value was calculated for low-risk scores and the positive predictive value was calculated for high-risk scores. RESULTS There was no significant difference (p = 0.706) in the mean ScoliScore (and standard deviation) between patients with curve progression (107 ± 55 points) and those without curve progression (102 ± 62 points). There was also no significant difference (p = 0.399) in curve progression between patients with high-risk scores (26.7%) and those with low-risk scores (12.9%). The positive predictive value of the test was 0.27 (95% confidence interval, 0.09 to 0.55), and the negative predictive value was 0.87 (95% confidence interval, 0.69 to 0.96). ScoliScores and rates of progression were not affected by brace-wear. CONCLUSIONS ScoliScores did not differ between patients with and without curve progression, and the negative and positive predictive values were lower in our study than in the previously published validation study by the developers of the test. This may be due to differences in our test population, genetic variability, or failure of patients in the non-progression group to follow up.


The Spine Journal | 2013

Effectiveness of cross-linking posterior segmental instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a 2-year follow-up comparative study.

Arjun A. Dhawale; Suken A. Shah; Petya Yorgova; Geraldine Neiss; Douglas J. Layer; Kenneth J. Rogers; Peter G. Gabos; Laurens Holmes

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Surgeons continue to debate the need for a cross-link (CL) in posterior spinal instrumentation constructs with segmental pedicle screws in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Advantage of CLs is increased stiffness of the construct, and disadvantages include added expense and risk of late operative-site pain and pseudarthrosis. PURPOSE To compare the effectiveness of using CLs versus using no cross-links (NCLs) in posterior segmental instrumentation in AIS. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective comparative study, level of evidence 3. PATIENT SAMPLE Seventy-five AIS patients less than 21 years of age, who underwent posterior spinal instrumentation with segmental pedicle screws (25 with CLs and 50 with NCLs) at a single institution with 2-year follow-up, are described. OUTCOME MEASURES Physiologic measures include imaging: thoracic and lumbar Cobb angles, correction rate, apical vertebral translation (AVT), and apical vertebral rotation (AVR); self-report measures include Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) domain outcome scores. METHODS Preoperative (pre-op) and postoperative first erect, 1-year, and 2-year follow-up radiographs were measured. Instrumentation-related complications and normalized SRS scores were recorded. Independent sample t test, χ(2) test, and repeated-measures analysis of variance were used for analyses. RESULTS The average age at surgery was 14 years, the mean pre-op Cobb angle was 57°, and the mean number of levels fused was 10.9. The groups were similar preoperatively with respect to age, sex, Lenke curve, Cobb angle, AVT, and Risser grade and were similar intraoperatively for levels fused and anchor density. There was no difference in AVR, Cobb angle, correction rate, or AVT between the groups (p>.05). Complications included one wound infection in the CL group and one painful scar in the NCL group. There were no differences in SRS domain scores. CONCLUSION We observed no differences in maintenance of correction, SRS scores, and complications with or without cross-linking posterior segmental instrumentation in AIS patients over 2-year follow-up. Further follow-up is necessary.


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume | 2016

Are We Prescribing Our Patients Too Much Pain Medication?: Best Predictors of Narcotic Usage After Spinal Surgery for Scoliosis

Daniel R. Grant; Scott J. Schoenleber; Alicia M. McCarthy; Geraldine Neiss; Petya Yorgova; Kenneth J. Rogers; Peter G. Gabos; Suken A. Shah

BACKGROUND Physicians play a role in the current prescription drug-abuse epidemic. Surgeons often prescribe more postoperative narcotic pain medication than patients routinely need. Although narcotics are effective for severe, acute, postoperative pain, few evidence-based guidelines exist regarding the routinely required amount and duration of use post-hospital discharge. METHODS Patients in a prospective cohort undergoing posterior spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis were asked preoperatively to rate their pain level, the level of pain expected each week postoperatively, and their pain tolerance. Post-discharge pain scores and narcotic use were reported at weekly intervals for 4 weeks postoperatively. Demographic data, preoperative Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 scores, operative details, perioperative data, and self-reported pain levels were analyzed with respect to their association with total medication use and refills received. Disposal plans were also assessed. RESULTS Seventy-two patients were enrolled, and 85% completed the surveys. The mean patient age was 14.9 years; 69% of the patients were female. The cohort was divided into 3 groups on the basis of total medication usage. The mean number of pills used in the middle (average-use) group was 49 pills. In postoperative week 4, narcotic usage was minimal (a mean of 2.9 pills by the highest-use group). Also by this time point, pain scores had, on average, returned to preoperative levels. Older age, male sex, a higher body mass index, and a higher preoperative pain score were associated with increased narcotic use. Sixty-seven percent of the patients planned to dispose of their unused medication, although only 59% of those patients planned on doing so in a manner recommended by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. CONCLUSIONS Postoperative narcotic dosing may be improved by considering patient age, weight, sex, and preoperative pain score. The precise estimation of individual narcotic needs is complex. Patient and family education on the importance and proper method of narcotic disposal is an essential component of minimizing the availability of unused postoperative medication. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Spine deformity | 2018

Intraoperative CT Scan Verification of Pedicle Screw Placement in AIS to Prevent Malpositioned Screws: Safety Benefit and Cost

Jennifer M. Bauer; Jeffrey A. Moore; Rajiv Rangarajan; Brian S. Gibbs; Petya Yorgova; Geraldine Neiss; Kenneth J. Rogers; Peter G. Gabos; Suken A. Shah

STUDY DESIGN Prospective database review. OBJECTIVES Determine if use of intraoperative 3D imaging of pedicle screw position provides clinical and cost benefit. Injury or reoperation from malpositioned pedicle screws in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery occurs but is increasingly considered to be a never-event. To avoid complications, intraoperative 3D imaging of screw position may be obtained. METHODS A prospective, consecutive AIS database at a high-volume pediatric spine center was examined three years before and after implementation of an intraoperative low-dose computed tomographic (CT) scan protocol. All screws were placed via freehand technique and corrected if found to be outside optimal trajectory on the postplacement CT scan. Demographic and outcome data were compared between cohorts, along with number, location, and reason for screw change. Cost analysis was based on the average cost of revision surgery for screw malposition versus intraoperative CT use. RESULTS There were 153 patients in the pre-CT and 153 in the post-CT cohorts with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Two reoperations were needed for revision of improper screw placement in the pre-CT group and none in the post-CT group. Number of patients needed to harm was 76 (absolute risk increase = 1.31% [-0.49%, 3.11%]). Of those who had intraoperative CT scans, 80 (52.3%) needed on average 1.75 screw trajectories/lengths changed. Forty-three percent were medial breaches; of these, 39% were in the concavity. There were no differences between patients who did and did not need screw repositioning with regard to body mass index (BMI), age, curve size, surgeon/trainee side, screw density, or preoperative and one-year postoperative Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire (SRS-22) scores. The average cost of reoperation for malposition was


Spine deformity | 2017

Is There an Improvement in Quality of Life with Early Onset Scoliosis Managed with Traditional Growing Rods Converted to Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods

Jennifer M. Bauer; Petya Yorgova; Geraldine Neiss; Kenneth J. Rogers; Peter F. Sturm; Paul D. Sponseller; Scott J. Luhmann; Jeff Pawelek; A. Suken Shah

4,900, whereas the cost of a single intraoperative CT was


Spine deformity | 2013

Ponte Osteotomies With Pedicle Screw Instrumentation in the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Suken A. Shah; Arjun A. Dhawale; Jon E. Oda; Petya Yorgova; Geraldine Neiss; Laurens Holmes; Peter G. Gabos

232. CONCLUSION Intraoperative CT is an effective tool to prevent reoperation in AIS surgery for incorrect screw placement. Despite high volume, experience, and specialty training, incorrect trajectories occur and systems should be in place for preventable error. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level II.STUDY DESIGN Prospective database review. OBJECTIVES Determine if use of intraoperative 3D imaging of pedicle screw position provides clinical and cost benefit. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND Injury or reoperation from malpositioned pedicle screws in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery occurs but is increasingly considered to be a never-event. To avoid complications, intraoperative 3D imaging of screw position may be obtained. METHODS A prospective, consecutive AIS database at a high-volume pediatric spine center was examined three years before and after implementation of an intraoperative low-dose computed tomographic (CT) scan protocol. All screws were placed via freehand technique and corrected if found to be outside optimal trajectory on the postplacement CT scan. Demographic and outcome data were compared between cohorts, along with number, location, and reason for screw change. Cost analysis was based on the average cost of revision surgery for screw malposition versus intraoperative CT use. RESULTS There were 153 patients in the pre-CT and 153 in the post-CT cohorts with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Two reoperations were needed for revision of improper screw placement in the pre-CT group and none in the post-CT group. Number of patients needed to harm was 76 (absolute risk increase = 1.31% [-0.49%, 3.11%]). Of those who had intraoperative CT scans, 80 (52.3%) needed on average 1.75 screw trajectories/lengths changed. Forty-three percent were medial breaches; of these, 39% were in the concavity. There were no differences between patients who did and did not need screw repositioning with regard to body mass index (BMI), age, curve size, surgeon/trainee side, screw density, or preoperative and one-year postoperative Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire (SRS-22) scores. The average cost of reoperation for malposition was


Journal of Children's Orthopaedics | 2015

Electronic monitoring of orthopedic brace compliance

Tariq Rahman; Whitney Sample; Petya Yorgova; Geraldine Neiss; Kenneth J. Rogers; Suken A. Shah; Peter G. Gabos; Dan Kritzer; J. Richard Bowen

4,900, whereas the cost of a single intraoperative CT was

Collaboration


Dive into the Petya Yorgova's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Suken A. Shah

Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Geraldine Neiss

Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kenneth J. Rogers

Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Arjun A. Dhawale

Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Laurens Holmes

Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeff Pawelek

Boston Children's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jennifer M. Bauer

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mutlu Cobanoglu

Adnan Menderes University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge