Philip Carthew

Application of the Margin of Exposure (MOE) approach to substances in food that are genotoxic and carcinogenic

This paper presents the work of an expert group established by the International Life Sciences Institute - European branch (ILSI Europe) to follow up the recommendations of an international conference on Risk Assessment of Compounds that are both Genotoxic and Carcinogenic: New Approaches. Twelve genotoxic and carcinogenic chemicals that can be present in food were selected for calculation of a Margin of Exposure (MOE) between a point of departure on the dose-response for oral carcinogenicity in animal studies and estimates of human dietary exposure. The MOE can be used to support prioritisation of risk management action and, if the MOE is very large, on communication of a low level of human health concern. Depending on the approaches taken in determining the point of departure and the estimation of exposure, it is possible to derive very different values for the MOE. It is therefore essential that the selection of the cancer endpoint and mathematical treatment of the data are clearly described and justified if the results of the MOE approach are to be trusted and of value to risk managers. An outline framework for calculating an MOE is proposed in order to help to ensure transparency in the results.

Lack of effect of butylparaben and methylparaben on the reproductive system in male rats

BACKGROUNDnParabens are widely used preservatives in cosmetics and pharmaceutical products, and approved as food additives. Parabens have been considered safe for these uses for many years. Recently, adverse effects on male reproductive parameters in rats have been reported when parabens were given orally for 8 weeks starting at three weeks of age. Our studies used two representative parabens, methyl- and butylparaben, to try to replicate these studies and thereby evaluate potential reproductive effects in male Wistar rats.nnnMETHODSnDiets containing 0, 100, 1000 or 10,000 ppm of either butyl- or methylparaben were fed to male rats for eight weeks. Rats were 22 days of age at the start of exposure. Parameters evaluated included organ weights, histopathology of reproductive tissues, sperm production, motility, morphology and reproductive hormone levels (butylparaben only).nnnRESULTSnNone of the parameters evaluated for either paraben showed compound- or dosage-dependent adverse effects. Metabolism experiments of butylparaben indicate that it is rapidly metabolized by non-specific esterases to p-hydroxybenzoic acid and butanol, neither of which is estrogenic.nnnCONCLUSIONSnExposure to methyl- or butylparaben in the diet for eight weeks did not affect any male reproductive organs or parameters at exposures as high as 10,000 ppm, corresponding to a mean daily dose of 1,141.1+/-58.9 or 1,087.6+/-67.8 mg/kg/day for methyl- and butylparaben, respectively. The rapid metabolism of parabens by esterases probably explains why these weakly estrogenic substances elicit no in vivo effects when administered by relevant exposure routes (i.e., topical and oral).

Cumulative exposure to tamoxifen : DNA adducts and liver cancer in the rat

Abstract. Tamoxifen is a potent rat liver carcinogen, currently being used as a long-term chemopreventative for breast cancer in healthy women. The mechanism by which tamoxifen causes liver cancer in rats is known to be associated with the accumulation of tamoxifen DNA adducts in this organ. We have examined the dose-response relationship of tamoxifen-induced DNA adducts in the liver and the subsequent increase in the development of liver cancer, with and without phenobarbital promotion. Female Wistar (Han) rats were fed 420xa0ppm tamoxifen in the diet for 0, 1, 4, 8 or 12 weeks after which time rats were either examined immediately for hepatic tamoxifen-induced DNA damage using the 32P-postlabelling assay, or left for lifetime for tumour assessment. A proportion of rats left for lifetime study were given phenobarbital in their drinking water. There was a clear dose-response relationship with respect to duration of tamoxifen exposure for both accumulation of DNA adducts and lifetime risk of liver cancer. In the absence of phenobarbital promotion there was a threshold value for tamoxifen-induced DNA adducts (180 adducts/108 nucleotides) and the subsequent induction of liver cancer. This study demonstrates the relationship between the accumulation of hepatic tamoxifen-induced DNA adducts and the development of liver cancer and establishes the threshold for hepatocarcinogenesis in terms of DNA adduct formation. These data could provide useful information in interpreting the relevance of low levels of DNA adducts in humans.

A model to estimate the oestrogen receptor mediated effects from exposure to soy isoflavones in food

The advantages that regular consumption of a diet containing soy may have on human health have been enshrined in a major health claim that has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration in the USA, regarding potential protection from heart disease by soy. This could have a major influence on the dietary consumption patterns of soy for consumers and lead to the development of soy enriched foods to enable consumers to achieve the benefits thought to be associated with increased soy consumption in a Western diet. If an increase in soy consumption is beneficial to particular disease conditions, there is always the possibility that there will be effects other than those that are desirable. For soy-containing foods there has been concern that the phytoestrogen content of soy, which is composed of several isoflavones, could be a separate health issue, due to the oestrogen-like activity of isoflavones. To address this, a method has been developed to estimate, relative to 17-beta oestradiol, the activity of the common isoflavones present in soy phytoestrogens, based on their binding to and transcriptional activation of the major oestrogen receptor sub-types alpha and beta. Using this approach, the additional oestrogen-like activity that would be expected from inclusion of soy supplemented foodstuffs in a Western diet, can be determined for different sub-populations, who may have different susceptibilities to the potential for the unwanted biological effects occurring with consumption of soy enriched foods. Because of the theoretical nature of this model, and the controversy over the nature of whether some of the oestrogen-like effects of phytoestrogens are adverse, the biological effects of soy isoflavones and their potential for adverse effects in man, is also reviewed. The question that is critical to the long term safe use of foods enriched in soy is, which observed biological effects in animal studies are likely to also occur in man and whether these would have an adverse effect on human health.

Intrapleural administration of fibres induces mesothelioma in rats in the same relative order of hazard as occurs in man after exposure

1 The dose—response data for the induction of mesothelioma, in rats, by the intrapleural administration of the fibrous zeolite, erionite, has been compared to the published data for the crocidolite and chrysotile forms of asbestos. Erionite is more than two orders of magnitude more carcinogenic than either of the two forms of asbestos examined. 2 The relative sensitivity of the intrapleural and intraperitoneal routes of injection were also examined. The sensitivity of the intraperitoneal over the intrapleural route of administration was considerably greater for all the forms of asbestos examined but not for erionite. 3 The relationship for different fibres, between the number of fibres required to give animals mesothelioma, at the 50% or 10% observable tumour effect level (OTEL) was examined, and a ranking of relative carcinogenicity was made. 4 This showed that the data derived from the dose responses obtained by the intrapleural administration of fibres to rats ranked the relative carcinogenicity of erionite, crocidolite and chrysotile in accord with the known clinical mesothelioma induction in man after exposure to these fibres. Examination of the carcinogenicity ranking from data derived from intraperitoneal injections of fibres was not in accord with the known clinical mesothelioma induction in man for the various asbestos types examined.

Toxicology ontology perspectives.

The field of predictive toxicology requires the development of open, public, computable, standardized toxicology vocabularies and ontologies to support the applications required by in silico, in vitro, and in vivo toxicology methods and related analysis and reporting activities. In this article we review ontology developments based on a set of perspectives showing how ontologies are being used in predictive toxicology initiatives and applications. Perspectives on resources and initiatives reviewed include OpenTox, eTOX, Pistoia Alliance, ToxWiz, Virtual Liver, EU-ADR, BEL, ToxML, and Bioclipse. We also review existing ontology developments in neighboring fields that can contribute to establishing an ontological framework for predictive toxicology. A significant set of resources is already available to provide a foundation for an ontological framework for 21st century mechanistic-based toxicology research. Ontologies such as ToxWiz provide a basis for application to toxicology investigations, whereas other ontologies under development in the biological, chemical, and biomedical communities could be incorporated in an extended future framework. OpenTox has provided a semantic web framework for the implementation of such ontologies into software applications and linked data resources. Bioclipse developers have shown the benefit of interoperability obtained through ontology by being able to link their workbench application with remote OpenTox web services. Although these developments are promising, an increased international coordination of efforts is greatly needed to develop a more unified, standardized, and open toxicology ontology framework.

An assessment of the carcinogenic potential of shea oleine in the rat

Shea oleine, an oil fraction derived from the nut of the tree Butyrospermum parkii, is used as a frying oil. As part of a series of studies, this investigation examined the carcinogenic potential of 15% (w/w) shea oleine in comparison with 15% (w/w) sheanut oil, and palm oil following dietary administration to rats over 104 weeks. The assessment comprised an evaluation of mortality, clinical signs, body weight, food intake, clinical pathology, organ weights and macroscopic and histopathological examination plus tumour type and incidence evaluation. Results showed that shea oleine produced no adverse effects and no evidence of tumorigenic potential compared to other commercially available sheanut and palm oils in the rat. Notable differences were confined to reduced body weight gain and food intake, reduced cholesterol and increased alkaline phosphatase levels, reduced heart weight and an increased incidence of pulmonary lipidosis with shea oleine diets. The latter effect may reflect a naturally lower incidence of this finding with palm oil diets. Tumour findings, specific to shea oleine diets, were restricted to an increase in the number of hepatomas for females, pancreatic exocrine adenomas for males and skin keratoacanthomas for males fed shea oleine diets. The increase in the incidence of hepatomas with treatment was thought to be related to the high fat content of the diets. The incidence of these tumour findings was similar to that given in published data for the Wistar rat, or the in house values for tumour incidence in rats fed high-fat diets. In conclusion, none of the findings in this study were considered to be adverse effects. In comparison with other commercially available edible oils, shea oleine showed no tumorigenic potential following dietary administration at 7.5 g/kg/day in the rat.

Application of the Margin of Exposure (MOE) approach to substances in food that are genotoxic and carcinogenic: Example: CAS No: 105650-23-5 PhIP (2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine)

PhIP (2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine) is a heterocyclic amine and genotoxic carcinogen contaminant that occurs during the grilling and frying of meat and fish, through an interaction between sugars and creatine via the Maillard reaction. PhIP causes cancers of the prostate, mammary gland and colon in rodents. Dose-response modelling of the data for these three tumour types gives BMDL10 values of 0.48 mg/kg/day for the prostate tumours, 0.74 mg/kg/day for mammary tumours and 2.71 mg/kg/day for colon tumours. The lowest MOEs for prostate, mammary and colon tumours were 20,000, 40,000 and 150,000, respectively.

Selection of appropriate tumour data sets for Benchmark Dose Modelling (BMD) and derivation of a Margin of Exposure (MoE) for substances that are genotoxic and carcinogenic: Considerations of biological relevance of tumour type, data quality and uncertainty assessment

This article addresses a number of concepts related to the selection and modelling of carcinogenicity data for the calculation of a Margin of Exposure. It follows up on the recommendations put forward by the International Life Sciences Institute - European branch in 2010 on the application of the Margin of Exposure (MoE) approach to substances in food that are genotoxic and carcinogenic. The aims are to provide practical guidance on the relevance of animal tumour data for human carcinogenic hazard assessment, appropriate selection of tumour data for Benchmark Dose Modelling, and approaches for dealing with the uncertainty associated with the selection of data for modelling and, consequently, the derived Point of Departure (PoD) used to calculate the MoE. Although the concepts outlined in this article are interrelated, the background expertise needed to address each topic varies. For instance, the expertise needed to make a judgement on biological relevance of a specific tumour type is clearly different to that needed to determine the statistical uncertainty around the data used for modelling a benchmark dose. As such, each topic is dealt with separately to allow those with specialised knowledge to target key areas of guidance and provide a more in-depth discussion on each subject for those new to the concept of the Margin of Exposure approach.

Food for thought... : A toxicology ontology roadmap

Foreign substances can have a dramatic and unpredictable adverse effect on human health. In the development of new therapeutic agents, it is essential that the potential adverse effects of all candidates be identified as early as possible. The field of predictive toxicology strives to profile the potential for adverse effects of novel chemical substances before they occur, both with traditional in vivo experimental approaches and increasingly through the development of in vitro and computational methods which can supplement and reduce the need for animal testing. To be maximally effective, the field needs access to the largest possible knowledge base of previous toxicology findings, and such results need to be made available in such a fashion so as to be interoperable, comparable, and compatible with standard toolkits. This necessitates the development of open, public, computable, and standardized toxicology vocabularies and ontologies so as to support the applications required by in silico, in vitro, and in vivo toxicology methods and related analysis and reporting activities. Such ontology development will support data management, model building, integrated analysis, validation and reporting, including regulatory reporting and alternative testing submission requirements as required by guidelines such as the REACH legislation, leading to new scientific advances in a mechanistically-based predictive toxicology. Numerous existing ontology and standards initiatives can contribute to the creation of a toxicology ontology supporting the needs of predictive toxicology and risk assessment. Additionally, new ontologies are needed to satisfy practical use cases and scenarios where gaps currently exist. Developing and integrating these resources will require a well-coordinated and sustained effort across numerous stakeholders engaged in a public-private partnership. In this communication, we set out a roadmap for the development of an integrated toxicology ontology, harnessing existing resources where applicable. We describe the stakeholders requirements analysis from the academic and industry perspectives, timelines, and expected benefits of this initiative, with a view to engagement with the wider community.