Philip Claudio Joerg
University of Zurich
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Philip Claudio Joerg.
Frontiers of Earth Science in China | 2016
Leo Sold; Matthias Huss; Horst Machguth; Philip Claudio Joerg; Gwendolyn Leysinger Vieli; Andreas Linsbauer; Nadine Salzmann; Michael Zemp; Martin Hoelzle
A re-analysis is presented here of a 10-year mass balance series at Findelengletscher, a temperate mountain glacier in Switzerland. Calculating glacier-wide mass balance from the set of glaciological point balance observations using conventional approaches, such as the profile or contour method, resulted in significant deviations from the reference value given by the geodetic mass change over a five-year period. This is attributed to the sparsity of observations at high elevations and to the inability of the evaluation schemes to adequately estimate accumulation in unmeasured areas. However, measurements of winter mass balance were available for large parts of the study period from snow probings and density pits. Complementary surveys by helicopter-borne ground-penetrating radar (GPR) were conducted in three consecutive years. The complete set of seasonal observations was assimilated using a distributed mass balance model. This model-based extrapolation revealed a substantial mass loss at Findelengletscher of -0.43m w.e. a^-1 between 2004 and 2014, while the loss was less pronounced for its former tributary, Adlergletscher (-0.30m w.e. a^-1). For both glaciers, the resulting time series were within the uncertainty bounds of the geodetic mass change. We show that the model benefited strongly from the ability to integrate seasonal observations. If no winter mass balance measurements were available and snow cover was represented by a linear precipitation gradient, the geodetic mass balance was not matched. If winter balance measurements by snow probings and snow density pits were taken into account, the model performance was substantially improved but still showed a significant bias relative to the geodetic mass change. Thus the excellent agreement of the model-based extrapolation with the geodetic mass change was owed to an adequate representation of winter accumulation distribution by means of extensive GPR measurements.
Geografiska Annaler Series A-physical Geography | 2014
Philip Claudio Joerg; Michael Zemp
Abstract Assessments of geodetic volume change are widely used in glaciology and have a long tradition dating back to the nineteenth century. Over time, the geodetic method and corresponding data storage have been developed further, but the resulting methodological heterogeneity can lead to errors that are difficult to separate from other survey uncertainties. In this study we used high‐resolution airborne laser scanning data from the indelengletscher in the wiss lps to evaluate state‐of‐the‐art volumetric glacier change methods. For the first time we have been able to simulate errors arising from different geodetic methods and spatial resolutions. The evaluation showed that, although the digital elevation models were perfectly co‐registered, systematic and random method‐ and scale‐dependent errors still occurred. These errors have an impact on the resulting volume changes at lower spatial resolutions and may lead to exponentially larger uncertainties. Volume changes from contour methods provided reasonably accurate results, while volumetric change assessments from central profile lines were especially prone to biases at any scale.
The Cryosphere | 2013
Michael Zemp; E. Thibert; Matthias Huss; D. Stumm; C. Rolstad Denby; Christopher Nuth; Samuel U. Nussbaumer; Geir Moholdt; Andrew Mercer; Christoph Mayer; Philip Claudio Joerg; Peter Jansson; B. Hynek; Andrea Fischer; H. Escher-Vetter; Hallgeir Elvehøy; Liss M. Andreassen
Journal of Hydrology | 2014
Matthias Huss; Michael Zemp; Philip Claudio Joerg; Nadine Salzmann
Remote Sensing of Environment | 2016
Jan U.H. Eitel; Bernhard Höfle; Lee A. Vierling; Antonio Abellán; Gregory P. Asner; Jeffrey S. Deems; Craig L. Glennie; Philip Claudio Joerg; Adam LeWinter; Troy S. Magney; Gottfried Mandlburger; Douglas C. Morton; Jörg Müller; Kerri T. Vierling
Remote Sensing of Environment | 2012
Philip Claudio Joerg; Felix Morsdorf; Michael Zemp
Journal of Glaciology | 2013
Leo Sold; Matthias Huss; Martin Hoelzle; Hubert Andereggen; Philip Claudio Joerg; Michael Zemp
Remote Sensing of Environment | 2015
Philip Claudio Joerg; Jörg Weyermann; Felix Morsdorf; Michael Zemp; Michael E. Schaepman
The Cryosphere Discussions | 2013
Michael Zemp; E. Thibert; Matthias Huss; D. Stumm; C. Rolstad Denby; Christopher Nuth; Samuel U. Nussbaumer; Geir Moholdt; Andrew Mercer; Christoph Mayer; Philip Claudio Joerg; Peter Jansson; B. Hynek; Andrea Fischer; H. Escher-Vetter; Hallgeir Elvehøy; Liss M. Andreassen
Archive | 2010
Philip Claudio Joerg; Felix Morsdorf; Michael Zemp