Philip J. Rossi
Marquette University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Philip J. Rossi.
Archive | 2013
Philip J. Rossi
It may seem that a model of God, or of any ultimate structuring principle for reality, is irrelevant to the conceptual shape or practical application of just war theory. This essay argues the contrary: our ultimate frame of reference for ordering of the cosmos and our human place in it bears significantly on how we construe human responsibility for establishing an international order that will bring warfare to an end. In particular, a model of God enabling us to take human freedom seriously as an effective power to bringing about peace as a lasting human good makes it possible to re-orient the finality of just war theory from that of merely minimizing the harm of war as an evil inevitably woven into human social dynamics to that of active peacemaking, i.e., of pursuing conditions that foster a stable order for peace that will render war an “unnecessary evil.”It may seem that a model of God, or of any ultimate structuring principle for reality, is irrelevant to the conceptual shape or practical application of just war theory. This essay argues the contrary: our ultimate frame of reference for ordering of the cosmos and our human place in it bears significantly on how we construe human responsibility for establishing an international order that will bring warfare to an end. In particular, a model of God enabling us to take human freedom seriously as an effective power to bringing about peace as a lasting human good makes it possible to re-orient the finality of just war theory from that of merely minimizing the harm of war as an evil inevitably woven into human social dynamics to that of active peacemaking, i.e., of pursuing conditions that foster a stable order for peace that will render war an “unnecessary evil.”
Theological Studies | 2010
Philip J. Rossi
For two centuries Catholic philosophers and theologians have generally treated Immanuel Kants critical philosophy as incompatible with principles fundamental to Catholic accounts of the human condition in relation to God. This article argues that contemporary scholarship—particularly about the role of anthropological concerns in the critical project—indicates that Kants understanding of finite human freedom provides a basis for Catholic theology to engage his thinking positively in the articulation of a theology of grace for humanitys postmodern context.
Theological Studies | 1997
Philip J. Rossi
cal, that most eloquent of Jansenist spokespersons, condemning Jesuits for allowing too much freedom to individual conscience! Had V. paid close attention to the Jesuit Constitutions, he would have found those who govern the Society of Jesus obliged to take seriously the individual consciences of those under their authority. Moreover, most histories of Jansenism emphasize prominent roles played by women. V. gives surprisingly little attention to Jansenist women or to any gender issues. Why not? Is it because the most prominent women associated with Jansenism, such as Angelique Arnauld, lived in the 17th century? These reservations should not obscure the fact that this is a very important study, perhaps a seminal work for further examination of the religious origins of the French Revolution. Such examination will be most fruitful when it approaches history as a longue duree and delves more deeply and broadly into religious diversity and controversy in pre-Revolutionary France.
Archive | 2004
Lawrence Pasternack; Philip J. Rossi
Archive | 1991
Philip J. Rossi; Michael Wreen
Archive | 1994
Philip J. Rossi; Paul A. Soukup
Archive | 2005
Philip J. Rossi
Archive | 1995
Philip J. Rossi
Archive | 2008
Philip J. Rossi
Religious Experience and Contemporary Theological Epistemology. Eds. L. Boeve, Y. de Maeseneer, S. van den Bossche. Leuven: Peeters-Leuven UP, 2005 | 2005
Philip J. Rossi