Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Philip S. Mullenix is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Philip S. Mullenix.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 2008

Prehospital tourniquet use in Operation Iraqi Freedom: effect on hemorrhage control and outcomes.

Alec C. Beekley; James A. Sebesta; Lorne H. Blackbourne; Garth S. Herbert; David S. Kauvar; David G. Baer; Thomas J. Walters; Philip S. Mullenix; John B. Holcomb

BACKGROUND Up to 9% of casualties killed in action during the Vietnam War died from exsanguination from extremity injuries. Retrospective reviews of prehospital tourniquet use in World War II and by the Israeli Defense Forces revealed improvements in extremity hemorrhage control and very few adverse limb outcomes when tourniquet times are less than 6 hours. HYPOTHESIS We hypothesized that prehospital tourniquet use decreased hemorrhage from extremity injuries and saved lives, and was not associated with a substantial increase in adverse limb outcomes. METHODS This was an institutional review board-approved, retrospective review of the 31st combat support hospital for 1 year during Operation Iraqi Freedom. Inclusion criteria were any patient with a traumatic amputation, major extremity vascular injury, or documented prehospital tourniquet. RESULTS Among 3,444 total admissions, 165 patients met inclusion criteria. Sixty-seven patients had prehospital tourniquets (TK); 98 patients had severe extremity injuries but no prehospital tourniquet (No TK). Extremity Acute Injury Scores were the same (3.5 TK vs. 3.4 No TK) in both groups. Differences (p < 0.05) were noted in the numbers of patients with arm injuries (16.2% TK vs. 30.6% No TK), injuries requiring vascular reconstruction (29.9% TK vs. 52.5% No TK), traumatic amputations (41.8% TK vs. 26.3% No TK), and in those patients with adequate bleeding control on arrival (83% TK vs. 60% No TK). Secondary amputation rates (4 (6.0%) TK vs. 9 (9.1%) No TK); and mortality (3 (4.4%) TK vs. 4 (4.1%) No TK) did not differ. Tourniquet use was not deemed responsible for subsequent amputation in severely mangled extremities. Analysis revealed that four of seven deaths were potentially preventable with functional prehospital tourniquet placement. CONCLUSIONS Prehospital tourniquet use was associated with improved hemorrhage control, particularly in the worse injured (Injury Severity Score >15) subset of patients. Fifty-seven percent of the deaths might have been prevented by earlier tourniquet use. There were no early adverse outcomes related to tourniquet use.


American Journal of Surgery | 2002

An institutional experience with laparoscopic gastric bypass complications seen in the first year compared with open gastric bypass complications during the same period

Craig S See; Preston L. Carter; David C. Elliott; Philip S. Mullenix; William Eggebroten; Clifford Porter; David M. Watts

BACKGROUND Complication rates for laparoscopic bariatric surgery remain in evolution. METHODS Single institution review of the initial years experience with laparoscopic gastric bypass compared with open gastric bypass complications for the same period. RESULTS There were 20 laparoscopic and 52 open gastric bypass procedures. Five laparoscopic patients had major complications. There were 4 anastomotic leaks. Nine open bypass patients had major complications, with 2 leaks. Leak rate was 20% for the laparoscopic group and 4% for the open group. All leaks in both groups led to substantial morbidity. There were two deaths, one in each group. The laparoscopic death was from postleak sepsis. CONCLUSIONS Gastric bypass, whether done open or laparoscopically, has significant surgical risk. Complication profiles differed between the two groups. Anastomotic leaks were significantly more frequent in the laparoscopic group, probably related to the learning curve. There is a continued need for open surgery in many bariatric patients.


American Journal of Surgery | 2003

Is parastomal hernia repair with polypropylene mesh safe

Scott R. Steele; Patrick Y. H. Lee; Matthew J. Martin; Philip S. Mullenix; Eugene S. Sullivan

BACKGROUND Concern over the safety of polypropylene mesh in parastomal hernia repairs has led some to avoid its use. We reviewed our rate of complications and outcomes with polypropylene mesh. METHODS From January 1988 through May 2002, 58 patients underwent parastomal hernia repair with polypropylene mesh. After closure of the fascia, the stoma was pulled through the center of the mesh, which was placed either above or below the fascia. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine independent predictors for the development of complications. RESULTS There were 31 end colostomies, 24 end ileostomies, and 3 loop transverse colostomies. Mean follow-up with 50.6 months. Overall complications related to the polypropylene mesh was 36% (recurrence 26%, surgical bowel obstruction 9%, prolapse 3%, wound infection 3%, fistula 3%, and mesh erosion 2%). None of the patients had extirpation of their mesh. Complications were significantly associated with younger age (59.6 versus 67 years, P = 0.04). Cancer patients with stomas had fewer complications (P = 0.02, odds ratio 0.34). Inflammatory bowel disease, stomal type, mesh location, urgent procedures, steroid use, and surgical approaches were not significantly associated with an increased complication rate. Of the 15 patients with recurrence, 7 underwent successful repair for an overall success rate of 86%. CONCLUSIONS Parastomal hernia repair with polypropylene mesh is safe and effective.


Diseases of The Colon & Rectum | 2007

Colon and Rectal Injuries During Operation Iraqi Freedom: Are There Any Changing Trends in Management or Outcome?

Scott R. Steele; Kate E. Wolcott; Philip S. Mullenix; Matthew J. Martin; James A. Sebesta; Kenneth Azarow; Alec C. Beekley

PurposeDespite the evolution in the management of traumatic colorectal injuries in both civilian and military settings during the previous few decades, they continue to be a source of significant morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to analyze management and clinical outcomes from a cohort of patients suffering colorectal injuries.MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from all patients injured and treated at the 31st Combat Support Hospital during Operation Iraqi Freedom from September 2003 to December 2004.ResultsFrom the 3,442 patients treated, 175 (5.1 percent) had colorectal injuries. Patients were predominately male (95 percent), suffered penetrating injuries (96 percent), and had a mean age of 29 (range, 4–70) years. Ninety-one percent of patients had associated injuries. Initial management included primary repair (34 percent), stoma (33 percent), resection with anastomosis (19 percent), and damage control only (14 percent). By injury location, stomas were placed more frequently with rectal or sphincter injuries 65 percent (25/40) vs. other sites (right, 19 percent (8/42); transverse, 25 percent (8/32); left, 36 percent (20/55); P < 0.01). Thirteen percent of patients eventually received stomas for failure of initial in-continuity management. Patients with colorectal injuries had a significantly increased mortality rate than those without (18 percent (31/175) vs. 8 percent (269/3267); P < 0.001) but not the subset without colorectal injuries undergoing celiotomy (18 vs.14.4 percent; P = 0.41). Rectal (odds radio, 22; P = 0.03) and transverse colon (odds radio, 17; P = 0.04) injuries were independently associated with increased mortality in multivariate regression analysis. Initial placement of stoma had an independent association with lower leak rates (odds radio, 0.06; P = 0.04).ConclusionsInjury to the rectum or transverse colon is an independent predictor of mortality. The use of a diverting stoma varied by injury site and was associated with a decreased leak rate but demonstrated no impact on the incidence of sepsis or mortality.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 2008

Selective nonoperative management of penetrating torso injury from combat fragmentation wounds.

Alec C. Beekley; Lorne H. Blackbourne; James A. Sebesta; Neil R. McMullin; Philip S. Mullenix; John B. Holcomb

BACKGROUND Historically, military surgical doctrine has mandated exploratory laparotomy for all penetrating fragmentation wounds. We hypothesized that stable patients with abdominal fragmentation injuries whose computerized tomography (CT) scans for intraperitoneal or retroperitoneal penetration disclosed nothing abnormal, can be safely observed without therapeutic laparotomy. METHODS We retrospectively studied all hemodynamically stable patients with penetrating fragmentation wounds to the back, flank, lower chest, abdomen, and pelvis evaluated by abdominal physical examination (PE), CT, or ultrasound treated during a 6-month period at one combat support hospital. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated comparing each positive test to laparotomy and each negative test to successful nonoperative management. RESULTS One hundred forty-five patients met study criteria. Based on CT scans, 85 (59%) patients were managed nonoperatively; 60 (41%) underwent laparotomy. Forty-five of 60 (75%) of laparotomies were therapeutic. CT scan for intraperitoneal or retroperitoneal penetration that disclosed nothing abnormal was 99% predictive of successful nonoperative management. In detecting intra-abdominal injury requiring laparotomy, sensitivity for each method was 30.2% (PE), 11.7% (ultrasound), and 97.8% (CT) (p < 0.05). Specificity was 94.8% (PE), 100% (ultrasound), and 84.8% (CT). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were 0.565 (PE), 0.543 (ultrasound), and 0.929 (CT) (p < 0.0001). All patients with a positive ultrasound (n = 4) underwent therapeutic laparotomy. CONCLUSION PE alone was unreliable in stable patients with abdominal fragmentation injuries. The clinical value of ultrasound results was limited, likely because the majority of these stable patients did not have injuries associated with the large accumulation of peritoneal fluid. CT scan safely and effectively analyzed nonoperative management of penetrating abdominal fragmentation injuries and should be the diagnostic study of choice in all stable patients without peritonitis with abdominal, flank, back, or pelvic combat fragmentation wounds.


American Journal of Surgery | 2003

Predictive value of intraoperative touch preparation analysis of sentinel lymph nodes for axillary metastasis in breast cancer

Philip S. Mullenix; Preston L. Carter; Matthew J. Martin; Scott R. Steele; Charles Scott; Michael J Walts; Alan L Beitler

BACKGROUND Accurate intraoperative diagnosis of axillary malignancy facilitates completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) at the time of initial surgery. The capability to address both the primary tumor and axillary disease in a single procedure offers several advantages. This study was designed to define the predictive value of intraoperative touch preparation analysis of sentinel lymph nodes for axillary metastasis in breast cancer and to evaluate the ability of the technique to facilitate accurate synchronous ALND. METHODS A consecutive cohort of patients with breast cancer at an Army medical center underwent intraoperative touch preparation analysis of sentinel lymph nodes concordant with initial excision. Those found to have sentinel nodes positive by touch preparation analysis underwent ALND at the initial procedure. Patients with negative sentinel nodes by touch preparation analysis, but positive by final pathology, underwent subsequent ALND. Results of the touch preparation analysis were compared with the final pathology. RESULTS Over a 16-month period, 71 consecutive patients with breast cancer underwent initial excision and touch preparation analysis of 162 sentinel lymph nodes. Final pathology confirmed axillary metastasis in 32% (23 of 71) of patients. Of these, intraoperative touch preparation analysis identified 48% (11 of 23). There were no false positives or unnecessary axillary dissections based upon touch preparation results. Per sentinel node, the positive predictive value was 100%, the sensitivity was 47%, and the specificity was 100%. On a per patient basis, the positive predictive value was 100%, and the sensitivity and specificity were 48% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative touch preparation analysis is an effective adjunct to sentinel lymph node biopsy. In our series, it facilitated a definitive cancer operation at the time of initial surgery in nearly 50% of patients, and ensured that no patient underwent an unnecessary axillary dissection.


American Journal of Surgery | 2003

Intraoperative use of isosulfan blue in the treatment of persistent lymphatic leaks

Scott R. Steele; Matthew J. Martin; Philip S. Mullenix; Stephen B. Olsen; Charles A. Andersen

BACKGROUND Lymphatic leaks are a major source of morbidity after lower extremity vascular surgery. We determined the ability of isosulfan blue (Lymphazurin) use to identify and help ligate offending lymphatics, and compared postoperative complication rates and length of stay versus nonoperative therapy alone. METHODS From January 1993 through March 2002, we identified 15 patients with lymphatic leaks. The first group consisted of 5 patients treated nonoperatively. The second group was 10 patients (11 explorations) treated operatively aided by isosulfan blue, after a trial of nonoperative therapy. RESULTS Isosulfan blue identified the leak in 10 of 11 cases. Mean drainage time for the nonoperative group was 47.6 days versus 1.8 days for the operative group (P = 0.036). Within the operative group, the mean drainage time during their initial conservative treatment phase was 15 days versus 1.8 days after surgery (P < 0.01). Complications were significantly less in the operative group (P < 0.05). Postoperative length of stay was a mean of 4.7 days versus 8.1 days for nonoperative patients (P = not significant). CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative isosulfan blue use accurately identifies disrupted lymphatic channels and helps ensure definitive ligation. This simple procedure is associated with fewer complications, and a trend toward shorter hospital stay.


American Journal of Surgery | 2003

Intraoperative duplex ultrasonography as an adjunct to technical excellence in 100 consecutive carotid endarterectomies.

Philip S. Mullenix; David F.J. Tollefson; Stephen B. Olsen; Neal Hadro; Charles A. Andersen

PURPOSE To evaluate the relationship of intraoperative duplex ultrasonography (duplex) results to neurologic outcomes and restenosis among patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA). METHODS One hundred consecutive CEAs were performed at a military medical center over 28 months. Prospectively acquired demographics, duplex results, revisions, and surgical outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS Thirty-four percent (34 of 100) of sites were abnormal by completion duplex. Of these, 70% (24 of 34) were B-mode flap type defects located in the common carotid artery (CCA), internal carotid artery (ICA), or external carotid artery (ECA). Twenty-one percent of the defects (7 of 34) were technically unacceptable and immediately revised. Subsequently, 3 perioperative neurologic events occurred, 2 strokes and 1 transient ischemic attack (TIA), all among patients with an identified but unrepaired defect involving the ICA or CCA. This association of unrepaired defect with early stroke or TIA was significant (P = 0.02). No significant association (P >0.05) between unrepaired defects and late ipsilateral stroke or TIA or restenosis was identified. CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative duplex scanning is a useful adjunct to CEA that can identify correctable mechanical problems. Residual elevated velocities or B-mode flaps 2 mm or greater in the ICA warrant consideration for immediate repair. Findings not requiring revision include flaps <2 mm, as well as isolated ECA defects. Prospectively validated duplex criteria are needed to further define which defects require immediate repair.


Vascular and Endovascular Surgery | 2006

Rapid high-volume population screening for three major risk factors of future stroke : Phase I results

Philip S. Mullenix; Matthew J. Martin; Scott R. Steele; George S. Lavenson; Benjamin W. Starnes; Neal Hadro; Rosemary P. Peterson; Charles A. Andersen

Three proximate risk factors for stroke are carotid stenosis, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension. Phase I of this prospective study was designed to establish the prevalence of these conditions among a population of health maintenance organization beneficiaries by using a rapid screening protocol in order to risk-stratify patients for appropriate management and subsequent cohort analysis. Patients at a tertiary care medical center were screened for stroke risk by using directed history, a 3-minute carotid “quick-scan” protocol, an EKG lead II rhythm strip, and bilateral arm blood pressures. Patients with any abnormal result underwent specific diagnostic consultation with vascular surgery, cardiology, or primary care. These evaluations included formal carotid duplex ultrasound, 12-lead EKG ± Holter monitor, and 5-day blood pressure check. Patients were then stratified into risk cohorts for appropriate management and future analysis of stroke incidence and outcomes. In 8 hours on a single day in October 2002, 294 patients (mean age 69) were screened. Combining history with results of screening and diagnostic tests, the overall prevalence of carotid stenosis was 6% (n= 17/294), atrial fibrillation 7% (n= 21/294), and severe hypertension 5% (n= 16/294). Fifty-nine patients (20%) screened positive for carotid stenosis by “quick-scan,” and 29% (n= 17/59) of these had confirmed stenosis (>50%) in 1 or both arteries by formal duplex. The prevalence of confirmed carotid stenosis was 37% among those screening positive for 1 artery (odds ratio [OR] 14.6; p <0.001) and 75% among those screening positive for both (OR 74.7; p <0.001). Significant independent predictors of carotid stenosis by multivariate analysis included coronary artery disease or myocardial infarction, smoking, stroke or transient ischemic attack, male gender, and white race (all p <0.05). The prevalence of confirmed stenosis was 10% with any 3 predictors alone (OR 2.5; p <0.05), 31% with any 4 (OR 21.2; p <0.001), and 50% with all 5 (OR 46.5; p <0.001). Thirty-three patients (11%) were found to have a previously unidentified and untreated arrhythmia, and 12% (n= 4/33) of these had confirmed new atrial fibrillation; 158 patients (54%) had moderate hypertension and 16 (5%) had severe hypertension (>180/100). Overall, 82% (n= 242/294) of patients screened required additional diagnostic tests. Based on these results, 11% (n= 31/294) of patients were stratified as high risk, 64% (n= 188/294) as moderate risk, and 25% (n= 75/294) as low risk for future stroke. Rapid and efficient screening of a large population for stroke risk factors is feasible. The prevalence of undiagnosed, unsurveilled, and untreated carotid stenosis, atrial fibrillation, and severe hypertension is significant, as 75% of patients screened had 1 or more confirmed major risk factors for stroke. Phase II of this study will investigate the degree of stroke risk reduction possible with a multidisciplinary approach to early identification and aggressive treatment of these risks.


International Journal of Colorectal Disease | 2006

Is there a role for concomitant pelvic floor repair in patients with sphincter defects in the treatment of fecal incontinence

Scott R. Steele; Patrick Y. H. Lee; Philip S. Mullenix; Matthew J. Martin; Eugene S. Sullivan

Background and aimsMore than half of all patients who undergo overlapping anal sphincter repair for fecal incontinence develop recurrent symptoms. Many have associated pelvic floor disorders that are not surgically addressed during sphincter repair. We evaluate the outcomes of combined overlapping anal sphincteroplasty and pelvic floor repair (PFR) vs. anterior sphincteroplasty alone in patients with concomitant sphincter and pelvic floor defects.Patients and methodsWe reviewed all patients with concomitant defects who underwent surgery between February 1998 and August 2001. Patients were assessed preoperatively by anorectal manometry, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency, and endoanal ultrasound. The degree of continence was assessed both preoperatively and postoperatively using the Cleveland Clinic Florida fecal incontinence score. Postoperative success was defined as a score of ≤5, whereas postoperative quality of life was assessed by a standardized questionnaire.ResultsTwenty-eight patients (mean age 52.3 years) underwent overlapping anal sphincteroplasty. The mean follow-up was 33.8 months. Cleveland Clinic Florida scores postoperatively showed a significant improvement from preoperative values (14.2 vs 5.1, p<0.001). Seventeen patients (61%) underwent concomitant PFR with sphincteroplasty. Three patients (27%) without PFR and one patient (6%) with PFR underwent repeat sphincter repair due to worsening symptoms (p=0.15). Two patients with PFR and one patient without PFR ultimately had an ostomy due to a failed repair (p=0.66). Comparing patients with and without PFR, there was a trend toward higher success rates (71 vs. 45%) when pelvic prolapse issues were addressed during sphincter repair.ConclusionConcomitant evaluation and repair of pelvic floor prolapse may be a clinically significant component of a successful anal sphincteroplasty for fecal incontinence but warrant further prospective evaluation.

Collaboration


Dive into the Philip S. Mullenix's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Matthew J. Martin

Madigan Army Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Scott R. Steele

Madigan Army Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kenneth Azarow

Madigan Army Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daniel Cuadrado

Madigan Army Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alec C. Beekley

Madigan Army Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James A. Sebesta

Madigan Army Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Preston L. Carter

Madigan Army Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ali Salim

Brigham and Women's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge