Philipp Goebes
University of Tübingen
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Philipp Goebes.
Journal of Plant Ecology-uk | 2017
Thomas Scholten; Philipp Goebes; Peter Kühn; Steffen Seitz; Thorsten Assmann; Jürgen Bauhus; Helge Bruelheide; François Buscot; Alexandra Erfmeier; Markus Fischer; Werner Härdtle; Jin-Sheng He; Keping Ma; Pascal A. Niklaus; Michael Scherer-Lorenzen; Bernhard Schmid; Xuezheng Shi; Zhengshan Song; Goddert von Oheimb; Christian Wirth; Tesfaye Wubet; Karsten Schmidt
Aims The aim of our research was to understand small-scale effects of topography and soil fertility on tree growth in a forest biodiversity and ecosystem functioning (BEF) experiment in subtropical SE China. Methods Geomorphometric terrain analyses were carried out at a spatial resolution of 5×5 m. Soil samples of different depth increments and data on tree height were collected from a total of 566 plots (667 m2 each). The soils were analyzed for carbon (soil organic carbon [SOC]), nitrogen, acidity, cation exchange capacity (CEC), exchangeable cations and base saturation as soil fertility attributes. All plots were classified into geomorphological units. Analyses of variance and linear regressions were applied to all terrain, soil fertility and tree growth attributes. Important Findings In general, young and shallow soils and relatively small differences in stable soil properties suggest that soil erosion has truncated the soils to a large extent over the whole area of the experiment. This explains the concurrently increasing CEC and SOC stocks downslope, in hollows and in valleys. However, colluvial, carbon-rich sediments are missing widely due to the convexity of the footslopes caused by uplift and removal of eroded sediments by adjacent waterways. The results showed that soil fertility is mainly influenced by topography. Monte–Carlo flow accumulation (MCCA), curvature, slope and aspect significantly affected soil fertility. Furthermore, soil fertility was affected by the different geomorphological positions on the experimental sites with ridge and spur positions showing lower exchangeable base cation contents, especially potassium (K), due to leaching. This geomorphological effect of soil fertility is most pronounced in the topsoil and decreases when considering the subsoil down to 50cm depth. Few soil fertility attributes affect tree height after 1–2 years of growth, among which C stocks proved to be most important while pHKCl and CEC only played minor roles. Nevertheless, soil acidity and a high proportion of Al on the exchange complex affected tree height even after only 1–2 years growth. Hence, our study showed that forest nutrition is coupled to a recycling of litter nutrients, and does not only depend on subsequent supply of nutrients from the mineral soil. Besides soil fertility, topography affected tree height. We found that especially MCCA as indicator of water availability affected tree growth at small-scale, as well as aspect. Overall, our synthesis on the interrelation between fertility, topography and tree growth in a subtropical forest ecosystem in SE China showed that topographic heterogeneity lead to ecological gradients across geomorphological positions. In this respect, small-scale soil–plant interactions in a young forest can serve as a driver for the future development of vegetation and biodiversity control on soil fertility. In addition, it shows that terrain attributes should be accounted for in ecological research.
PLOS ONE | 2015
Philipp Goebes; Helge Bruelheide; Werner Härdtle; Wenzel Kröber; Peter Kühn; Ying Li; Steffen Seitz; Goddert von Oheimb; Thomas Scholten
Soil erosion is a key threat to many ecosystems, especially in subtropical China where high erosion rates occur. While the mechanisms that induce soil erosion on agricultural land are well understood, soil erosion processes in forests have rarely been studied. Throughfall kinetic energy (TKE) is influenced in manifold ways and often determined by the tree’s leaf and architectural traits. We investigated the role of species identity in mono-specific stands on TKE by asking to what extent TKE is species-specific and which leaf and architectural traits account for variation in TKE. We measured TKE of 11 different tree species planted in monocultures in a biodiversity-ecosystem-functioning experiment in subtropical China, using sand-filled splash cups during five natural rainfall events in summer 2013. In addition, 14 leaf and tree architectural traits were measured and linked to TKE. Our results showed that TKE was highly species-specific. Highest TKE was found below Choerospondias axillaris and Sapindus saponaria, while Schima superba showed lowest TKE. These species-specific effects were mediated by leaf habit, leaf area (LA), leaf pinnation, leaf margin, stem diameter at ground level (GD), crown base height (CBH), tree height, number of branches and leaf area index (LAI) as biotic factors and throughfall as abiotic factor. Among these, leaf habit, tree height and LA showed the highest effect sizes on TKE and can be considered as major drivers of TKE. TKE was positively influenced by LA, GD, CBH, tree height, LAI, and throughfall amount while it was negatively influenced by the number of branches. TKE was lower in evergreen, simple leaved and dentate leaved than in deciduous, pinnated or entire leaved species. Our results clearly showed that soil erosion in forest plantations can be mitigated by the appropriate choice of tree species.
Ecology and Evolution | 2017
Stefan Trogisch; Andreas Schuldt; Jürgen Bauhus; Juliet A. Blum; Sabine Both; François Buscot; Nadia Castro-Izaguirre; Douglas Chesters; Walter Durka; David Eichenberg; Alexandra Erfmeier; Markus Fischer; Christian Geißler; Philipp Goebes; Jessica L. M. Gutknecht; Christoph Z. Hahn; Sylvia Haider; Werner Härdtle; Jin-Sheng He; Andy Hector; Lydia Hönig; Yuanyuan Huang; Alexandra-Maria Klein; Peter Kühn; Matthias Kunz; Katrin N. Leppert; Ying Li; Xiaojuan Liu; Pascal A. Niklaus; Zhiqin Pei
Abstract Biodiversity–ecosystem functioning (BEF) research has extended its scope from communities that are short‐lived or reshape their structure annually to structurally complex forest ecosystems. The establishment of tree diversity experiments poses specific methodological challenges for assessing the multiple functions provided by forest ecosystems. In particular, methodological inconsistencies and nonstandardized protocols impede the analysis of multifunctionality within, and comparability across the increasing number of tree diversity experiments. By providing an overview on key methods currently applied in one of the largest forest biodiversity experiments, we show how methods differing in scale and simplicity can be combined to retrieve consistent data allowing novel insights into forest ecosystem functioning. Furthermore, we discuss and develop recommendations for the integration and transferability of diverse methodical approaches to present and future forest biodiversity experiments. We identified four principles that should guide basic decisions concerning method selection for tree diversity experiments and forest BEF research: (1) method selection should be directed toward maximizing data density to increase the number of measured variables in each plot. (2) Methods should cover all relevant scales of the experiment to consider scale dependencies of biodiversity effects. (3) The same variable should be evaluated with the same method across space and time for adequate larger‐scale and longer‐time data analysis and to reduce errors due to changing measurement protocols. (4) Standardized, practical and rapid methods for assessing biodiversity and ecosystem functions should be promoted to increase comparability among forest BEF experiments. We demonstrate that currently available methods provide us with a sophisticated toolbox to improve a synergistic understanding of forest multifunctionality. However, these methods require further adjustment to the specific requirements of structurally complex and long‐lived forest ecosystems. By applying methods connecting relevant scales, trophic levels, and above‐ and belowground ecosystem compartments, knowledge gain from large tree diversity experiments can be optimized.
Progress in Physical Geography | 2016
Philipp Goebes; Karsten Schmidt; Werner Härdtle; Steffen Seitz; Felix Stumpf; Goddert von Oheimb; Thomas Scholten
Below vegetation, throughfall kinetic energy (TKE) is an important factor to express the potential of rainfall to detach soil particles and thus for predicting soil erosion rates. TKE is affected by many biotic (e.g. tree height, leaf area index) and abiotic (e.g. throughfall amount) factors because of changes in rain drop size and velocity. However, studies modelling TKE with a high number of those factors are lacking. This study presents a new approach to model TKE. We used 20 biotic and abiotic factors to evaluate thresholds of those factors that can mitigate TKE and thus decrease soil erosion. Using these thresholds, an optimal set of biotic and abiotic factors was identified to minimize TKE. The model approach combined recursive feature elimination, random forest (RF) variable importance and classification and regression trees (CARTs). TKE was determined using 1405 splash cup measurements during five rainfall events in a subtropical Chinese tree plantation with five-year-old trees in 2013. Our results showed that leaf area, tree height, leaf area index and crown area are the most prominent vegetation traits to model TKE. To reduce TKE, the optimal set of biotic and abiotic factors was a leaf area lower than 6700 mm2, a tree height lower than 290 cm combined with a crown base height lower than 60 cm, a leaf area index smaller than 1, more than 47 branches per tree and using single tree species neighbourhoods. Rainfall characteristics, such as amount and duration, further classified high or low TKE. These findings are important for the establishment of forest plantations that aim to minimize soil erosion in young succession stages using TKE modelling.
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology | 2015
Philipp Goebes; Steffen Seitz; Peter Kühn; Ying Li; Pascal A. Niklaus; Goddert von Oheimb; Thomas Scholten
Journal of Hydrology | 2014
Philipp Goebes; Steffen Seitz; Christian Geißler; Tamás Lassu; Piet Peters; Manuel Seeger; Karin Nadrowski; Thomas Scholten
SOIL | 2016
Steffen Seitz; Philipp Goebes; Zhengshan Song; Helge Bruelheide; Werner Härdtle; Peter Kühn; Ying Li; Thomas Scholten
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms | 2015
Steffen Seitz; Philipp Goebes; Pascale Zumstein; Thorsten Assmann; Peter Kühn; Pascal A. Niklaus; Andreas Schuldt; Thomas Scholten
Land Degradation & Development | 2017
Felix Stumpf; Philipp Goebes; Karsten Schmidt; Marcus Schindewolf; Sarah Schönbrodt-Stitt; Alexandre Wadoux; Wei Xiang; Thomas Scholten
Catena | 2017
Felix Stumpf; Karsten Schmidt; Philipp Goebes; Thorsten Behrens; Sarah Schönbrodt-Stitt; Alexandre Wadoux; Wei Xiang; Thomas Scholten