Christian Geißler
University of Tübingen
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Christian Geißler.
Ecological Monographs | 2011
Helge Bruelheide; Martin Böhnke; Sabine Both; Teng Fang; Thorsten Assmann; Martin Baruffol; Jürgen Bauhus; François Buscot; Xiao-Yong Chen; Bing-Yang Ding; Walter Durka; Alexandra Erfmeier; Markus Fischer; Christian Geißler; Dali Guo; Liang-Dong Guo; Werner Härdtle; Jin-Sheng He; Andy Hector; Wenzel Kröber; Peter Kühn; Anne C. Lang; Karin Nadrowski; Kequan Pei; Michael Scherer-Lorenzen; Xuezheng Shi; Thomas Scholten; Andreas Schuldt; Stefan Trogisch; Goddert von Oheimb
Subtropical broad-leaved forests in southeastern China support a high diversity of woody plants. Using a comparative study design with 30 × 30 m plots (n = 27) from five successional stages ( 1 m in height in each plot and counted all woody recruits (bank of all seedlings ≤1 m in height) in each central 10 × 10 m quadrant of each plot. In addition, we measured a number of environmen...
Zeitschrift Fur Geomorphologie | 2013
Thomas Iserloh; Johannes B. Ries; Artemi Cerdà; M.T. Echeverría; Wolfgang Fister; Christian Geißler; Nikolaus J. Kuhn; F.J. León; Piet Peters; Marcus Schindewolf; Jürgen Schmidt; Thomas Scholten; Manuel Seeger
To assess the inflfl uence of rainfall simulator type and plot dimensions on runoff and erosion, seven small portable rainfall simulators from Freiberg, Tubingen, Trier (all Germany), Valencia, Zaragoza (both Spain), Basel (Switzerland) and Wageningen (the Netherlands) were compared on a prepared bare fallow fifi eld. The experiments were carried out during an international rainfall simulator workshop, organized at Trier University (Germany) from 30th of June to 1st of July 2011.The tested rainfall simulators differ in design, rainfall intensities, rain spectra, etc. and represent most of the devices which have been used over the last decade in Europe. The plots for the different rainfall simulators were selected as similar as possible concerning soil physical and chemical properties, aspect and inclination and were chosen to be placed side by side in horizontal direction. Test procedure was standardized in order to examine the inflfl uence of the rainfall simulator andplot dimension only. The results show a clear and consistent relationship in runoff, erosion and infifi ltration behaviour of the different used rainfall simulators. With all the devices total soil loss is measurable, but different plot sizes, intensities and kinetic energies of the simulated rainfall caused differences in soil loss and runoff quantities per unit of area. Regarding course characteristics over runs, similarities could be observed especially in runoff behaviour. The rainfall simulators (> 1 m² plot size) are able to reproduce infifi ltration and interrillerosion processes. With an increase of plot size (≥ 1 m²), rill-erosion will be also reflfl ected. Therefore it can be concluded that up to a certain plot size, the results of the different simulators are comparable and depend in their magnitude on the properties of the applied rainfall. The increase in process complexity with increasing plot size shows, that the scale of the simulation is one of the most important parameters to be taken intoaccount when comparing values of erosion and runoff.
PLOS ONE | 2013
Christian Geißler; Karin Nadrowski; Peter Kühn; Martin Baruffol; Helge Bruelheide; Bernhard Schmid; Thomas Scholten
Throughfall kinetic energy (TKE) plays an important role in soil erosion in forests. We studied TKE as a function of biodiversity, functional diversity as well as structural stand variables in a secondary subtropical broad-leaved forest in the Gutianshan National Nature Reserve (GNNR) in south-east China, a biodiversity hotspot in the northern hemisphere with more than 250 woody species present. Using a mixed model approach we could identify significant effects of all these variables on TKE: TKE increased with rarefied tree species richness and decreased with increasing proportion of needle-leaved species and increasing leaf area index (LAI). Furthermore, for average rainfall amounts TKE was decreasing with tree canopy height whereas for high rainfall amounts this was not the case. The spatial pattern of throughfall was stable across several rain events. The temporal variation of TKE decreased with rainfall intensity and increased with tree diversity. Our results show that more diverse forest stands over the season have to cope with higher cumulative raindrop energy than less diverse stands. However, the kinetic energy (KE) of one single raindrop is less predictable in diverse stands since the variability in KE is higher. This paper is the first to contribute to the understanding of the ecosystem function of soil erosion prevention in diverse subtropical forests.
Ecology and Evolution | 2017
Stefan Trogisch; Andreas Schuldt; Jürgen Bauhus; Juliet A. Blum; Sabine Both; François Buscot; Nadia Castro-Izaguirre; Douglas Chesters; Walter Durka; David Eichenberg; Alexandra Erfmeier; Markus Fischer; Christian Geißler; Philipp Goebes; Jessica L. M. Gutknecht; Christoph Z. Hahn; Sylvia Haider; Werner Härdtle; Jin-Sheng He; Andy Hector; Lydia Hönig; Yuanyuan Huang; Alexandra-Maria Klein; Peter Kühn; Matthias Kunz; Katrin N. Leppert; Ying Li; Xiaojuan Liu; Pascal A. Niklaus; Zhiqin Pei
Abstract Biodiversity–ecosystem functioning (BEF) research has extended its scope from communities that are short‐lived or reshape their structure annually to structurally complex forest ecosystems. The establishment of tree diversity experiments poses specific methodological challenges for assessing the multiple functions provided by forest ecosystems. In particular, methodological inconsistencies and nonstandardized protocols impede the analysis of multifunctionality within, and comparability across the increasing number of tree diversity experiments. By providing an overview on key methods currently applied in one of the largest forest biodiversity experiments, we show how methods differing in scale and simplicity can be combined to retrieve consistent data allowing novel insights into forest ecosystem functioning. Furthermore, we discuss and develop recommendations for the integration and transferability of diverse methodical approaches to present and future forest biodiversity experiments. We identified four principles that should guide basic decisions concerning method selection for tree diversity experiments and forest BEF research: (1) method selection should be directed toward maximizing data density to increase the number of measured variables in each plot. (2) Methods should cover all relevant scales of the experiment to consider scale dependencies of biodiversity effects. (3) The same variable should be evaluated with the same method across space and time for adequate larger‐scale and longer‐time data analysis and to reduce errors due to changing measurement protocols. (4) Standardized, practical and rapid methods for assessing biodiversity and ecosystem functions should be promoted to increase comparability among forest BEF experiments. We demonstrate that currently available methods provide us with a sophisticated toolbox to improve a synergistic understanding of forest multifunctionality. However, these methods require further adjustment to the specific requirements of structurally complex and long‐lived forest ecosystems. By applying methods connecting relevant scales, trophic levels, and above‐ and belowground ecosystem compartments, knowledge gain from large tree diversity experiments can be optimized.
Catena | 2012
Christian Geißler; Peter Kühn; Martin Böhnke; Helge Bruelheide; Xuezheng Shi; Thomas Scholten
Journal of Vegetation Science | 2011
Sabine Both; Teng Fang; Martin Böhnke; Helge Bruelheide; Christian Geißler; Peter Kühn; Thomas Scholten; Stefan Trogisch; Alexandra Erfmeier
Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science | 2011
Thomas Scholten; Christian Geißler; Jacek Goc; Peter Kühn; Christoph Wiegand
Ecosystems | 2012
Yu-Ting Wu; Jessica L. M. Gutknecht; Karin Nadrowski; Christian Geißler; Peter Kühn; Thomas Scholten; Sabine Both; Alexandra Erfmeier; Martin Böhnke; Helge Bruelheide; Tesfaye Wubet; François Buscot
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology | 2012
Christian Geißler; Anne C. Lang; G. von Oheimb; Werner Härdtle; Martin Baruffol; Thomas Scholten
Journal of Earth Science | 2010
Christian Geißler; Peter Kühn; Xuezheng Shi; Thomas Scholten