Philipp Schleicher

Biomechanical Comparison of Expandable Cages for Vertebral Body Replacement in the Thoracolumbar Spine

Study Design. An in vitro biomechanical study of expandable cages for vertebral body replacement in the human thoracolumbar spine. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the in vitro biomechanical properties of 3 different expandable cages with a nonexpandable cage. Summary and Background Data. Recently, there has been a rapid increase in the use and the commercial availability of expandable cages for vertebral body replacement in the thoracolumbar spine. Although all 3 expandable cages, evaluated in this study, are approved for clinical use in Europe, little information is available concerning the biomechanical properties of these implants. Material and Methods. Thirty-two human thoracolumbar spines (T11 to L3) were tested in flexion, extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending with a nondestructive loading technique using an unconstrained testing apparatus. Three-dimensional displacement was measured using an optical measurement system. First, all motion segments were tested intact. After complete corporectomy of L1, cages were implanted according to producer’s information. The following implants (n = 8/group) were tested: 1) meshed titanium cage (nonexpandable cage, DePuy AcroMed); 2) X-tenz (expandable cage, DePuy AcroMed); 3) Synex (expandable Cage; Synthes); and 4) VBR (expandable cage, Ulrich). Finally, posterior stabilization using the Universal Spine System (Synthes), posterior-anterior stabilization using the Universal Spine System (Synthes), and anterior plating (Locking Compression Plate, Synthes) was applied to each test specimen. The mean apparent stiffness values, range of motion, and neutral and elastic zone were calculated from the corresponding load-displacement curves. Results. No significant differences could be determined between the in vitro biomechanical properties of expandable and nonexpandable cages. In comparison to the intact motion segment, isolated anterior stabilizationusing cages and anterior plating significantly decreased stiffness and increased range of motion in all directions. In contrast, additional posterior stabilization significantly increased stiffness and decreased range of motion in all directions compared to the intact motion segment. The combined anterior-posterior stabilization demonstrated greatest stiffness results. Conclusion. Biomechanical results indicate that design variations of expandable cages for vertebral body replacement are of little importance. Additionally, no significant difference could be determined between the biomechanical properties of expandable and nonexpandable cages. After corporectomy, isolated implantation of expandable cages plus anterior plating was not able to restore normal stability of the motion segment. Therefore, isolated anterior stabilization using cages plus Locking Compression Plate should not be used for vertebral body replacement in the thoracolumbar spine.

A new stand-alone cervical anterior interbody fusion device: biomechanical comparison with established anterior cervical fixation devices.

Study Design. A new anchored spacer—a low-profile cervical interbody fusion cage with integrated anterior fixation—was compared biomechanically to established anterior cervical devices. Objective. To evaluate the fixation properties of the new stand-alone device and compare these properties with established fixation methods. The hypothesis is that the new device will provide stability comparable to that provided by an anterior cervical cage when supplemented with an anterior plate. Summary of Background Data. It is accepted that the use of anterior cervical plating increases the chance of achieving a solid fusion. However, its use may be associated with an increase in operation time and a higher postoperative morbidity caused by a larger anterior approach and disruption of the anterior musculature. This dilemma has led to the development of a new, low profile stand-alone cervical anterior cage device with integrated screw fixation. Methods. Twenty-four human cadaveric C4–C7 cervical spines were loaded nondestructively with pure moments in a nonconstraining testing apparatus to induce flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation while angular motion was measured optoelectronically. The specimens were tested:1. Intact (N = 24).2. After discectomy and anterior stabilization.a. Interbody cage + locking plate (N = 8).b. Interbody cage + dynamic plate (N = 8).c. Anchored spacer (N = 8).3. After ventral plate removal of group 2a and 2b (N = 16). Results. All fixation techniques decreased range of motion (ROM) and lax zone (LZ) (P < 0.05) in all test modes compared with the intact motion segment and cage-only group. There were no significant differences between the anchored spacer and cage + locking plate or cage + dynamic plate. Conclusion. The anchored spacer provided a similar biomechanical stability to that of the established anterior fusion technique using an anterior plate plus cage and has a potentially lower perioperative and postoperative morbidity. These results support progression to clinical trials using the cervical anchored spacer as a stand-alone implant.

Biomechanical evaluation of different asymmetrical posterior stabilization methods for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

OBJECT Beside several other advantages, the transforaminal approach for lumbar interbody fusion offers the possibility of reducing surgical trauma by limiting the approach to only 1 side. This requires posterior stabilization methods, which are applied without the need to damage contralateral muscles and soft tissues. The goal in this study was to compare different posterior stabilization methods for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) biomechanically. METHODS Stiffness testing was performed in 8 fresh-frozen human cadaveric lumbar spine motion segments, including the following sequentially tested configurations: 1) native motion segment; 2) TLIF and bilateral pedicle screw (PS) construct; 3) TLIF and ipsilateral PS construct; 4) TLIF and ipsilateral PSs plus contralateral translaminar facet screws according to the Magerl technique; and 5) TLIF and ipsilateral PSs plus contralateral lumbar facet interference screw (LFIS). RESULTS In extension, the unilateral range of motion (uROM) and elastic zone (EZ) were significantly lower than native motion segments for bilateral PS and LFIS. There were no significant differences among the different stabilization methods. In flexion, uROM and EZ were significantly lower than the native segment in the spines treated with bilateral PSs and translaminar facet screws. The LFIS differed from the native segment in EZ only. Again, there were no significant differences between the different posterior stabilization methods. In lateral bending, the EZ of spines treated with uni- and bilateral PS differed significantly. There were no additional significant differences. In rotation, the stiffness values of bilateral PS were significantly higher than native, unilateral PS, and LFIS. The comparison between ipsi- and bilateral PS showed a tendency, but not a significant difference for uROM and EZ. There was no statistically significant evidence that the TLIF method led to an asymmetrical motion behavior in our study. CONCLUSIONS Bilateral PS augmentation offers significantly more stability than unilateral PSs in the majority of the test modes. There was no significant difference between the other tested methods. All tested stabilization methods could achieve at least the stability of the native segment.

Maintained pain reduction in five patients with multiple myeloma 12 months after treatment of the involved cervical vertebrae with vertebroplasty

Purpose: To evaluate in a prospective study the clinical and radiographic outcome of vertebroplasty in patients with osteolytic lesions of the cervical spine caused by multiple myeloma. Material and Methods: Pathological vertebral fractures associated with multiple myeloma were treated in five patients. Vertebroplasty was performed in 12 vertebral bodies. Symptomatic levels were identified by correlating the clinical presentation with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), conventional radiographs, and computed tomography (CT). During the 12-month follow-up, pain symptoms were measured on a self-reported visual analog scale (VAS), neck pain disability index (NPDI, range 0–100%), and cervical spine functional score (CSFS, range 0–100). Medical imaging was performed pre- and postoperatively and after 3, 6, and 12 months. The vertebral height was measured to assess the restoration of the sagittal alignment. Results: The median pain scores (VAS) as well as the NPDI and CSFS decreased significantly after vertebroplasty (P<0.05). Cement leakage occurred in two of 12 vertebral bodies (16.6%), without clinical relevance. The vertebral body height was stabilized during follow-up. Conclusion: Vertebroplasty in the cervical spine is an effective open surgical procedure for the stabilization of pathological vertebral fractures caused by multiple myeloma leading to a statistically significant reduction of pain status. Vertebral body height is stabilized and further deformities are avoided.

Biomechanical comparison of bioabsorbable cervical spine interbody fusion cages

Study Design. In vitro biomechanical study of bioabsorbable cervical spine interbody fusion cages using a sheep model. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the segmental stability provided by 2 new developed bioabsorbable cervical spine interbody fusion cages and to compare it with a tricortical iliac crest bone graft and a titanium meshed interbody fusion cage. Further, the biomechanical effect of an additional anterior plate instrumentation was determined. Summary and Background Data. Despite the initial favorable results, the long-term effects of metallic cage devices on spinal motion segments are still unknown. Furthermore, shortcomings of metallic cages like migration, adjacent level degeneration, stenotic myelopathy, and artifacts in postoperative radiologic assessment have already been reported. Bioabsorbable cages have been designed to avoid these complications. Currently, no information is available about the biomechanical properties of bioabsorbable cervical spine interbody fusion cages. Methods. Forty sheep cervical spines (C2–C5) were tested in flexion, extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending with a nondestructive stiffness method using a nonconstrained testing apparatus. First, the motion segment C3–C4 was tested intact. After complete discectomy, the following groups were evaluated: autologous iliac crest bone graft, titanium mesh cylinder (Harms, DePuy AcroMed), bioabsorbable PDLLA-cage (experimental), and bioabsorbable Resorbon cage (Biomet Merck). Further, all implants were tested with an additional anterior plate instrumentation. The mean apparent stiffness, range of motion, neutral zone, and elastic zone were calculated from the corresponding load-displacement curves. Results. No significant difference in range of motion and segmental stiffness among the tricortical iliac crest bone graft, meshed titanium Harms cage, and PDLLA-cage could be determined. The Resorbon cage significantly (P < 0.05) decreased range of motion and increased stiffness in rotation and flexion in comparisonto all tested implants and the intact motion segment. An additional anterior plate significantly (P < 0.05) decreased range of motion and increased stiffness in flexion and extension. Conclusion. In this study, bioabsorbable cages demonstrated biomechanical in vitro properties equal or superior to metallic cages. From the biomechanical point of view, bioabsorbable cages, especially the Resorbon cage, may be a viable alternative to current metallic interbody cage devices. However, animal experimental in vivo evaluation of bioabsorbable cervical spine interbody fusion cages still has to be performed.

Recommendations for the treatment of thoracolumbar and lumbar spine injuries

ZusammenfassungIn dieser Arbeit werden Empfehlungen zur Versorgung von Frakturen der Brust- (BWS) und der Lendenwirbelsäule (LWS) gegeben. Die Empfehlungen beruhen auf der Erfahrung der beteiligten Wirbelsäulenchirurgen der Arbeitsgemeinschaft „Wirbelsäule“ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie unter Berücksichtigung der aktuellen Literatur. Grundlagen der Diagnostik, der konservativen und operativen Therapie werden dargestellt. Die Frakturen werden Anhand von morphologischen Kriterien, wie der Zerstörung des Wirbelkörpers, der Fragmentdislokation, der Einengung des Spinalkanals, der Achsabweichungen und der Abweichung vom individuellen sagittalen Profil beurteilt. Die Abweichung von dem individuellen sagittalen Profil wird anhand der Änderung des monosegmentalen oder bisegmentalen Grund-Deckplatten-Winkels bestimmt. Es werden die Therapieoptionen für den knochengesunden Patienten aufgezeigt.AbstractThis paper gives recommendations for treatment of thoracolumbar and lumbar spine injuries. The recommendations are based on the experience of the involved spine surgeons, who are part of a study group of the “Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie” and a review of the current literature. Basics of diagnostic, conservative, and operative therapy are demonstrated. Fractures are evaluated by using morphologic criteria like destruction of the vertebral body, fragment dislocation, narrowing of the spinal canal, and deviation from the individual physiologic profile. Deviations from the individual sagittal profile are described by using the monosegmental or bisegmental end plate angle. The recommendations are developed for acute traumatic fractures in patients without severe osteoporotic disease.

The effect of repetitive pilot-hole use on the insertion torque and pullout strength of vertebral system screws.

Study Design. In vitro biomechanical investigation of the screw-holding capacity. Objective. To evaluate the effect of repetitive screw-hole use on the insertional torque and retentive strength of vertebral system screws. Summary and Background Data. Placement and removal of vertebral system screws is sometimes necessary during the surgical procedures in order to assess the walls of the pilot hole. This procedure may compromise the holding capacity of the implant. Methods. Screws with outer diameter measuring 5, 6, and 7 mm were inserted into wood, polyurethane, polyethylene, and cancellous bone cylindrical blocks. The pilot holes were made with drills of a smaller, equal, or wider diameter than the inner screw diameter. Three experimental groups were established based on the number of insertions and reinsertions of the screws and subgroups were created according to the outer diameter of the screw and the diameter of the pilot hole used. Results. A reduction of screw-holding capacity was observed between the first and the following insertions regardless the anchorage material. The pattern of reduction of retentive strength was not similar to the pattern of torque reduction. The pullout strength was more pronounced between the first and the last insertions, while the torque decreased more proportionally from the first to the last insertions. Conclusion. Insertion and reinsertion of the screws of the vertebral fixation system used in the present study reduced the insertion torque and screw purchase.

Cages augmented with mineralized collagen and platelet-rich plasma as an osteoconductive/inductive combination for interbody fusion.

Study Design. After anterior cervical discectomy, fusion was radiologically, biomechanically, and histologically assessed in a sheep spine fusion model. Objective. To evaluate the efficacy of a platelet-rich plasma (PRP) application combined with a mineralized collagen matrix (MCM) as an alternative to autologous cancellous iliac crest bone grafts in a spine fusion model. Summary of Background Data. PRP has the ability to stimulate bone and tissue healing. MCM is a recently developed osteoconductive material. Up to now, no comparative evaluation of PRP in combination with a MCM at the cervical spine has been performed in vivo. Methods. Twenty-four sheep (N = 8/group) underwent C3/4 discectomy and fusion: group 1, titanium cage filled with autologous cancellous iliac crest bone graft; group 2, titanium cage filled with MCM; and group 3, titanium cage filled with MCM and PRP. Radiographic evaluation was performed before surgery and after 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks, respectively. After 12 weeks, fusion sites were evaluated using functional radiographic views and quantitative computed tomographic scans to assess bone mineral density. Furthermore, histomorphologic and histomorphometrical analyses were performed to evaluate fusion. Results. In comparison with the titanium cage group filled with autologous cancellous iliac crest bone grafts representing the control group, MCM-alone group showed a slightly lower fusion rate in the radiographic and the histomorphometrical analysis. The addition of PRP could not enhance this finding. There was no significant difference between MCM and MCM + PRP group in radiologic and histologic findings. Conclusion. The MCM alone is not able to replace autologous bone grafts. Early activation of the platelets by calcium, which is released from mineralized collagen, could be the reason for the insufficient osteoinductive effect of PRP. In consequence, the combined application of mineralized collagen and PRP had no significant osteoinductive effect in this model.

Traumatic Spondylolisthesis of the Axis Vertebra in Adults.

Study Design Narrative review. Objective To elucidate the current concepts in diagnosis and treatment of traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis. Methods Literature review using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases. Results The traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis accounts to 5% of all cervical spine injuries and is defined by a bilateral separation of the C2 vertebral body from the neural arch. The precise location of the fracture line may vary widely. For understanding the pathobiomechanics, the involvement of the C2–C3 disk is essential. Although its synonym “hangmans fracture” suggests an extension moment as primary injury mechanism, flexion moments are also proven to cause such fracture morphology. The axial force vector (distraction versus compression) is thought to have a significant effect on the neurologic involvement. The most widely accepted classifications, according to Effendi and modified by Levine, regard the displacement of the C2 vertebral body and possible locking of the facet joints. For decisions on conservative versus surgical therapy, a definitive statement about the stability is essential. The stability is determined by involvement of the C2–C3 disk and longitudinal ligaments, which frequently cannot be assessed by X-ray or computed tomography alone. The assessment of this soft tissue injury therefore requires additional imaging either by magnetic resonance imaging to display the disk and longitudinal ligaments or dynamic fluoroscopy to assess functional behavior of the C2–C3 motion segment. If stability is proven, an immobilization of the cervical spine in a semirigid cervical collar is sufficient. Unstable lesions require surgical stabilization. The standard procedure is an anterior C2–C3 diskectomy and fusion, because of the lower morbidity of the anterior approach and the motion preservation between C1 and C2. In rare cases (irreducible locked facet joints, the necessity of decompression of the vertebral artery, contraindication for anterior approach), a posterior approach is sometimes necessary. Isolated direct screw osteosynthesis is of little value, because it only makes sense in cases with an intact C2–C3 disk, which is usually regarded as stable and therefore might be treated conservatively. Conclusions Overall, the clinical evidence regarding traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis is very low and mainly based on small case series, expert opinion, laboratory findings, and theoretical considerations.

A zero-profile anchored spacer in multilevel cervical anterior interbody fusion: biomechanical comparison to established fixation techniques.

Study Design. In vitro biomechanical analysis of different multilevel cervical fixation techniques. Objective. To compare the multilevel stability of a cervical anchored spacer (AS) with established fixation techniques. Summary of Background Data. To avoid plate-related complications, for example, dysphagia zero-profile AS has been developed. The use of these new zero-profile implants for treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease is widely accepted after encouraging biomechanical results for single-level instrumentation. However, there is only little knowledge about the biomechanical stability of these zero-profile devices in multilevel instrumentations. Methods. Eight fresh-frozen human cadaveric cervical spines (C3–C7) were nondestructively tested in a biomechanical 3-dimensional spine test setup. Segmental range of motion (ROM) under torsional load of 1.5 N·m was measured optoelectronically. Intact spine baseline measurement specimens were tested with 2- and 3-level instrumentation including (1) stand-alone PEEK-cage; (2) PEEK-cage plus locking plate; and (3) AS. Repeated-measures analyses of variance were used for statistical analysis. Results. Comparison of baseline ROM and stand-alone PEEK-cage instrumentation showed a significant lower segmental ROM only for 2-level instrumentations. Cage plus plate and AS were able to reduce segmental ROM significantly (P < 0.05) in 2- and 3-level instrumentations. Comparing cage plus plate and AS, a significant lower ROM was detected for flexion/extension in 2- and 3-level instrumentation and for lateral bending in 2-level instrumentation using cage plus plate. Conclusion. Segmental stability decreases with the number of instrumented segments regardless of the used implant. Comparing the different fixation techniques biomechanically, the locking plate and cage construct was stiffer in all test modes than the anchored devices in multilevel constructs. However, it remains unclear what the clinical significance may be. Level of Evidence: N/A