Pierre L. Divenyi

Nonlinguistic auditory capabilities in aphasia

Nonlinguistic auditory capabilities were assessed through psychophysical tests in 11 left-CVA aphasic, four right-CVA nonaphasic, and eight normal male subjects selected from the same age group. The tests included frequency discrimination, gap detection, gap discrimination, frequency sweep discrimination, assessment of the magnitude of the frequency uncertainty effect in the detectability of tones in noise, and assessment of frequency selectivity through simultaneous masked thresholds. Results of these tests were compared to measures of auditory comprehension obtained from the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination, the Porch Index of Communicative Ability, and the Token Test. Nonlinguistic auditory performance of the three subject groups differed significantly from each other. For the left-CVA subjects, frequency sweep discrimination, frequency discrimination, and the frequency uncertainty effect in tone-in-noise detection were the best predictors of verbal auditory comprehension. The right-CVA subjects displayed marked deficits with regard to all pitch-related tests. The findings stress the importance of considering the presence of nonlinguistic auditory dysfunctions when evaluating linguistic auditory capabilities in aphasia.

Spectral versus temporal features in dichotic listening.

Abstract Ear advantage for the processing of dichotic speech sounds can be separated into two components. One of these components is an ear advantage for those phonetic features that are based on spectral acoustic cues. This ear advantage follows the direction of a given individuals ear dominance for the processing of spectral information in dichotic sounds, whether speech or nonspeech. The other factor represents a right-ear advantage for the processing of temporal information in dichotic sounds, whether speech or nonspeech. The present experiments were successful in dissociating these two factors. Since the results clearly show that ear advantage for speech is influenced by ear dominance for spectral information, a full understanding of the asymmetry in the perceptual salience of speech sounds in any individual will not be possible without knowing his ear dominance.

Some figural properties of auditory patterns

Listeners identified one of six permutations of three frequencies, presented as brief three-note melodies. Identification performance remained high in spite of transposition of the original three frequencies throughout a two-octave range, so long as the musical intervals or frequency ratios between the adjacent pairs of frequencies remained constant. Even when those intervals were compressed or expanded, while remaining about equal to each other, identification was quite good for the range between the lowest and highest frequency of no more than approximately 1/3 octave. Performance decreased sharply when the span was much wider. Unequal intervals, where the low and middle frequencies were closer together or farther apart than the middle and high frequencies, did not retain good identification performance. When the three-tone patterns were embedded in longer sequences of seven or eight tones, the identification performance was best when the pattern occurred at the beginning or the end of the sequence, and when the range of frequencies from which the irrelevant background tones were chosen lay outside the range of pattern frequencies. Under conditions where the background frequencies were fixed and the pattern frequencies were moved, thus combining the manipulation of embedding with that of transposition of the pattern, overlap of pattern and background frequencies was still the principal cause of deterioration in performance. The findings are related to some analogies to the perceptual rules of Gestalt theory, as well as to certain aspects of musical practice.

Central auditory processing. III. The "cocktail party" effect and anterior temporal lobectomy.

The capacity to selectively attend to only one of multiple, spatially separated. simultaneous sound sources--the cocktail party effect--was evaluated in normal subjects and in those with anterior temporal lobectomy using common environmental sounds. A significant deficit in this capacity was observed for those stimuli located on the side of space contralateral to the lobectomy, a finding consistent with the hypothesis that within each anterior temporal lobe is a mechanism that is normally capable of enhancing the perceptual salience of one acoustic stimulus on the opposite side of space, when other sound sources are present on that side. Damage to this mechanism also appears to be associated with a deficit of spatial localization for sounds contralateral to the lesion.

Discrimination of time intervals bounded by tone bursts.

Trained listeners had to discriminate, in a four-level 2AFC paradigm, the duration of a time interval bounded by pairs of brief tone bursts. The time intervals ranged from 10 to 100 msec. When the tone-burst markers were similar in their intensity (86 dB SPL) and frequency (1 kHz), the just noticeable time difference was found to be monotonically related to the base interval. On the other hand, when the intensity of the first marker was severely attenuated (by 50 dB) or when a large (2-octave) difference was introduced between the frequencies of the two markers, the time discrimination functions became nonmonotonic. A similar, albeit slight, departure from monotonicity was also achieved by making the second marker much longer than the first (300 msec vs. 10 msec). The nonmonotonicity of these time discrimination functions is compared to the well-documented nonmonotonicity that may be observed for voice onset time (VOT) discrimination functions.

Binaural suppression of nonechoes

A brief diotic conditioner has been shown to effectively disrupt lateralization of a brief dichotic probe presented after a short interval (4-10 ms, onset to onset) with an interaural time delay that is clearly discriminable in the absence of the conditioner [e.g., P. M. Zurek, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 66, 1750-1757 (1980)], even when the conditioner and the probe are different sounds [P. L. Divenyi and J. Blauert, in Auditory Processing of Complex Sounds, edited by W. A. Yost and C. S. Watson (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1987), pp. 146-155]. The present experiments investigated lateralization suppression of a narrow-band dichotic probe centered at 2 kHz by a narrow-band diotic conditioner, in situations in which the probe could not be regarded as an echo of the conditioner. In one case, the conditioner was identical to the probe but was presented in opposite phase; in other conditions, the center frequency of the conditioner was different, with the center frequency to bandwidth ratio remaining constant. The effects of frequency and temporal separation between the conditioner and the probe on the suppression of the lateralization of the probe were explored. Suppression of lateralization was measured as the increase in the just-noticeable interaural time difference (jnd), with respect to the interaural time jnd obtained for the probe alone. Low-frequency (0.5 to 1.5 kHz) conditioners were more effective in suppressing the lateralization of the probe than those at or above the probe frequency.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Resolution of steady‐state sounds in simulated auditory space

A simulated acoustic equivalent of a sound source placed on the perimeter of a circle having a 4‐m radius in the frontal horizontal half‐plane was generated by obtaining, in 5‐deg azimuthal steps, head‐related transfer functions measured in both ears of an artificial head placed in an anechoic room. When an arbitrary sound is passed through the digital filter defined by the left and right transfer functions corresponding to a given angle, the sound will acquire a subjective azimuth comparable to the one at which the transfer function was measured [J. Blauert and P. Laws, Acustica 29, 273–277 (1973)]. This technique was used to measure the resolution of pairs of simultaneous steady‐state stimuli (frequency‐modulated, amplitude‐modulated, and pure sinusoids or noises). The listener was required to identify the relative location of the two sounds. In one set of experiments, the position of the two sounds was fixed, and thresholds were obtained for the modulation‐ or carrier‐frequency difference at which the ...

Ear dominance in dichotic chords and ear superiority in frequency discrimination

Frequency‐discrimination thresholds were determined for pure tones presented either to the right or to the left ear of experienced listeners. In some conditions the stimulus was monaural, whereas in others a tone of fixed, different frequency was simultaneoulsy present in the contralateral ear. Center frequencies of 1.2, 1.7, and 3.2 kHz were investigated. Results reveal a small but reliable discrepancy between just noticeable frequency differences obtained for the right and for the left ear, both in the monaural and in the dichotic conditions. Furthermore, the direction and the degree of asymmetry with respect to the frequency resolving power of the two ears showed a correlation with the direction and the degree of ear dominance for the pitch of dichotic two‐tone complexes. [See Efron and Yund, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 59, 889–898 (1976).] Implications of the relationship between the two types of functional asymmetry of the auditory system are discussed.

Individual differences in the perception of dichotic chords

A new method was employed to measure the changes in the strength of ear dominance in the perception of dichotic chords as a function of stimulus intensity. The results of the first experiment, where the right and left tones were of equal intensity, revealed striking individual differences in the way the ear dominance of five subjects changed as the intensity of the chords was varied over a 60-dB range--no two subjects exhibiting the same pattern of behavior. Since, within the context of the model of Yund and Efron [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 62, 607-617 (1977)] these individual differences could result from right-left asymmetries in the subjects intensity-response (I-R) transduction mechanisms, a second experiment was performed in which the two tones had different intensities. From the results of the second experiment the shape of the I-R function for each ear could be computed. Using these I-R functions as parameters, the model accurately predicted the idiosyncratic changes of ear dominance observed in the first experiment. The right-left asymmetries in the I-R functions also a-count for previously reported idiosyneratic changes in ear dominance as a function of the frequency difference between the two tones of the dichotic chord.

Is pitch a learned attribute of sounds? Two points in support of Terhardt's pitch theory.

Terhardt [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 55, 1061-1069 (1974)] postulated a pitch perception model wherein a learning stage constitutes an integral part: it is only repeated exposure to patterns of spectral pitch that will generate the percept of virtual pitch (i.e., the residue). Two examples, one clinical and one musical, are cited to support the idea that perception of the pitch of complex tones represents a case of pattern perception which is acquired with experience.