Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Piotr Chlosta is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Piotr Chlosta.


European Urology | 2012

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Omar M. Aboumarzouk; Robert J. Stein; R. Eyraud; Georges-Pascal Haber; Piotr Chlosta; Bhaskar K. Somani; Jihad H. Kaouk

CONTEXT Centres worldwide have been performing partial nephrectomies laparoscopically for greater than a decade. With the increasing use of robotics, many centres have reported their early experiences using it for nephron-sparing surgery. OBJECTIVE To review published literature comparing robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION An online systematic review of the literature according to Cochrane guidelines was conducted from 2000 to 2012 including studies comparing RPN and LPN. All studies comparing RPN with LPN were included. The outcome measures were the patient demographics, tumour size, operating time, warm ischaemic time, blood loss, transfusion rates, length of hospital stay, conversion rates, and complications. A meta-analysis of the results was conducted. For continuous data, a Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test was used; for dichotomous data, an inverse variance was used. Each was expressed as a risk ratio with a 95% confidence interval p<0.05 considered significant. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A total of 717 patients were included, 313 patients in the robotic group and 404 patients in the laparoscopic group (seven studies). There was no significant difference between the two groups in any of the demographic parameters except for age (age: p=0.006; sex: p=0.54; laterality: p=0.05; tumour size: p=0.62, tumour location: p=57; or confirmed malignant final pathology: p=0.79). There was no difference between the two groups regarding operative times (p=0.58), estimated blood loss (p=0.76), or conversion rates (p=0.84). The RPN group had significantly less warm ischaemic time than the LPN group (p=0.0008). There was no difference regarding postoperative length of hospital stay (p=0.37), complications (p=0.86), or positive margins (p=0.93). CONCLUSIONS In early experience, RPN appears to be a feasible and safe alternative to its laparoscopic counterpart with decreased warm ischaemia times noted.


European Urology | 2012

Positive Surgical Margins After Nephron-Sparing Surgery

Martin Marszalek; Marco Carini; Piotr Chlosta; Klaus Jeschke; Ziya Kirkali; Ruth Knüchel; Stephan Madersbacher; Jean-Jacques Patard; Hendrik Van Poppel

CONTEXT Little is known on the natural history of positive surgical margins (PSMs) in partial nephrectomy (PN). Accumulating data suggest that secondary nephrectomy might not be necessary in all patients with PSMs after PN. OBJECTIVE Provide an overview on incidence and risk factors for PSMs after partial nephrectomy and on the rate of local and distant disease recurrence related to PSMs. We also provide recommendations on how to avoid and how to treat PSMs after PN. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A nonsystematic literature research was based on Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science queries on these keywords: nephron-sparing surgery, partial nephrectomy/ies, and margin. Only human studies (original research) published in English were included. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS PSMs are present in 0-7% of patients after open PN, in 0.7-4% after laparoscopic PN, and in 3.9-5.7% after robot-assisted PN. The thickness of healthy parenchyma surrounding the tumour is irrelevant as long as complete tumour removal is achieved. The coincidence of a highly malignant tumour and PSM increases the risk of local recurrence. Intermediate follow-up data indicate that the vast majority of patients with PSMs will not experience local or distant tumour recurrence. Frozen-section analysis for evaluation of resection margins during PN is of minor clinical significance, as the surgeons gross assessment of macroscopically negative margins provides reliable results. CONCLUSIONS PSMs in PN are rare. As indicated by intermediate follow-up data, the majority of patients with PSMs after PN remain without disease recurrence, and a surveillance strategy seems preferable to surgical reintervention.


European Urology | 2015

Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic and Laparoscopic Simple Prostatectomy: A European-American Multi-institutional Analysis

Riccardo Autorino; Homayoun Zargar; Mirandolino B. Mariano; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Rene Sotelo; Piotr Chlosta; Octavio Castillo; Deliu Victor Matei; Antonio Celia; Gokhan Koc; Anup Vora; Monish Aron; J. Kellogg Parsons; Giovannalberto Pini; James C. Jensen; Douglas E. Sutherland; Xavier Cathelineau; Luciano A Nunez Bragayrac; Ioannis M. Varkarakis; D. Amparore; Matteo Ferro; Gaetano Gallo; Alessandro Volpe; Hakan Vuruskan; Gaurav Bandi; Jonathan Hwang; Josh Nething; Nic Muruve; Sameer Chopra; Nishant Patel

BACKGROUND Laparoscopic and robotic simple prostatectomy (SP) have been introduced with the aim of reducing the morbidity of the standard open technique. OBJECTIVE To report a large multi-institutional series of minimally invasive SP (MISP). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Consecutive cases of MISP done for the treatment of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) due to benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) between 2000 and 2014 at 23 participating institutions in the Americas and Europe were included in this retrospective analysis. INTERVENTION Laparoscopic or robotic SP. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Demographic data and main perioperative outcomes were gathered and analyzed. A multivariable analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with a favorable trifecta outcome, arbitrarily defined as a combination of the following postoperative events: International Prostate Symptom Score <8, maximum flow rate >15ml/s, and no perioperative complications. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 1330 consecutive cases were analyzed, including 487 robotic (36.6%) and 843 laparoscopic (63.4%) SP cases. Median overall prostate volume was 100ml (range: 89-128). Median estimated blood loss was 200ml (range: 150-300). An intraoperative transfusion was required in 3.5% of cases, an intraoperative complication was recorded in 2.2% of cases, and the conversion rate was 3%. Median length of stay was 4 d (range: 3-5). On pathology, prostate cancer was found in 4% of cases. Overall postoperative complication rate was 10.6%, mostly of low grade. At a median follow-up of 12 mo, a significant improvement was observed for subjective and objective indicators of BOO. Trifecta outcome was not significantly influenced by the type of procedure (robotic vs laparoscopic; p=0.136; odds ratio [OR]: 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8-2.9), whereas operative time (p=0.01; OR: 0.9; 95% CI, 0.9-1.0) and estimated blood loss (p=0.03; OR: 0.9; 95% CI, 0.9-1.0) were the only two significant factors. Retrospective study design, lack of a control arm, and limited follow-up represent major limitations of the present analysis. CONCLUSIONS This study provides the largest outcome analysis reported for MISP for BOO/BPE. These findings confirm that SP can be safely and effectively performed in a minimally invasive fashion in a variety of healthcare settings in which specific surgical expertise and technology is available. MISP can be considered a viable surgical treatment in cases of large prostatic adenomas. The use of robotic technology for this indication can be considered in centers that have a robotic program in place for other urologic indications. PATIENT SUMMARY Analysis of a large data set from multiple institutions shows that surgical removal of symptomatic large prostatic adenomas can be carried out with good outcomes by using robot-assisted laparoscopy.


European Urology | 2010

Testosterone Measurement in Patients with Prostate Cancer

Claude Schulman; Jacques Irani; Juan Morote; Jack A. Schalken; Francesco Montorsi; Piotr Chlosta; Axel Heidenreich

CONTEXT Serum testosterone measurement has no widely accepted place in the management of patients with prostate cancer (PCa). However, several potential clinical applications of serum testosterone determination can be envisaged. OBJECTIVE To review the role of testosterone and the androgen axis in the natural history of PCa and evaluate the evidence for the clinical application of serum testosterone measurement in patient screening, diagnosis, and management. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A Medline search retrieved original research and review articles relating to the androgen axis in PCa and the use of testosterone measurement for (1) assessing PCa risk in the general population, (2) adding to the specificity of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, (3) determining tumour aggressiveness, (4) assessing the efficacy of androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), and (5) optimising the scheduling of intermittent ADT. Relevant data were reviewed during a roundtable discussion, and consensus recommendations were agreed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A body of data implicates the androgen axis in PCa throughout its natural history. Based on current evidence, serum testosterone measurement cannot be recommended for determining PCa risk, increasing specificity of PSA testing, or assessing tumour aggressiveness. In contrast, for patients receiving ADT, there is a clear rationale for serum testosterone monitoring to ensure that castration levels are achieved. Practical recommendations for testosterone measurement during ADT are outlined. If PSA is rising while on ADT, castration levels of serum testosterone must be demonstrated before hormonal independence can be assumed. Serum testosterone levels might be considered an additional trigger for therapy reinitiation in intermittent ADT schedules. Finally, future prospective studies should further evaluate the potential relevance of testosterone measurement as an independent assessment of prognosis and treatment decision in different disease stages. CONCLUSIONS As a therapeutic target, serum testosterone levels should be monitored to verify response to ADT and confirm suspected castration independence.


Urologia Internationalis | 2014

Obesity and Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality: A Systematic Review of Prospective Cohort Studies

Tomasz Golabek; Jakub Bukowczan; Piotr Chlosta; Jan Powroźnik; Jakub Dobruch; Andrzej Borówka

Background: There has been a large body of research on obesity and the risk of prostate cancer (PCa) that has been published recently. However, the epidemiological evidence for such an association has not been consistent. This may be attributed to the nature of case-control and retrospective studies, which generally are more prone to biases. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review of prospective cohort studies to assess the association between obesity and the risk of PCa incidence and death. Methods: A search of the PubMed database and references of published studies (from inception until March 2013) was conducted. Twenty-three eligible studies were identified and included in the systematic review. Results: The evidence from the prospective cohort studies linking obesity with PCa incidence has not been consistent. However, cumulative data is compelling for a strong positive association between obesity and fatal PCa. Conclusions: Obesity is a significant diet-related risk factor for fatal PCa. Further well-constructed, large cohort studies on the potential association between obesity and PCa, as well as on underlying mechanisms, are needed.


European Urology | 2014

A Randomised Phase 2 Study Combining LY2181308 Sodium (Survivin Antisense Oligonucleotide) with First-line Docetaxel/Prednisone in Patients with Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer

Paweł Wiechno; Bradley G. Somer; Begoña Mellado; Piotr Chlosta; José Manuel Cervera Grau; Daniel Castellano; Christoph W. M. Reuter; M. Stöckle; Jörn Kamradt; Joanna Pikiel; Ignacio Duran; Steffen Wedel; Sophie Callies; Valérie André; Karla Hurt; Jacqueline Brown; Michael Lahn; Bernhard Heinrich

Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is partially characterised by overexpression of antiapoptotic proteins, such as survivin. In this phase 2 study, patients with metastatic CRPC (n=154) were randomly assigned (1:2 ratio) to receive standard first-line docetaxel/prednisone (control arm) or the combination of LY2181308 with docetaxel/prednisone (experimental arm). The primary objective was to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) for LY2181308 plus docetaxel. Secondary efficacy measures included overall survival (OS), several predefined prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-derived end points, and Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) scores. The median PFS of treated patients for the experimental arm (n=98) was 8.64 mo (90% confidence interval [CI], 7.39-10.45) versus 9.00 mo (90% CI, 7.00-10.09) in the control arm (n=51; p=0.755). The median OS for the experimental arm was 27.04 mo (90% CI, 19.94-33.41) compared with 29.04 mo (90% CI, 20.11-39.26; p=0.838). The PSA responses (≥ 50% PSA reduction), BPI, and FACT-P scores were similar in both arms. In the experimental arm, patients had a numerically higher incidence of grades 3-4 neutropenia, anaemia, thrombocytopenia, and sensory neuropathy. In conclusion, this study failed to detect a difference in efficacy between the two treatment groups.


BJUI | 2015

Long-term analysis of oncological outcomes after laparoscopic radical cystectomy in Europe: results from a multicentre study by the European Association of Urology (EAU) section of Uro-technology.

Simone Albisinni; Jens Rassweiler; C.C. Abbou; Xavier Cathelineau; Piotr Chlosta; L. Fossion; Franco Gaboardi; Peter Rimington; Laurent Salomon; Rafael R Sanchez-Salas; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Dogu Teber; Roland van Velthoven

To report long‐term outcomes of laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) in a multicentre European cohort, and explore feasibility and safety of LRC.


Gastroenterology Research and Practice | 2013

Enterovesical fistulae: aetiology, imaging, and management.

Tomasz Golabek; Anna Szymanska; Tomasz Szopiński; Jakub Bukowczan; Mariusz Furmanek; Jan Powroznik; Piotr Chlosta

Background and Study Objectives. Enterovesical fistula (EVF) is a devastating complication of a variety of inflammatory and neoplastic diseases. Radiological imaging plays a vital role in the diagnosis of EVF and is indispensable to gastroenterologists and surgeons for choosing the correct therapeutic option. This paper provides an overview of the diagnosis of enterovesical fistulae. The treatment of fistulae is also briefly discussed. Material and Methods. We performed a literature review by searching the Medline database for articles published from its inception until September 2013 based on clinical relevance. Electronic searches were limited to the keywords: “enterovesical fistula,” “colovesical fistula” (CVF), “pelvic fistula”, and “urinary fistula”. Results. EVF is a rare pathology. Diverticulitis is the commonest aetiology. Over two-thirds of affected patients describe pathognomonic features of pneumaturia, fecaluria, and recurrent urinary tract infections. Computed tomography is the modality of choice for the diagnosis of enterovesical fistulae as not only does it detect a fistula, but it also provides information about the surrounding anatomical structures. Conclusions. In the vast majority of cases, this condition is diagnosed because of unremitting urinary symptoms after gastroenterologist follow-up procedures for a diverticulitis or bowel inflammatory disease. Computed tomography is the most sensitive test for enterovesical fistula.


BJUI | 2015

Technical solutions to improve the management of non‐muscle‐invasive transitional cell carcinoma: summary of a European Association of Urology Section for Uro‐Technology (ESUT) and Section for Uro‐Oncology (ESOU) expert meeting and current and future perspectives

Thorsten Bach; Rolf Muschter; Thomas R. W. Herrmann; Thomas Knoll; C. Scoffone; M. Pilar Laguna; Andreas Skolarikos; P. Rischmann; Günter Janetschek; Jean de la Rosette; Udo Nagele; Bernard Malavaud; A. Breda; Juan Palou; Alexander Bachmann; Thomas Frede; Petrisor Geavlete; Evangelos Liatsikos; Patrice Jichlinski; Hartwig Schwaibold; Piotr Chlosta; Alexey Martov; A. Lapini; Joerg Schmidbauer; Bob Djavan; A. Stenzl; Mauricio Brausi; Jens Rassweiler

The aim of the present review was to compare state‐of‐the‐art care and future perspectives for the detection and treatment of non‐muscle‐invasive transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder. We provide a summary of the third expert meeting on ‘Optimising the management of non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer, organized by the European Association of Urology Section for Uro‐Technology (ESUT) in collaboration with the Section for Uro‐Oncology (ESOU), including a systematic literature review. The article includes a detailed discussion on the current and future perspectives for TCC, including photodynamic diagnosis, optical coherence tomography, narrow band imaging, the Storz Professional Image Enhancement system, magnification and high definition techniques. We also provide a detailed discussion of future surgical treatment options, including en bloc resection and tumour enucleation. Intensive research has been conducted to improve tumour detection and there are promising future perspectives, that require proven clinical efficacy. En bloc resection of bladder tumours may be advantageous, but is currently considered to be experimental.


BJUI | 2012

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in obese patients: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Omar M. Aboumarzouk; Robert J. Stein; Georges-Pascal Haber; Jihad H. Kaouk; Piotr Chlosta; Bhaskar K. Somani

Whats known on the subject? and What does the study add?

Collaboration


Dive into the Piotr Chlosta's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrzej Borówka

Medical University of Warsaw

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tomasz Drewa

Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Steven Joniau

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alberto Briganti

Vita-Salute San Raffaele University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Giansilvio Marchioro

University of Eastern Piedmont

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lorenzo Tosco

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge