Piotr Scisło

Outcome prediction following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Multiple risk scores comparison.

BACKGROUND The aim of the study was to compare 7 available risk models in the prediction of 30-day mortality following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Heart team decision supported by different risk score calculations is advisable to estimate the individual procedural risk before TAVI. METHODS One hundred and fifty-six consecutive patients (n = 156, 48% female, mean age 80.03 ± 8.18 years) who underwent TAVI between March 2010 and October 2014 were in-cluded in the study. Thirty-day follow-up was performed and available in each patient. Base-line risk was calculated according to EuroSCORE I, EuroSCORE II, STS, ACEF, Amblers, OBSERVANT and SURTAVI scores. RESULTS In receiver operating characteristics analysis, neither of the investigated scales was able to distinguish between patients with or without an endpoint with areas under the curve (AUC) not exceeding 0.6, as follows: EuroSCORE I, AUC 0.55; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.47-0.63, p = 0.59; EuroSCORE II, AUC 0.59; 95% CI 0.51-0.67, p = 0.23; STS, AUC 0.55; 95% CI 0.47-0.63, p = 0.52; ACEF, AUC 0.54; 95% CI 0.46-0.62, p = 0.69; Amblers, AUC 0.54; 95% CI 0.46-0.62, p = 0.70; OBSERVANT, AUC 0.597; 95% CI 0.52-0.67, p = 0.21; SURTAVI, AUC 0.535; 95% CI 0.45-0.62, p = 0.65. SURTAVI model was calibrated best in high-risk patients showing coherence between expected and observed mortality (10.8% vs. 9.4%, p = 0.982). ACEF demonstrated best classification accuracy (17.5% vs. 6.9%, p = 0.053, observed mortality in high vs. non-high-risk cohort, respectively). CONCLUSIONS None of the investigated risk scales proved to be optimal in predicting 30-day mortality in unselected, real-life population with aortic stenosis referred to TAVI. This data supports primary role of heart team in decision process of selecting patients for TAVI.

Does a blanking period after pulmonary vein isolation impact long-term results? Results after 55 months of follow-up.

BACKGROUND The aims of the study are 1) to assess antiarrhythmic prophylaxis efficacy during the first 2 months after radiofrequency ablation (ARF) due to AF; 2) to define risk factors for early AF recurrence (EAFR) after ARF; 3) to determine the long-term follow-up results and risk factors for late AF recurrence (LAFR). METHODS A total number of 210 consecutive patients who had undergone ARF due to AF were analyzed. Patients were randomized into three groups: Group 1 (G1), without any anti-arrhythmic drug (AAD); Group 2 (G2), with amiodarone or sotalol; Group 3 (G3), with last ineffective AAD. The study was designed to analyze two periods: short-term observation, the first 2 months after ARF; and at least 2 years of long-term follow-up. RESULTS After 2 months, clinical data were collected from 171 patients (123 males, mean age of 50.3 years; persistent AF in 19.8%; lone AF in 36.6%). Sinus rhythm (SR) was maintained in 84 (49.1%) patients; 35 (20.4%) patients presented with a single episode of AF, 39 (23%) patients experienced a reduction in number of AF episodes, and 13 (7.5%) patients showed no improvement. No predisposing factor for early recurrence was found. After a mean follow-up of 55 months, clinical data were collected in 137 patients, of which 47 (34%) maintained SR. Those more likely to sustain SR were: males (82.9% vs. 62.2%; p = 0.018), younger patients (44.8 ± 12.7 vs. 52.5 ± 9.9; p = 0.0001), patients with smaller left atrium diameter (4.05 ± ± 0.49 cm vs. 4.25 ± 0.51 cm; p = 0.04), and those without any AF recurrence during the first 2 months after ARF (78.7% vs. 35.6%; p < 0.0001). In the multivariable analysis, the independent risk factors for LAFR were hypertension (p < 0.001) and persistent AF (p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS Antiarrhythmic prophylaxis does not affect the number of AF recurrences during the first 2 months after ablation. SR maintenance during a blanking period after AF ablation is a positive prognostic factor in long-term follow-up. Persistent AF and hypertension are independent risk factors for late AF recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation.

Direct transcatheter aortic valve implantation – one-year outcome of a case control study

Introduction Transaortic valve implantation (TAVI) has a well-established position in the treatment of high-risk and inoperable patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). The TAVI protocol requires a pre-dilatation for native valve preparation. Aim To assess the safety and feasibility of TAVI without pre-dilatation and to compare it with the procedure with pre-dilatation. Material and methods Out of 101 TAVI patients, in 10 the procedure was performed without balloon predilatation, and 8 patients were included in the analysis. The procedural, echocardiographic, and clinical outcomes were compared with a case control matched cohort (1: 2 ratio). A 12-month follow-up was done in all cases. Results The procedure was successfully completed in all patients in the study group (SG), but there was one procedural failure in the control group (CG). All patients received a CoreValve (Medtronic) bioprosthesis. There was a significant immediate decrease in transvalvular gradients (TG) in both study arms after the procedure (SG: mean TG: from 46.0 ±14.0 mm Hg to 10.0 ±4.8 mm Hg, p < 0.001; CG: mean TG: from 55.9 ±12.0 mm Hg to 9.9 ±2.9 mm Hg, p < 0.001). A marked increase in the effective orifice areas was observed in both cohorts (SG: 1.63 ±0.13 cm2 and CG: 1.67 ±0.25 cm2, p = 0.75). The periprocedural complication rate was equally distributed in both arms. The 12-month all-cause mortality was 12.5% in both groups. Conclusions The direct TAVI approach seams to be safe and feasible. The clinical and echocardiographic results are not different from those achieved in patients treated with standard TAVI protocol with pre-dilatation.

Pre-procedural dual antiplatelet therapy and bleeding events following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)

INTRODUCTION Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is associated with bleeding that increases mortality. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is recommended in TAVI, however little is known about pre-procedural DAPT use and its impact on hemostasis. We sought to determine the frequency, predictors and bleeding events in patients receiving DAPT before TAVI. METHODS Three-hundred-and-three (n=303, 78.6±7.6years, 49% female, EuroScore 23.1±16.9) consecutive patients undergoing TAVI were prospectively analyzed and followed for in-hospital events. According to pre-procedural antiplatelet status study population was divided into 2 groups: patients receiving aspirin and clopidogrel (DAPT) and those on aspirin only or no antiplatelet therapy (noDAPT). RESULTS Pre-procedural DAPT was used in 139 cases (46%). Previous PCI (OR 4.8, [2.8-8.3], p<0.0001), implantation of self-expandable prosthesis (OR 2.2, [1.2-4], p=0.007) femoral access (OR 2.2, [1.1-4.5], p=0.029) and platelet count (OR 1.006, [1.002-1.01], p=0.002) were identified as independent predictors of pre-procedural DAPT. No difference was observed in the rates of any bleeding (23% in DAPT vs. 24.4% in noDAPT, p=0.930) or major/life-threatening bleeding (12.2% in DAPT vs. 14.7% in noDAPT, p=0.715). Propensity-score matching analysis did not alter the results. GFR <30ml/min was the strongest predictor of bleeding (OR 4.3, [1.9-9.9], p=0.0005). There was a trend towards lower frequency of MI and stroke/TIA in DAPT as compared with noDAPT (3.6% vs. 9.8%, p=0.082). CONCLUSIONS Pre-procedural DAPT is frequent and does not increase short-term bleeding complications or need for transfusion following TAVI. Possible impact of DAPT use before TAVI on ischemic complications needs to be investigated in larger populations.

Common carotid artery access for transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an alternative method of treatment for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis in patients who are at high risk of surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR). In randomised clinical trials TAVI was shown to be superior to standard medical therapy in a cohort of inoperable patients and non-inferior to AVR in high-risk operable patients. Additionally, in a recent trial with self-expandable prosthesis use, TAVI was associated with lower mortality compared with surgery. Usually, femoral arteries are the most common vascular access to deliver the bioprosthesis; however, in some cases (up to 20%) this route may not be applied because of significant peripheral artery disease or tortuosity. In this article, we present the first two TAVI procedures in Poland performed via the left common carotid artery.

Baseline platelet indices and bleeding after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Bleeding complications are frequent and independently predict mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). It has been demonstrated that certain platelet parameters are indicative of platelet reactivity. We sought to determine the possible correlation between simple platelet indices and bleeding complications in patients undergoing TAVI. Platelet indices – platelet count, mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet distribution width and plateletcrit – were measured in 110 consecutive patients on the day preceding TAVI. In-hospital bleeding events after TAVI were assessed according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 classification as any bleeding, major and life-threatening bleeding (MLTB) and need for transfusion. By receiver-operating characteristic analysis, only MPV was able to distinguish between patients with and without any bleeding [area under the curve (AUC) 0.629, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.531–0.719, P = 0.0342], MLTB (AUC 0.730, 95% CI 0.637–0.811, P = 0.0004) and need for transfusion (AUC 0.660, 95% CI 0.563–0.747, P = 0.0045). By multivariate logistic regression, high MPV (>10.6) and low platelet distribution width (<14.8) were associated with increased risk of any bleeding [odds ratio (OR) 4.08, 95% CI 1.66–10.07, P = 0.0022; and OR 3.82, 95% CI 1.41–10.36, P = 0.0084, respectively] and MLTB (OR 10.76, 95% CI 3.05–38, P = 0.0002; and OR 8.46, 95% CI 1.69–42.17, P = 0.0092, respectively). Additionally, high MPV independently correlated with the need for transfusion (OR 4.11, 95% CI 1.71–9.86, P = 0.0016). Larger and less heterogenic platelets may be associated with increased risk of short-term bleeding complications after TAVI.

Transesophageal Real Time Three‐Dimensional Echocardiography in Assessment of Partial Atrioventricular Septal Defect

We present a practical application of real time three‐dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in a 67‐year‐old male patient with congenital heart disease.

Transoesophageal real-time three-dimensional echocardiography in assessing large multiperforated atrial septal aneurysm

A 51-year-old woman presented with a 2 year history of declining exercise capacity and irregular palpitations. Clinical examination revealed sinus rhythm at 86 b.p.m., and blood pressure of 112/70 mmHg, without pedal oedema. Initial transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) revealed moderate right ventricular (RV) enlargement with moderate tricuspid regurgitation and mild pulmonary hypertension (estimated PASP 40 mmHg). There was interventricular septal flattening in diastole due to RV volume overload. Transoesophageal two-dimensional echocardiography (2D TEE) demonstrated multiperforated atrial septal aneurysm (ASD II-atrial septal defects type II) …

Percutaneous Closure of Post-Infarction Ventricular Septal Defects—An Over Decade-long Experience

OBJECTIVES To report an over decade-long experience with percutaneous post-infarction ventricular septal defect (PIVSD) closure. BACKGROUND PIVSDs remains a major clinical challenge with extremely high mortality. Data concerning interventional closure of PIVSD is scarce. METHODS All percutaneous PIVSD closures performed between 2003 and 2016 in 8 participating centres were identified. Data concerning patients and procedures was acquired. Patients were divided into two groups, based on the time interval between VSD diagnosis and closure (≤14 days-acute phase, >14 days-non-acute phase). RESULTS Twenty-one percutaneous PIVSD closures were performed on 20 patients (9 females, mean age: 70 years). Mean interval between the diagnosis and the procedure was 182.6 ± 500 days (range: 7-2228). Defects were mostly located in apical (55%) segments of the septum. In 7 cases (33%) the procedure was performed in the acute phase. The closure was technically successful in 17 cases (81%). Four patients died within 48 hours after the procedure. 30-days survival rate of the entire cohort was 70%. Univariate analysis revealed impact of technical success of the procedure (HR 0.13, CI 0.03-0.68 P = 0.016) and white blood cell count (HR 1.36 per unit increase, CI 1.1-1.69, P = 0.005) on 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS In a selected population of patients percutaneous PIVSD closure is feasible and provides satisfactory survival rate. Procedural success has a protective impact on survival. Timing of the closure remains controversial. Procedure in the non-acute phase carries lower mortality, but at the same time introduces a selection bias. Larger registry-based studies are required.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in a patient with severe aortic insufficiency of aortic valve homograft

We present the case of a 64-year-old female who was admitted to our centre with severe aortic insufficiency and advanced heart failure symptoms (NYHA class III–IV). Her medical history included: surgical homograft aortic valve replacement due to severe aortic insufficiency 14 years ago, chronic atrial fibrillation, and hypothyroidism. The patient’s logistic EuroSCORE was 32%, EuroSCORE II 9.1%, and STS score 3.95%. Preprocedural transthoracic echocardiographic examination revealed akinesis of the basal and mid segments of interventricular septum, global hypokinesis of remaining segments with ejection fraction of 19%, enlargement of the left ventricle and atrium (diameter of 68 and 43 mm, respectively), regurgitant orifice area of 0.3 cm2, regurgitant volume of 58 mL, and regurgitant jet width to left ventricular outflow tract ratio of 66% (Fig. 1). An additional transoesophageal echocardiographic examination was performed for more precise measurement: this showed aortic annulus diameter of 24 mm. Angiography and computed tomography were also performed, showing no lesions in either the coronary or peripheral arteries. On the basis of the abovementioned clinical conditions, the Heart Team decided to refer the patient to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) via femoral access. The procedure was performed under general anaesthesia with a temporary pacemaker placed through the jugular vein and vascular access obtained with 18 Fr sheath by puncture of the right femoral artery. Due to lack of calcifications, two pig-tail catheters were placed in order to mark the plane of the annulus (Fig. 2) and 29 mm Medtronic CoreValveTM bioprosthesis was implanted under rapid pacing. Despite these preventive measures, the final position of prosthesis was too low with moderate-to-severe aortic insufficiency (Fig. 3) that persisted even after postdilatation with a 28 mm balloon. Therefore, the decision to implant another 29 mm CoreValve 10 to 15 mm higher was made. Finally, in control imaging, only a mild paravalvular leak was present (Fig. 4), and on discharge the ejection fraction had improved to 43%. TAVI is an effective treatment option for severe aortic stenosis in inoperable and high-risk patients. However, failure (mostly insufficiency) of a previous homograft aortic valve poses a challenge for any interventional treatment. In selected patients, TAVI can be a feasible alternative for high risk re-operation. TAVI may also be considered in some cases of native aortic insufficiency where there is favourable anatomy.