Piotr Szaniawski
Uppsala University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Piotr Szaniawski.
IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics | 2013
Johan Lindahl; Uwe Zimmermann; Piotr Szaniawski; Tobias Törndahl; Adam Hultqvist; P.M.P. Salomé; Charlotte Platzer-Björkman; Marika Edoff
In this paper, co-evaporation of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGS) in an inline single-stage process is used to fabricate solar cell devices with up to 18.6% conversion efficiency using a CdS buffer layer and 18.2% using a Zn1-xSnxOy Cd-free buffer layer. Furthermore, a 15.6-cm2 mini-module, with 16.8% conversion efficiency, has been made with the same layer structure as the CdS baseline cells, showing that the uniformity is excellent. The cell results have been externally verified. The CIGS process is described in detail, and material characterization methods show that the CIGS layer exhibits a linear grading in the [Ga]/([Ga]+[In]) ratio, with an average [Ga]/([Ga]+[In]) value of 0.45. Standard processes for CdS as well as Cd-free alternative buffer layers are evaluated, and descriptions of the baseline process for the preparation of all other steps in the Ångström Solar Center standard solar cell are given.
IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics | 2014
Tove Ericson; Jonathan J. Scragg; Adam Hultqvist; Jörn Timo Wätjen; Piotr Szaniawski; Tobias Törndahl; Charlotte Platzer-Björkman
To improve the conduction band alignment and explore the influence of the buffer-absorber interface, we here investigate an alternative buffer for Cu2ZnSnS4 (CZTS) solar cells. The Zn(O, S) system was chosen since the optimum conduction band alignment with CZTS is predicted to be achievable, by varying oxygen to sulfur ratio. Several sulfur to oxygen ratios were evaluated to find an appropriate conduction band offset. There is a clear trend in open-circuit voltage (Voc), with the highest values for the most sulfur rich buffer, before going to the blocking ZnS, whereas the fill factor peaks at a lower S content. The best alternative buffer cell in this series had an efficiency of 4.6% and the best CdS reference gave 7.3%. Extrapolating Voc values to 0 K gave activation energies well below the expected bandgap of 1.5 eV for CZTS, which indicate that recombination at the interface is dominating. However, it is clear that the values are affected by the change of buffer composition and that increasing sulfur content of the Zn(O, S) increases the activation energy for recombination. A series with varying CdS buffer thickness showed the expected behavior for short wavelengths in quantum efficiency measurements but the final variation in efficiency was small.
Journal of Physics D | 2014
Christopher Frisk; Charlotte Platzer Björkman; Jörgen Olsson; Piotr Szaniawski; Timo Wätjen; Viktor Fjällström; P.M.P. Salomé; Marika Edoff
Highly efficient Cu(In,Ga)(S,Se)2 photovoltaic thin film solar cells often have a compositional variation of Ga to In in the absorber layer, here described as a Ga-profile. In this work we have stu ...
IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics | 2015
Viktor Fjällström; Piotr Szaniawski; Bart Vermang; P.M.P. Salomé; Fredrik Rostvall; Uwe Zimmermann; Marika Edoff
This study deals with potential-induced degradation (PID) of Cu(In,Ga)Se2-based solar cells and different approaches to subsequent recovery of efficiency. Three different recovery methods were studied: 1) etch recovery, 2) accelerated recovery, and 3) unaccelerated recovery. After being completely degraded, the solar cells with CdS buffer layers recovered their efficiencies at different rates, depending on the method which was used. On the other hand, if Zn(O,S) was used as a buffer layer instead of CdS, the recovery rate was close to zero. The buffer layer type clearly influenced the sodium distribution during PID stressing and recovery, as well as the possibilities for recovery of the electrical performance.
IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics | 2015
Piotr Szaniawski; P.M.P. Salomé; Viktor Fjällström; Tobias Törndahl; Uwe Zimmermann; Marika Edoff
Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin-film solar cells with Ga-graded absorber layers and a [Cu]/([In] + [Ga]) ratio varying between 0.5 and 1.0 were prepared by coevaporation and investigated. Except for the sample with a final [Cu]/([In] + [Ga]) ratio of 1.0, the samples were Cu-poor at all times during the evaporation. The variation in copper was found to influence the material properties in several ways: 1) Changing the Cu content had a strong impact on In and Ga interdiffusion, resulting in decreased Ga gradients in samples with large Cu deficiency; 2) the Cu-poor Cu(In,Ga)3Se5 phase was detected in absorbers with [Cu]/([In] + [Ga]) ratios of 0.65 and below; and 3) the grain size changed significantly with the Cu variation. We observe a trend of reduced solar cell efficiencies for [Cu]/([In] + [Ga]) ratios of 0.65 and below, with an efficiency of 13.4% for the sample with a [Cu]/([In] + [Ga]) ratio of only 0.5, i.e., far from stoichiometry. We tentatively attribute the efficiency loss to a high concentration of point defects caused by the Cu deficiency.
IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics | 2017
Piotr Szaniawski; Pawel Zabierowski; Jörgen Olsson; Uwe Zimmermann; Marika Edoff
Reverse breakdown is investigated in multiple Cu(In,Ga)Se<sub>2</sub> solar cells with varying buffer layer thicknesses. A method to extract transition voltage, which marks the change of conduction mechanism that leads to electrical breakdown, is described as an alternative to the often less-meaningful breakdown voltage. Transition voltages for samples with CdS and Zn<italic><sub>x</sub></italic>Sn<sub>1-</sub><italic><sub>x</sub></italic>O<italic> <sub>y</sub></italic> buffers are extracted from breakdown measurements performed in darkness and under illumination. The electric field is calculated for ZTO-based samples measured in darkness, and its implications for the energy band structure are examined. Fowler–Nordheim tunneling and Poole–Frenkel conduction are considered as candidates for the main breakdown mechanism in darkness. A model combining the two conduction mechanisms is proposed, and fits for experimental data are presented and discussed. Involvement of defects is debated, and defect-and-breakdown-related phenomena are showcased.
IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics | 2017
Piotr Szaniawski; Jörgen Olsson; Christopher Frisk; Viktor Fjällström; Dorothea Ledinek; Fredrik Larsson; Uwe Zimmermann; Marika Edoff
Light-on-bias effects were investigated in multiple Cu(In, Ga)Se<sub>2</sub> solar cells with varying absorber layer compositions. A strong link between deformations caused by red-on-bias treatments in current–voltage (<italic>IV </italic>) and capacitance–voltage (<italic>CV</italic>) characteristics was demonstrated. Similarly to red-on-bias, blue-on-bias leads to a local increase in static negative charge, but in samples with CdS buffers this increase is shifted away from the interface and has no impact on device performance. <italic>IV</italic> characteristics of samples with Cd-free buffers are not affected by any light-on-bias treatments, suggesting that CdS plays a vital role in the decreased performance after red-on-bias. A statistical approach was used to search for compositional trends in red-on-bias behavior. Deformation factors were defined for <italic>IV</italic> and <italic>CV </italic> characteristics before and after the treatment. While there is a strong relationship between the deformations observed in both types of measurements, the degree to which red-on-bias affects <italic>IV</italic> and <italic>CV </italic> curves can vary dramatically. These variations cannot be attributed to changes in composition, since no clear compositional trends were found. Rather, other factors related to sample manufacturing and to the buffer layer seem to have major impact on red-on-bias behavior.
Progress in Photovoltaics | 2015
P.M.P. Salomé; Viktor Fjällström; Piotr Szaniawski; J. P. Leitão; Adam Hultqvist; Paulo A. Fernandes; J. P. Teixeira; Bruno P. Falcão; Uwe Zimmermann; António F. da Cunha; Marika Edoff
Progress in Photovoltaics | 2014
P.M.P. Salomé; Viktor Fjällström; Adam Hultqvist; Piotr Szaniawski; Uwe Zimmermann; Marika Edoff
Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells | 2016
Christopher Frisk; Tove Ericson; Shuyi Li; Piotr Szaniawski; Jörgen Olsson; Charlotte Platzer-Björkman