Pitchayaponne Klunklin
Chiang Mai University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Pitchayaponne Klunklin.
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy | 2013
Ekkasit Tharavichitkul; Somsak Wanwilairat; Somvilai Chakrabandhu; Pitchayaponne Klunklin; Wimrak Onchan; Damrongsak Tippanya; Wannapa Nopnop; R. Galalae; Imjai Chitapanarux
Purpose A report of preliminary results and toxicity profiles using image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) combined with whole pelvic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (WP-IMRT) for locally advanced cervical cancer. Material and methods Fifteen patients with locally advanced cervical cancer were enrolled into the study. WP-IMRT was used to treat the Clinical Target Volume (CTV) with a dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions. Concurrent cisplatin (40 mg/m2) was prescribed during radiotherapy (RT) on weekly basis. IGBT using computed tomography was performed at the dose of 7 Gy × 4 fractions to the High-Risk Clinical Target Volume (HR-CTV). Results The mean cumulative doses – in terms of equivalent dose of 2 Gy (EQD2) – of IGBT plus WP-IMRT to HR-CTV, bladder, rectum, and sigmoid colon were 88.3, 85.0, 68.2 and 73.6 Gy, respectively. In comparison with standard (point A prescription) dose-volume histograms, volume-based image-guided brachytherapy improved the cumulative doses for bladder of 67%, rectum of 47% and sigmoid of 46%. At the median follow-up time of 14 months, the local control, metastasis-free survival and overall survival rates were 93%, 100% and 93%, respectively. No grade 3-4 acute and late toxicities were observed. Conclusion The combination of image-guided brachytherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy improved the dose distribution to tumor volumes and avoided overdose in OARs which could be converted in excellent local control and toxicity profiles.
Brachytherapy | 2015
Ekkasit Tharavichitkul; Damrongsak Tippanya; Rungtip Jayavasti; Somvilai Chakrabandhu; Pitchayaponne Klunklin; Wimrak Onchan; Somsak Wanwilairat; R. Galalae; Imjai Chitapanarux
PURPOSE To report the preliminary results of transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS)-guided brachytherapy (BT) in cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Twenty-nine patients with cervical cancer Stage IB-IVA according to The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging were treated by radical radiotherapy from February 2012 to December 2012. Treatment was composed of WPRT to 50 Gy in 25 fractions and central shielding after 44 Gy in combination with TAUS-guided BT to optimize the total dose (equivalent dose of 2 Gy [EQD2]) to the minimal dose at cervical points (in EQD2 concepts) defined by TAUS ≥80 Gy while maintaining low doses to the ICRU report no. 38 bladder and rectal points. The treatment results and toxicity profiles were reported. RESULTS At median followup time of 19 months (range, 17-27), the local control and disease-free survival rates were 93.1% and 86.2%, respectively. One episode of Grade 3 vaginal toxicity was observed in this followup period. The mean applied doses to cervix, bladder, and rectal points were 82.6, 72.5, and 75 Gy, respectively. TAUS-guided planning reduced bladder (defined as >80 Gy in EQD2) and rectal overdose (defined as >75 Gy in EQD2) in 44.9% and 34.5% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION The 2-year results demonstrate that TAUS-guided BT is feasible and associated with excellent tumor control/toxicity rates in cervical cancer.
Radiation oncology journal | 2014
Ekkasit Tharavichtikul; Pooriwat Meungwong; Taned Chitapanarux; Somvilai Chakrabandhu; Pitchayaponne Klunklin; Wimrak Onchan; Somsak Wanwilairat; Patrinee Traisathit; R. Galalae; Imjai Chitapanarux
Purpose To evaluate association between equivalent dose in 2 Gy (EQD2) to rectal point dose and gastrointestinal toxicity from whole pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) and intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) in cervical cancer patients who were evaluated by rectosigmoidoscopy in Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University. Materials and Methods Retrospective study was designed for the patients with locally advanced cervical cancer, treated by radical radiotherapy from 2004 to 2009 and were evaluated by rectosigmoidoscopy. The cumulative doses of WPRT and ICBT to the maximally rectal point were calculated to the EQD2 and evaluated the association of toxicities. Results Thirty-nine patients were evaluated for late rectal toxicity. The mean cumulative dose in term of EQD2 to rectum was 64.2 Gy. Grade 1 toxicities were the most common findings. According to endoscopic exam, the most common toxicities were congested mucosa (36 patients) and telangiectasia (32 patients). In evaluation between rectal dose in EQD2 and toxicities, no association of cumulative rectal dose to rectal toxicity, except the association of cumulative rectal dose in EQD2 >65 Gy to late effects of normal tissue (LENT-SOMA) scale ≥ grade 2 (p = 0.022; odds ratio, 5.312; 95% confidence interval, 1.269-22.244). Conclusion The cumulative rectal dose in EQD2 >65 Gy have association with ≥ grade 2 LENT-SOMA scale.
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy | 2013
Ekkasit Tharavichitkul; Somsak Wanwilairat; Anirut Watcharawipha; Damrongsak Tippanya; Rungtip Jayasvasti; Somvilai Chakrabandhu; Pitchayaponne Klunklin; Wimrak Onchan; R. Galalae; Imjai Chitapanarux
Purpose To evaluate the cumulative dose at point A for three and four centimeters central shielding. Material and methods The plans of external beam radiotherapy plus conventional intracavitary brachytherapy were performed. Three or four centimeters central shieldings (after 44 Gy) were applied to the standard whole pelvis irradiation. Additional intracavitary brachytherapy 4 × 7 Gy at point A was prescribed, and the cumulative dose in EQD2 (α/β = 10) of 3 cm and 4 cm central shielding were evaluated. Results The cumulative dose at point A in EQD2 (α/β = 10) of 3 cm central shielding were 95.7 Gy for AR and 95.5 Gy for AL, while the cumulative dose at point As in EQD2 (α/β = 10) of 4 cm central shielding were 90.8 Gy for AR and 91.2 Gy for AL. Conclusions The 3 cm central shielding caused higher cumulative dose (in terms of EQD2 [α/β = 10]) than 4 cm central shielding.
Journal of Radiation Research | 2014
Imjai Chitapanarux; Ekkasit Tharavichitkul; Somvilai Jakrabhandu; Pitchayaponne Klunklin; Wimrak Onchan; Jirawattana Srikawin; Nantaka Pukanhaphan; Patrinee Traisathit; Roy Vongtama
Objective: To assess the treatment outcomes and to explore the determinants of clinical outcome in breast cancer patients with 1–3 positive nodes who did or did not receive postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in a tertiary care referral cancer center in Northern Thailand. Methods: We investigated a retrospective cohort of registered breast cancer patients at the Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand from 2001–2007. Analysis was performed using Cox regression models to identify factors affecting the overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) rates. Comparisons were made between two cohorts: women who received adjuvant PMRT (74 patients) and women who did not receive adjuvant PMRT (81 patients). Results: A total of 155 patients were included with a median follow-up period of 4.45 years. There was a statistically significant 4-year OS difference between the two groups of patients: 100% for the PMRT group and 93.1% for the non-PMRT group (P = 0.044). The 4-year RFS was 85.9% for patients receiving PMRT and 78.3% for patients who did not receive PMRT (P = 0.291). On multivariate analysis of OS, using hormonal treatment was the only significant independent factor associated with improved OS. On multivariate analysis of RFS, none of the variables were significantly associated with improved RFS. PMRT was notfound to be a prognostic variable related to the outcome of patients using a logistic regression model. Conclusion: Our retrospective, hospital-based analysis demonstrated that PMRT improved the treatment outcome in terms of OS for women with 1–3 node positive early-stage breast cancer.
Gynecologic Oncology | 2018
Ekkasit Tharavichitkul; Somvilai Chakrabandhu; Pitchayaponne Klunklin; Wimrak Onchan; Bongkot Jia-Mahasap; Somsak Wanwilairat; Damrongsak Tippanya; Rungtip Jayasvasti; Patumrat Sripan; R. Galalae; Imjai Chitapanarux
OBJECTIVES To report the intermediate-term results of trans-abdominal ultrasound (TAUS)-guided brachytherapy in cervical cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ninety-two patients with cervical cancer (stage IB-IVA, according to FIGO staging), were treated by curative radiotherapy from February 2012 to June 2015. All patients were treated with whole pelvic radiotherapy to 50 Gy in 25 fractions and central shielding after 44 Gy, in combination with TAUS-guided brachytherapy, in order to escalate the total dose (EQD2) to the minimal dose at cervical points (in EQD2 concepts) defined by TAUS, while maintaining low doses to ICRU bladder and rectal points. The treatment results and toxicity profiles were reported. RESULTS At median follow-up time of 41.2 months (range 8 to 61 months) the pelvic control, disease-free survival, and overall survival rates were 84.8%, 75%, and 88%, respectively. The mean applied doses to cervix, bladder, and rectal points were 83.5, 72.3, and 76.5 Gy, respectively. Eight patients developed grade 2 Gastrointestinal toxicity. CONCLUSION The 3-year results demonstrated that TAUS-guided brachytherapy is feasible and associated with excellent tumor control/toxicity rates in cervical cancer.
Radiology and Oncology | 2017
Imjai Chitapanarux; Wannapha Nobnop; Patumrat Sripan; Ausareeya Chumachote; Ekkasit Tharavichitkul; Somvilai Chakrabandhu; Pitchayaponne Klunklin; Wimrak Onchan; Bongkot Jia-Mahasap; Suwapim Janla-or; Patcharawadee Kayan; Patrinee Traisathit; Dirk Van Gestel
Abstract Background The aim of the study was to analyse of two-year loco-regional failure free survival (LRFFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity outcomes of the first 100 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients in Thailand treated by helical tomotherapy. Patients and methods Between March 2012 and December 2015, 100 patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma were treated by helical tomotherapy. All patients were treated by platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Results The median age was 51 years (interquartile ranges [IQR]: 42.5–57.0). The mean ± SD of D95% of planning target volume (PTV) 70, 59.4 and 54 were 70.2 ± 0.5, 59.8 ± 0.6, and 54.3 ± 0.8 Gy, respectively. The mean ± SD of conformity index, and homogeneity index were 0.89 ± 0.13 and 0.06 ± 0.07. Mean ± SD of D2 % of spinal cord and brainstem were 34.1 ± 4.4 and 53.3 ±6.3 Gy. Mean ± SD of D50 of contralateral and ipsilateral parotid gland were 28.4 ± 6.7 and 38.5 ± 11.2 Gy. At a median follow-up of 33 months (IQR: 25–41), the 2-year LRFFS, DMFS, OS were 94% (95%CI: 87–98%), 96% (95% CI: 89–98%), and 99% (95% CI: 93–100%), respectively. Acute grade 3 dermatitis, pharyngoesophagitis, and mucositis occurred in 5%, 51%, and 37%, respectively. Late pharyngoesophagitis grade 0 and 1 were found in 98% and 2% of patients. Late xerostomia grade 0, 1 and 2 were found in 17%, 78% and 5%, respectively. Conclusions Helical tomotherapy offers good dosimetric performance and achieves excellent treatment outcome in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.
Radiation oncology journal | 2015
Ekkasit Tharavichitkul; Suwapim Janla-or; Somsak Wanwilairat; Somvilai Chakrabandhu; Pitchayaponne Klunklin; Wimrak Onchan; Bongkot Supawongwattana; R. Galalae; Imjai Chitapanarux
We present a case of cervical cancer treated by concurrent chemoradiation. In radiation therapy part, the combination of the whole pelvic helical tomotherapy plus image-guided brachytherapy with megavoltage computed tomography of helical tomotherapy was performed. We propose this therapeutic approach could be considered in a curative setting in some problematic situation as our institution.
BMC Cancer | 2016
Ekkasit Tharavichitkul; Vicharn Lorvidhaya; Pimkhuan Kamnerdsupaphon; Vimol Sukthomya; Somvilai Chakrabandhu; Pitchayaponne Klunklin; Wimrak Onchan; Bongkoch Supawongwattana; Nantaka Pukanhaphan; R. Galalae; Imjai Chitapanarux
Journal of Cancer Therapy | 2015
Ekkasit Tharavichitkul; Sukon Prasitwattanaseree; Cholthicha Thipmate; Somvilai Chakrabandhu; Pitchayaponne Klunklin; Wimrak Onchan; R. Galalae; Imjai Chitapanarux