Somvilai Chakrabandhu
Chiang Mai University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Somvilai Chakrabandhu.
Gynecologic Oncology | 2013
Ekkasit Tharavichitkul; Somvilai Chakrabandhu; Somsak Wanwilairat; Damrongsak Tippanya; Wannapha Nobnop; Nantaka Pukanhaphan; R. Galalae; Imjai Chitapanarux
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the outcomes of image-guided brachytherapy combined with 3D conformal or intensity modulated external beam radiotherapy (3D CRT/IMRT) in cervical cancer at Chiang Mai University. METHODS From 2008 to 2011, forty-seven patients with locally advanced cervical cancer were enrolled in this study. All patients received high-technology (3D CRT/IMRT) whole pelvic radiotherapy with a total dose of 45-46 Gy plus image-guided High-Dose-Rate intracavitary brachytherapy 6.5-7 Gy × 4 fractions to a High-Risk Clinical Target Volume (HR-CTV) according to GEC-ESTRO recommendations. The dose parameters of the HR-CTV for bladder, rectum and sigmoid colon were recorded, as well as toxicity profiles. In addition, the endpoints for local control, disease-free, metastasis-free survival and overall survival were calculated. RESULTS At the median follow-up time of 26 months, the local control, disease-free survival, and overall survival rates were 97.9%, 85.1%, and 93.6%, respectively. The mean dose of HR-CTV, bladder, rectum and sigmoid were 93.1, 88.2, 69.6, and 72 Gy, respectively. In terms of late toxicity, the incidence of grade 3-4 bladder and rectum morbidity was 2.1% and 2.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS A combination of image-guided brachytherapy and IMRT/3D CRT showed very promising results of local control, disease-free survival, metastasis-free survival and overall survival rates. It also caused a low incidence of grade 3-4 toxicity in treated study patients.
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy | 2013
Ekkasit Tharavichitkul; Somsak Wanwilairat; Somvilai Chakrabandhu; Pitchayaponne Klunklin; Wimrak Onchan; Damrongsak Tippanya; Wannapa Nopnop; R. Galalae; Imjai Chitapanarux
Purpose A report of preliminary results and toxicity profiles using image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) combined with whole pelvic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (WP-IMRT) for locally advanced cervical cancer. Material and methods Fifteen patients with locally advanced cervical cancer were enrolled into the study. WP-IMRT was used to treat the Clinical Target Volume (CTV) with a dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions. Concurrent cisplatin (40 mg/m2) was prescribed during radiotherapy (RT) on weekly basis. IGBT using computed tomography was performed at the dose of 7 Gy × 4 fractions to the High-Risk Clinical Target Volume (HR-CTV). Results The mean cumulative doses – in terms of equivalent dose of 2 Gy (EQD2) – of IGBT plus WP-IMRT to HR-CTV, bladder, rectum, and sigmoid colon were 88.3, 85.0, 68.2 and 73.6 Gy, respectively. In comparison with standard (point A prescription) dose-volume histograms, volume-based image-guided brachytherapy improved the cumulative doses for bladder of 67%, rectum of 47% and sigmoid of 46%. At the median follow-up time of 14 months, the local control, metastasis-free survival and overall survival rates were 93%, 100% and 93%, respectively. No grade 3-4 acute and late toxicities were observed. Conclusion The combination of image-guided brachytherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy improved the dose distribution to tumor volumes and avoided overdose in OARs which could be converted in excellent local control and toxicity profiles.
Brachytherapy | 2015
Ekkasit Tharavichitkul; Damrongsak Tippanya; Rungtip Jayavasti; Somvilai Chakrabandhu; Pitchayaponne Klunklin; Wimrak Onchan; Somsak Wanwilairat; R. Galalae; Imjai Chitapanarux
PURPOSE To report the preliminary results of transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS)-guided brachytherapy (BT) in cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Twenty-nine patients with cervical cancer Stage IB-IVA according to The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging were treated by radical radiotherapy from February 2012 to December 2012. Treatment was composed of WPRT to 50 Gy in 25 fractions and central shielding after 44 Gy in combination with TAUS-guided BT to optimize the total dose (equivalent dose of 2 Gy [EQD2]) to the minimal dose at cervical points (in EQD2 concepts) defined by TAUS ≥80 Gy while maintaining low doses to the ICRU report no. 38 bladder and rectal points. The treatment results and toxicity profiles were reported. RESULTS At median followup time of 19 months (range, 17-27), the local control and disease-free survival rates were 93.1% and 86.2%, respectively. One episode of Grade 3 vaginal toxicity was observed in this followup period. The mean applied doses to cervix, bladder, and rectal points were 82.6, 72.5, and 75 Gy, respectively. TAUS-guided planning reduced bladder (defined as >80 Gy in EQD2) and rectal overdose (defined as >75 Gy in EQD2) in 44.9% and 34.5% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION The 2-year results demonstrate that TAUS-guided BT is feasible and associated with excellent tumor control/toxicity rates in cervical cancer.
Radiation oncology journal | 2014
Ekkasit Tharavichtikul; Pooriwat Meungwong; Taned Chitapanarux; Somvilai Chakrabandhu; Pitchayaponne Klunklin; Wimrak Onchan; Somsak Wanwilairat; Patrinee Traisathit; R. Galalae; Imjai Chitapanarux
Purpose To evaluate association between equivalent dose in 2 Gy (EQD2) to rectal point dose and gastrointestinal toxicity from whole pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) and intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) in cervical cancer patients who were evaluated by rectosigmoidoscopy in Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University. Materials and Methods Retrospective study was designed for the patients with locally advanced cervical cancer, treated by radical radiotherapy from 2004 to 2009 and were evaluated by rectosigmoidoscopy. The cumulative doses of WPRT and ICBT to the maximally rectal point were calculated to the EQD2 and evaluated the association of toxicities. Results Thirty-nine patients were evaluated for late rectal toxicity. The mean cumulative dose in term of EQD2 to rectum was 64.2 Gy. Grade 1 toxicities were the most common findings. According to endoscopic exam, the most common toxicities were congested mucosa (36 patients) and telangiectasia (32 patients). In evaluation between rectal dose in EQD2 and toxicities, no association of cumulative rectal dose to rectal toxicity, except the association of cumulative rectal dose in EQD2 >65 Gy to late effects of normal tissue (LENT-SOMA) scale ≥ grade 2 (p = 0.022; odds ratio, 5.312; 95% confidence interval, 1.269-22.244). Conclusion The cumulative rectal dose in EQD2 >65 Gy have association with ≥ grade 2 LENT-SOMA scale.
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy | 2013
Ekkasit Tharavichitkul; Somsak Wanwilairat; Anirut Watcharawipha; Damrongsak Tippanya; Rungtip Jayasvasti; Somvilai Chakrabandhu; Pitchayaponne Klunklin; Wimrak Onchan; R. Galalae; Imjai Chitapanarux
Purpose To evaluate the cumulative dose at point A for three and four centimeters central shielding. Material and methods The plans of external beam radiotherapy plus conventional intracavitary brachytherapy were performed. Three or four centimeters central shieldings (after 44 Gy) were applied to the standard whole pelvis irradiation. Additional intracavitary brachytherapy 4 × 7 Gy at point A was prescribed, and the cumulative dose in EQD2 (α/β = 10) of 3 cm and 4 cm central shielding were evaluated. Results The cumulative dose at point A in EQD2 (α/β = 10) of 3 cm central shielding were 95.7 Gy for AR and 95.5 Gy for AL, while the cumulative dose at point As in EQD2 (α/β = 10) of 4 cm central shielding were 90.8 Gy for AR and 91.2 Gy for AL. Conclusions The 3 cm central shielding caused higher cumulative dose (in terms of EQD2 [α/β = 10]) than 4 cm central shielding.
OncoTargets and Therapy | 2018
Chagkrit Ditsatham; Imjai Chitapanarux; Areewan Somwangprasert; Kirati Watcharachan; Panchaporn Wongmaneerung; Chaiyut Charoentum; Busyamas Chewaskulyong; Somvilai Chakrabandhu; Wimrak Onchan; Anongnart Teeyasuntranonn; Patumrat Sripan
Background We report the safety and efficacy of eribulin as a late treatment line in Thai metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. Patients and methods A total of 30 MBC patients treated with eribulin between January 2014 and January 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were scheduled to receive 1.4 mg/m2 of eribulin on day 1, day 8 and subsequently every 21 days. All patients had previously received at least three chemotherapy regimens including anthracycline and taxane. Response rate and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed. Results The median age was 56 years (range, 40–74 years), with a median follow-up time of 5.7 months (range, 0.2–25 months). The overall response rate was 30% (nine patients): four patients had triple-negative breast cancer, three patients had luminal B breast cancer and two patients had luminal A breast cancer. The median PFS was 2.9 months (range, 0.2–14 months). The median number of previous chemotherapy regimens was 4 (range, 3–9). Univariate analysis showed that the number of regimens (four or fewer) prior to eribulin was statistically associated with superior PFS (P = 0.009). Multivariate analysis also showed similar statistical association between number of prior regimens (four or fewer) and better PFS adjusted by age group (≥50 years; hazard ratio = 1.29; 95% CI: 1.0–1.65; P = 0.046). There were no toxic deaths or grade 4 toxicities. Nine (30%) patients had grade 3 anemia toxicities, and the other common toxicities were leukopenia and neutropenia. Four (13%) patients required dose reduction and 16 (53%) patients required dose delay because of toxicities. Conclusion Eribulin is an effective drug for heavily pretreated MBC patients with tolerable toxicities. The benefit was superior in patients who received fewer than four previous chemotherapy regimens.
Journal of gastrointestinal oncology | 2018
Kanyarat Katanyoo; Imjai Chitapanarux; Tharatorn Tungkasamit; Somvilai Chakrabandhu; Marisa Chongthanakorn; Rungarun Jiratrachu; Apiradee Kridakara; Kanokpis Townamchai; Pooriwat Muangwong; Chokaew Tovanabutra; Kittisak Chomprasert
Background Adjuvant chemotherapy at concurrent time with radiation therapy (RT) or at adjuvant time alone in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is used with several regimens. The cost-utility analysis was conducted to compare administration of two 5-FU regimens and capecitabine in the aspect of provider and societal viewpoint. Methods Stage II or III rectal cancer patients who received pre-operative or post-operative concurrent chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy were compared by using decision tree model between (I) 5-FU plus leucovorin (LV) for 5 days per cycle (Mayo Clinic regimen); (II) 5-FU continuous infusion (CI) for 120-h per cycle (CAO/ARO/AIO-94 protocol); (III) standard regimen of capecitabine. All probability data were extracted from landmark study. Direct medical costs were the cost from database of Drug Medical Supply Information Center, while direct non-medical cost and utility were interviewed from stage II and III rectal cancer patients. The time horizon of this study was 5 years. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was the final result in this study, which determined as the numerator of the difference of costs among three drug regimens, and the difference of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) from each drug was the denominator. Results 5-FU plus LV was the cheapest and least efficacy for adjuvant treatment of LARC in both provider and societal viewpoint. In provider viewpoint, the ICERs of 5-FU CI and capecitabine were 334,550 THB/QALY (US
Gynecologic Oncology | 2018
Ekkasit Tharavichitkul; Somvilai Chakrabandhu; Pitchayaponne Klunklin; Wimrak Onchan; Bongkot Jia-Mahasap; Somsak Wanwilairat; Damrongsak Tippanya; Rungtip Jayasvasti; Patumrat Sripan; R. Galalae; Imjai Chitapanarux
9,840/QALY) and 189,935 THB/QALY (US
Radiology and Oncology | 2017
Imjai Chitapanarux; Wannapha Nobnop; Patumrat Sripan; Ausareeya Chumachote; Ekkasit Tharavichitkul; Somvilai Chakrabandhu; Pitchayaponne Klunklin; Wimrak Onchan; Bongkot Jia-Mahasap; Suwapim Janla-or; Patcharawadee Kayan; Patrinee Traisathit; Dirk Van Gestel
5,586/QALY), respectively, with the corresponding societal viewpoint of 264,447 THB/QALY (US
Radiation oncology journal | 2015
Ekkasit Tharavichitkul; Suwapim Janla-or; Somsak Wanwilairat; Somvilai Chakrabandhu; Pitchayaponne Klunklin; Wimrak Onchan; Bongkot Supawongwattana; R. Galalae; Imjai Chitapanarux
7,778/QALY) and 119,120 THB/QALY (US