Praveen Hariharan

Sensitivity of Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate and C-reactive Protein for the Exclusion of Septic Arthritis in Emergency Department Patients

BACKGROUND Previous studies in post-operative orthopedic and pediatric patients suggest that erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) testing may be helpful in ruling out septic arthritis. However, these tests have not been evaluated in a population of adult Emergency Department (ED) patients. STUDY OBJECTIVE Determine the sensitivity of ESR and CRP in patients with septic arthritis. METHODS Retrospective analysis of ED patients with septic arthritis from 2003 to 2008. Eligible patients had an International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision diagnosis of pyogenic arthritis (711.0x) plus: positive synovial fluid culture, positive synovial Gram stain, or operative irrigation. Patients were excluded if no ESR or CRP was performed within 24 h. Sensitivity of ESR and CRP at various cutoffs was calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS We identified 167 patients with septic arthritis. We included 143 (86%) who had ESR (n=140, 84%) or CRP (n=96, 57%) performed. Mean age was 49 (± 22) years, and 85 (59%) were male. Race was: 125 (87%) white, 4 (3%) black, and 12 (8%) Hispanic. Thirty-five (24%) had infection of prosthetic joints. Synovial cultures were positive in 102 (71%). Sensitivity of ESR was: 98% (95% CI 94-100%) using a cutoff of ≥10 mm/h (n=134) and 94% (95% CI 88-97%) using a cutoff of ≥15 mm/h (n=131). The sensitivity of CRP was 92% (95% CI 84-96%) using a cutoff of ≥20 mg/L (n=88). CONCLUSION ESR and CRP have sensitivities of >90% for septic arthritis, but only when low thresholds are used. Further study is required to determine the clinical usefulness of ESR and CRP testing.

Association between the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) and short-term clinical deterioration.

The Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) has been shown to predict 30 and 90 day mortality after PE. However, whether the PESI predicts patients who will be free of clinically adverse outcomes during a typical hospitalisation is not known. Retrospective analysis of Emergency Department patients with PE from May 2006 to April 2008. We compiled demographics, data to calculate the PESI and a composite outcome. Patients were considered to have a negative PESI if they were in category I or II (≤85 points). Patients were considered to have the composite outcome if, within five days of diagnosis, they: A) had recurrent PE; B) developed a new cardiac dysrhythmia; C) required advanced cardiac life support; D) required respiratory support; E) required vasopressors; F) received thrombolysis; G) had major bleeding; H) returned to the ED; I) died. We enrolled 245 patients with PE. Of these, 115 (47%) were male, 204 (83%) were white. The mean age was 57 ± 17 years. The PESI identified 109 (44%) as low risk and 136 (56%) as high risk. Sixty-one (26%) patients had the outcome, of whom nine (14%) were characterised as low risk by the PESI. Test characteristics were: sensitivity 86% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 75%-93%), specificity 55% (95% CI: 47%-62%), NPV 63% (95% CI: 55%-70%), PPV 40% (95% CI: 31%-49%), LR(+) 1.9 (95% CI: 1.57-2.30) and LR(-) 0.26 (95% CI: 0.14-0.48). Of the patients who had an adverse clinical event or required a hospital-based intervention within the first five days after PE diagnosis, 14% were categorised by the PESI as safe for discharge [corrected] .

Association between electrocardiographic findings, right heart strain, and short-term adverse clinical events in patients with acute pulmonary embolism.

Electrocardiographic (ECG) changes may be seen with pulmonary emboli (PE). Whether ECG is associated with short‐term adverse clinical events after PE is less well established.

A Comparison of Patients Diagnosed With Pulmonary Embolism Who Are ≥65 Years With Patients <65 Years

Recent studies have highlighted differences in how older patients respond to high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) and treatment. However, guidelines for PE risk stratification and treatment are not based on age, and data are lacking for older patients. We characterized the impact of age on clinical features, risk stratification, treatment, and outcomes in a sample of patients with PE in the emergency department. We performed an observational cohort study of 547 consecutive patients with PE in the emergency department from 2005 to 2011 in an urban tertiary hospital. We used bivariate proportions and multivariable logistic regression to compare clinical presentation, risk category, treatment, and outcomes in patients ≥65 years with those <65 years. The mean age was 58 ± 17 years, 276 (50%) were women, and 210 (38%) were ≥65 years. PE was more severe in patients ≥65 years (massive 14% vs 5%, submassive 48% vs 25%, and low risk 38% vs 70%, p <0.0001), with submassive PE being the most common presentation in patients ≥65 years. However, subanalysis removing natriuretic peptides from the definition of submassive PE negated this finding. Treatment with parenteral anticoagulation (88% vs 90%, p = 0.32), thrombolytic therapy (5% vs 4%, p = 0.87), and inferior vena cava filter (4% vs 4%, p = 0.73) were similar among age groups. Patients ≥65 years had higher 30-day mortality (11% vs 3%, p <0.001). In conclusion, patients ≥65 years present with more severe PE and have higher mortality, although treatment patterns were similar to younger patients. Age-specific guideline definitions of submassive PE may better identify high-risk patients.

Changes in treatment and outcomes after creation of a pulmonary embolism response team (PERT), a 10-year analysis

Multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response teams (PERTs) are being implemented to improve care of patients with life-threatening PE. We sought to determine how the creation of PERT affects treatment and outcomes of patients with serious PE. A pre- and post-intervention study was performed using an interrupted time series design, to compare patients with PE before (2006–2012) and after (2012–2016) implementation of PERT at a university hospital. T-tests, Chi square tests and logistic regression were used to compare outcomes, and multivariable regression were used to adjust for differences in PE severity. Two-sided p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. For the interrupted time-series analysis, data was divided into mutually exclusive 6-month time periods (11 pre- and 7 post-PERT). To examine changes in treatment and outcomes associated with PERT, slopes and change points were compared pre- and post-PERT. Two-hundred and twelve pre-PERT and 228 post-PERT patients were analyzed. Patient demographics were generally similar, though pre-PERT, PE were more likely to be low-risk (37% vs. 19%) while post-PERT, PE were more likely to be submassive (32% vs. 49%). More patients underwent catheter directed therapy (1% vs. 14%, p = < 0.0001) or any advanced therapy (19 [9%] vs. 44 [19%], p = 0.002) post PERT. Interrupted time series analysis demonstrated that this increase was sudden and coincident with implementation of PERT, and most noticeable among patients with submassive PE. There were no differences in major bleeding or mortality pre- and post-PERT. While the use of advanced therapies, particularly catheter-directed therapies, increased after creation of PERT, especially among patients with submassive PE, there was no apparent increase in bleeding.

ASSOCIATION OF HIGH CLOT BURDEN IN PULMONARY EMBOLISM WITH RIGHT HEART STRAIN AND IMMEDIATE ADVERSE CLINICAL EVENTS

CT Pulmonary Angiogram (CTPA) provides a volumetric assessment of clot burden associated with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). However, it is unclear if clot burden is associated with right heart strain (RHS) or clinical deterioration. We prospectively enrolled Emergency Department patients with PE