Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Quyen D. Chu is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Quyen D. Chu.


Annals of Surgical Oncology | 2007

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of peritoneal surface malignancies of colonic origin: A consensus statement

Jesus Esquivel; Robert P. Sticca; Paul H. Sugarbaker; Edward A. Levine; Tristan D. Yan; Richard B. Alexander; Dario Baratti; David L. Bartlett; R. Barone; P. Barrios; S. Bieligk; P. Bretcha-Boix; C. K. Chang; Francis Chu; Quyen D. Chu; Steven A. Daniel; E. De Bree; Marcello Deraco; L. Dominguez-Parra; Dominique Elias; R. Flynn; J. Foster; A. Garofalo; François Noël Gilly; Olivier Glehen; A. Gomez-Portilla; L. Gonzalez-Bayon; Santiago González-Moreno; M. Goodman; Vadim Gushchin

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of peritoneal surface malignancies of colonic origin : a consensus statement


Annals of Surgical Oncology | 2007

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of peritoneal surface malignancies of colonic origin: a consensus statement. Society of Surgical Oncology.

Jesus Esquivel; Robert P. Sticca; Paul H. Sugarbaker; Edward A. Levine; Tristan D. Yan; Richard B. Alexander; Dario Baratti; David L. Bartlett; R. Barone; Pedro Barrios; S. Bieligk; P. Bretcha-Boix; C. K. Chang; Frank Chu; Quyen D. Chu; Steven A. Daniel; de Bree E; Marcello Deraco; L. Dominguez-Parra; Dominique Elias; R. Flynn; J. Foster; A. Garofalo; François Noël Gilly; Olivier Glehen; A. Gomez-Portilla; L. Gonzalez-Bayon; Santiago González-Moreno; M. Goodman; Gushchin

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of peritoneal surface malignancies of colonic origin : a consensus statement


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2014

Burnout and Career Satisfaction Among US Oncologists

Tait D. Shanafelt; William J. Gradishar; Michael P. Kosty; Daniel Satele; Helen K. Chew; Leora Horn; Ben Clark; Amy Hanley; Quyen D. Chu; John Pippen; Jeff A. Sloan; Marilyn Raymond

PURPOSE To evaluate the personal and professional characteristics associated with career satisfaction and burnout among US oncologists. METHODS Between October 2012 and March 2013, the American Society of Clinical Oncology conducted a survey of US oncologists evaluating burnout and career satisfaction. The survey sample included equal numbers of men and women and represented all career stages. RESULTS Of 2,998 oncologists contacted, 1,490 (49.7%) returned surveys (median age of respondents, 52 years; 49.6% women). Among the 1,117 oncologists (37.3% of overall sample) who completed full-length surveys, 377 (33.8%) were in academic practice (AP) and 482 (43.2%) in private practice (PP), with the remainder in other settings. Oncologists worked an average of 57.6 hours per week (AP, 58.6 hours per week; PP, 62.9 hours per week) and saw a mean of 52 outpatients per week. Overall, 484 oncologists (44.7%) were burned out on the emotional exhaustion and/or depersonalization domain of Maslach Burnout Inventory (AP, 45.9%; PP, 50.5%; P = .18). Hours per week devoted to direct patient care was the dominant professional predictor of burnout for both PP and AP oncologists on univariable and multivariable analyses. Although a majority of oncologists were satisfied with their career (82.5%) and specialty (80.4%) choices, both measures of career satisfaction were lower for those in PP relative to AP (all P < .006). CONCLUSION Overall career satisfaction is high among US oncologists, albeit lower for those in PP relative to AP. Burnout rates among oncologists seem similar to those described in recent studies of US physicians in general. Those oncologists who devote the greatest amount of their professional time to patient care seem to be at greatest risk for burnout.


Journal of Surgical Research | 2010

High Chemokine Receptor CXCR4 Level in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Specimens Predicts Poor Clinical Outcome

Quyen D. Chu; Lori Panu; Neal T. Holm; Benjamin D.L. Li; Lester W. Johnson; Songlin Zhang

INTRODUCTION Basal-like tumors or triple negative breast cancers are those that lack hormone-receptor and HER-2 expressions. They are considered to be aggressive tumors, and molecular mechanism to account for this is poorly understood. CXCR4 is a chemokine receptor that has been linked to breast cancer invasion and metastasis. We postulate that high CXCR4 overexpression level in cancer specimens predicts a poor outcome in patients with triple negative breast cancers. METHODS One hundred fifty-one patients with triple negative breast cancers were prospectively accrued and analyzed. All had undergone standardized treatment and surveillance protocols. From each specimen, CXCR4 levels were detected using Western blots. Results were quantified against 1 microg of HeLa cells (positive controls). CXCR4 expression was defined as high (>or=6-fold) or low (<6-fold). Primary endpoints were cancer recurrence and death. Statistical analysis performed included Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 37 mo, patients whose tumors had high CXCR4 overexpression (>or=6-fold) had a significantly higher incidence of cancer recurrence (P=0.014) and cancer-related death (P=0.026) than those in the low CXCR4 group (<6-fold). After adjusting for tumor size and nodal status, the relative risk for cancer recurrence and death in the high CXCR4 group was 2.1-fold (P=0.007; 95% CI: 1.22 to 3.8) and 2-fold (P=0.047; 95% CI: 1.01 to 4.06) higher than those in the low CXCR4 group, respectively. CONCLUSION High CXCR4 overexpression in cancer specimens predicts a worse outcome in patients who have triple negative breast cancer.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2014

Satisfaction With Work-Life Balance and the Career and Retirement Plans of US Oncologists

Tait D. Shanafelt; Marilyn Raymond; Michael P. Kosty; Daniel Satele; Leora Horn; John Pippen; Quyen D. Chu; Helen K. Chew; William Clark; Amy Hanley; Jeff A. Sloan; William J. Gradishar

PURPOSE To evaluate satisfaction with work-life balance (WLB) and career plans of US oncologists. METHODS The American Society of Clinical Oncology conducted a survey of US oncologists evaluating satisfaction with WLB and career plans between October 2012 and March 2013. The sample included equal numbers of men and women from all career stages. RESULTS Of 2,998 oncologists contacted, 1,490 (49.7%) returned surveys. From 1,117 oncologists (37.3% of overall sample) completing full-length surveys, we evaluated satisfaction with WLB and career plans among the 1,058 who were not yet retired. The proportion of oncologists satisfied with WLB (n = 345; 33.4%) ranked lower than that reported for all other medical specialties in a recent national study. Regarding career plans, 270 oncologists (26.5%) reported a moderate or higher likelihood of reducing their clinical work hours in the next 12 months, 351 (34.3%) indicated a moderate or higher likelihood of leaving their current position within 24 months, and 273 (28.5%) planned to retire before 65 years of age. Multivariable analyses found women oncologists (odds ratio [OR], 0.458; P < .001) and those who devoted greater time to patient care (OR for each additional hour, 0.977; P < .001) were less likely to be satisfied with WLB. Satisfaction with WLB and burnout were the strongest predictors of intent to reduce clinical work hours and leave current position on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION Satisfaction with WLB among US oncologists seems lower than for other medical specialties. Dissatisfaction with WLB shows a strong relationship with plans to reduce hours and leave current practice. Given the pending US oncologist shortage, additional studies exploring interactions among WLB, burnout, and career satisfaction and their impact on career and retirement plans are warranted.


Annals of Surgery | 2006

High eIF4E, VEGF, and microvessel density in stage I to III breast cancer.

Kerry Byrnes; Stephen White; Quyen D. Chu; Carol Meschonat; Herbert Yu; Lester W. Johnson; Arrigo DeBenedetti; Fleurette Abreo; Richard H. Turnage; John C. McDonald; Benjamin D. Li

Objective:In a prospective trial, to determine if eIF4E overexpression in breast cancer specimens is correlated with VEGF elevation, increased tumor microvessel density (MVD) counts, and a worse clinical outcome irrespective of nodal status. Summary and Background Data:In vitro, the overexpression of eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) up-regulates the translation of mRNAs with long 5′-untranslated regions (5′-UTRs). One such gene product is the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Methods:A total of 114 stage I to III breast cancer patients were prospectively accrued and followed with a standardized clinical surveillance protocol. Cancer specimens were quantified for eIF4E, VEGF, and MVD. Outcome endpoints were cancer recurrence and cancer-related death. Results:eIF4E overexpression was found in all cancer specimens (mean ± SD, 12.5 ± 7.6-fold). Increasing eIF4E overexpression correlated with increasing VEGF elevation (r = 0.24, P = 0.01, Spearmans coefficient), and increasing MVD counts (r = 0.35, P < 0.0002). Patients whose tumor had high eIF4E overexpression had shorter disease-free survival (P = 0.004, log-rank test) and higher cancer-related deaths (P = 0.002) than patients whose tumors had low eIF4E overexpression. Patients with high eIF4E had a hazard ratio for cancer recurrence and cancer-related death of 1.8 and 2.1 times that of patients with low eIF4E (respectively, P = 0.009 and P = 0.002, Cox proportional hazard model). Conclusions:In breast cancer patients, increasing eIF4E overexpression in the cancer specimens correlates with higher VEGF levels and MVD counts. Patients whose tumors had high eIF4E overexpression had a worse clinical outcome, independent of nodal status. Thus, eIF4E overexpression in breast cancer appears to predict increased tumor vascularity and perhaps cancer dissemination by hematogenous means.


Annals of Surgery | 2005

A Prospective Trial on Initiation Factor 4E (eIF4E) Overexpression and Cancer Recurrence in Node-Positive Breast Cancer

Derek R. McClusky; Quyen D. Chu; Herbert Yu; Arrigo DeBenedetti; Lester W. Johnson; Carol Meschonat; Richard H. Turnage; John C. McDonald; Fleurette Abreo; Benjamin D.L. Li

Objective:A previous study of patients with stage I to III breast cancer showed that those patients whose tumors were in the highest tertile of eIF4E overexpression experienced a higher risk for recurrence. This study was designed to determine whether high eIF4E overexpression predicts cancer recurrence independent of nodal status by specifically targeting patients with node-positive disease. Methods:The prospective trial was designed to accrue 168 patients with node-positive breast cancer to detect a 2.5-fold increase in risk for recurrence. eIF4E level was quantified by Western blots as x-fold elevated compared with breast tissues from noncancer patients. End points measured were disease recurrence and cancer-related death. Statistical analyses performed include survival analysis by the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard model. Results:One hundred seventy-four patients with node-positive breast cancer were accrued. All patients fulfilled study inclusion and exclusion criteria, treatment protocol, and surveillance requirements, with a compliance rate >95%. The mean eIF4E elevation was 11.0 ± 7.0-fold (range, 1.4–34.3-fold). Based on previously published data, tertile distribution was as follow: 1) lowest tertile (<7.5-fold) = 67 patients, 2) intermediate tertile (7.5–14-fold) = 54 patients, and 3) highest tertile (>14-fold) = 53 patients. At a median follow up of 32 months, patients with the highest tertile had a statistically significant higher cancer recurrence rate (log-rank test, P = 0.002) and cancer-related death rate (P = 0.036) than the lowest group. Relative risk calculations demonstrated that high eIF4E patients had a 2.4-fold increase in relative risk increase for cancer recurrence (95% confidence interval, 1.2–4.1; P = 0.01). Conclusions:In this prospective study designed to specifically address risk for recurrence in patients with node-positive breast cancer, the patients whose tumors were in the highest tertile of eIF4E overexpression had a 2.4-fold increase in relative risk for cancer recurrence. Therefore, eIF4E overexpression appears to be an independent predictor of a worse outcome in patients with breast cancer independent of nodal status.


Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | 2009

Race/Ethnicity Has No Effect on Outcome for Breast Cancer Patients Treated at an Academic Center with a Public Hospital

Quyen D. Chu; Mark Smith; Mallory Williams; Lori Panu; Lester W. Johnson; Runhua Shi; Benjamin D.L. Li; Jonathan Glass

Background: African American women have a higher breast cancer mortality rate than Caucasian women. To understand this difference, socioeconomic status (SES) needs to be controlled, which can be achieved by evaluating outcome within a population that is underinsured or low SES. We elected to examine the effect of race/ethnicity on outcome of patients with operable breast cancer by evaluating outcome in a population with low SES and similar access to care. Methods: From a prospective breast cancer database created in 1998, we examined outcome for 786 patients with stage 0 to III breast cancer treated up to September 2008. Patients were treated at Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in Shreveport and E.A. Conway Hospital and the majority received standard definitive surgery as well as appropriate adjuvant treatment. Primary endpoints were cancer recurrence and death. Statistical analysis performed included Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, log-rank test, Cox proportional hazards model, independent-samples t test, and χ2 test. P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Sixty percent of patients were African American and over two thirds of patients were classified as either free care or Medicaid. The 5-year overall survival (OS) for African American and Caucasian patients was similar (81% and 84%, respectively; P = 0.23). On multivariate analysis, race/ethnicity was not an independent predictor of OS (P = 0.5); OS for the entire cohort was comparable with what was reported in the National Cancer Data Base. Conclusion: In a predominantly indigent population, race/ethnicity had no effect on breast cancer outcome. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18(8):2157–61)


Surgery | 2011

Chemokine receptor CXCR4 level in primary tumors independently predicts outcome for patients with locally advanced breast cancer

David J. Hiller; Carol Meschonat; Roger H. Kim; Benjamin D.L. Li; Quyen D. Chu

BACKGROUND Chemokine receptor CXCR4 is a marker of metastatic disease. We found initially that CXCR4 level is a predictive marker for patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). We now confirm our initial observations. METHODS We evaluated 77 LABC patients who had neoadjuvant therapy. Specimens were taken at the time of definitive operation. CXCR4 levels were detected with Western blots. CXCR4 expression >6.6-fold over known concentration of HeLa cells was defined as high. Primary endpoints were cancer recurrence and death. Statistical analyses were Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS Median follow-up time was 42 months; 55 patients (71%) had low CXCR4 level. The 5-year overall survival for the low and high CXCR4 group was 78% and 50%, respectively (P = .015). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) for the low and high CXCR4 group was 67% and 41%, respectively (P = .024). On multivariate analysis, CXCR4 overexpression (P = .003) and nodal status (P = .044) were independent predictors of overall survival; CXCR4 overexpression (P = .003) and nodal status (P = .026) were also independent predictors of DFS. CONCLUSION We confirmed that high CXCR4 levels in cancer specimens after neoadjuvant therapy independently predict a poor outcome for patients with LABC.


Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research | 2009

Tissue microarray analysis of eIF4E and its downstream effector proteins in human breast cancer

Heather E. Kleiner; Prasad Krishnan; Jesse Tubbs; Mark Smith; Carol Meschonat; Runhua Shi; Mary Lowery-Nordberg; Patrick Adegboyega; Marcia Unger; James A. Cardelli; Quyen D. Chu; J. Michael Mathis; John L. Clifford; Arrigo De Benedetti; Benjamin Dl Li

BackgroundEukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) is elevated in many cancers and is a prognostic indicator in breast cancer. Many pro-tumorigenic proteins are selectively translated via eIF4E, including c-Myc, cyclin D1, ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and Tousled-like kinase 1B (TLK1B). However, western blot analysis of these factors in human breast cancer has been limited by the availability of fresh frozen tissue and the labor-intensive nature of the multiple assays required. Our goal was to validate whether formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues arranged in a tissue microarray (TMA) format would be more efficient than the use of fresh-frozen tissue and western blot to test multiple downstream gene products.ResultsBreast tumor TMAs were stained immunohistochemically and quantitated using the ARIOL imaging system. In the TMAs, eIF4E levels correlated strongly with c-Myc, cyclin D1, TLK1B, VEGF, and ODC. Western blot comparisons of eIF4E vs. TLK1B were consistent with the immunohistochemical results. Consistent with our previous western blot results, eIF4E did not correlate with node status, ER, PR, or HER-2/neu.ConclusionWe conclude that the TMA technique yields similar results as the western blot technique and can be more efficient and thorough in the evaluation of several products downstream of eIF4E.

Collaboration


Dive into the Quyen D. Chu's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lester W. Johnson

Louisiana State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gary V. Burton

Louisiana State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Roger H. Kim

LSU Health Sciences Center Shreveport

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Neal T. Holm

Louisiana State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Benjamin D. L. Li

Louisiana State University in Shreveport

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gloria Caldito

Louisiana State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David J. Hiller

Louisiana State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge