R. Allan Reese
Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by R. Allan Reese.
Veterinary Microbiology | 2011
Sarah J. Haig; Robert L. Davies; Timothy J. Welch; R. Allan Reese; David W. Verner-Jeffreys
A study was undertaken to compare the virulence and serum killing resistance properties of Atlantic salmon and rainbow trout Yersinia ruckeri isolates. Five isolates, covering heat-stable O-antigen O1, O2 and O5 serotypes, were tested for virulence towards fry and juveniles of both species by experimental bath challenge. The sensitivity of 15 diverse isolates to non-immune salmon and rainbow trout serum was also examined. All five isolates caused significant mortality in salmon fry. Serotype O1 isolate 06059 caused the highest mortality in salmon (74% and 70% in fry and juveniles, respectively). Isolate 06041, a typical ERM-causing serotype O1 UK rainbow trout strain, caused mortalities in both rainbow trout and salmon. None of the salmon isolates caused any mortalities in 150-250 g rainbow trout, and only serotype O2 isolate 06060 caused any significant mortality (10%) in rainbow trout fry. Disease progression and severity was affected by water temperature. Mortality in salmon caused by the isolates 06059 and 05094 was much higher at 16 °C (74% and 33%, respectively) than at 12 °C (30 and 4% respectively). Virulent rainbow trout isolates were generally resistant to sera from both species, whereas salmon isolates varied in their serum sensitivity. Convalescent serum from salmon and rainbow trout that had been infected by serotype O1 isolates mediated effective classical pathway complement killing of serotype O1 and O5 isolates that were resistant to normal sera. Overall, strains recovered from infected salmon possess a wider range of phenotypic properties (relative virulence, O serotype and possession of serum-resistance factors), compared to ERM-causing rainbow trout isolates.
Preventive Veterinary Medicine | 2014
Birgit Oidtmann; Edmund J. Peeler; Mark Thrush; Angus Cameron; R. Allan Reese; Fiona M. Pearce; Peter Dunn; Trude Marie Lyngstad; Saraya Tavornpanich; Edgar Brun; Katharina D.C. Stärk
An expert consultation was conducted to provide quantitative parameters required to inform risk-based surveillance of aquaculture holdings for selected infectious hazards. The hazards were four fish diseases endemic in some or several European countries: infectious salmon anaemia (ISA), viral haemorrhagic septicaemia (VHS), infectious haematopoietic necrosis (IHN), and koi herpes virus disease (KHD). Experts were asked to provide estimates for the relative importance of 5 risk themes for the hazard to be introduced into and infect susceptible fish at the destination. The 5 risk themes were: (1) live fish and egg movements; (2) exposure via water; (3) on-site processing; (4) short distance mechanical transmission and (5) distance independent mechanical transmission. The experts also provided parameter estimates for hazard transmission pathways within the themes. The expert consultation was undertaken in a 2 step approach: an online survey followed by an expert consultation meeting. The expert opinion indicated that live fish movements and exposure via water were the major relevant risk themes. Experts were recruited from several European countries and thus covered a range of farming systems. Therefore, the outputs from the expert consultation have relevance for the European context.
Preventive Veterinary Medicine | 2014
Birgit Oidtmann; Fiona M. Pearce; Mark Thrush; Edmund J. Peeler; Chiara Ceolin; Katharina D.C. Stärk; Manuela Dalla Pozza; Ana Afonso; Nicolas Diserens; R. Allan Reese; Angus Cameron
We developed a model to calculate a quantitative risk score for individual aquaculture sites. The score indicates the risk of the site being infected with a specific fish pathogen (viral haemorrhagic septicaemia virus (VHSV); infectious haematopoietic necrosis virus, Koi herpes virus), and is intended to be used for risk ranking sites to support surveillance for demonstration of zone or member state freedom from these pathogens. The inputs to the model include a range of quantitative and qualitative estimates of risk factors organised into five risk themes (1) Live fish and egg movements; (2) Exposure via water; (3) On-site processing; (4) Short-distance mechanical transmission; (5) Distance-independent mechanical transmission. The calculated risk score for an individual aquaculture site is a value between zero and one and is intended to indicate the risk of a site relative to the risk of other sites (thereby allowing ranking). The model was applied to evaluate 76 rainbow trout farms in 3 countries (42 from England, 32 from Italy and 2 from Switzerland) with the aim to establish their risk of being infected with VHSV. Risk scores for farms in England and Italy showed great variation, clearly enabling ranking. Scores ranged from 0.002 to 0.254 (mean score 0.080) in England and 0.011 to 0.778 (mean of 0.130) for Italy, reflecting the diversity of infection status of farms in these countries. Requirements for broader application of the model are discussed. Cost efficient farm data collection is important to realise the benefits from a risk-based approach.
Archive | 2001
R. Allan Reese
Preventive Veterinary Medicine | 2012
Edmund J. Peeler; R. Allan Reese; Deborah Cheslett; Fiona Geoghegan; Ayesha Power; Mark Thrush
Marine Environmental Research | 2007
Alexander P. Scott; Matthew B. Sanders; Grant D. Stentiford; R. Allan Reese; Ioanna Katsiadaki
Significance | 2004
R. Allan Reese
Aquaculture | 2009
David W. Verner–Jeffreys; C Joiner; Nicola J. Bagwell; R. Allan Reese; Asbjørn Husby; Peter Dixon
Journal of The Royal Statistical Society Series A-statistics in Society | 1995
R. Allan Reese; M. C. J. van Pul
Significance | 2017
R. Allan Reese