R. B. Zaripov
Russian Academy of Sciences
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by R. B. Zaripov.
Journal of Physical Chemistry B | 2015
Azar Aliabadi; R. B. Zaripov; Kev M. Salikhov; V. K. Voronkova; E. Vavilova; Mohammad A. Abdulmalic; Tobias Rüffer; Bernd Büchner; V. Kataev
We have applied the pulse ELDOR detected NMR (EDNMR) technique to determine the tensors of the transferred Cu (S = 1/2) - (14)N (I = 1) hyperfine (HF) interaction in single crystals of diamagnetically diluted mononuclear o-phenylenebis(N(R)-oxamide) complexes of [(n)Bu4N]2[Cu(opboR2)] (R = Et 1, (n)Pr 2) (1%) in a host lattice of [(n)Bu4N]2[Ni(opboR2)] (R = Et 3, (n)Pr 4) (99%) (1@3 and 2@4)). To facilitate the analysis of our EDNMR data and to analyze possible manifestations of the nuclear quadrupole interaction in the EDNMR spectra, we have treated a model electron-nuclear system of the coupled S = 1/2 and I = 1 spins using the spin density matrix formalism. It appears that this interaction yields a peculiar asymmetry of the EDMR spectra that manifests not only in the shift of the positions of the EDNMR lines that correspond to the forbidden EPR transitions, as expected, but also in the intensities of the EDNMR lines. The symmetric shape of the experimental spectra suggests the conclusion that, in the studied complexes, the quadrupole interaction is negligible. This has simplified the analysis of the spectra. The HF tensors of all four N donor atoms could be accurately determined. On the basis of the HF tensors, an estimate of the spin density transferred from the central paramagnetic Cu(II) ion to the N donor atoms reveals its unequal distribution. We discuss possible implications of our estimates for the magnetic exchange paths and interaction strengths in respective trinuclear complexes [Cu3(opboR2) (pmdta)2](NO3)2 (R = Et 6, (n)Pr 7).
Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology | 2017
R. B. Zaripov; E. Vavilova; I. T. Khairuzhdinov; Kev M. Salikhov; V. K. Voronkova; Mohammad A. Abdulmalic; François Eya’ane Meva; Saddam Weheabby; Tobias Rüffer; Bernd Büchner; V. Kataev
We have investigated with the pulsed ESR technique at X- and Q-band frequencies the coherence and relaxation of Cu spins S = 1/2 in single crystals of diamagnetically diluted mononuclear [n-Bu4N]2[Cu(opba)] (1%) in the host lattice of [n-Bu4N]2[Ni(opba)] (99%, opba = o-phenylenebis(oxamato)) and of diamagnetically diluted mononuclear [n-Bu4N]2[Cu(opbon-Pr2)] (1%) in the host lattice of [n-Bu4N]2[Ni(opbon-Pr2)] (99%, opbon-Pr2 = o-phenylenebis(N(propyl)oxamidato)). For that we have measured the electron spin dephasing time T m at different temperatures with the two-pulse primary echo and with the special Carr–Purcell–Meiboom–Gill (CPMG) multiple microwave pulse sequence. Application of the CPMG protocol has led to a substantial increase of the spin coherence lifetime in both complexes as compared to the primary echo results. It shows the efficiency of the suppression of the electron spin decoherence channel in the studied complexes arising due to spectral diffusion induced by a random modulation of the hyperfine interaction with the nuclear spins. We argue that this method can be used as a test for the relevance of the spectral diffusion for the electron spin decoherence. Our results have revealed a prominent role of the opba4– and opbon-Pr2 4– ligands for the dephasing of the Cu spins. The presence of additional 14N nuclei and protons in [Cu(opbon-Pr2)]2– as compared to [Cu(opba)]2– yields significantly shorter T m times. Such a detrimental effect of the opbon-Pr2 4− ligands has to be considered when discussing a potential application of the Cu(II)−(bis)oxamato and Cu(II)−(bis)oxamidato complexes as building blocks of more complex molecular structures in prototype spintronic devices. Furthermore, in our work we propose an improved CPMG pulse protocol that enables elimination of unwanted echoes that inevitably appear in the case of inhomogeneously broadened ESR spectra due to the selective excitation of electron spins.
Applied Magnetic Resonance | 2014
Kev M. Salikhov; I. T. Khairuzhdinov; R. B. Zaripov
Applied Magnetic Resonance | 2011
R. B. Zaripov; V. I. Dzhabarov; A. A. Knyazev; Yu. G. Galyametdinov
Physical Review B | 2013
R. B. Zaripov; E. Vavilova; Vasili Miluykov; Ilya Bezkishko; O. G. Sinyashin; Kev M. Salikhov; V. Kataev; B. Büchner
Physical Review B | 2011
Yulia Krupskaya; R. B. Zaripov; Evgenia Vavilova; Vasili Miluykov; Ilya Bezkishko; Dmitry B. Krivolapov; O. N. Kataeva; O. G. Sinyashin; Evamarie Hey-Hawkins; V. K. Voronkova; Kev M. Salikhov; V. Kataev; Bernd Büchner
Applied Magnetic Resonance | 2016
Alex Kokorin; R. B. Zaripov; O. I. Gromov; A. A. Sukhanov; Tamás Kálai; Éva Lamperth; Kálmán Hideg
Dalton Transactions | 2015
Mohammad A. Abdulmalic; Azar Aliabadi; Andreas Petr; Yulia Krupskaya; V. Kataev; Bernd Büchner; R. B. Zaripov; E. Vavilova; V. K. Voronkova; Kev Salikov; Torsten Hahn; Jens Kortus; François Eya’ane Meva; Dieter Schaarschmidt; Tobias Rüffer
Applied Magnetic Resonance | 2014
Kev M. Salikhov; Aydar Ye. Mambetov; Marcel M. Bakirov; I. T. Khairuzhdinov; R. T. Galeev; R. B. Zaripov; Barney L. Bales
Applied Magnetic Resonance | 2018
A. I. Kokorin; R. B. Zaripov; O. I. Gromov; Kálmán Hideg; Tamás Kálai