R. G. T. Zegers
Michigan State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by R. G. T. Zegers.
Physical Review C | 2012
A. L. Cole; T.S. Anderson; R. G. T. Zegers; Sam M. Austin; B. A. Brown; L. Valdez; S. Gupta; G. W. Hitt; O. Fawwaz
Background: Electron-capture reaction rates on medium-heavy nuclei are an important ingredient for modeling the late evolution of stars that become core-collapse or thermonuclear supernovae. The estimation of these rates requires the knowledge of Gamow-Teller strength distributions in the β + direction. Astrophysical models rely on electron-capture rate tables largely based on theoretical models, which must be validated and tested against experimental results. Purpose: This paper presents a systematic evaluation of the ability of theoretical models to reproduce experimental Gamow-Teller transition strength distributions measured via (n,p)-type charge-exchange reactions at intermediate beam energies. The focus is on transitions from stable nuclei in the pf shell (45 A 64). In addition, the impact of deviations between experimental and theoretical Gamow-Teller strength distributions on derived stellar electron-capture rates is investigated. Method: Data on Gamow-Teller transitions from 13 nuclei in the pf shell measured via charge-exchange reactions and supplemented with results from β-decay experiments where available, were compiled and compared with strength distributions calculated in shell models (using the GXPF1a and KB3G effective interactions) and quasiparticle random-phase approximation (QRPA) using ground-state deformation parameters and masses from the finite-range droplet model. Electron-capture rates at relevant stellar temperatures and densities were derived for all distributions and compared. Results: With few exceptions, shell-model calculations in the pf model space with the KB3G and GXPF1a interactions qualitatively reproduce experimental Gamow-Teller strength distributions of 13 stable isotopes with 45 A 64. Results from QRPA calculations exhibit much larger deviations from the data and overestimate the total experimental Gamow-Teller strengths. For stellar densities in excess of 10 7 g/cm 3 , ground-state electroncapture rates derived from the shell-model calculations using the KB3G (GXPF1a) interaction deviate on average less than 47% (31%) from those derived from experimental data for which the location of daughter states at low excitation energies are well established. For electron-capture rates derived from Gamow-Teller strengths calculated in QRPA, the deviations are much larger, especially at low stellar densities. Conclusions: Based on the limited set of test cases available for nuclei in the pf shell, shell-models using the GXPF1a and KB3G interactions can be used to estimate electron-capture rates for astrophysical purposes with relatively good accuracy. Measures of the uncertainties in these rates can serve as input for sensitivity studies in stellar evolution models. Ground-state electron-capture rates based on the QRPA formalism discussed in the paper exhibit much larger deviations than those based on the shell-model calculations and should be used with caution, especially at low stellar densities.
Physical Review C | 2014
G. Martínez-Pinedo; Yi Hua Lam; K. Langanke; R. G. T. Zegers; C. Sullivan
We have evaluated the electron capture rates on
Physics Letters B | 2014
E. Litvinova; B. A. Brown; D.-L. Fang; Tomislav Marketin; R. G. T. Zegers
^{20}
Physical Review Letters | 2014
A. Spyrou; S. N. Liddick; Ann-Cecilie Larsen; M. Guttormsen; K. Cooper; A.C. Dombos; D. J. Morrissey; F. Naqvi; G. Perdikakis; S. J. Quinn; T. Renstrøm; J. A. Rodriguez; A. Simon; C. S. Sumithrarachchi; R. G. T. Zegers
Ne,
The Astrophysical Journal | 2015
C. Sullivan; Evan O’Connor; R. G. T. Zegers; Thomas Grubb; Sam M. Austin
^{20}
Physical Review Letters | 2009
N. Muramatsu; Jau-Ann Chen; W. C. Chang; D. S. Ahn; J. K. Ahn; H. Akimune; Y. Asano; S. Daté; H. Ejiri; H. Fujimura; M. Fujiwara; S. Fukui; Shinji Hasegawa; K. Hicks; K. Horie; T. Hotta; K. Imai; T. Ishikawa; T. Iwata; Y. Kato; H. Kawai; K. Kino; H. Kohri; N. Kumagai; S. Makino; Tatsuma D. Matsuda; T. Matsumura; N. Matsuoka; T. Mibe; M. Miyabe
F,
Metabolism-clinical and Experimental | 2012
Martijn N. Spoelstra; Andrea Mari; Marijke Mendel; Edward Senga; Patrick F. van Rheenen; Theo H. van Dijk; Dirk-Jan Reijngoud; R. G. T. Zegers; Geert Tom Heikens; Robert H.J. Bandsma
^{24}
Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A-accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment | 2012
G. Perdikakis; M. Sasano; Sam M. Austin; D. Bazin; C. Caesar; S. Cannon; J. M. Deaven; H. J. Doster; C. J. Guess; G. W. Hitt; J. Marks; R. Meharchand; D. T. Nguyen; D. Peterman; A. Prinke; M. Scott; Y. Shimbara; K. Thorne; L. Valdez; R. G. T. Zegers
Mg,
Physical Review Letters | 2015
Z. Meisel; S. George; S. Ahn; D. Bazin; B. A. Brown; J. Browne; J.F. Carpino; H. Chung; A.L. Cole; Richard H. Cyburt; A. Estrade; M. Famiano; A. Gade; C. Langer; M. Matos; W. Mittig; F. Montes; D. J. Morrissey; J. Pereira; H. Schatz; J. Schatz; M. Scott; D. Shapira; K. Smith; J. Stevens; Wanpeng Tan; O. B. Tarasov; S. Towers; K. Wimmer; J. Winkelbauer
^{24}
Physical Review C | 2015
M. D. Jones; N. Frank; T. Baumann; J. Brett; J. Bullaro; Paul DeYoung; J. E. Finck; K. Hammerton; J. Hinnefeld; Z. Kohley; A. N. Kuchera; J. Pereira; A. Rabeh; Warren F. Rogers; J.K. Smith; A. Spyrou; S. L. Stephenson; K. Stiefel; M. Tuttle-Timm; R. G. T. Zegers; M. Thoennessen
Na and the