R. J. D. Spooner

Mortality from liver cancer and liver disease in haemophilic men and boys in UK given blood products contaminated with hepatitis C

BACKGROUND Most people with haemophilia who were treated with blood products before the introduction of virus-inactivation procedures were infected with the hepatitis-C virus (HCV). However, there is little quantitative information about the long-term effects on mortality of such infection. METHODS We carried out a cohort study of mortality from liver cancer and liver disease in 4865 haemophilic men and boys in the UK. They were treated between 1969 and 1985 with blood products carrying a high risk of HCV infection, and were followed up from first recorded exposure to Jan 1, 1993. FINDINGS Based on death-certificate information, mortality was 16.7 times higher than in the general population for liver disease (95% CI 12.5-22.0; 51 deaths), and 5.6 times higher (1.8-13.0; five deaths) for liver cancer. For men and boys with severe haemophilia who were not infected with HIV-1, the cumulative risks of death from chronic or unspecified liver disease or from liver cancer in the 25 years since first recorded exposure to high HCV-risk products were 1.4% (0.7-3.0) at all ages, and 0.10% (0.01-0.7), 2.2% (0.8-6.1), and 14.3% (4.5-40.9) for those with first recorded exposure at ages under 25, 25-44, and 45 or older. For those with haemophilia and HIV-1 infection, the corresponding risks were 6.5% (4.5-9.5) at all ages, and 3.8% (2.1-6.8), 17.1% (10.0-28.5), and 18.7% (6.4-47.6) in the three age-groups. In those with severe haemophilia, age-standardised all-cause mortality was stable during 1969-84 but increased during 1985-92 in both HIV-1-infected and HIV-1-uninfected groups. Among those not infected with HIV-1, the increase in all-cause mortality resulted largely from deaths attributed to chronic or unspecified liver disease or liver cancer in men aged over 45. INTERPRETATION There is an emerging risk of mortality from liver disease and liver cancer in the UK haemophilia population in individuals both infected and uninfected with HIV-1, which probably results from infection with hepatitis C.

Importance of age at infection with HIV-1 for survival and development of AIDS in UK haemophilia population

BACKGROUND Greater age at infection with HIV-1 is known to be associated with shorter time to development of AIDS, but the size of the differences between people infected in infancy and those infected in old age has not been examined in a single large population of patients with death as an endpoint. We, therefore, investigated the role of age at seroconversion in the entire UK population of haemophiliacs. METHODS We studied 1216 HIV-1-infected haemophilia patients in the UK who were registered with the National Haemophilia Register and were alive on Jan 1, 1985. Their estimated ages at HIV-1 seroconversion ranged from 8 months to 79 years. FINDINGS 10 years after seroconversion 67% (95% Cl 64-69) of the population were still alive. Survival was strongly related to age at seroconversion (86% [82-90], 72% [68-76], 45% [39-51], and 12% [5-21] at 10 years among those patients who seroconverted at ages < 15, 15-34, 35-54, and > or = 55). This steep age-gradient in survival was not explained by deaths expected in the absence of HIV infection or by confounding with other factors such as haemophilia type or severity. The age-gradient was steeper for survival (ie, time from HIV-1 infection to death) than for time to diagnosis of AIDS, partly because survival after an AIDS diagnosis was poorer in older patients, and there was also a substantial increase in mortality among HIV-infected patients who did not satisfy the formal AIDS definition and this increase was greater in older patients. INTERPRETATION Age at infection with HIV-1 is a more important determinant of survival than has previously been appreciated. Age should, therefore, be considered in future studies of disease progression, and studies that compare people infected at different ages should provide insight into the biology of the immune response to HIV-1.

Home treatment of haemophilia and Christmas disease: five years' experience.

Summary. The Oxford home treatment programme began in 1971. The material used was human factor VIII concentrate made by the Lister Institutes Plasma Fractionation Laboratory at Oxford Haemophilia Centre. The first group of patients admitted to the programme were those making heaviest demands on the Centre for ‘on demand’ treatment. No problems were encountered by these patients, and other patients have been admitted to the programme each year since. By the end of 1975, 56 haemophilic patients and seven Christmas disease patients were receiving regular home treatment. The haemophilic patients on home treatment have on average increased their factor VIII requirements while on home treatment by 31 % to 1945 u of factor VIII per month, although some of the patients who were making very heavy demands for treatment are now using less than before starting home treatment. Since the introduction of home treatment programme, 68% of the treatment received by the 56 haemophilic patients in the scheme was given at home thus saving the patients the cost and discomfort of travelling to the Centre to receive treatment, and saving the staff of the Centre the work of giving the treatment. Including factor VIII used to cover surgical procedures and doses received at other hospitals, the patients received on average 1893 u of factor VIH per month after commencing home treatment. The standard home treatment dose received by the haemophilic patients during 1975 was 250 International Units of factor VIII which proved satisfactory in resolving the majority of bleeds. The lesions treated at home required on average 1.16 doses per bleed (290 u of factor VIII).