R. Kshetri
Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by R. Kshetri.
Physical Review C | 2011
M. K. Pradhan; A. Mukherjee; P. Basu; A. Goswami; R. Kshetri; Subinit Roy; P. Roy Chowdhury; M. Saha Sarkar; R. Palit; V. V. Parkar; S. Santra; M. Ray
Complete and incomplete fusion cross sections for {sup 6}Li + {sup 159}Tb have been measured at energies around the Coulomb barrier by the {gamma}-ray method. The measurements show that the complete fusion cross sections at above-barrier energies are suppressed by {approx}34% compared to coupled-channel calculations. A comparison of the complete fusion cross sections at above-barrier energies with the existing data for {sup 11,10}B + {sup 159}Tb and {sup 7}Li + {sup 159}Tb shows that the extent of suppression is correlated with the {alpha} separation energies of the projectiles. It has been argued that the Dy isotopes produced in the reaction {sup 6}Li + {sup 159}Tb at below-barrier energies are primarily due to the d transfer to unbound states of {sup 159}Tb, while both transfer and incomplete fusion processes contribute at above-barrier energies.
Physical Review C | 2008
M. Ray; A. Mukherjee; M. K. Pradhan; R. Kshetri; M. Saha Sarkar; R. Palit; I. Majumdar; P. K. Joshi; H. C. Jain; B. Dasmahapatra
Measurement of fusion cross sections for the {sup 6,7}Li + {sup 24}Mg reactions by the characteristic {gamma}-ray method has been done at energies from below to well above the respective Coulomb barriers. The fusion cross sections obtained from these {gamma}-ray cross sections for the two systems are found to agree well with the total reaction cross sections at low energies. The relatively large difference between total cross sections and measured fusion cross sections at higher energies is consistent with the fact that other channels, in particular breakup, open up with an increase of bombarding energy. The breakup channel, however, appears not to have any influence on fusion cross sections. The critical angular momenta (l{sub cr}) deduced from the fusion cross sections are found to have an energy dependence similar to other Li-induced reactions.
Journal of Instrumentation | 2012
R. Kshetri
A probability model has been presented for understanding the operation of an array of encapsulated germanium detectors generally known as composite detector. The addback mode of operation of a composite detector has been described considering the absorption and scattering of γ-rays. Considering up to triple detector hit events, we have obtained expressions for peak-to-total and peak-to-background ratios of the cluster detector, which consists of seven hexagonal closely packed encapsulated HPGe detectors. Results have been obtained for the miniball detectors comprising of three and four seven hexagonal closely packed encapsulated HPGe detectors. The formalism has been extended to the SPI spectrometer which is a telescope of the INTEGRAL satellite and consists of nineteen hexagonal closely packed encapsulated HPGe detectors. This spectrometer comprises of twelve detector modules surrounding the cluster detector. For comparison, we have considered a spectrometer comprising of nine detector modules surrounding the three detector configuration of miniball detector. In the present formalism, the operation of these sophisticated detectors could be described in terms of six probability amplitudes only. Using experimental data on relative efficiency and fold distribution of cluster detector as input, the fold distribution and the peak-to-total, peak-to-background ratios have been calculated for the SPI spectrometer and other composite detectors at 1332 keV. Remarkable agreement between experimental data and results from the present formalism has been observed for the SPI spectrometer.
Journal of Instrumentation | 2012
R. Kshetri
Based on absorption and scattering of gamma-rays, a formalism has been presented for modeling the clover germanium detector in addback mode and to predict its response for high energy γ-rays. In the present formalism, the operation of a bare clover detector could be described in terms of three quantities only. Considering an additional parameter, the formalism could be extended for suppressed clover. Using experimental data on relative single crystal efficiency and addback factor as input, the peak-to-total ratio has been calculated for three energies (Eγ = 3.401, 5.324 and 10.430 MeV) where direct measurement of peak-to-total ratio is impossible due to absence of a radioactive source having single monoenergetic gamma-ray of that energy. The experimental validation and consistency of the formalism have been shown considering data for TIGRESS clover detector. In a recent work (R. Kshetri, JINST 2012 7 P04008), we showed that for a given γ-ray energy, the formalism could be used to predict the peak-to-total ratio as a function of number of detector modules. In the present paper, we have shown that for a given composite detector (clover detector is considered here), the formalism could be used to predict the peak-to-total ratio as a function of γ-ray energy.
Physical Review C | 2013
M. K. Pradhan; A. Mukherjee; Subinit Roy; P. Basu; A. Goswami; R. Kshetri; R. Palit; V. V. Parkar; M. Ray; M. Saha Sarkar; S. Santra
The inclusive cross sections of the
Journal of Instrumentation | 2012
R. Kshetri
\alpha
Journal of Instrumentation | 2012
R. Kshetri
-particles produced in the reaction
Physical Review C | 2012
H. Pai; G. Mukherjee; R. Raut; S. Basu; A. Goswami; Somen Chanda; T. Bhattacharjee; S. Bhattacharyya; C. Bhattacharya; S. Bhattacharya; S.R. Banerjee; S. Kundu; K. Banerjee; A. Dey; T. K. Rana; J. K. Meena; D. Gupta; S. Mukhopadhyay; Srijit Bhattacharya; Sudeb Bhattacharya; Swaroop Ganguly; R. Kshetri; M. K. Pradhan
^{6}
Physical Review C | 2016
D. Pramanik; S. Sarkar; M. Saha Sarkar; Abhijit Bisoi; S. Ray; Shinjinee Dasgupta; A. Chakraborty; Krishichayan; R. Kshetri; I. Ray; Sutapa Ganguly; Mukul Pradhan; M. Ray Basu; R. Raut; G. Ganguly; S. S. Ghugre; Arup Sinha; S. Basu; S. Bhattacharya; A. Mukherjee; P. Banerjee; A. Goswami
Li+
Journal of Instrumentation | 2014
R. Kshetri
^{159}