R. Pellegrino
University of Genoa
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by R. Pellegrino.
European Respiratory Journal | 2005
M.R. Miller; John L. Hankinson; Vito Brusasco; Felip Burgos; Richard Casaburi; Allan L. Coates; Robert O. Crapo; Paul L. Enright; C.P.M. van der Grinten; P. Gustafsson; Robert L. Jensen; D.C. Johnson; Neil R. MacIntyre; Roy T. McKay; Daniel Navajas; O.F. Pedersen; R. Pellegrino; G. Viegi; Jack Wanger
[⇓][1] SERIES “ATS/ERS TASK FORCE: STANDARDISATION OF LUNG FUNCTION TESTING” Edited by V. Brusasco, R. Crapo and G. Viegi Number 2 in this Series [1]: #F13
European Respiratory Journal | 2005
Jack Wanger; J.L. Clausen; Allan L. Coates; O.F. Pedersen; Vito Brusasco; Felip Burgos; Richard Casaburi; Robert O. Crapo; Paul L. Enright; C.P.M. van der Grinten; P. Gustafsson; John L. Hankinson; Robert L. Jensen; D.C. Johnson; Neil R. MacIntyre; Roy T. McKay; M.R. Miller; Daniel Navajas; R. Pellegrino; G. Viegi
[⇓][1] SERIES “ATS/ERS TASK FORCE: STANDARDISATION OF LUNG FUNCTION TESTING” Edited by V. Brusasco, R. Crapo and G. Viegi Number 3 in this Series [1]: #F7
European Respiratory Journal | 2005
Neil R. MacIntyre; Robert O. Crapo; G. Viegi; D.C. Johnson; van der Grinten Cp; Brusasco; Felip Burgos; Richard Casaburi; Allan L. Coates; Paul L. Enright; P. Gustafsson; John L. Hankinson; Robert L. Jensen; Roy T. McKay; M.R. Miller; Daniel Navajas; O.F. Pedersen; R. Pellegrino; Jack Wanger
[⇓][1] SERIES “ATS/ERS TASK FORCE: STANDARDISATION OF LUNG FUNCTION TESTING” Edited by V. Brusasco, R. Crapo and G. Viegi Number 4 in this Series [1]: #F4
European Respiratory Journal | 2005
M.R. Miller; Robert O. Crapo; John L. Hankinson; Vito Brusasco; Felip Burgos; Richard Casaburi; Allan L. Coates; Paul L. Enright; C.P.M. van der Grinten; P. Gustafsson; Robert L. Jensen; D.C. Johnson; Neil R. MacIntyre; Roy T. McKay; Daniel Navajas; O.F. Pedersen; R. Pellegrino; G. Viegi; Jack Wanger
SERIES “ATS/ERS TASK FORCE: STANDARDISATION OF LUNG FUNCTION TESTING” Edited by V. Brusasco, R. Crapo and G. Viegi Number 1 in this Series ⇓In preparing the joint statements on lung function testing for the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS), it was agreed by the working party that the format of the statements should be modified so that they were easier to use by both technical and clinical staff. This statement contains details about procedures that are common for many methods of lung function testing and, hence, are presented on their own. A list of abbreviations used in all the documents is also included as part of this statement. All terms and abbreviations used here are based on a report of the American College of Chest Physicians/ATS Joint Committee on Pulmonary Nomenclature 1. The metrology definitions agreed by the International Standards Organization (ISO) are recommended 2 and some important terms are defined as follows. Accuracy is the closeness of agreement between the result of a measurement and the conventional true value. Repeatability is the closeness of agreement between the results of successive measurements of the same item carried out, subject to all of the following conditions: same method, same observer, same instrument, same location, same condition of use, and repeated over a short space of time. In previous documents, the term reproducibility was used in this context, and this represents a change towards bringing this document in line with the ISO. Reproducibility is the closeness of agreement of the results of successive measurements of the same item where the individual measurements are carried out with changed conditions, such as: method of measurement, observer, instrument, location, conditions of use, and time. Thus, if a technician tests a subject several times, this is looking at the …
European Respiratory Journal | 2008
R. Pellegrino; Vito Brusasco; G. Viegi; Robert O. Crapo; Felip Burgos; Richard Casaburi; Allan L. Coates; C.P.M. van der Grinten; P. Gustafsson; John L. Hankinson; Robert L. Jensen; D.C. Johnson; Neil R. MacIntyre; Roy T. McKay; M.R. Miller; Daniel Navajas; O.F. Pedersen; Jack Wanger
To the Editors: In 1986, the American Thoracic Society (ATS) first suggested a fixed ratio of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) to forced vital capacity (FVC) <0.75 to define airflow obstruction 1. Subsequent ATS documents published in 1991 2 and 1995 3 generically defined airflow obstruction as a reduction of FEV1/FVC, without recommending any numerical cut-off point. By contrast, the European Respiratory Society (ERS) guidelines 4 suggested the diagnosis of airflow obstruction be based on a ratio of FEV1 to slow vital capacity (VC) <88 and <89% of predicted in males and females, respectively. These values were not arbitrarily chosen as they roughly correspond to the lower 95th percentiles of frequency distributions of a healthy population. More importantly, they are consistent with the well-known decrease of lung elastic recoil and, by inference, of forced expiratory flow with ageing. In 2001, the Global Initiative for …
European Respiratory Journal | 2010
M.R. Miller; John L. Hankinson; Vito Brusasco; Felip Burgos; Richard Casaburi; Allan L. Coates; Paul L. Enright; C.P.M. van der Grinten; P. Gustafsson; Robert L. Jensen; Neil R. MacIntyre; Roy T. McKay; O.F. Pedersen; R. Pellegrino; G. Viegi; Jack Wanger
To the Editors: A few questions have been raised following the publication in 2005 of the joint American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) series of documents on standardising lung function testing and these are answered below. The following questions and answers pertain to the standardisation document for spirometry 1. ### Start of test criteria Should blows be rejected solely on the basis of a poor back extrapolated volume (EV)? #### Reply Usually. The forced vital capacity (FVC) may be usable, but the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) is likely to be falsely high or low. #### Rationale The acceptability criteria for spirometry were designed to help technologists improve the subject’s technique in order to get the best and most reliable result. EV is important for determining that a fast start to the blow was achieved and this is crucial for getting the best values for FEV1 and peak expiratory flow (PEF). ### End of test criteria In the original document, there was an error in table 5. #### Reply In table 5, the within-manoeuvre criteria for a satisfactory completion of a blow should have read “Duration of ≥6 s (3 s for children) and a plateau in the volume–time curve, or if the subject cannot or should not continue to exhale.” The original table had “or” in twice, whereas the accompanying text was correct, as above. #### Rationale The end of test (EOT) criteria are applied in order to ensure that efforts are made to achieve the best estimate of FVC. When a subject cannot meet the plateau criterion (<25 mL exhaled in the previous second of the blow) this may be for reasons other than premature volitional cessation of the blow. For example, in some young subjects or patients with a rigid chest wall, it is chest wall limitation that suddenly causes exhalation to stop 2 and it is difficult for …
Revue Des Maladies Respiratoires | 2007
Jack Wanger; J.L. Clausen; Allan L. Coates; O.F. Pedersen; V. Brusasco; Felip Burgos; Richard Casaburi; R. Crapo; Paul L. Enright; C.P.M. van der Grinten; P. Gustafsson; John L. Hankinson; Robert L. Jensen; D.C. Johnson; Neil R. MacIntyre; Roy T. McKay; M.R. Miller; Daniel Navajas; R. Pellegrino; G. Viegi
Definitions et subdivisions du volume pulmonaire 17S48 Preparation du patient 17S49 Determination des subdivisions pulmonaires ........ 17S49 Mesure de la CRF par plethysmographie corporelle 17S50 Introduction et theorie 17S50 Materiel 17S50 Technique de mesure 17S50 Controle qualite 17S51 Calculs 17S52 Mesure de la CRF par rincage de l’azote 17S52 Introduction et theorie 17S52 Materiel 17S52 Technique de mesure 17S53 Controle qualite 17S53 Calculs 17S54 Mesure de la Crf par dilution de l’helium 17S54 Introduction et theorie 17S54 Materiel 17S54 Technique de mesure 17S55 Controle qualite 17S56 Calculs 17S56 Mesure des volumes pulmonaires par des techniques d’imagerie 17S56 Radiographies conventionnelles 17S57 Tomodensitometrie 17S57 Imagerie par resonance magnetique 17S57 Controverses et questions critiques 17S57 Valeurs de reference 17S58 Prevention des infections 17S58 Abreviations 17S58
Revue Des Maladies Respiratoires | 2007
R. Pellegrino; G. Viegi; V. Brusasco; R. Crapo; Felip Burgos; Richard Casaburi; Allan L. Coates; C.P.M. van der Grinten; P. Gustafsson; John L. Hankinson; Robert L. Jensen; D.C. Johnson; Neil R. MacIntyre; Roy T. McKay; M.R. Miller; Daniel Navajas; O.F. Pedersen; Et J. Wanger
Generalites 17S80 Spirometrie 17S81 Volumes pulmonaires 17S83 Capacite de diffusion du monoxyde de carbone 17S85 Les differents types d’anomalies respiratoires 17S86
/data/revues/07618425/00243-c2/83/ | 2006
R. Pellegrino; G. Viegi; V. Brusasco; R. Crapo; Felip Burgos; Richard Casaburi; Allan L. Coates; C.P.M. van der Grinten; P. Gustafsson; John L. Hankinson; Robert L. Jensen; D.C. Johnson; Neil R. MacIntyre; Roy T. McKay; M.R. Miller; Daniel Navajas; O.F. Pedersen; Et J. Wanger
Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales | 2007
R. Pellegrino; G. Viegi; Vito Brusasco; Robert O. Crapo; F. Burgos Lázaro; Richard Casaburi; Allan L. Coates; C.P.M. van der Grinten; P. Gustafsson; John L. Hankinson; Robert L. Jensen; D.C. Johnson; Neil R. MacIntyre; Roy T. McKay; M.R. Miller; Daniel Navajas; O.F. Pedersen; Jack Wanger