Rachel Hammonds

Ebola in Africa: beyond epidemics, reproductive health in crisis

According to WHO, more than 5000 people have died from Ebola, including 240 health workers. We are deeply concerned about the devastating effect of Ebola on reproductive health in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone in the context of continuous deterioration of socioeconomic conditions and general health in aff ected countries. The indirect negative effect of Ebola on reproductive health stems mainly from the desertion of already understaffed health facilities by health-care workers who are fearful of contracting Ebola. This fear is further increased because most reproductive health life-saving interventions include handling blood or bodily fluids from patients whose Ebola status is often unknown and health staff often do not have access to appropriate protection. Most referral maternity wards in the three most affected countries (Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone) do not have equipment to do real-time screening for Ebola (eg, PCR), which could lead to the denial of care for women suspected to be pregnant. Additionally, the absence of providers offering relevant services, the inability to differentiate between Ebola and other febrile diseases, and the fear of contracting Ebola at a health facility can prevent users seeking reproductive health services. Statistics from Matam maternity hospital in Conakry, Guinea, show a substantial drop in attendance between March, 2014, and September, 2014, compared with 2013 (fi gure). A decrease in paediatric or maternal admissions because of fear of contracting Ebola has also been reported by Medecins Sans Frontieres in Sierra Leone. We are concerned that women in need of reproductive health care because of pregnancy, childbirth, and post-partum related complications, including haemorrhage, eclampsia, obstructed labour, and abortion, will not have necessary and even life-saving care and attention. United Nations Population Fund estimates that 15% of the 800 000 women who will give birth in the next 12 months in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone could die of complications because of inade quate emergency obstetric care, and thousands of others could develop devastating pathological conditions, such as obstetric fistula. Increased support to fight Ebola is needed in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone coupled, with specific attention to reproductive health services. Adequate measures, including health system strengthening and community mobilisation coupled with an enabling environment for provision of emergency obstetric care, need to be put in place urgently to avoid devastating short-term and long-term effects for thousands of women.

Perceptions and experiences of access to public healthcare by people with disabilities and older people in Uganda

IntroductionIn the year 2000, a set of eight Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) were presented as a way to channel global efforts into the reduction of poverty and the promotion of social development. A global discussion regarding how to renew these goals is underway and it is in this context that the Goals and Governance for Global Health (Go4Health) research consortium conducted consultations with marginalized communities in Asia, Latin America, the Pacific and Africa as a way to include their voices in world’s new development agenda. The goal of this paper is to present the findings of the consultations carried out in Uganda with two groups within low-resource settings: older people and people living with disabilities.MethodsThis qualitative study used focus group discussions and key informant interviews with older people in Uganda’s Kamwenge district, and with persons with disabilities from the Gulu region. Thematic analysis was performed and emerging categories and themes identified and presented in the findings.FindingsOur findings show that a sense of community marginalization is present within both older persons and persons living with disabilities. These groups report experiencing political sidelining, discrimination and inequitable access to health services. This is seen as the key reason for their poor health. Clinical services were found to be of low quality with little or no access to facilities, trained personnel, and drugs and there are no rehabilitative or mental health services available.ConclusionUganda must fulfil its international obligations and take progressive measures to meet the right to health for all its peoples, but especially allocate its limited resources to proactively support its most marginalized citizens. The growing impetus within post-2015 development negotiations to redress in-country health and other inequalities through a comprehensive systems approach is of importance in the Ugandan development context. This approach reflects the participant’s perspectives, which also calls for a more equitable approach to health and development as opposed to a narrow, vertical focus on specific population groups, as was the case with the MDGs.

Under the (legal) radar screen: global health initiatives and international human rights obligations

BackgroundGiven that many low income countries are heavily reliant on external assistance to fund their health sectors the acceptance of obligations of international assistance and cooperation with regard to the right to health (global health obligations) is insufficiently understood and studied by international health and human rights scholars. Over the past decade Global Health Initiatives, like the Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (Global Fund) have adopted novel approaches to engaging with stakeholders in high and low income countries. This article explores how this experience impacted on acceptance of the international obligation to (help) fulfil the right to health beyond borders.MethodsThe authors conducted an extensive review of international human rights law literature, transnational legal process literature, global public health literature and grey literature pertaining to Global Health Initiatives. To complement this desk work and deepen their understanding of how and why different legal norms evolve the authors conducted 19 in-depth key informant interviews with actors engaged with three stakeholders; the European Union, the United States and Belgium. The authors then analysed the interviews through a transnational legal process lens.ResultsThrough according value to the process of examining how and why different legal norms evolve transnational legal process offers us a tool for engaging with the dynamism of developments in global health suggesting that operationalising global health obligations could advance the right to health for all.ConclusionsIn many low-income countries the health sector is heavily dependent on external assistance to fulfil the right to health of people thus it is vital that policies and tools for delivering reliable, long-term assistance are developed so that the right to health for all becomes more than a dream. Our research suggests that the Global Fund experience offers lessons to build on.

Great expectations for the World Health Organization: a Framework Convention on Global Health to achieve universal health coverage

Establishing a reform agenda for the World Health Organization (WHO) requires understanding its role within the wider global health system and the purposes of that wider global health system. In this paper, the focus is on one particular purpose: achieving universal health coverage (UHC). The intention is to describe why achieving UHC requires something like a Framework Convention on Global Health (FCGH) that have been proposed elsewhere,(1) why WHO is in a unique position to usher in an FCGH, and what specific reforms would help enable WHO to assume this role.

Beyond health aid: would an international equalization scheme for universal health coverage serve the international collective interest?

It has been argued that the international community is moving ‘beyond aid’. International co-financing in the international collective interest is expected to replace altruistically motivated foreign aid. The World Health Organization promotes ‘universal health coverage’ as the overarching health goal for the next phase of the Millennium Development Goals. In order to provide a basic level of health care coverage, at least some countries will need foreign aid for decades to come. If international co-financing of global public goods is replacing foreign aid, is universal health coverage a hopeless endeavor? Or would universal health coverage somehow serve the international collective interest?Using the Sustainable Development Solutions Network proposal to finance universal health coverage as a test case, we examined the hypothesis that national social policies face the threat of a ‘race to the bottom’ due to global economic integration and that this threat could be mitigated through international social protection policies that include international cross-subsidies – a kind of ‘equalization’ at the international level.The evidence for the race to the bottom theory is inconclusive. We seem to be witnessing a ‘convergence to the middle’. However, the ‘middle’ where ‘convergence’ of national social policies is likely to occur may not be high enough to keep income inequality in check.The implementation of the international equalization scheme proposed by the Sustainable Development Solutions Network would allow to ensure universal health coverage at a cost of US

Sub-Saharan Africa and the health MDGs: the need to move beyond the "quick impact" model.

55 in low income countries-the minimum cost estimated by the World Health Organization. The domestic efforts expected from low and middle countries are far more substantial than the international co-financing efforts expected from high income countries. This would contribute to ‘convergence’ of national social policies at a higher level. We therefore submit that the proposed international equalization scheme should not be considered as foreign aid, but rather as an international collective effort to protect and promote national social policy in times of global economic integration: thus serving the international collective interest.