Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Rachel M. Abenavoli is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Rachel M. Abenavoli.


The Journal of Positive Psychology | 2011

Character strengths predict subjective well-being during adolescence

Jane E. Gillham; Zoe Adams-Deutsch; Jaclyn Werner; Karen Reivich; Virginia Coulter-Heindl; Mark Linkins; Breanna Winder; Christopher Peterson; Nansook Park; Rachel M. Abenavoli; Angelica Contero; Martin E. P. Seligman

Previous research indicates that several character strengths (e.g., gratitude, optimism, persistence, and self-regulation) correlate positively with measures of subjective well-being in adolescents. We examined whether character strengths predict future well-being. Adolescent high school students (N = 149) completed the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths for Youth and measures of subjective well-being (depression, happiness, life satisfaction) at several assessments from the fall of 9th grade through the spring of their 10th grade year. In analyses controlling for the effects of other strengths, other-directed strengths (e.g., kindness, teamwork) predicted fewer symptoms of depression. Transcendence strengths (e.g., meaning, love) predicted greater life satisfaction. Social support partially mediated the relationship between strengths and depression, but did not mediate the relationship between strengths and life satisfaction. These findings indicate that strengths that build connections to people and purposes larger than the self predict future well-being.


Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology | 2012

Evaluation of a group cognitive-behavioral depression prevention program for young adolescents: a randomized effectiveness trial.

Jane E. Gillham; Karen Reivich; Steven M. Brunwasser; Derek R. Freres; Norma D. Chajon; V. Megan Kash-MacDonald; Tara M. Chaplin; Rachel M. Abenavoli; Samantha L. Matlin; Robert Gallop; Martin E. P. Seligman

Depression is a common psychological problem in adolescence. Recent research suggests that group cognitive-behavioral interventions can reduce and prevent symptoms of depression in youth. Few studies have tested the effectiveness of such interventions when delivered by school teachers and counselors (as opposed to research team staff). We evaluated the effectiveness of the Penn Resiliency Program for adolescents (PRP-A), a school-based group intervention that targets cognitive behavioral risk factors for depression. We randomly assigned 408 middle school students (ages 10–15) to one of three conditions: PRP-A, PRP-AP (in which adolescents participated in PRP-A and parents were invited to attend a parent intervention component), or a school-as-usual control. Adolescents completed measures of depression and anxiety symptoms, cognitive style, and coping at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 6-month follow-up. PRP-A reduced depression symptoms relative to the school as usual control. Baseline levels of hopelessness moderated intervention effects. Among participants with average and high levels of hopelessness, PRP (A and AP) significantly improved depression symptoms, anxiety symptoms, hopelessness, and active coping relative to control. Among participants with low baseline hopelessness, we found no intervention effects. PRP-AP was not more effective than PRP-A alone. We found no intervention effects on clinical levels of depression or anxiety. These findings suggest that cognitive-behavioral interventions can be beneficial when delivered by school teachers and counselors. These interventions may be most helpful to students with elevated hopelessness.


Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness | 2017

Universal Interventions: Fully Exploring Their Impacts and Potential to Produce Population-Level Impacts

Mark T. Greenberg; Rachel M. Abenavoli

ABSTRACT In this article we seek to promote a deeper understanding of the value of universal intervention research in education as well as other fields and to call for greater interdisciplinary learning and discourse. Our goal is to deepen the conversation regarding how to build a stronger research orientation toward longitudinal, population-level outcomes in education and mental health. After highlighting the value of universal approaches targeting entire populations and their relevance to education, we raise issues regarding the traditional benchmarks of efficacy when applied to universal intervention trials and suggest alternative metrics for judging the impact of universal approaches. We conclude with lessons based on exemplar studies to help shape future research and policy regarding universal interventions.


Journal of Early Adolescence | 2016

Social Support Seeking and Early Adolescent Depression and Anxiety Symptoms: The Moderating Role of Rumination

Clorinda E. Vélez; Elizabeth D. Krause; Allison McKinnon; Steven M. Brunwasser; Derek R. Freres; Rachel M. Abenavoli; Jane E. Gillham

This study examined how social support seeking and rumination interacted to predict depression and anxiety symptoms 6 months later in early adolescents (N = 118; 11-14 years at baseline). We expected social support seeking would be more helpful for adolescents engaging in low rather than high levels of rumination. Adolescents self-reported on all measures at baseline, and on depression and anxiety symptoms 6 months later. Social support seeking predicted fewer symptoms of depression and anxiety at low rumination levels but was not associated with benefits as rumination increased. For depression symptoms, social support seeking predicted more symptoms at high rumination levels. Results were stronger for emotion-focused than problem-focused support seeking and for depression compared with anxiety symptoms. These findings suggest that cognitive risk factors like rumination may explain some inconsistencies in previous social support literature, and highlight the importance of a nuanced approach to studying social support seeking.


International Journal of Psychophysiology | 2015

How does reactivity to frustrative non-reward increase risk for externalizing symptoms?

Lisa M. Gatzke-Kopp; Cynthia J. Willner; Michelle K. Jetha; Rachel M. Abenavoli; David DuPuis; Sidney J. Segalowitz

Frustration is a normative affective response with an adaptive value in motivating behavior. However, excessive anger in response to frustration characterizes multiple forms of externalizing psychopathology. How a given trait subserves both normative and pathological behavioral profiles is not entirely clear. One hypothesis is that the magnitude of response to frustration differentiates normative versus maladaptive reactivity. Disproportionate increases in arousal in response to frustration may exceed normal regulatory capacity, thus precipitating aggressive or antisocial responses. Alternatively, pathology may arise when reactivity to frustration interferes with other cognitive systems, impairing the individuals ability to respond to frustration adaptively. In this paper we examine these two hypotheses in a sample of kindergarten children. First we examine whether children with conduct problems (CP; n=105) are differentiated from comparison children (n=135) with regard to magnitude of autonomic reactivity (cardiac and electrodermal) across a task that includes a frustrative non-reward block flanked by two reward blocks. Second we examine whether cognitive processing, as reflected by magnitude of the P3b brain response, is disrupted in the context of frustrative non-reward. Results indicate no differences in skin conductance, but a greater increase in heart rate during the frustration block among children in the CP group. Additionally, the CP group was characterized by a pronounced decrement in P3b amplitude during the frustration condition compared with both reward conditions. No interaction between cardiac and P3b measures was observed, suggesting that each system independently reflects a greater sensitivity to frustration in association with externalizing symptom severity.


Journal of Early Adolescence | 2018

Rumination, Depression, and Gender in Early Adolescence: A Longitudinal Study of a Bidirectional Model:

Elizabeth D. Krause; Clorinda E. Vélez; Rebecca Woo; Brittany Hoffmann; Derek R. Freres; Rachel M. Abenavoli; Jane E. Gillham

Recent research suggests that rumination may represent both a risk factor for and consequence of depression, especially among female samples. Nevertheless, few longitudinal studies have examined a reciprocal model of rumination and depression in early adolescence, just before rates of depression diverge by gender. The present study evaluated a cross-lagged path model of rumination and depression in a sample of 408 early adolescents. Gender moderation was also examined. Support was found for a longitudinal bidirectional model of rumination and depression but only among girls. For boys, increased rumination emerged as a consequence, not as a predictor, of depression symptoms. In early adolescence, rumination may be a greater risk factor for depression among girls than boys, whereas depression may be a significant vulnerability factor for increased rumination among both boys and girls. Why rumination may be more maladaptive for girls than boys is discussed within a psychosocial and developmental framework.


Journal of Early Adolescence | 2015

Parent Predictors Of Adolescents’ Explanatory Style

Clorinda E. Vélez; Elizabeth D. Krause; Steven M. Brunwasser; Derek R. Freres; Rachel M. Abenavoli; Jane E. Gillham

The current study tested the prospective relations (6-month lag) between three aspects of the parent-child relationship at Time 1 (T1) and adolescents’ explanatory styles at Time 2 (T2): caregiving behaviors, parents’ explanatory style for their own negative events, and parents’ explanatory style for their children’s negative events. The sample included 129 adolescents aged 11 to 14 years at baseline and their parents. Adolescents reported on their own explanatory style and their parents’ caregiving behaviors; parents self-reported on their caregiving behaviors and their explanatory style for their own and their children’s events. Regression analyses identified maternal acceptance as a significant predictor of T2 adolescents’ explanatory style. Marginal effects emerged for fathers’ psychological control and fathers’ explanatory style for their children’s events. Findings suggest that the ways parents—especially mothers—interact with their children may play a role in adolescents’ cognitive vulnerability to depression.


Mindfulness | 2016

Promoting Stress Management and Wellbeing in Educators: Feasibility and Efficacy of a School-Based Yoga and Mindfulness Intervention

Harris Ar; Patricia A. Jennings; Deirdre A. Katz; Rachel M. Abenavoli; Mark T. Greenberg


The international journal of emotional education | 2013

Preventing adolescents' externalizing and internalizing symptoms: Effects of the Penn Resiliency Program.

J. J. Cutuli; Jane E. Gillham; Tara M. Chaplin; Karen Reivich; Martin E. P. Seligman; Robert Gallop; Rachel M. Abenavoli; Derek R. Freres


Early Childhood Research Quarterly | 2017

Identification and validation of school readiness profiles among high-risk kindergartners

Rachel M. Abenavoli; Mark T. Greenberg; Karen L. Bierman

Collaboration


Dive into the Rachel M. Abenavoli's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark T. Greenberg

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Deirdre A. Katz

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Derek R. Freres

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alexis R. Harris

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Karen Reivich

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge