Rafael de Paiva Salomão
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Rafael de Paiva Salomão.
Nature | 2015
Roel J. W. Brienen; Oliver L. Phillips; Ted R. Feldpausch; Emanuel Gloor; Timothy R. Baker; Jon Lloyd; Gabriela Lopez-Gonzalez; Abel Monteagudo-Mendoza; Yadvinder Malhi; Simon L. Lewis; R. Vásquez Martínez; Miguel Alexiades; E. Álvarez Dávila; Patricia Alvarez-Loayza; Ana Andrade; Luiz E. O. C. Aragão; Alejandro Araujo-Murakami; E.J.M.M. Arets; Luzmila Arroyo; Olaf S. Bánki; Christopher Baraloto; Jorcely Barroso; Damien Bonal; Rene G. A. Boot; José Luís C. Camargo; Carolina V. Castilho; V. Chama; Kuo-Jung Chao; Jérôme Chave; James A. Comiskey
Atmospheric carbon dioxide records indicate that the land surface has acted as a strong global carbon sink over recent decades, with a substantial fraction of this sink probably located in the tropics, particularly in the Amazon. Nevertheless, it is unclear how the terrestrial carbon sink will evolve as climate and atmospheric composition continue to change. Here we analyse the historical evolution of the biomass dynamics of the Amazon rainforest over three decades using a distributed network of 321 plots. While this analysis confirms that Amazon forests have acted as a long-term net biomass sink, we find a long-term decreasing trend of carbon accumulation. Rates of net increase in above-ground biomass declined by one-third during the past decade compared to the 1990s. This is a consequence of growth rate increases levelling off recently, while biomass mortality persistently increased throughout, leading to a shortening of carbon residence times. Potential drivers for the mortality increase include greater climate variability, and feedbacks of faster growth on mortality, resulting in shortened tree longevity. The observed decline of the Amazon sink diverges markedly from the recent increase in terrestrial carbon uptake at the global scale, and is contrary to expectations based on models.
Journal of Vegetation Science | 2002
Yadvinder Malhi; Oliver L. Phillips; Jon Lloyd; Timothy R. Baker; James Wright; Samuel Almeida; L. Arroyo; T. Frederiksen; John Grace; Niro Higuchi; Timothy J. Killeen; William F. Laurance; C. Leaño; Simon L. Lewis; Patrick Meir; Abel Monteagudo; David A. Neill; P. Núñez Vargas; S.N. Panfil; S. Patiño; Nigel C. A. Pitman; Carlos A. Quesada; A. Rudas-Ll.; Rafael de Paiva Salomão; Scott R. Saleska; Natalino Silva; M. Silveira; W.G. Sombroek; Renato Valencia; R. Vásquez Martínez
Abstract The Amazon basin is likely to be increasingly affected by environmental changes: higher temperatures, changes in precipitation, CO2 fertilization and habitat fragmentation. To examine the important ecological and biogeochemical consequences of these changes, we are developing an international network, RAINFOR, which aims to monitor forest biomass and dynamics across Amazonia in a co-ordinated fashion in order to understand their relationship to soil and climate. The network will focus on sample plots established by independent researchers, some providing data extending back several decades. We will also conduct rapid transect studies of poorly monitored regions. Field expeditions analysed local soil and plant properties in the first phase (2001–2002). Initial results suggest that the network has the potential to reveal much information on the continental-scale relations between forest and environment. The network will also serve as a forum for discussion between researchers, with the aim of standardising sampling techniques and methodologies that will enable Amazonian forests to be monitored in a coherent manner in the coming decades. Abbreviation: PSP = Permanent sample plot.
Global Ecology and Biogeography | 2014
Edward T. A. Mitchard; Ted R. Feldpausch; Roel J. W. Brienen; Gabriela Lopez-Gonzalez; Abel Monteagudo; Timothy R. Baker; Simon L. Lewis; Jon Lloyd; Carlos A. Quesada; Manuel Gloor; Hans ter Steege; Patrick Meir; Esteban Álvarez; Alejandro Araujo-Murakami; Luiz E. O. C. Aragão; Luzmila Arroyo; Gerardo Aymard; Olaf Banki; Damien Bonal; Sandra A. Brown; Foster Brown; Carlos Cerón; Victor Chama Moscoso; Jérôme Chave; James A. Comiskey; Fernando Cornejo; Massiel Corrales Medina; Lola Da Costa; Flávia R. C. Costa; Anthony Di Fiore
Aim The accurate mapping of forest carbon stocks is essential for understanding the global carbon cycle, for assessing emissions from deforestation, and for rational land-use planning. Remote sensing (RS) is currently the key tool for this purpose, but RS does not estimate vegetation biomass directly, and thus may miss significant spatial variations in forest structure. We test the stated accuracy of pantropical carbon maps using a large independent field dataset. Location Tropical forests of the Amazon basin. The permanent archive of the field plot data can be accessed at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5521/FORESTPLOTS.NET/2014_1 Methods Two recent pantropical RS maps of vegetation carbon are compared to a unique ground-plot dataset, involving tree measurements in 413 large inventory plots located in nine countries. The RS maps were compared directly to field plots, and kriging of the field data was used to allow area-based comparisons. Results The two RS carbon maps fail to capture the main gradient in Amazon forest carbon detected using 413 ground plots, from the densely wooded tall forests of the north-east, to the light-wooded, shorter forests of the south-west. The differences between plots and RS maps far exceed the uncertainties given in these studies, with whole regions over- or under-estimated by > 25%, whereas regional uncertainties for the maps were reported to be < 5%. Main conclusions Pantropical biomass maps are widely used by governments and by projects aiming to reduce deforestation using carbon offsets, but may have significant regional biases. Carbon-mapping techniques must be revised to account for the known ecological variation in tree wood density and allometry to create maps suitable for carbon accounting. The use of single relationships between tree canopy height and above-ground biomass inevitably yields large, spatially correlated errors. This presents a significant challenge to both the forest conservation and remote sensing communities, because neither wood density nor species assemblages can be reliably mapped from space.
Global Biogeochemical Cycles | 2016
Ted R. Feldpausch; Oliver L. Phillips; Roel J. W. Brienen; Emanuel Gloor; Jon Lloyd; Gabriela Lopez-Gonzalez; Abel Monteagudo-Mendoza; Yadvinder Malhi; A. Alarcón; E. Álvarez Dávila; Patricia Alvarez-Loayza; Ana Andrade; Luiz E. O. C. Aragão; Luzmila Arroyo; Timothy R. Baker; Christopher Baraloto; Jorcely Barroso; Damien Bonal; Wendeson Castro; V. Chama; Jérôme Chave; Tomas F. Domingues; Sophie Fauset; Nikée Groot; E.N. Honorio Coronado; Susan G. Laurance; William F. Laurance; Simon L. Lewis; J. C. Licona; Beatriz Schwantes Marimon
The Amazon Basin has experienced more variable climate over the last decade, with a severe and widespread drought in 2005 causing large basin-wide losses of biomass. A drought of similar climatological magnitude occurred again in 2010; however, there has been no basin-wide ground-based evaluation of effects on vegetation. We examine to what extent the 2010 drought affected forest dynamics using ground-based observations of mortality and growth from an extensive forest plot network. We find that during the 2010 drought interval, forests did not gain biomass (net change: −0.43 Mg ha−1, confidence interval (CI): −1.11, 0.19, n = 97), regardless of whether forests experienced precipitation deficit anomalies. This contrasted with a long-term biomass sink during the baseline pre-2010 drought period (1998 to pre-2010) of 1.33 Mg ha−1 yr−1 (CI: 0.90, 1.74, p < 0.01). The resulting net impact of the 2010 drought (i.e., reversal of the baseline net sink) was −1.95 Mg ha−1 yr−1 (CI:−2.77, −1.18; p < 0.001). This net biomass impact was driven by an increase in biomass mortality (1.45 Mg ha−1 yr−1 CI: 0.66, 2.25, p < 0.001) and a decline in biomass productivity (−0.50 Mg ha−1 yr−1, CI:−0.78, −0.31; p < 0.001). Surprisingly, the magnitude of the losses through tree mortality was unrelated to estimated local precipitation anomalies and was independent of estimated local pre-2010 drought history. Thus, there was no evidence that pre-2010 droughts compounded the effects of the 2010 drought. We detected a systematic basin-wide impact of the 2010 drought on tree growth rates across Amazonia, which was related to the strength of the moisture deficit. This impact differed from the drought event in 2005 which did not affect productivity. Based on these ground data, live biomass in trees and corresponding estimates of live biomass in lianas and roots, we estimate that intact forests in Amazonia were carbon neutral in 2010 (−0.07 Pg C yr−1 CI:−0.42, 0.23), consistent with results from an independent analysis of airborne estimates of land-atmospheric fluxes during 2010. Relative to the long-term mean, the 2010 drought resulted in a reduction in biomass carbon uptake of 1.1 Pg C, compared to 1.6 Pg C for the 2005 event.
Global Change Biology | 2016
Michelle O. Johnson; David Galbraith; Manuel Gloor; Hannes De Deurwaerder; Matthieu Guimberteau; Anja Rammig; Kirsten Thonicke; Hans Verbeeck; Celso von Randow; Abel Monteagudo; Oliver L. Phillips; Roel J. W. Brienen; Ted R. Feldpausch; Gabriela Lopez Gonzalez; Sophie Fauset; Carlos A. Quesada; Bradley Christoffersen; Philippe Ciais; Gilvan Sampaio; Bart Kruijt; Patrick Meir; Paul R. Moorcroft; Ke Zhang; Esteban Álvarez-Dávila; Atila Alves de Oliveira; Iêda Leão do Amaral; Ana Andrade; Luiz E. O. C. Aragão; Alejandro Araujo-Murakami; E.J.M.M. Arets
Abstract Understanding the processes that determine above‐ground biomass (AGB) in Amazonian forests is important for predicting the sensitivity of these ecosystems to environmental change and for designing and evaluating dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs). AGB is determined by inputs from woody productivity [woody net primary productivity (NPP)] and the rate at which carbon is lost through tree mortality. Here, we test whether two direct metrics of tree mortality (the absolute rate of woody biomass loss and the rate of stem mortality) and/or woody NPP, control variation in AGB among 167 plots in intact forest across Amazonia. We then compare these relationships and the observed variation in AGB and woody NPP with the predictions of four DGVMs. The observations show that stem mortality rates, rather than absolute rates of woody biomass loss, are the most important predictor of AGB, which is consistent with the importance of stand size structure for determining spatial variation in AGB. The relationship between stem mortality rates and AGB varies among different regions of Amazonia, indicating that variation in wood density and height/diameter relationships also influences AGB. In contrast to previous findings, we find that woody NPP is not correlated with stem mortality rates and is weakly positively correlated with AGB. Across the four models, basin‐wide average AGB is similar to the mean of the observations. However, the models consistently overestimate woody NPP and poorly represent the spatial patterns of both AGB and woody NPP estimated using plot data. In marked contrast to the observations, DGVMs typically show strong positive relationships between woody NPP and AGB. Resolving these differences will require incorporating forest size structure, mechanistic models of stem mortality and variation in functional composition in DGVMs.
Ecology Letters | 2014
Timothy R. Baker; R. Toby Pennington; Susana Magallón; Emanuel Gloor; William F. Laurance; Miguel Alexiades; Esteban Álvarez; Alejandro Araujo; E.J.M.M. Arets; Gerardo Aymard; Atila Alves de Oliveira; Iêda Leão do Amaral; Luzmila Arroyo; Damien Bonal; Roel J. W. Brienen; Jérôme Chave; Kyle G. Dexter; Anthony Di Fiore; Eduardo Eler; Ted R. Feldpausch; Leandro V. Ferreira; Gabriela Lopez-Gonzalez; Geertje M.F. van der Heijden; Niro Higuchi; Eurídice N. Honorio; Isau Huamantupa; Timothy J. Killeen; Susan G. Laurance; Claudio Leaño; Simon L. Lewis
The Amazon rain forest sustains the worlds highest tree diversity, but it remains unclear why some clades of trees are hyperdiverse, whereas others are not. Using dated phylogenies, estimates of current species richness and trait and demographic data from a large network of forest plots, we show that fast demographic traits – short turnover times – are associated with high diversification rates across 51 clades of canopy trees. This relationship is robust to assuming that diversification rates are either constant or decline over time, and occurs in a wide range of Neotropical tree lineages. This finding reveals the crucial role of intrinsic, ecological variation among clades for understanding the origin of the remarkable diversity of Amazonian trees and forests.
Scientific Reports | 2016
Hans ter Steege; Rens W. Vaessen; Dairon Cárdenas-López; Daniel Sabatier; Alexandre Antonelli; Sylvia Mota de Oliveira; Nigel C. A. Pitman; Peter M. Jørgensen; Rafael de Paiva Salomão
Amazonia is the most biodiverse rainforest on Earth, and the debate over how many tree species grow there remains contentious. Here we provide a checklist of all tree species collected to date, and describe spatial and temporal trends in data accumulation. We report 530,025 unique collections of trees in Amazonia, dating between 1707 and 2015, for a total of 11,676 species in 1225 genera and 140 families. These figures support recent estimates of 16,000 total Amazonian tree species based on ecological plot data from the Amazonian Tree Diversity Network. Botanical collection in Amazonia is characterized by three major peaks, centred around 1840, 1920, and 1980, which are associated with flora projects and the establishment of inventory plots. Most collections were made in the 20th century. The number of collections has increased exponentially, but shows a slowdown in the last two decades. We find that a species’ range size is a better predictor of the number of times it has been collected than the species’ estimated basin-wide population size. Finding, describing, and documenting the distribution of the remaining species will require coordinated efforts at under-collected sites.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences | 2016
Fernanda Coelho de Souza; Kyle G. Dexter; Oliver L. Phillips; Roel J. W. Brienen; Jérôme Chave; David Galbraith; Gabriela Lopez Gonzalez; Abel Monteagudo Mendoza; R. Toby Pennington; Lourens Poorter; Miguel Alexiades; Esteban Álvarez-Dávila; Ana Andrade; Luis E. O. C. Aragão; Alejandro Araujo-Murakami; E.J.M.M. Arets; Gerardo A. Aymard C.; Christopher Baraloto; Jorcely Barroso; Damien Bonal; Rene G. A. Boot; José Luís C. Camargo; James A. Comiskey; Fernando Cornejo Valverde; Plínio Barbosa de Camargo; Anthony Di Fiore; Fernando Elias; Terry L. Erwin; Ted R. Feldpausch; Leandro V. Ferreira
Lineages tend to retain ecological characteristics of their ancestors through time. However, for some traits, selection during evolutionary history may have also played a role in determining trait values. To address the relative importance of these processes requires large-scale quantification of traits and evolutionary relationships among species. The Amazonian tree flora comprises a high diversity of angiosperm lineages and species with widely differing life-history characteristics, providing an excellent system to investigate the combined influences of evolutionary heritage and selection in determining trait variation. We used trait data related to the major axes of life-history variation among tropical trees (e.g. growth and mortality rates) from 577 inventory plots in closed-canopy forest, mapped onto a phylogenetic hypothesis spanning more than 300 genera including all major angiosperm clades to test for evolutionary constraints on traits. We found significant phylogenetic signal (PS) for all traits, consistent with evolutionarily related genera having more similar characteristics than expected by chance. Although there is also evidence for repeated evolution of pioneer and shade tolerant life-history strategies within independent lineages, the existence of significant PS allows clearer predictions of the links between evolutionary diversity, ecosystem function and the response of tropical forests to global change.
Revista Arvore | 2014
Rafael de Paiva Salomão; Silvio Brienza Júnior; Nélson Araújo Rosa
The objective of this paper was to evaluate density of planting, of mortality and annual periodic increment (API) of growth in diameter and height of species used in reforestation in areas of forest restoration after mining in conservation units in Amazonia. It was also analyzed the soil management practices in plantation areas. The monitoring covered a period of 13 years (1996-2009), at the National Forest Saraca Taquera, in Porto Trombetas, Para State, Brazil. The species were distributed in classes of mortality. We analyzed the size and the ecological suitability, based on mortality and growth increments (diameter and height) of the species in the artificial ecosystem restored. The annual periodic increment of diameter considering the studied species allowed the following classification: excellent (7 species), high (33), low (20) and very low (9) and similarly, the grow of tree height it was found: excellent (9 species), superior (20), low (31) and very low (9). The ecological aptitude of 69 species in the study area, based on mortality and the increments in diameter and height, allowed the identification of the following groups of species aptitude: excellent (3), good (16), regular (25), low (21); improper (20) and inept (5). The use of soil practices during the activities of restoration should be reviewed due to strong evidence of mortality and growing of planted trees being influenced by soil storage time, the amount of top soil spread superficially, the acidity and fertility of soil and the top soil depth and the distance of transport to the target areas.
Ecology | 2017
Hans ter Steege; Daniel Sabatier; Sylvia Mota de Oliveira; William E. Magnusson; Jean-François Molino; Vitor Hugo Freitas Gomes; Edwin Theodoor Pos; Rafael de Paiva Salomão
Species richness estimation is one of the most widely used analyses carried out by ecologists, and nonparametric estimators are probably the most used techniques to carry out such estimations. We tested the assumptions and results of nonparametric estimators and those of a logseries approach to species richness estimation for simulated tropical forests and five data sets from the field. We conclude that nonparametric estimators are not suitable to estimate species richness in tropical forests, where sampling intensity is usually low and richness is high, because the assumptions of the methods do not meet the sampling strategy used in most studies. The logseries, while also requiring substantial sampling, is much more effective in estimating species richness than commonly used nonparametric estimators, and its assumptions better match the way field data is being collected.