Raghuvir N. Sengupta

The Mechanism of Peptidyl Transfer Catalysis by the Ribosome

The ribosome catalyzes two fundamental biological reactions: peptidyl transfer, the formation of a peptide bond during protein synthesis, and peptidyl hydrolysis, the release of the complete protein from the peptidyl tRNA upon completion of translation. The ribosome is able to utilize and distinguish the two different nucleophiles for each reaction, the α-amine of the incoming aminoacyl tRNA versus the water molecule. The correct binding of substrates induces structural rearrangements of ribosomal active-site residues and the substrates themselves, resulting in an orientation suitable for catalysis. In addition, active-site residues appear to provide further assistance by ordering active-site water molecules and providing an electrostatic environment via a hydrogen network that stabilizes the reaction intermediates and possibly shuttles protons. Major questions remain concerning the timing, components, and mechanism of the proton transfer steps. This review summarizes the recent progress in structural, biochemical, and computational advances and presents the current mechanistic models for these two reactions.

Structure and Function Converge To Identify a Hydrogen Bond in a Group I Ribozyme Active Site

The determination of how enzymes achieve their catalytic power requires an understanding of how structural motifs are used to position functional groups of enzymes and substrates within active sites. The recent explosion of RNA crystal structures provides an extraordinary opportunity to delve deeply into the relationship between ribozyme structure and function. The Tetrahymena group I ribozyme provides an attractive system for such studies because of the wealth of structural information, with ten crystal structures of group I introns solved in the past five years,[1–5] and extensive functional information[6] that enables incisive analysis of the energetics of catalysis.

Slow molecular recognition by RNA

Molecular recognition is central to biological processes, function, and specificity. Proteins associate with ligands with a wide range of association rate constants, with maximal values matching the theoretical limit set by the rate of diffusional collision. As less is known about RNA association, we compiled association rate constants for all RNA/ligand complexes that we could find in the literature. Like proteins, RNAs exhibit a wide range of association rate constants. However, the fastest RNA association rates are considerably slower than those of the fastest protein associations and fall well below the diffusional limit. The apparently general observation of slow association with RNAs has implications for evolution and for modern-day biology. Our compilation highlights a quantitative molecular property that can contribute to biological understanding and underscores our need to develop a deeper physical understanding of molecular recognition events.

LESSONS FROM CATALYSIS BY RNA ENZYMES

We can set the stage for discussion of RNA catalysis by considering the inception of this field less than 25 years ago and asking the following question: Why was catalysis by RNA a surprise to the scientific community? At the time, 1982, there was strong opposition to Cech’s conclusion that an RNA sequence, and not a protein, was responsible for cleaving and joining RNA regions in a process he referred to as ‘selfsplicing’ (Figure 1A)[1]. The objections ranged from ‘there must be a protein contaminant’ to ‘it’s not a real enzyme because it doesn’t carry out a multiple turnover reaction [2].’ But the data were strong, the original group I self-splicing intron carried out self-splicing, the intron was readily converted into an RNA enzyme (or ‘ribozyme;’ Figure 1B)[3], and Pace and Altman demonstrated the following year that an RNA is the catalytic component of RNase P, a multi-turnover enzyme that processes tRNAs to allow them to function in protein synthesis [4].

Differential Assembly of Catalytic Interactions within the Conserved Active Sites of Two Ribozymes.

Molecular recognition is central to biology and a critical aspect of RNA function. Yet structured RNAs typically lack the preorganization needed for strong binding and precise positioning. A striking example is the group I ribozyme from Tetrahymena, which binds its guanosine substrate (G) orders of magnitude slower than diffusion. Binding of G is also thermodynamically coupled to binding of the oligonucleotide substrate (S) and further work has shown that the transition from E•G to E•S•G accompanies a conformational change that allows G to make the active site interactions required for catalysis. The group I ribozyme from Azoarcus has a similarly slow association rate but lacks the coupled binding observed for the Tetrahymena ribozyme. Here we test, using G analogs and metal ion rescue experiments, whether this absence of coupling arises from a higher degree of preorganization within the Azoarcus active site. Our results suggest that the Azoarcus ribozyme forms cognate catalytic metal ion interactions with G in the E•G complex, interactions that are absent in the Tetrahymena E•G complex. Thus, RNAs that share highly similar active site architectures and catalyze the same reactions can differ in the assembly of transition state interactions. More generally, an ability to readily access distinct local conformational states may have facilitated the evolutionary exploration needed to attain RNA machines that carry out complex, multi-step processes.